https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103571
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101995
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski ---
>I don't see any problem with aarch64 fwiw.
I have to try it on aarch64 but it failed there at one point.
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #8)
> Also, what is fragile here? This is *removing*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103571
--- Comment #22 from Hongtao.liu ---
reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #21)
> (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #19)
> > (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #17)
> > > (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #16)
> > > > There're already t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80521
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Keywords|needs-bisection
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80368
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Sta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77335
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71982
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71527
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71174
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70544
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70163
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Sta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94404
Bug 94404 depends on bug 70163, which changed state.
Bug 70163 Summary: C++ DR 257 constructor forward to virtual base class's
constructor in an abstract class required
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70163
What|Remov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69933
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Sta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69731
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68903
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||12.0
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67795
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #15
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67775
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67259
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
See A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66934
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66901
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Sta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66878
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61103
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60937
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59716
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59704
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59342
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57570
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57063
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49946
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35167
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98614
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103622
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bergner at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97984
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
Ok so it started on GCC 10 branch with
r10-4677-g60838d634634a70d65a126166c944b159ac7649c.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103623
Bug ID: 103623
Summary: error: unable to generate reloads (ICE in
curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:4132), or
error: insn does not satisfy its constraints (ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103624
Bug ID: 103624
Summary: ICE: unrecognizable insn
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assign
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103617
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Unfortunately, it does not help:
(gdb) pp predicate->true_range
Attempt to take address of value not located in memory.
(gdb) pp &predicate->true_range
UNDEFINED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103625
Bug ID: 103625
Summary: ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2769 (error:
unrecognizable insn)
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103626
Bug ID: 103626
Summary: _GLIBCXX_HOSTED should respect -ffreestanding
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: li
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103627
Bug ID: 103627
Summary: ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2769 (error:
unrecognizable insn)
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19992
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103628
Bug ID: 103628
Summary: ICE: Segmentation fault (in gfc_conv_tree_to_mpfr)
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103622
--- Comment #2 from Kewen Lin ---
Got exposed from r12-5752, r12-5751 we got the error msg like:
test.c: In function ‘get_float128_exponent’:
test.c:6:5: note: builtin ‘__builtin_vec_scalar_extract_exp’ requires builtin
‘__builtin_vsx_scalar_ex
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103466
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53499
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
hmm, for the test in comment #0, GCC, ICC and MSVC all have the same behavior
of picking #2 while clang's result is the different one here where it says
operator- is ambiguous.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103629
Bug ID: 103629
Summary: Possible miscompilation triggered by
-fvisibility=hidden
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103562
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92120
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |cltang at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103629
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103629
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
-fvisibility=hidden hides typeinfo so it could be possibility of having two
typeinfo for the same class in if not used correctly.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103630
Bug ID: 103630
Summary: [9/10/11/12 Regression] std::make_exception_ptr(t)
is ill-formed
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103630
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |redi at gcc dot gnu.org
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103629
--- Comment #3 from Mathieu Malaterre ---
Steps to reproduce without a full Debian environement:
```
$ wget
http://deb.debian.org/debian/pool/main/o/openvdb/openvdb_8.1.0.orig.tar.xz
$ tar xf openvdb_8.1.0.orig.tar.xz
$ cd openvdb-8.1.0
$ mkdir
mpPKcS0_
testl %eax, %eax
jne .L22
.L5:
call_Z11myerrorcallv
nop
.seh_endproc
.ident "GCC: (GNU) 12.0.0 20211209 (experimental)"
.def_Z11mypredicateP7SEXPREC; .scl2; .type 32;
.endef
.def
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103465
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 51957
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51957&action=edit
Test-case used
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103629
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103631
Bug ID: 103631
Summary: Internal compiler error in C++20 class NTTP + concept
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103630
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Also, since the changes for PR 90295 is no longer usable
in C++98:
include/bits/exception_ptr.h:182: error: declaration of
'std::__exception_ptr::exception_ptr::exception_ptr()' has a different
exception
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103631
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102229
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103631
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|12.0|11.3
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92860
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|marxin at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103629
--- Comment #5 from Mathieu Malaterre ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> (In reply to Mathieu Malaterre from comment #3)
> > $ export CXXFLAGS=-fvisibility=hidden
>
> Yes you can't just use -fvisibility=hidden without the source
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103622
--- Comment #3 from Kewen Lin ---
> One thought seems to check instance->fntype first and take (skip) it as
> mismatch if it's NULL.
This looks like a bad idea, to use long double as the type instead of float128
when type float128 isn't suppor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103629
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Mathieu Malaterre from comment #5)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> > (In reply to Mathieu Malaterre from comment #3)
> > > $ export CXXFLAGS=-fvisibility=hidden
> >
> > Yes you
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103629
--- Comment #7 from Mathieu Malaterre ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6)
> (In reply to Mathieu Malaterre from comment #5)
> > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> > > (In reply to Mathieu Malaterre from comment #3)
> > > >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59342
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103465
--- Comment #7 from Tomas Kalibera ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #5)
> > However, still talking about the current master only, I see a difference
> > with -O3, when I try on the repro example from Bug 103274 and -O3:
> >
> > x86_64
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59716
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59704
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103465
--- Comment #8 from Tomas Kalibera ---
Created attachment 51958
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51958&action=edit
Example for comment 7.
Example for Dockerfile for comment 7. To be placed in a new directory with that
Docker
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71934
--- Comment #29 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:747380f47da0da6c11fd5262ac428bb53433ea19
commit r12-5855-g747380f47da0da6c11fd5262ac428bb53433ea19
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103465
--- Comment #9 from Tomas Kalibera ---
Created attachment 51959
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51959&action=edit
Dockerfile for comment 7
Dockerfile to reproduce behavior in comment 7. To be placed in a fresh
directory wit
std
gcc version 12.0.0 20211209 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71934
--- Comment #30 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bf15cd665e74791aae87e7e151a0cf0c4cb54684
commit r12-5856-gbf15cd665e74791aae87e7e151a0cf0c4cb54684
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103617
Andrew Macleod changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #51949|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59716
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103632
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|rtl-optimization|middle-end
--- Comment #1 from Andrew P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103617
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Andrew Macleod from comment #3)
> Created attachment 51961 [details]
> new patch
>
> Doh. there was a thinko and I think c++ was silently changing the parameter
> back to a pointer. Try this on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103632
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103465
--- Comment #10 from Tomas Kalibera ---
(In reply to Tomas Kalibera from comment #7)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #5)
> > > However, still talking about the current master only, I see a difference
> > > with -O3, when I try on the re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71934
--- Comment #31 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0d5db1dd65b45286082f82f600ca0a3e6e43e06e
commit r12-5857-g0d5db1dd65b45286082f82f600ca0a3e6e43e06e
Author: Iain Sandoe
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103465
--- Comment #11 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Tomas Kalibera from comment #9)
> Created attachment 51959 [details]
> Dockerfile for comment 7
>
> Dockerfile to reproduce behavior in comment 7. To be placed in a fresh
> directory with a.c.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103633
Bug ID: 103633
Summary: Missed popcount recognition
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103633
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
Last recon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71934
--- Comment #32 from Iain Sandoe ---
I guess the first part (fixing with PIE) fixes a regression - but the remainder
is an enhancement?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103465
--- Comment #12 from Martin Liška ---
> So, still, the reorder-stacks-and-partition optimization is not dropped by
> target (though I am not claiming they should be dropped, I don't know,
> that's only what I learned from your response to my ori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103465
--- Comment #13 from Tomas Kalibera ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #12)
> > So, still, the reorder-stacks-and-partition optimization is not dropped by
> > target (though I am not claiming they should be dropped, I don't know,
> > tha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103465
--- Comment #14 from Tomas Kalibera ---
Created attachment 51962
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51962&action=edit
example for comment 1 and 13
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102221
--- Comment #6 from Giuseppe D'Angelo ---
Hi,
(Sorry for chiming in after all this time); given this might not entirely be
libstdc++ related (cf. the latest testcase), would it be possible for someone
on the optimizer to gave their opinion?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96937
Will Cohen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wcohen at redhat dot com
--- Comment #6 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96937
--- Comment #7 from Will Cohen ---
Created attachment 51963
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51963&action=edit
Reproducer showing duplicate formal parameters from kernel probe_rom.i
Compiled with following to generate probe_r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67775
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 67775, which changed state.
Bug 67775 Summary: [concepts] bug when using variadic expansions in compound
requirements
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67775
What|Removed |Ad
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68903
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103401
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6a071b2d40a1078b4029c2b77ef29ffca4e7050c
commit r12-5860-g6a071b2d40a1078b4029c2b77ef29ffca4e7050c
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69731
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103143
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:425a39fd4effd9604af9f5f0780d209036d6e886
commit r12-5861-g425a39fd4effd9604af9f5f0780d209036d6e886
Author: Martin Sebor
Date: Sat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69933
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71934
--- Comment #33 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fa9f40bacbd187996e03f93086fae1ab9052f51b
commit r12-5868-gfa9f40bacbd187996e03f93086fae1ab9052f51b
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70163
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski -
1 - 100 of 200 matches
Mail list logo
