[Bug c++/107605] New: GCC rejects valid program involving std::bind and requires

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107605 Bug ID: 107605 Summary: GCC rejects valid program involving std::bind and requires Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug target/107606] New: rs6000: Option not to use parameter save area in variadic function implementations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107606 Bug ID: 107606 Summary: rs6000: Option not to use parameter save area in variadic function implementations Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Se

[Bug target/107581] ICE on sparc-leon-uclibc during go build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107581 --- Comment #10 from Marc Poulhiès --- Thanks for applying the fix Ian!

[Bug modula2/107607] New: tools-src/calcpath uses unportable realpath(1)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107607 Bug ID: 107607 Summary: tools-src/calcpath uses unportable realpath(1) Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: m

[Bug modula2/107607] tools-src/calcpath uses unportable realpath(1)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107607 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |13.0

[Bug tree-optimization/107569] [13 Regression] Failure to optimize std::isfinite since r13-3596

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107569 --- Comment #19 from Aldy Hernandez --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #18) > Ok, just so that I don't just kibbitz/review frange stuff but also try to do > something, here is my so far untested attempt at normal multiplication > fold_r

[Bug tree-optimization/107569] [13 Regression] Failure to optimize std::isfinite since r13-3596

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107569 --- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 53865 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53865&action=edit gcc13-pr107569.patch Here is an updated patch (including the incremental patch) with some fixes. Previous ver

[Bug tree-optimization/107608] New: [13 Regression] Failure on fold-overflow-1.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107608 Bug ID: 107608 Summary: [13 Regression] Failure on fold-overflow-1.c Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tre

[Bug tree-optimization/107608] [13 Regression] Failure on fold-overflow-1.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107608 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c/107609] New: ice in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2791

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107609 Bug ID: 107609 Summary: ice in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2791 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug tree-optimization/107569] [13 Regression] Failure to optimize std::isfinite since r13-3596

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107569 --- Comment #21 from Jakub Jelinek --- Ok, found a brown paper bag issue in the patch: --- gcc/range-op-float.cc2022-11-09 21:31:09.420369509 +0100 +++ gcc/range-op-float.cc2022-11-09 21:31:09.420369509 +0100 @@ -1981,7 +1981,7 @@ frang

[Bug d/104749] [12/13 regression] stage1 d21 fails to link on Solaris/x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104749 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/107569] [13 Regression] Failure to optimize std::isfinite since r13-3596

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107569 --- Comment #22 from Jakub Jelinek --- Note, I was using: double foo (int x, int y) { double r; if (x >= 0) return 0.0; switch (y) { case 1: r = 0.0; break; case 2: r = 1.0; break; default: r = 0.5; break; } retur

[Bug web/107610] New: Broken 'onlinedocs' after "Porting the Docs to Sphinx"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107610 Bug ID: 107610 Summary: Broken 'onlinedocs' after "Porting the Docs to Sphinx" Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: documentation Severity: major

[Bug tree-optimization/107569] [13 Regression] Failure to optimize std::isfinite since r13-3596

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107569 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #53865|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug target/107585] [13 Regression] ICE: in decompose, at rtl.h:2288 at -O

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107585 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:49de156a6adb50e0624479f22c20141cadef812d commit r13-3874-g49de156a6adb50e0624479f22c20141cadef812d Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: T

[Bug target/107546] [10/11/12 Regression] simd, redundant pcmpeqb and pxor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107546 --- Comment #13 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:49de156a6adb50e0624479f22c20141cadef812d commit r13-3874-g49de156a6adb50e0624479f22c20141cadef812d Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug target/107585] [13 Regression] ICE: in decompose, at rtl.h:2288 at -O

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107585 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug web/107610] Broken 'onlinedocs' after "Porting the Docs to Sphinx"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107610 James Greenhalgh changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/84646] Missed optimisation for hoisting conditions outside nested loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84646 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- commit 837be6c7cfb49e16a18ef8f6c44d98bfa6d2396b Author: Richard Biener Date: Wed Nov 9 13:52:58 2022 +0100 tree-optimization/84646 - remove premature thread path rejection This removes a prematu

[Bug tree-optimization/107569] [13 Regression] Failure to optimize std::isfinite since r13-3596

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107569 --- Comment #24 from Aldy Hernandez --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #22) > Folding statement: _2 = __builtin_pow (1.0e+1, _1); > Global Exported: _2 = [frange] double [0.0 (0x0.0p+0), +Inf] +NAN > The +NAN looks suspicious, shouldn'

[Bug tree-optimization/107569] [13 Regression] Failure to optimize std::isfinite since r13-3596

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107569 --- Comment #25 from Aldy Hernandez --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #23) > Created attachment 53866 [details] > gcc13-pr107569.patch > > Updated version of the patch I'll test now (if you don't have any nits). > Besides the thinko I

[Bug web/107610] Broken 'onlinedocs' after "Porting the Docs to Sphinx"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107610 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- I posted a patch adding http redirects: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-November/605528.html The discussion on IRC was about doing that, not that it's already fixed.

[Bug web/107610] Broken 'onlinedocs' after "Porting the Docs to Sphinx"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107610 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- I've (temporarily) installed the redirects in a .htaccess on my own site so you can test them. Just replace "gcc.gnu.org" with "kayari.org" to check that it redirects to a valid page of the gcc-12.2.0 doc

[Bug c++/107605] GCC rejects valid program involving std::bind and requires

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107605 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Keywords|

[Bug tree-optimization/107569] [13 Regression] Failure to optimize std::isfinite since r13-3596

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107569 --- Comment #26 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #24) > If you single step from there on, we run into: > > if (gimple_stmt_nonnegative_warnv_p (call, &strict_overflow_p)) > r.set_nonnegative (type); > else

[Bug web/107610] Broken 'onlinedocs' after "Porting the Docs to Sphinx"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107610 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |redi at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug modula2/107611] New: mc-boot-ch/Gtermios.cc etc. don't compile on Mac OS X 10.7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107611 Bug ID: 107611 Summary: mc-boot-ch/Gtermios.cc etc. don't compile on Mac OS X 10.7 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug modula2/107611] mc-boot-ch/Gtermios.cc etc. don't compile on Mac OS X 10.7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107611 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |13.0

[Bug tree-optimization/107569] [13 Regression] Failure to optimize std::isfinite since r13-3596

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107569 --- Comment #27 from Aldy Hernandez --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #26) > (In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #24) > > If you single step from there on, we run into: > > > > if (gimple_stmt_nonnegative_warnv_p (call, &strict

[Bug modula2/107612] New: plugin/m2rte doesn't build on Mac OS X 10.7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107612 Bug ID: 107612 Summary: plugin/m2rte doesn't build on Mac OS X 10.7 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: modu

[Bug modula2/107612] plugin/m2rte doesn't build on Mac OS X 10.7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107612 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |13.0

[Bug c++/107605] GCC rejects valid program involving requires-clause

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107605 Jason Liam changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|GCC rejects valid program |GCC rejects valid program

[Bug tree-optimization/107569] [13 Regression] Failure to optimize std::isfinite since r13-3596

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107569 --- Comment #28 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #27) > > As for signed zeros in -fsigned-zeros (default) mode, wonder if we e.g. > > don't > > say sqrt is nonnegative (even when sqrt (-0.0) is -0.0). > > It seem

[Bug modula2/101392] cc1gm2 -fdump-system-exports SEGV on Solaris/SPARC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101392 --- Comment #6 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #5 from Gaius Mulley --- > thanks for this excellent analysis. Here is a patch which will fix the > passing > of binop.proc in M2GenGCC.c. I'd tried looking into this a

[Bug modula2/105392] SEGV compiling gm2-libs-pim/BitBlockOps.mod on SPARC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105392 --- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth --- Created attachment 53868 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53868&action=edit Proposed patch

[Bug modula2/105392] SEGV compiling gm2-libs-pim/BitBlockOps.mod on SPARC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105392 --- Comment #2 from Rainer Orth --- With PR modula2/101392 fixed, I ran into this one again. As it turns out, it's another instance of the same issue: $ cc1gm2 -iplugindir=/var/gcc/modula-2/11.4-gcc-g3/./gcc/plugin -quiet -mcpu=v9 -g -O2 -fPIC

[Bug modula2/105392] SEGV compiling gm2-libs-pim/BitBlockOps.mod on SPARC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105392 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/84646] Missed optimisation for hoisting conditions outside nested loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84646 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:203b127fccc9abe5373c9e3cc03a476c35b1f594 commit r13-3877-g203b127fccc9abe5373c9e3cc03a476c35b1f594 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/107569] [13 Regression] Failure to optimize std::isfinite since r13-3596

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107569 --- Comment #29 from Aldy Hernandez --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #28) > (In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #27) > > > As for signed zeros in -fsigned-zeros (default) mode, wonder if we e.g. > > > don't > > > say sqrt is non

[Bug target/107590] __atomic_test_and_set broken on PowerPC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107590 Peter Dimov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pdimov at gmail dot com --- Comment #7 fr

[Bug tree-optimization/107569] [13 Regression] Failure to optimize std::isfinite since r13-3596

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107569 --- Comment #30 from Aldy Hernandez --- Created attachment 53869 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53869&action=edit do not set NAN sign in frange::set_nonnegative() proposed patch in testing

[Bug tree-optimization/84646] Missed optimisation for hoisting conditions outside nested loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84646 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener --- I have a patch to make forwprop do the loop PHI elimination but then there's no CD-DCE pass after that to remove the loop itself :/ It might be tempting to swap cddce3 and dce7 or turn dce7 into a cd-dce ..

[Bug tree-optimization/107608] [13 Regression] Failure on fold-overflow-1.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107608 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug other/107613] New: sphinx-build is slow for gccint manual

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107613 Bug ID: 107613 Summary: sphinx-build is slow for gccint manual Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other

[Bug c++/107605] GCC rejects valid program involving requires-clause

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107605 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Jason Liam from comment #2) > Yes i know this has nothing to do with `std::bind`. OK, good. You reported a bug with std::bind in the title, and std::bind in the example. I'm providing the nec

[Bug other/107613] sphinx-build is slow for gccint manual

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107613 --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- Without cProfile, it's ~45 seconds.

[Bug other/107613] sphinx-build is slow for gccint manual

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107613 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug sanitizer/107586] gcc trunk missed a stack-buffer-overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107586 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Ev

[Bug other/107614] New: build goes through but make install fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107614 Bug ID: 107614 Summary: build goes through but make install fails Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other

[Bug lto/107078] LTO is causing that firebird build is core dumping

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107078 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug gcov-profile/107537] gcov skips throw/fallthrough annotations for 'never executed' branches

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107537 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-11-10 Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug tree-optimization/84646] Missed optimisation for hoisting conditions outside nested loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84646 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f1b76811f2c3773e8cabcc07932bf13e82e264db commit r13-3879-gf1b76811f2c3773e8cabcc07932bf13e82e264db Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug other/107614] build goes through but make install fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107614 felix-gcc at fefe dot de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|-

[Bug driver/107448] GCC no longer diagnoses missing input file with -MG since r11-6855-g4804de453e7f5f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107448 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-11-10 CC|

[Bug c++/107615] New: Segfault on accessing to methods of optional class through member pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107615 Bug ID: 107615 Summary: Segfault on accessing to methods of optional class through member pointer Product: gcc Version: 12.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: no

[Bug c++/107616] New: c++tools: select not found breaks build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107616 Bug ID: 107616 Summary: c++tools: select not found breaks build Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug middle-end/107617] New: SCC-VN with len_store and big endian

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107617 Bug ID: 107617 Summary: SCC-VN with len_store and big endian Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end

[Bug c++/107616] c++tools: select not found breaks build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107616 --- Comment #1 from John David Anglin --- Created attachment 53870 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53870&action=edit Patch Fix build of server.cc when select is not present.

[Bug middle-end/107617] SCC-VN with len_store and big endian

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107617 rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug middle-end/107617] SCC-VN with len_store and big endian

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107617 --- Comment #1 from rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org --- For completeness, the mailing list thread is here: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-September/602252.html

[Bug tree-optimization/84646] Missed optimisation for hoisting conditions outside nested loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84646 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fxue at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #11

[Bug target/107606] rs6000: Option not to use parameter save area in variadic function implementations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107606 --- Comment #1 from Segher Boessenkool --- Hi Florian, What do you want such an option to do? The PSA is used only when it is needed, do you want to have the compiler error out in such cases? This is very unpredictable to the user, so it shou

[Bug web/107610] Broken 'onlinedocs' after "Porting the Docs to Sphinx"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107610 --- Comment #4 from Georg-Johann Lay --- Also affected are other bits of the web page that are auto-generated, like https://gcc.gnu.org/install/configure.html And with the new URLs, "deep" links like https://gcc.gnu.org/install/configuration.

[Bug tree-optimization/107473] Unexpected warning / error with strncpy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107473 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-11-10 CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/107523] [13 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu since r13-3628-g6fd485d15c1a2c42

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107523 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[13 Regression] wrong code |[13 Regression] wrong code

[Bug other/107618] New: Incorrect diagnostics when using -Og, builtin_expect(), and function attribute "warning" or "error"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107618 Bug ID: 107618 Summary: Incorrect diagnostics when using -Og, builtin_expect(), and function attribute "warning" or "error" Product: gcc Version: unknown

[Bug target/107604] FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/aapcs64/test_dfp_17.c execution, -O0 fails on aarch64_be

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107604 Christophe Lyon changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC|

[Bug sanitizer/107619] New: False positive of -fsanitize=null

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107619 Bug ID: 107619 Summary: False positive of -fsanitize=null Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: sanitizer

[Bug tree-optimization/107569] [13 Regression] Failure to optimize std::isfinite since r13-3596

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107569 --- Comment #31 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 53873 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53873&action=edit gcc13-pr107569-div.patch This is what I meant by complete nightmare - division.

[Bug sanitizer/107619] False positive of -fsanitize=null

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107619 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/107615] Segfault on accessing to methods of optional class through member pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107615 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Created attachment 53874 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53874&action=edit testcase Next time please attach the testcase instead of just linking to godbolt.

[Bug c++/107615] Segfault on accessing to methods of optional class through member pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107615 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/107606] rs6000: Option not to use parameter save area in variadic function implementations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107606 --- Comment #2 from Florian Weimer --- (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #1) > Or what else is the intention? Do you have an example of something that was > hard to debug, maybe? The prctl(2) manual page documents the prctl function

[Bug other/107620] New: Build errors when using sphinx

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107620 Bug ID: 107620 Summary: Build errors when using sphinx Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other

[Bug c++/107615] Segfault on accessing to methods of optional class through member pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107615 --- Comment #3 from Danil Kolotushkin --- Oh, sorry! Pointers to the members are a bit confusing for me. Interestingly, previous versions of gcc and clang work fine in that case. I added more fields to the object, and it seems that they are by d

[Bug target/107590] __atomic_test_and_set broken on PowerPC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107590 --- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Peter Dimov from comment #7) > I don't see an alignment requirement being mentioned here. I think you misunderstood the alignment issue. There might be no alignment requirement directly on __a

[Bug target/107590] __atomic_test_and_set broken on PowerPC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107590 --- Comment #9 from Peter Dimov --- The easiest way to reproduce the issue is with the following test: https://github.com/boostorg/smart_ptr/blob/c577d68b0272fd0bddc88ea60a8db07219391589/test/spinlock_test.cpp This crashes because - presumably

[Bug middle-end/107618] Incorrect diagnostics when using -Og, builtin_expect(), and function attribute "warning" or "error"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107618 Yann Droneaud changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yann at droneaud dot fr --- Comment #1

Business Inquiry

Hello Admin I hope you are doing well I am Mashood Ali, a web developer The domain name (*g95.org *) has expired and going to be deleted soon. I want to buy this domain name from you so that I can make a programming website out of it. If you agree with my offer, kindly reply to m

[Bug target/107606] rs6000: Option not to use parameter save area in variadic function implementations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107606 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/107515] MVE: Generic functions do not accept _Float16 scalars

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107515 Stam Markianos-Wright changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |stammark at gcc dot gnu.

[Bug middle-end/107618] Incorrect diagnostics when using -Og, builtin_expect(), and function attribute "warning" or "error"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107618 --- Comment #2 from Yann Droneaud --- I was wondering what GCC expects __builtin_object_size(0, 0) to be, and used the following: void a_1 (void) __attribute__((__warning__("-1"))); void a0 (void) __attribute__((__warning__("0")));

[Bug tree-optimization/107569] [13 Regression] Failure to optimize std::isfinite since r13-3596

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107569 --- Comment #32 from Aldy Hernandez --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #31) > Created attachment 53873 [details] > gcc13-pr107569-div.patch > > This is what I meant by complete nightmare - division. Ugh, yeah. That's pretty bad. (No

[Bug web/65699] online docs lacks version that it documents

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65699 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Target Milestone|---

[Bug other/107621] New: spinx generated documents has too much white space on the top

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107621 Bug ID: 107621 Summary: spinx generated documents has too much white space on the top Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: documentation

[Bug other/107621] spinx generated documents has too much white space on the top

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107621 --- Comment #1 from Richard Earnshaw --- I don't see that when using Firefox, so perhaps it is a browser issue.

[Bug tree-optimization/107608] [13 Regression] Failure on fold-overflow-1.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107608 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2) > With -fnon-call-exceptions we are a bit more careful (but the above is gone > in the gimplifier still). For -fnon-call-exceptions, you need -fno-delete-dead-ex

[Bug target/107590] __atomic_test_and_set broken on PowerPC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107590 --- Comment #10 from Sergey Fedorov --- Created attachment 53876 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53876&action=edit Preprocessed spinlock_test from 10.6 36-172% /opt/local/bin/g++-mp-11 --save-temps -v spinlock_test.cpp -I/o

[Bug target/107590] __atomic_test_and_set broken on PowerPC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107590 --- Comment #11 from Sergey Fedorov --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #8) > No preprocessed source of the code going wrong. > Not even register state or instructions where the segfault is happening > (this is would be very useful but n

[Bug other/107621] spinx generated documents has too much white space on the top

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107621 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Richard Earnshaw from comment #1) > I don't see that when using Firefox, so perhaps it is a browser issue. I see it both with Chrome and Firefox and Microsoft Edge. All on Windows. Even on Linu

[Bug other/107621] spinx generated documents has too much white space on the top

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107621 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- Created attachment 53877 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53877&action=edit Safari window here is the view of Safari. That whitespace at the top makes my eye just focuses on that alone r

[Bug target/107590] __atomic_test_and_set broken on PowerPC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107590 --- Comment #12 from Sergey Fedorov --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2) > >Reason: 259 at address: 0x3109 > > Yes that does seem like an alignment disagreement. > > I suspect the code is broken for allocation and it is allocati

[Bug other/107621] spinx generated documents has too much white space on the top

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107621 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- Created attachment 53878 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53878&action=edit Chrome on Windows at normal zoom So much whitespace on the top and even on the left side which is distracting.

[Bug rtl-optimization/77425] Pointer test follows dereference in sched-int.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77425 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5c6546ca7d8cab1f1c129f5b55f709e2ceee0f94 commit r13-3884-g5c6546ca7d8cab1f1c129f5b55f709e2ceee0f94 Author: David Malcolm Date: Th

[Bug middle-end/77432] warn about null check after pointer dereference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77432 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5c6546ca7d8cab1f1c129f5b55f709e2ceee0f94 commit r13-3884-g5c6546ca7d8cab1f1c129f5b55f709e2ceee0f94 Author: David Malcolm Date: Th

[Bug analyzer/99671] RFE: analyzer could complain about ptr derefs that occur before the ptr is checked

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99671 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5c6546ca7d8cab1f1c129f5b55f709e2ceee0f94 commit r13-3884-g5c6546ca7d8cab1f1c129f5b55f709e2ceee0f94 Author: David Malcolm Date: Th

[Bug analyzer/99671] RFE: analyzer could complain about ptr derefs that occur before the ptr is checked

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99671 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/77432] warn about null check after pointer dereference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77432 --- Comment #7 from David Malcolm --- (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #5) > I hadn't seen this, and I filed PR analyzer/99671 last year to track adding > a -fanalyzer warning for this. I now have a mostly-working implementation > of the

[Bug fortran/107595] [13 Regression] ICE in ix86_push_argument, at config/i386/i386.cc:4335

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107595 --- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4) > The initializer is > > {.a=4, .b=null ()} > > the frontend would need to lower such initializers to runtime initialization > (or not use static sto

  1   2   >