[Bug target/106060] Inefficient constant broadcast on x86_64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106060 Hongtao.liu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||crazylht at gmail dot com --- Comment #1

[Bug tree-optimization/106025] [13 Regression] Incorrect optimization at -O2 leads to infinite test execution time since r13-469-g9a53101caadae1b5

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106025 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- It looks like the pattern just exposes an existing issue. -fdbg-cnt=match:0-104 breaks while -fdbg-cnt=match:0-103 is OK but the MAX generation for this looks correct. Disabling VRP fixes it but avoids th

[Bug rust/105913] gccrs doesn't compile on 32-bit targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105913 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |--- Status|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/106057] Missed stmt_can_throw_external check in stmt_kills_ref_p

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106057 --- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka --- The second testcase (with longjmp) invalid since longjmp can clobber automatic variable and making the variable static breaks the testcase since we believe htat longjmp reads global memory state (it doesn't).

[Bug c++/105885] [12/13 Regression] the address of 'template argument' will never be NULL warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105885 --- Comment #3 from Markus Ebner --- > I guess reporters reasoning is that ARG is defaulted to nullptr and that's > the reason the diagnostic is unwanted? I don't think it has any todo with whether nullptr is the default value for ARG or not.

[Bug ipa/105600] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE with LTO when building Mumble

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105600 --- Comment #18 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Martin Liska : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c600ff8dc5a870d952c9c63fe4fa4535b9f0a488 commit r12-8509-gc600ff8dc5a870d952c9c63fe4fa4535b9f0a488 Author: Martin Liska D

[Bug ipa/105600] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE with LTO when building Mumble

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105600 --- Comment #19 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Martin Liska : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3f1637f8b17ded9e08841abc1182dcde0e35e660 commit r11-10089-g3f1637f8b17ded9e08841abc1182dcde0e35e660 Author: Martin Liska

[Bug ipa/105600] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE with LTO when building Mumble

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105600 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/106062] [13 Regression] ICE in build_builtin_unreachable since r13-1204-gd68d366425369649

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106062 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug tree-optimization/106064] New: Wrong code comparing two global zero-sized arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106064 Bug ID: 106064 Summary: Wrong code comparing two global zero-sized arrays Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug c++/106062] [13 Regression] ICE in build_builtin_unreachable since r13-1204-gd68d366425369649

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106062 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug c++/106062] [13 Regression] ICE in build_builtin_unreachable since r13-1204-gd68d366425369649

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106062 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8a15cd3396aa08dc2633982481fe392af0aa9e78 commit r13-1217-g8a15cd3396aa08dc2633982481fe392af0aa9e78 Author: Martin Liska Date: Thu

[Bug c++/106062] [13 Regression] ICE in build_builtin_unreachable since r13-1204-gd68d366425369649

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106062 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/106065] New: Crash when reading extended derived type array in namelist

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106065 Bug ID: 106065 Summary: Crash when reading extended derived type array in namelist Product: gcc Version: 12.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/106059] [13 regression] cc.dg/vect/pr79347.c fails after r13-1171-g9f55aee9dca759

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106059 --- Comment #1 from Segher Boessenkool --- Well, this patch should not have changed behaviour at all!

[Bug tree-optimization/106063] [13 Regression] ICE: in gimple_expand_vec_cond_expr, at gimple-isel.cc:281 with -O2 -fno-tree-forwprop --param=evrp-mode=legacy-first

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106063 Andrew Macleod changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amacleod at redhat dot com --- Comment

[Bug c++/105885] [12/13 Regression] the address of 'template argument' will never be NULL warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105885 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6e4d5300c1f62c3f0cd1bf859b0ee6bb4e31e434 commit r13-1218-g6e4d5300c1f62c3f0cd1bf859b0ee6bb4e31e434 Author: Jason Merrill Date: W

[Bug c++/94554] spurious -Waddress warning within "if constexpr" function-null compares

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94554 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:124a9e08b7a83795bd4d09001955f0eef68ecd00 commit r13-1219-g124a9e08b7a83795bd4d09001955f0eef68ecd00 Author: Jason Merrill Date: Th

[Bug analyzer/105890] RFE: -fanalyzer should complain about mkstemp with not enough "X"s in format string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105890 --- Comment #2 from David Malcolm --- https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009604499/functions/mkstemp.html says: "The string in template should look like a filename with six trailing 'X's" https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/f

[Bug fortran/105807] ICE / error when defining a class containing polymorphic components

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105807 --- Comment #3 from G. Steinmetz --- One tick simpler, without vect3d : $ cat z3.f90 program p type t end type type t2 class(t), allocatable :: v end type type, extends(t2) :: elem2d end type type(t) :: b

[Bug fortran/106047] ICE in structure_alloc_comps, at fortran/trans-array.cc:9574

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106047 --- Comment #2 from G. Steinmetz --- Hmm, exploring some more test cases; z2 gives same ICE, z3 prints 128, z4 gives an error, z5 is ok/works : $ cat z2.f90 program p type t character(:), allocatable :: c end type type(t) :: x

[Bug c++/105925] [11/12/13 Regression] Could not convert '{{0, 0.0}}' from '' to 'X' since r12-954-g84fd1b5dff70cd74

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105925 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/94554] spurious -Waddress warning within "if constexpr" function-null compares

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94554 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |13.0 Resolution|---

[Bug c/103360] [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Waddress

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103360 Bug 103360 depends on bug 94554, which changed state. Bug 94554 Summary: spurious -Waddress warning within "if constexpr" function-null compares https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94554 What|Removed

[Bug c++/105885] [12/13 Regression] the address of 'template argument' will never be NULL warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105885 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b96b64bec37c3dddf1f0f93c27ceb4fd5685c70a commit r12-8510-gb96b64bec37c3dddf1f0f93c27ceb4fd5685c70a Author: Jason Merrill

[Bug target/106060] Inefficient constant broadcast on x86_64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106060 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu --- Created attachment 53196 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53196&action=edit A patch This generates: : 0: b8 7b 00 00 00 mov$0x7b,%eax 5: c5 f9 6e c0

[Bug c++/105885] [12/13 Regression] the address of 'template argument' will never be NULL warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105885 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/105593] avx512 math function raises uninitialized variable warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105593 --- Comment #6 from Rogério de Souza Moraes --- I got another example with similar warning: # #include //#pragma GCC diagnostic push //#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wmaybe-uninitialized" #include //#pragma GCC diagnostic p

[Bug tree-optimization/106064] Wrong code comparing two global zero-sized arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106064 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code

[Bug testsuite/106059] [13 regression] cc.dg/vect/pr79347.c fails after r13-1171-g9f55aee9dca759

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106059 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC|

[Bug c++/99963] [11 Regression] [concepts] template vs concept auto reports ambiguous overload

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99963 --- Comment #5 from Yuanfang Chen --- (In reply to Yuanfang Chen from comment #4) > (In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #1) > > Started with r11-1571. Reduced testcase that replaces the abbreviated > > function templates with their correspon

[Bug analyzer/106066] New: crash dump when "-fdump-analyzer" enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106066 Bug ID: 106066 Summary: crash dump when "-fdump-analyzer" enabled Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: analyz

[Bug libstdc++/106067] New: Error on implicit conversion to std::function: 'static constexpr bool std::_Function_handler<...>...' used before its definition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106067 Bug ID: 106067 Summary: Error on implicit conversion to std::function: 'static constexpr bool std::_Function_handler<...>...' used before its definition Product: gcc

[Bug analyzer/106066] crash dump when "-fdump-analyzer" enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106066 --- Comment #1 from Илья Шипицин --- another crash using "-fanalyzer-verbose-state-changes" stacktrace during IPA pass: analyzer src/ssl_crtlist.c:523:17: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault 523 | entry = crtlist_ent

[Bug c/106068] New: Infinite loop generated with -mcpu=cortex-m7 and -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106068 Bug ID: 106068 Summary: Infinite loop generated with -mcpu=cortex-m7 and -O2 Product: gcc Version: 10.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Comp

[Bug target/106068] Infinite loop generated with -mcpu=cortex-m7 and -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106068 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/106068] Infinite loop generated with -mcpu=cortex-m7 and -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106068 --- Comment #2 from Dave Flogeras --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > You access an out of bounds for the array dhcp_rx_options_given in the while > statement: > > while((dhcp_rx_options_given[8 + n] != 0) && (n < 2)) { > > >

[Bug target/106068] Infinite loop generated with -mcpu=cortex-m7 and -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106068 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Dave Flogeras from comment #2) > For that code, agreed, and that was indeed both our and upstreams > workaround. We were just wondering if it was a legitimate compiler bug > given that it gener

[Bug c++/105982] [13 Regression] internal compiler error: in lookup_template_class, at cp/pt.cc:10361

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105982 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:01aff2ba18a654324957af446a3065db489c0f14 commit r13-1224-g01aff2ba18a654324957af446a3065db489c0f14 Author: Patrick Palka Date: T

[Bug c++/105982] [13 Regression] internal compiler error: in lookup_template_class, at cp/pt.cc:10361

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105982 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/86722] ifcvt produces x&0 that is never cleaned up

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86722 Roger Sayle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/105931] [12/13 regression] ICE in cxx_eval_constant_expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105931 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b00b95198e6720eb23a2618870d67800f6180fdd commit r13-1225-gb00b95198e6720eb23a2618870d67800f6180fdd Author: Patrick Palka Date: T

[Bug c++/105925] [11/12/13 Regression] Could not convert '{{0, 0.0}}' from '' to 'X' since r12-954-g84fd1b5dff70cd74

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105925 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d610ae121e8ecd738de4dc01e6ac11ecf7c2327e commit r13-1226-gd610ae121e8ecd738de4dc01e6ac11ecf7c2327e Author: Jason Merrill Date: T

[Bug c++/105925] [11/12/13 Regression] Could not convert '{{0, 0.0}}' from '' to 'X' since r12-954-g84fd1b5dff70cd74

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105925 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6c72f1bfc3469422460d86314a081353632d4bcb commit r13-1227-g6c72f1bfc3469422460d86314a081353632d4bcb Author: Jason Merrill Date: T

[Bug fortran/105813] ICE in gfc_simplify_unpack, at fortran/simplify.cc:8490

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105813 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --

[Bug c++/105925] [11/12/13 Regression] Could not convert '{{0, 0.0}}' from '' to 'X' since r12-954-g84fd1b5dff70cd74

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105925 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:db29b66193407d2fd6a04a07ecbd961c8d3f7d62 commit r12-8511-gdb29b66193407d2fd6a04a07ecbd961c8d3f7d62 Author: Jason Merrill

[Bug fortran/105813] ICE in gfc_simplify_unpack, at fortran/simplify.cc:8490

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105813 --- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl --- On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 09:18:40PM +, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- > Simpler fix: > > diff --git a/gcc/fortran/check.cc b/gcc/fortran/check.cc >

[Bug libstdc++/106067] Error on implicit conversion to std::function: 'static constexpr bool std::_Function_handler<...>...' used before its definition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106067 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- Probably due to r12-3174 (backported as r11-9289)

[Bug target/106069] New: wrong code with -O -fno-tree-forwprop -maltivec on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106069 Bug ID: 106069 Summary: wrong code with -O -fno-tree-forwprop -maltivec on ppc64le Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug target/106069] [12/13 Regression] wrong code with -O -fno-tree-forwprop -maltivec on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106069 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.2 Keywords|

[Bug target/106069] [12/13 Regression] wrong code with -O -fno-tree-forwprop -maltivec on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106069 --- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek --- The difference between r12-4495 and r12-4496: $ diff -up b/q.C.252r.expand a/q.C.252r.expand --- b/q.C.252r.expand 2022-06-23 23:16:44.753507476 + +++ a/q.C.252r.expand 2022-06-23 23:16:16.232784087

[Bug c++/105925] [11/12/13 Regression] Could not convert '{{0, 0.0}}' from '' to 'X' since r12-954-g84fd1b5dff70cd74

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105925 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:553aecc570ce4ef5c751dc39b83bfbde6380f953 commit r11-10091-g553aecc570ce4ef5c751dc39b83bfbde6380f953 Author: Jason Merrill

[Bug c++/105925] [11/12/13 Regression] Could not convert '{{0, 0.0}}' from '' to 'X' since r12-954-g84fd1b5dff70cd74

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105925 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/106065] Crash when reading extended derived type array in namelist

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106065 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/106024] [11/12/13 Regression] ICE on missing template keyword in template method call in pack expansion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106024 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org St

[Bug target/106069] [12/13 Regression] wrong code with -O -fno-tree-forwprop -maltivec on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106069 --- Comment #2 from luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Could you also paste the ASM difference please? (I don't have environment at handle so far..)

[Bug tree-optimization/106070] New: Wrong code with -O1

Aborted (core dumped) gcc version 13.0.0 20220623 (31ce821a790caec8a2849dd67a9847e78a33d14c)

[Bug tree-optimization/106070] Wrong code with -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106070 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Single file testcase: #include unsigned int var_2 = 1; int var_4 = -1; signed char var_10 = (signed char)(-127 - 1); unsigned long long int arr_252; [[gnu::noipa]] void test() { for (unsigned a = 0; a < (

[Bug tree-optimization/106070] Wrong code with -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106070 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-06-24 Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug fortran/106047] ICE in structure_alloc_comps, at fortran/trans-array.cc:9574

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106047 G. Steinmetz changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code |ice-on-valid-code --- Comment #3 from G.

[Bug target/105930] [12/13 Regression] Excessive stack spill generation on 32-bit x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105930 --- Comment #20 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3b8794302b52a819ca3ea78238e9b5025d1c56dd commit r13-1239-g3b8794302b52a819ca3ea78238e9b5025d1c56dd Author: Roger Sayle Date: Fri

[Bug fortran/106071] New: single where run error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106071 Bug ID: 106071 Summary: single where run error Product: gcc Version: 12.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assig