https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90885
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107879
--- Comment #7 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6)
> Created attachment 53978 [details]
> gcc13-pr107879.patch
>
> Untested fix.
The patch fixed real ffmpeg-4 tests for me (before the change there were about
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107384
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107506
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106473
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100521
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100569
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||testsuite-fail
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100642
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101520
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101741
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100412
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||testsuite-fail
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102669
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103160
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103262
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103469
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19089
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104547
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107850
--- Comment #4 from Charles-Henri Gros ---
Looking into it further, there may be an implicit requirement that the
predicate does not modify its argument.
https://eel.is/c++draft/algorithms.requirements#6
"When not otherwise constrained, the Pred
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106773
--- Comment #3 from David Faust ---
There are two remaining issues:
1. We are missing support for 'linkage=extern' encoding for variables,
so 'bpf_link_fops' and others are incorrectly marked with 'linkage=global'
instead.
2. 'bpf_link_f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105125
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |middle-end
--- Comment #2 from Andrew P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105125
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
The code has been wrong since the warning was added back in 1999:
r0-25196-g3c12fcc27809a2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107904
Bug ID: 107904
Summary: __func__ is not properly treated as an array variable
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: accepts-invalid, rejects-valid
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107905
Bug ID: 107905
Summary: 2x slowdown versus CLANG and ICL
Product: gcc
Version: 11.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107905
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization, ra
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107904
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107482
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Max Filippov
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1fb5287dfcf3bef8adea98a4bded441c95e43914
commit r12-8947-g1fb5287dfcf3bef8adea98a4bded441c95e43914
Author: Max Filippov
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107482
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Max Filippov
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:01df02a881a0b6d7c5746e717a9d0355ee4e747a
commit r11-10399-g01df02a881a0b6d7c5746e717a9d0355ee4e747a
Author: Max Filippov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107482
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Max Filippov
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bd6963543042ce713d290c23e098de84865a287f
commit r10-11100-gbd6963543042ce713d290c23e098de84865a287f
Author: Max Filippov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86656
Bug 86656 depends on bug 107482, which changed state.
Bug 107482 Summary: [10/11/12 Regression] out-of-bounds heap access in IRA
since r6-3496-g86f0bef37378a0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107482
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107482
jcmvbkbc at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|N
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107905
--- Comment #2 from Georgi ---
> I don't see that causing a 2x slow down though.
Same here, yet, the results prove that not only on Zen2, on top of that on
i5-7200U @2.5GHz and Windows 10, this function takes 203s, cannot figure it
out, could y
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107863
--- Comment #10 from Hongtao.liu ---
I notice there's TARGET_PROMOTE_PROTOTYPES which can prevent unsigend char 255
be extended to int 255 which is a more perfect solution to this problem. But we
can only get fntype in this hook, ideally we shou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66671
S. Davis Herring changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||herring at lanl dot gov
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107906
Bug ID: 107906
Summary: Function template specialization given weak rather
than local symbol
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107897
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
(gdb) p fn->curr_properties
$4 = 92431
that looks like garbage. We likely cut off processing one of the functions
because of the error (and failed to initialize ->curr_properties when
allocating struct fu
201 - 235 of 235 matches
Mail list logo