https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105436
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Marek, I think you're right. I meant to follow what is done for C++98
CPP_RSHIFT with CPP_GREATER_EQ, but here actually CPP_RSHIFT isn't special in
C++98.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105438
Bug ID: 105438
Summary: Incorrect array-bounds warning with array size carried
over from a previous template instantiation
Product: gcc
Version: 11.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105438
--- Comment #1 from Bernie Innocenti ---
Reproducible in Godbolt with any 11.x release as well as trunk:
https://godbolt.org/z/zWb55P8G7
nux-gnu-ld
--with-as=/usr/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-as --disable-libstdcxx-pch
--prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-r13-56-20220430001627-g66d1e440e14-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-amd64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 13.0.0 20220430 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105434
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105432
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||unlvsur at live dot com
--- Comment #7 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105439
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105432
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zsojka at seznam dot cz
--- Comment #8 fr
**/
The emitted error is:
//
:9:18: error: non-constant condition for static assertion
9 | static_assert(foo('a'));
| ~~~^
In file included from
/opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-trunk-20220430/include/c++/13.0.0/string:53,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100545
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0aa277bf0b4b794314ab3f11bab438d17b57465d
commit r13-57-g0aa277bf0b4b794314ab3f11bab438d17b57465d
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105436
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59716
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|10.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88580
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill |
|a/show_bug.cgi?id=59
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105441
Bug ID: 105441
Summary: The floating point overload of from_chars ignores 'P'
for hex format
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105442
Bug ID: 105442
Summary: [modules] exporting a class with an inline virtual
destructor causes linker errors (duplicate symbols)
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105441
--- Comment #1 from 康桓瑋 ---
floating_from_chars.cc#L667
// Parse the written exponent.
int written_exponent = 0;
if (first != last && *first == 'p')
{
// Tentatively consume the 'p' and try to parse a decimal number.
const char* const
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105441
--- Comment #2 from 康桓瑋 ---
floating_from_chars.cc#L667
// Parse the written exponent.
int written_exponent = 0;
if (first != last && *first == 'p')
{
// Tentatively consume the 'p' and try to parse a decimal number.
const char* const
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105441
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105443
Bug ID: 105443
Summary: [modules] Internal compiler error
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105435
--- Comment #2 from David Binderman ---
A reduction of the original code produces this:
void arm_cpu_builtins() {
if (0 ? 0 ? 4 : 2 : 0)
;
}
The best parse of this I can think of is:
void arm_cpu_builtins() {
if (0 ? (0 ? 4 : 2) : 0)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105444
Bug ID: 105444
Summary: Support for disabling all warnings
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: preprocess
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105432
--- Comment #9 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #6)
> Created attachment 52910 [details]
> untested patch
when will this patch be applied to the main? I am working on building a new
series of canadian toolchains.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105432
--- Comment #10 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #6)
> Created attachment 52910 [details]
> untested patch
FWIW, patch fixes bootstrap for {powerpc,i686,x86_64}-apple-darwin.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105445
Bug ID: 105445
Summary: miscompile on ia64 with -foptimize-sibling-calls
Product: gcc
Version: 11.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105445
--- Comment #1 from matoro ---
Created attachment 52914
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52914&action=edit
Preprocessed source.
25 matches
Mail list logo
