https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108027
--- Comment #6 from LIU Hao ---
That's not a GCC bug. That's because you have installed libraries to the
default but wrong location.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108027
--- Comment #7 from LIU Hao ---
The .la files generated by libtool are usually nonsense
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RemoveLaFiles). If you run `make
install` by hand then you may delete them by hand. Some packagers (e.g. makepkg
on A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107551
--- Comment #23 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d71b20fc30965ba8326ad9363d0aca9d61eb4ed3
commit r13-4581-gd71b20fc30965ba8326ad9363d0aca9d61eb4ed3
Author: Martin Liska
Date: Fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107551
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||12.2.0
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107977
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE: in |[11/12/13 Regression] ICE:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107984
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-12-09
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107990
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107993
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Assi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107409
--- Comment #12 from Rama Malladi ---
I found difference in dumps at various stages of the compilation for the
mainline GCC and with update_max_bb_count() commented. Here are the details:
Mainline: Commit ID: 63a42ffc0833553fbcb84b50cf0fd2d867b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108022
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
Yes, -ggdb3 seems to me like a reasonable solution. Note you can always strip
the debuginfo into a separate file.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107409
--- Comment #13 from Martin Liška ---
Note the mentioned revision is a fix and yes, sometimes these revisions can end
up with a regression as profile estimation is a complex guess.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108029
Bug ID: 108029
Summary: GCC'ASAN at -O0 failed to detect a memory leak
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108029
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108029
--- Comment #2 from Li Shaohua ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1)
> I can see the leak with both gcc-12 and gcc master.
Interesting, because I tested using Compiler explorer. On my local machines,
some gcc-12 -O0 won't report, but s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108029
--- Comment #3 from Li Shaohua ---
(In reply to Li Shaohua from comment #2)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1)
> > I can see the leak with both gcc-12 and gcc master.
>
> Interesting, because I tested using Compiler explorer. On my lo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108027
--- Comment #8 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to LIU Hao from comment #7)
> The .la files generated by libtool are usually nonsense
> (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RemoveLaFiles). If you run `make
> install` by hand then you may delete th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108030
Bug ID: 108030
Summary: `std::experimental::simd` not inlined
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108030
Matthias Kretz (Vir) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108030
Matthias Kretz (Vir) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mkretz at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107976
--- Comment #4 from Zdenek Sojka ---
Thank you for having a look. If anything is done with the param limits,
jump-table-max-growth-ratio-for-size should probably receive the same care.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108031
Bug ID: 108031
Summary: riscv: Access of members of a global structure is not
optimized in atomic operations
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81615
--- Comment #12 from Ben Barrowes ---
I use these intermediate files during the software analysis process, but then
delete them later. They are useful for me to have.
When I am given a makefile, it is often 1000's loc. I am not sure I want to go
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107551
--- Comment #25 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Martin Liska
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5ec102e3290ff1cac457420a1219fa1ca370
commit r12-8966-g5ec102e3290ff1cac457420a1219fa1ca370
Author: Martin Liska
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107551
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107714
Stam Markianos-Wright changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Version|12.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107997
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108030
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108031
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|middle-end |target
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105753
fiesh at zefix dot tv changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fiesh at zefix dot tv
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108031
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Component|target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108032
Bug ID: 108032
Summary: internal compiler error : in final_scan_insn_1, at
final.c:3079
Product: gcc
Version: 9.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105753
--- Comment #9 from fiesh at zefix dot tv ---
I forgot to mention that my test case requires -flto to be present.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108032
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107977
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12/13 Regression] ICE: |ICE: in
|in add_speci
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108032
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108030
--- Comment #3 from Matthias Kretz (Vir) ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> I bet by adding too many always_inline functions that call normal inlines
> that is what is bound to happen, one runs into inline growth limits. It is
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108033
Bug ID: 108033
Summary: -G should be an alias to -msmall-data-limit=
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108033
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108030
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Matthias Kretz (Vir) from comment #3)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> > I bet by adding too many always_inline functions that call normal inlines
> > that is what is bound to hap
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104471
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104471
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
This patch should fix the issue (I might get to it in a few weeks though):
diff --git a/libcpp/files.cc b/libcpp/files.cc
index a18b1caf48d..eb90fa4f65a 100644
--- a/libcpp/files.cc
+++ b/libcpp/files.cc
@@
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104951
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105509
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106652
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thiago at kde dot org
--- Comment #19 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105595
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106650
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106653
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-12-09
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106657
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106658
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106852
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108034
Bug ID: 108034
Summary: cannot use bug alias name in see also
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: web
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107333
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107569
--- Comment #43 from Andrew Macleod ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #42)
> On #c0 foo, this was previously optimized in dom2 which optimized
> _4 = ABS_EXPR ;
> _3 = _4 u> 1.7976931348623157081452742373170435679807056752584499659
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108035
Bug ID: 108035
Summary: std::source_location::function_name() provides an
empty string when used with clang++
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108036
Bug ID: 108036
Summary: Spurious warning for zero-sized array parameters to a
function
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107997
--- Comment #10 from Jan-Benedict Glaw ---
I gave that patch a try: GCC build is successful, as is the Linux build
afterwards using that toolchain. (Cannot test the resulting kernel of
course---I don't have the hardware.)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108035
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
That looks solely like a clang issue. It implements the builtin gcc has added
for - __builtin_source_location () - but fills in
_M_function_name
with just "" rather than a pretty name.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108035
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Right, if Clang doesn't provide a name then there's nothing libstdc++ can do
about it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108037
Bug ID: 108037
Summary: prefer for affinity with OMP_PROC_BIND=true to match
"spread" instead of "close"
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108035
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://github.com/llvm/llv
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108036
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 54055
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54055&action=edit
Full testcase that actually compiles
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108036
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 54056
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54056&action=edit
Reduced testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108036
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108036
--- Comment #3 from Alejandro Colomar ---
Hi Andrew!
Just a few nitpicks:
- In the first testcase you posted, the [] is missing the 0: [0].
- In the reduced test case, you call the pointer to one past the end as 'end'.
That is misleading,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108036
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Alejandro Colomar from comment #3)
> - In the reduced test case, you call the pointer to one past the end as
> 'end'. That is misleading, since 'end' is commonly also used for pointers
> to th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108036
--- Comment #5 from Alejandro Colomar ---
Interesting. Thanks for clarifying :)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81615
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Priority
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107495
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Giuseppe D'Angelo from comment #1)
> Variation of the above:
The testcase in comment #1 is almost definitely the same as PR 59328.
Note the testcase in comment #0 is also rejected by clang ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107675
m.cencora at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m.cencora at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107579
--- Comment #7 from Patrick Palka ---
This is essentially a dup of PR100295, except here the unevaluated context is a
requires-expr instead of sizeof, and r12-2862 exposed this bug by making us
correctly recognize a requires-expr as an unevaluat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107872
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108038
Bug ID: 108038
Summary: GCC generates poor code for select of consecutive
constants
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107872
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108039
Bug ID: 108039
Summary: Unnecessary extension on riscv-64
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimizati
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108039
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108039
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|riscv-64|riscv64 aarch64
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108040
Bug ID: 108040
Summary: -fdevirtualize causes part of function to be missing
in output
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108039
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
I did something similar years ago:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2010-October/297761.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2010-October/297762.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107872
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:01254aa2eb766c7584fd047568d7277d4d65d067
commit r13-4585-g01254aa2eb766c7584fd047568d7277d4d65d067
Author: Paul Thomas
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104921
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108041
Bug ID: 108041
Summary: ivopts results in extra instruction in simple loop
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107675
--- Comment #15 from Thomas Neumann ---
> You cannot use 'relaxed' atomic load in is_object_initialized - as thread
> performing such load will not observe/synchronize with any modifications
> (other than atomic variable itself) performed by oth
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104921
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
(define_insn "aarch64_bfmlal_lanev4sf"
[(set (match_operand:V4SF 0 "register_operand" "=w")
(plus: V4SF (match_operand:V4SF 1 "register_operand" "0")
(unspec:V4SF [(match_operan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104921
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
The following patterns has the same problem too:
(define_insn "aarch64_bfdot_lane"
[(set (match_operand:VDQSF 0 "register_operand" "=w")
(plus:VDQSF
(unspec:VDQSF
[(match_opera
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108000
Eugene Rozenfeld changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81615
--- Comment #14 from Ben Barrowes ---
Thanks for engaging, and thanks for the suggestion. I might be able to do this
over the winter. Could you give me a hint as to where to look. Which files.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81615
--- Comment #15 from Steve Kargl ---
On Sat, Dec 10, 2022 at 01:47:44AM +, barrowes at alum dot mit.edu wrote:
>
> Thanks for engaging, and thanks for the suggestion. I might be able to do this
> over the winter. Could you give me a hint as
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107995
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108042
Bug ID: 108042
Summary: [10/11/12/13 Regression] weakref on an extern decl is
incorrectly ignored
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wron
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108042
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.5.3
Known to fail|
gorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 13.0.0 20221209 (experimental) (GCC)
-linux-gnu-as --disable-libstdcxx-pch
--prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-r13-4583-20221209191939-g71b31d13757-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-nobootstrap-amd64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 13.0.0 20221209 (experimental) (GCC)
found that if I omit the body of resize_screen() and place its instructions
directly in main(), then the analyzer doesn't report anything is wrong. It
seems the extra layer of indirection with the resize_screen() function trips it
up.
This problem happens with GCC 11.3.0, 12.1.0, and 13.0-2022120
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108043
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Mil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108043
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-12-10
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105207
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55242
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pavel.morozkin at gmail dot com
--- Comm
97 matches
Mail list logo
