https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101767
--- Comment #4 from Anton Maklakov ---
I've stumbled this bug as well
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104457
Bug ID: 104457
Summary: ipa-cp with autofdo: internal compiler error in
update_specialized_profile, at ipa-cp.c:4422
Product: gcc
Version: 10.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104442
--- Comment #2 from Marc Poulhiès ---
Ok thanks for looking into this.
I'll submit the patch on the list then !
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104446
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE |[9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104453
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1c827873ed283df282f2df11dfe0ff607e07dab3
commit r12-7122-g1c827873ed283df282f2df11dfe0ff607e07dab3
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104450
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:871afdc512be0510cbd4fa0928e5a1bd0681766e
commit r12-7123-g871afdc512be0510cbd4fa0928e5a1bd0681766e
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104453
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail|12.0|
Summary|[9/10/11/12 Regres
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104451
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:59b31f0e2d187ebdb3d399661e22b28e4ebd8099
commit r12-7124-g59b31f0e2d187ebdb3d399661e22b28e4ebd8099
Author: liuhongt
Date: Wed Feb
ecking-yes-rtl-df-extra-nobootstrap-amd64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 12.0.1 20220209 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104445
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||uros at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104451
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by hongtao Liu
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c4bcb6320d0ff881e0f6ee7f24b35ea67a61d38c
commit r9-9944-gc4bcb6320d0ff881e0f6ee7f24b35ea67a61d38c
Author: liuhongt
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104451
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by hongtao Liu
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0ceeec139d2e181bbeab389deaf53c118a507e68
commit r10-10443-g0ceeec139d2e181bbeab389deaf53c118a507e68
Author: liuhongt
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104451
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by hongtao Liu
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ec01f11091ad54aeeea343647847c85b090c60d7
commit r11-9546-gec01f11091ad54aeeea343647847c85b090c60d7
Author: liuhongt
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104445
--- Comment #5 from Uroš Bizjak ---
We do have:
(define_expand "vec_extractv4qiqi"
[(match_operand:QI 0 "register_operand")
(match_operand:V4QI 1 "register_operand")
(match_operand 2 "const_int_operand")]
"TARGET_SSE4_1"
{
ix86_expa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104451
--- Comment #8 from Hongtao.liu ---
Fixed in GCC12, GCC11.3, GCC10.4, GCC9.5.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102832
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104458
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104457
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104442
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Tom submitted
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-February/590050.html already,
which is slightly different.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104445
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #5)
> We do have:
>
> (define_expand "vec_extractv4qiqi"
> [(match_operand:QI 0 "register_operand")
>(match_operand:V4QI 1 "register_operand")
>(match_operan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104445
--- Comment #7 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6)
> We are missing vec_extractv2sisi or vec_extractv8qiv4qi, with -mno-mmx -mavx.
> It seems we have addv2si3 available though.
vec_extractv2sisi is available in mmx
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104445
--- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 9 Feb 2022, ubizjak at gmail dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104445
>
> --- Comment #7 from Uroš Bizjak ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104458
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104445
--- Comment #9 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #8)
> > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6)
> > > We are missing vec_extractv2sisi or vec_extractv8qiv4qi, with -mno-mmx
> > > -mavx.
> > > It seems we hav
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104446
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104446
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104445
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #9)
> (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #8)
> > > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6)
> > > > We are missing vec_extractv2sisi or vec_extractv8qiv4q
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104459
Bug ID: 104459
Summary: [9/10/11/12 Regression] '-fcompare-debug' failure w/
-O2 -funswitch-loops -fno-tree-dce
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104455
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104460
Bug ID: 104460
Summary: [RISCV] Incorrect DW_AT_high_pc for assembly source
with linker relaxation
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
URL: https://github.com/riscv-collab/r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104460
--- Comment #1 from Joseph Faulls ---
Created attachment 52387
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52387&action=edit
myfunc.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104460
--- Comment #2 from Joseph Faulls ---
Created attachment 52388
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52388&action=edit
main.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104459
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104461
Bug ID: 104461
Summary: cody requires -fmodule-mapper hostname to have an IPv6
address
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
nux-gnu
--with-ld=/usr/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-ld
--with-as=/usr/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-as --disable-libstdcxx-pch
--prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-r12-7124-20220209171435-g59b31f0e2d1-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-amd64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc vers
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104441
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5390a2f191682dae3c6d1e1deac20e05be413514
commit r12-7125-g5390a2f191682dae3c6d1e1deac20e05be413514
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Sun Jan 30 10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104463
Bug ID: 104463
Summary: Split debug info not loaded from .debug/ if
.gnu_debuglink points to binary itself
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sev
el: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 12.0.1 20220209 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35513
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ab0b5fbfe90168d2e470aefb19e0cf31526290bc
commit r12-7126-gab0b5fbfe90168d2e470aefb19e0cf31526290bc
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Sat Jun 19 05:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100593
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ab0b5fbfe90168d2e470aefb19e0cf31526290bc
commit r12-7126-gab0b5fbfe90168d2e470aefb19e0cf31526290bc
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Sat Jun 19 0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104465
Bug ID: 104465
Summary: std::vector should satisfy
std::ranges::viewable_range (P2415 for -c++2b)
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104441
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104465
--- Comment #1 from Younan Zhang ---
* link typo for Clang 13 demo: https://gcc.godbolt.org/z/f7Eb53zb5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104445
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:da2bf62d9e2a25f2d6a99176144c250b51fbdee7
commit r12-7127-gda2bf62d9e2a25f2d6a99176144c250b51fbdee7
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102832
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:da2bf62d9e2a25f2d6a99176144c250b51fbdee7
commit r12-7127-gda2bf62d9e2a25f2d6a99176144c250b51fbdee7
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104445
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102832
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104462
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104465
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Younan Zhang from comment #0)
> It seems that P2415 is still not implemented for libstdc++ yet.
Correct.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104465
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Younan Zhang from comment #0)
> cppreference (https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/ranges/reverse_view) or
> C++20 draft suggests (24.7.1 [range.adaptor.object]/1,
> https://timsong-cpp.github.io
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104465
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
But the reason that it accepts the argument is that it's an lvalue.
You tested std::ranges::viewable_range> but you should
have tested std::ranges::viewable_range&>.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104465
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Younan Zhang from comment #0)
> Clang 13 rejects the above code (https://gcc.godbolt.org/z/xoKesEz7q), which
> is as expected.
That's just because Clang is broken and doesn't work with any li
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104464
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-02-09
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104466
Bug ID: 104466
Summary: Inlining functions with restrict parameters can
inhibit lim (e.g. in 554.roms_r)
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104288
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andrew Macleod :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c6bb1db76b3ac127aff7dacf391fc1798a94bb7d
commit r12-7128-gc6bb1db76b3ac127aff7dacf391fc1798a94bb7d
Author: Andrew MacLeod
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104288
Andrew Macleod changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104407
--- Comment #17 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:be9cd0ca8a5f13cfee6a39b217d439a25c53553a
commit r12-7129-gbe9cd0ca8a5f13cfee6a39b217d439a25c53553a
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104407
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10/11/12 Regression] |[10/11 Regression]
|'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104420
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2d3c477599b02b06e338acd5f5098ee7a3fe6176
commit r12-7130-g2d3c477599b02b06e338acd5f5098ee7a3fe6176
Author: Roger Sayle
Date: Wed F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96392
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2d3c477599b02b06e338acd5f5098ee7a3fe6176
commit r12-7130-g2d3c477599b02b06e338acd5f5098ee7a3fe6176
Author: Roger Sayle
Date: Wed Fe
/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-ld
--with-as=/usr/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-as --disable-libstdcxx-pch
--prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-r12-7126-20220209043854-gab0b5fbfe90-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-nobootstrap-amd64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 12.0.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104400
--- Comment #1 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Thank you for reporting this, Jeff.
I've reproduced the bug. I hope to fix this on this week.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104464
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8f8f8c68b434eb32756284dd8e80cfbdff524a20
commit r12-7132-g8f8f8c68b434eb32756284dd8e80cfbdff524a20
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104468
Bug ID: 104468
Summary: with -O -g, quadratic compile time of function with
__attribute__(("00")) that passes large structs by
value
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104454
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.0.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104464
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104465
--- Comment #6 from Younan Zhang ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #4)
> But the reason that it accepts the argument is that it's an lvalue.
>
> You tested std::ranges::viewable_range> but you
> should have tested std::ranges::viewa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104466
--- Comment #1 from Martin Jambor ---
Created attachment 52393
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52393&action=edit
Test-case
Forgotten testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104467
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104468
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||12.0
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104466
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104468
--- Comment #2 from Erik Carstensen ---
Perhaps the problem is unrelated to function calls; it seems the time is
quadratic in the number of struct literals: If I change argument types to
pointers, then the issue remains if I pass the args as ({s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104442
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Rodgers ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3)
> Tom submitted
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-February/590050.html already,
> which is slightly different.
The primary difference was changi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104467
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |middle-end
--- Comment #2 from Uroš Bizja
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103752
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1ce5395977f37e8d0c03394f7b932a584ce85cc7
commit r12-7133-g1ce5395977f37e8d0c03394f7b932a584ce85cc7
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103752
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 103752, which changed state.
Bug 103752 Summary: [12 Regression][ICE][modules] with import
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103752
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103752
Johel Ernesto Guerrero Peña changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||johelegp at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102178
--- Comment #28 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Could somebody benchmark the following patch on zen2 470.lbm.
diff --git a/gcc/lra-constraints.cc b/gcc/lra-constraints.cc
index 9cee17479ba..76619aca8eb 100644
--- a/gcc/lra-constraints.cc
+++ b/gcc/lr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102562
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 102562, which changed state.
Bug 102562 Summary: [12 Regression][modules] Failing
g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header tests since r12-4067-gc46ecb0112e91c8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102562
What
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104117
--- Comment #21 from Vladimir Makarov ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #20)
> (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #15)
> > (In reply to Vladimir Makarov from comment #13)
> > > I think there are two code spots whose pitfalls resulted
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104443
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103921
Johel Ernesto Guerrero Peña changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Sta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103752
--- Comment #5 from Johel Ernesto Guerrero Peña ---
*** Bug 103921 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 103921, which changed state.
Bug 103921 Summary: [modules] ICE dependent expression in explicit-specifier of
instantiation of imported template
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103921
What|Re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104432
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ee50b4383a0dca88172c3a821418344bd7391956
commit r12-7134-gee50b4383a0dca88172c3a821418344bd7391956
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104432
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24021
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jeffreyalaw at gmail dot com,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104460
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Gcc is not responsible for debug info that is done for the .s file, please
report that issue to binutils: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104460
Joseph Faulls changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24021
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104400
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
s=/usr/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-as --disable-libstdcxx-pch
--prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-r12-7128-20220209090954-gc6bb1db76b3-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-nobootstrap-amd64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 12.0.1 20220209 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102586
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> Shall it treat the fields that partially fall into the range and partially
> don't as padding (ignore them)
In short yes, but...
What a wacky class hierarchy.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25689
--- Comment #3 from Zhao Wei Liew ---
Created attachment 52395
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52395&action=edit
Test patch (seeking feedback)
Hi! I wrote a small patch to fix this issue, but I think that it has much room
fo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24021
--- Comment #8 from Aldy Hernandez ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #7)
> Very cool. ANd no, I'm not enough of an expert on the FP side to shepherd
> that though. I would expect it to be exceptionally tricky on the solver
> side.
T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24021
--- Comment #9 from Vincent Lefèvre ---
(In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #6)
> As I've mentioned, I'm hoping some floating expert can take this across to
> goal line, as my head will start spinning as soon as we start talking about
> NANs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24021
--- Comment #10 from Vincent Lefèvre ---
(In reply to Vincent Lefèvre from comment #9)
> Subnormals might also need to be considered as special cases: "Whether and
> in what cases subnormal numbers are treated as zeros is implementation
> defined
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104470
Bug ID: 104470
Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault compiling
std::variant with -std=c++20
Product: gcc
Version: 10.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sev
1 - 100 of 175 matches
Mail list logo
