https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103978
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
Hmm, works with GCC 8.3.1 from redhat with glibc 2.28.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103978
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
here is the more interesting part, If I do -fexceptions with the C front-end,
it works. But with the C++ front-end, neither -fno-exceptions nor -fexceptions
work.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103986
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
There's nothing wrong with the unswitching I think. The exit test is optimized
out in VRP2 where the preceeding DOM pass ended up putting some more SSA ranges
in, specifically those derived from the unreac
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103986
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97953
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel at constexpr dot org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97953
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103984
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101530
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2c4dccb605d485293291878397b42927dc050481
commit r12-6514-g2c4dccb605d485293291878397b42927dc050481
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103480
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6bba184ccbf47368eaea27ee2c1e7b850526640b
commit r12-6516-g6bba184ccbf47368eaea27ee2c1e7b850526640b
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103480
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10/11/12 Regression] |[10/11 Regression]
|-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97953
--- Comment #26 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d4e5ca668498a41af6417721be2ec69b2eac062e
commit r10-10391-gd4e5ca668498a41af6417721be2ec69b2eac062e
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97953
--- Comment #27 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c018cf9d12c5909a852c33a200cf816204c219b3
commit r9-9908-gc018cf9d12c5909a852c33a200cf816204c219b3
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97953
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103987
Bug ID: 103987
Summary: ice in ao_ref_init_from_ptr_and_range, at
tree-ssa-alias.c:840
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86465
--- Comment #15 from Geoff ---
This appears to still be an issue in gcc 11.2 minimal reproduced example using
std::optional https://godbolt.org/z/ebbMe3Wva
std::optional empty_optional(int x){
return {};
}
std::optional empty_optional_or_t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103987
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ice in |[12 Regression] ice in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103987
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103987
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Reduced test-case:
$ cat pr103987.f
CHARACTER*(*) LTYPE, PTYPE, DEFNAM
PARAMETER (LTYPE=
1'GIF (Graphics Interchange Format file, landscape orientation)',
2 PTYPE=
3'VGIF (Graph
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86465
--- Comment #16 from Geoff ---
This appears to still be an issue in gcc 11.2 minimal reproduced example using
std::optional https://godbolt.org/z/ebbMe3Wva.
-std=c++17 -O3 -fsanitize=address -Wall -Werror -Wno-unused
std::optional empty_optiona
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103987
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
# .MEM_261 = VDEF <.MEM_195>
grgi03 (&C.4661, &C.4662, &bx, &by, &C.4663, &bx, &by, pixmap.86_80);
and the param we're asking for is pixmap.86_80, nothing checks for a
POINTER_TYPE here before using ao_ref
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103977
--- Comment #5 from avieira at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Posted a fix on ML:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-January/588237.html
Sorry for the breakage, wrong assumption by my part :(
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103971
--- Comment #1 from avieira at gcc dot gnu.org ---
seurer could you check whether
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-January/588237.html fixes this?
I don't have easy access to a powerpc target for bootstrap.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86465
--- Comment #17 from Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen ---
Does a viable workaround exist that doesn't amount to disabling the warning
option altogether?
In my case, the actual warning is triggered inside the standard library, which
is used by my code that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103987
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
C testcase:
void foo();
void bar(int i)
{
foo (i);
}
void foo(int *p)
{
*p = 0;
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103985
--- Comment #2 from Dr. Thomas Orgis ---
You mean every call to a write(), even to a buffer variable, should be a thread
synchronization point? That would mean that I swiftly should get rid of those
in the performance-critical paths. I hoped it'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103985
--- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Can you try gcc-11 or gcc-12?
There were some fixes for asynchronous I/O (pr100352) touching the locking
mechanism.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103988
Bug ID: 103988
Summary: [OpenACC][2.7] Support array vars in reductions
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: openacc
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103804
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4960516df2f90e6ae16aa03c63c8bf2c702e6bc4
commit r12-6519-g4960516df2f90e6ae16aa03c63c8bf2c702e6bc4
Author: Martin Liska
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103804
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103989
Bug ID: 103989
Summary: [12 regression] std::optional and bogus
-Wmaybe-unitialized at -Og
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86465
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@nieper-wisskirchen.de
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103989
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-01-12
Summary|[12 regres
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103989
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103990
Bug ID: 103990
Summary: 541.leela_r slower by 4.5-6% with PGO+LTO -Ofast
-march=native in the first week of January 2022
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103990
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103991
Bug ID: 103991
Summary: Bogus -Wreturn-type with constexpr if and local var
with destructor
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103990
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssa-pre.c b/gcc/tree-ssa-pre.c
index ab24fa98a1f..2bdfae5482f 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-ssa-pre.c
+++ b/gcc/tree-ssa-pre.c
@@ -4442,7 +4442,6 @@ pass_pre::execute (function *fun)
if (to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103991
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103955
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c0e355c77972d96fcec2ff7da047ad03e10e51d9
commit r12-6522-gc0e355c77972d96fcec2ff7da047ad03e10e51d9
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101941
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
--- Comment #25 from David Malcolm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82028
LIU Hao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lh_mouse at 126 dot com
--- Comment #2 from LI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103990
--- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
>
> should fix that
I can confirm that it does.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103533
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2c16dfe6268eeeb4b7924ff423e274fa00894a4d
commit r12-6526-g2c16dfe6268eeeb4b7924ff423e274fa00894a4d
Author: David Malcolm
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103940
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2c16dfe6268eeeb4b7924ff423e274fa00894a4d
commit r12-6526-g2c16dfe6268eeeb4b7924ff423e274fa00894a4d
Author: David Malcolm
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103940
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82028
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103225
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103990
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2f62294dec1f3af59dd7505c058b0af38c2d1524
commit r12-6527-g2f62294dec1f3af59dd7505c058b0af38c2d1524
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103990
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
Bug 26163 depends on bug 103990, which changed state.
Bug 103990 Summary: 541.leela_r slower by 4.5-6% with PGO+LTO -Ofast
-march=native in the first week of January 2022
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103990
What|Re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97444
--- Comment #1 from Tom de Vries ---
Created attachment 52169
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52169&action=edit
Tentative patch, __atomic_exchange only
Code generated for the generic case:
...
{ // Atomic exchange -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103551
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andrew Macleod :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:77184b7446196eae1a70452939ccd3e99e0d2e3b
commit r12-6528-g77184b7446196eae1a70452939ccd3e99e0d2e3b
Author: Andrew MacLeod
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83541
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andrew Macleod :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:75845d584f490c294d40908168e5721adc38145d
commit r12-6529-g75845d584f490c294d40908168e5721adc38145d
Author: Andrew MacLeod
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83541
Andrew Macleod changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103551
Andrew Macleod changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103978
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #10 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98737
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 52170
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52170&action=edit
gcc12-pr98737-canon.patch
Untested patch to fix up if users misuse the fetch_op or op_fetch atomic when
they s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103720
--- Comment #3 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org ---
this is fixed with the following commit in gcc12.
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-cvs/2022-January/359118.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103720
qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103991
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Slightly bigger testcase that shows that also consteval if is affected:
struct S { ~S(); };
int
foo ()
{
S s;
if constexpr (true)
return 0;
else
return 1;
}
#if __cpp_if_consteval >= 202106L
i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103977
--- Comment #6 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
And just to follow-up. With the patch that was committed to the trunk, the 30+
targets that were previously failing are now working.
A few are still building, but I expect them to succeed. mips* is faili
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103991
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Maybe better:
struct S { ~S(); };
int
foo ()
{
S s;
if constexpr (true)
return 0;
else
return 1;
}
#if __cpp_if_consteval >= 202106L
constexpr int
bar ()
{
S s;
if consteval
{
re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103977
--- Comment #7 from avieira at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Thanks for confirming that Jeff :)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42436
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Macleod ---
What needs to be done here? anything?
Looking at VRP1, there is only a single divide left at that point:
countm1.6_54 = _12 / _13;
and VRP1 is setting the global range of _13 to:
_13: unsigned int [2,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103971
avieira at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103977
--- Comment #8 from avieira at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The patch Jeff mentioned is this:
[vect] PR103971, PR103977: Fix epilogue mode selection for autodetect only
gcc/ChangeLog:
* tree-vect-loop.c (vect-analyze-loop): Handle scenario where target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103992
Bug ID: 103992
Summary: common_iterator(const common_iterator<_It2, _Sent2>&
__x) uses new instead of construct_at
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103991
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78655
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Macleod ---
We currently get everything except the last tidbit.
a_1(D) int * VARYING
:
x_2 = a_1(D) == 0B;
a_3 = a_1(D) + 40;
return x_2;
When we see
a_3 = a_1(D) + 40;
Are we allowed to assume
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103993
Bug ID: 103993
Summary: Incorrect error generated by mismatched-new-delete
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103993
--- Comment #1 from JohnJiming Lindal ---
Created attachment 52171
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52171&action=edit
preprocessed output
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103991
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
For the more permanent solution, perhaps making the other branch
__builtin_unreachable() if it doesn't fall through is too expensive and we
should just arrange for the pre- r12-5638 behavior where we in GENE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103992
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103994
Bug ID: 103994
Summary: Module ICE in mark_by_value, at cp/module.cc:4772
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102935
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Michael Meissner :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:18d88d11973c63bda4e586b979b71d48c1d9b78a
commit r12-6532-g18d88d11973c63bda4e586b979b71d48c1d9b78a
Author: Michael Meissner
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103991
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
For consteval if I guess we could do:
--- gcc/cp/cp-objcp-common.c.jj 2022-01-11 23:11:22.091294356 +0100
+++ gcc/cp/cp-objcp-common.c2022-01-12 17:57:18.232202275 +0100
@@ -313,6 +313,13 @@ cxx_block_ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102935
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103831
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:614a9580d4463c4aefd74c40ed46bfab2bef65c7
commit r11-9456-g614a9580d4463c4aefd74c40ed46bfab2bef65c7
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103831
--- Comment #5 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to 康桓瑋 from comment #2)
> Please let me add a digression, is the standard overconstrained the
> definition of tiny_range?
> In the current standard, it seems that only single_view and empty_view
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103831
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103989
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103980
--- Comment #8 from Ryan ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #7)
> It might be the case Wdouble-promotion is just useless on s390 if you
> configure your compiler with --enable-s390-excess-float-precision which was
> only added for GCC11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103995
Bug ID: 103995
Summary: conj() ignored with tree loop vectorizer
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103995
--- Comment #1 from Michele Martone ---
Small correction: the URL in the link above should have been just
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-11.2.0/gcc/Optimize-Options.html
(top of the page).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103980
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Ryan from comment #8)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #7)
> > It might be the case Wdouble-promotion is just useless on s390 if you
> > configure your compiler with --enable-s390-exces
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103996
Bug ID: 103996
Summary: Enhancement: Better diagnostic for invalid reuse of a
function name
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103996
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
C++ front-end produces:
: In function 'void f()':
:4:10: error: invalid types '[int]' for array subscript
4 | index[0] = 0;
| ^
Which seems better.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103996
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-01-12
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103993
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||100406
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103996
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Enhancement: Better |Provide Better diagnostic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103861
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b5193e352981fab8441c600b0a50efe1f30c1d30
commit r12-6533-gb5193e352981fab8441c600b0a50efe1f30c1d30
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100637
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b5193e352981fab8441c600b0a50efe1f30c1d30
commit r12-6533-gb5193e352981fab8441c600b0a50efe1f30c1d30
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103989
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
--- Comment #4 from Andrew P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103995
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|conj() ignored with tree|[11/12 Regression] conj()
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78655
--- Comment #11 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
We can assume that the result of a POINTER_PLUS is non-null if either argument
is non-null. So X + constant is always non-null. X + Y would be non-null if
either X or Y is known to be non-null.
If we kno
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83584
Pavel M changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pavel.morozkin at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100637
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98026
Andrew Macleod changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amacleod at redhat dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103935
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e1503b9a3d2f480d3df42823cd47c3b6c12f5564
commit r12-6534-ge1503b9a3d2f480d3df42823cd47c3b6c12f5564
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Wed J
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103991
--- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
> Am 12.01.2022 um 17:33 schrieb jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
> :
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103991
>
> Jakub Jelinek changed:
>
> What|Removed
1 - 100 of 140 matches
Mail list logo
