https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105665
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Alexandre Oliva :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:be2861fe8c527a5952257462ceca899bb43b1452
commit r13-972-gbe2861fe8c527a5952257462ceca899bb43b1452
Author: Alexandre Oliva
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100810
--- Comment #16 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Alexandre Oliva :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:be2861fe8c527a5952257462ceca899bb43b1452
commit r13-972-gbe2861fe8c527a5952257462ceca899bb43b1452
Author: Alexandre Oliva
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105825
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
St
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105473
--- Comment #21 from harper at msor dot vuw.ac.nz ---
I have only one problem here, and it's with the f2018 standard seeming
to contradict itself in two places that both apply to this program.
12.11.1 begins "The set of input/output error condit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105777
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1982fe2692b6c3b7f969ffc4edac59f9d4359e91
commit r13-979-g1982fe2692b6c3b7f969ffc4edac59f9d4359e91
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30314
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1982fe2692b6c3b7f969ffc4edac59f9d4359e91
commit r13-979-g1982fe2692b6c3b7f969ffc4edac59f9d4359e91
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105831
Bug ID: 105831
Summary: Nonportable syntax in "test" and "[" commands.
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105777
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105832
Bug ID: 105832
Summary: Dead Code Elimination Regression at -O3 (trunk vs.
12.1.0)
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105825
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Started with r13-927-gdcfdd2851b297e0005a8490b7f867ca45d1ad340
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87656
--- Comment #17 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #16)
> Note, what is most important with this are configure scripts, if we start
> warning on something still widely used in configure snippets, we'll get
> silen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105792
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.2
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105292
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sumbera at volny dot cz
--- Comment #12
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105797
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:df4f95dbd4764ffc1e8270e5b3c0fd71b6724562
commit r13-980-gdf4f95dbd4764ffc1e8270e5b3c0fd71b6724562
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105833
Bug ID: 105833
Summary: Dead Code Elimination Regression at -O2 (trunk vs.
12.1.0)
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105834
Bug ID: 105834
Summary: Dead Code Elimination Regression at -O2 (trunk vs.
12.1.0)
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100374
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:43c013df02fdb07f9b7a5e7e6669e6d69769d451
commit r13-981-g43c013df02fdb07f9b7a5e7e6669e6d69769d451
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105835
Bug ID: 105835
Summary: Dead Code Elimination Regression at -O1 (trunk vs.
12.1.0)
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105836
Bug ID: 105836
Summary: [OpenMP] segfault when assigning after firstprivate +
allocate
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: openmp, wrong-c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105797
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12/13 Regression] |[11/12 Regression] Internal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105837
Bug ID: 105837
Summary: New test c-c++-common/diagnostic-format-sarif-file-4.c
in r13-967-g6cf276ddf22066 fails
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105835
Roger Sayle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105637
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:44a5bd6d933d86ed988fc4695aa00f122cf83eb4
commit r13-984-g44a5bd6d933d86ed988fc4695aa00f122cf83eb4
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105637
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13 Regression] Wrong|[12 Regression] Wrong
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105637
--- Comment #5 from Ted Lyngmo ---
Excellent and thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105637
--- Comment #6 from Rob Lefebvre ---
Thank you!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105838
Bug ID: 105838
Summary: g++ 12.1.0 runs out of memory or time when building
const std::vector of std::strings
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105761
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
St
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105839
Bug ID: 105839
Summary: internal compiler error: in tsubst_omp_for_iterator,
at cp/pt.cc:18122 (instantiate_pending_templates ->
instantiate_decl -> tsubst_lambda_expr)
Pro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105839
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Adjusted testcase, so that it is already valid C++17:
template
void
foo (const T &x)
{
[&] (auto&& y)
{
#pragma omp parallel for
for (auto&& [v1, v2] : x)
;
} ([]{});
}
void
bar ()
{
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105761
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:284ae8b46f5eef74c0b660a87a7169497f559e73
commit r13-985-g284ae8b46f5eef74c0b660a87a7169497f559e73
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105840
Bug ID: 105840
Summary: confusing diagnostic when naming the wrong class in a
constructor
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105840
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105840
--- Comment #2 from Barry Revzin ---
I think something to this effect maybe?
:9:7: error: attempting to declare constructor for unrelated class 'A';
did you mean to use 'B'?
9 | A(int i);
| ^~
| B
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105841
Bug ID: 105841
Summary: Change in behavior of CTAD for alias templates
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105761
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2843bfa21073dd1ac222540e189e8bcf40afc2c0
commit r12-8456-g2843bfa21073dd1ac222540e189e8bcf40afc2c0
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105840
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Ah, that sounds great to me.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105761
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c27cbeb985f7b6e1759399971b4fe2773e91ca71
commit r11-10047-gc27cbeb985f7b6e1759399971b4fe2773e91ca71
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105761
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||11.3.1, 12.1.1, 13.0
Target Milestone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105756
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0ecb6b906f215ec56df1a555139abe9ad95414fb
commit r13-986-g0ecb6b906f215ec56df1a555139abe9ad95414fb
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105473
--- Comment #22 from Jerry DeLisle ---
12.11.2 (6) says "if the statement is a READ statement or the error
condition occurs in a wait operation for a transfer initiated by a READ
statement, all input items or namelist group objects in the state
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105842
Bug ID: 105842
Summary: rejects-valid: static member function overload set
constrained by concepts for class template results in
ambiguous call
Product: gcc
Vers
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105843
Bug ID: 105843
Summary: pt_BR: wrong translation for "integer constant is so
large that it is unsigned"
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105843
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
The translation project is the upstream for the translations really.
https://translationproject.org/team/index.html has the list of emails for the
translation team and you should send an email to them.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105844
Bug ID: 105844
Summary: std::lcm(5, 4) is UB but accepted in a
constexpr due to cast to unsigned
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105844
Goswin von Brederlow changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||goswin-v-b at web dot de
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105844
--- Comment #2 from Goswin von Brederlow ---
I know the patch doesn't work yet, the static_asserts aren't constexpr. But
hopefully it gives someone enough of an idea to fix it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105831
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105473
--- Comment #23 from harper at msor dot vuw.ac.nz ---
Given what "undefined" means in Fortran, I see no bug now.
On Fri, 3 Jun 2022, jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2022 21:04:22 +
> From: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
49 matches
Mail list logo
