https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102681
--- Comment #4 from Feng Xue ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #3)
> Simply initializing the variable as in the patch below avoids the warning.
> The control flow in the code is sufficiently opaque to make it worthwhile
> from a readab
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102740
Bug ID: 102740
Summary: [11.2/12 Regression] Data member not found in struct
inside an unnamed union
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102736
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Keywords|needs-bisection
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102740
--- Comment #1 from Curdeius Curdeius ---
Also, the bug doesn't appear (or TBH, it's a different bug), when the unnamed
union contains a `content` data member. But it seems to be a bug then as well,
because it's not what is intended to be initia
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102740
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.4
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102740
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102741
Bug ID: 102741
Summary: ICE in aarch64_add_offset_1 at
gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c:4920
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102741
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93934
--- Comment #17 from Richard Biener ---
It might help to provide a option or tunable to disable the use of fcmov which
should reduce the attack surface a bit. I don't see any way to avoid using
fld for loading x87 float or double values (well, l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102741
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|12.0|---
Summary|[12 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102741
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102587
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 102741 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102742
Bug ID: 102742
Summary: ERROR: descriptor 3 still open after tests complete
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102740
--- Comment #3 from Curdeius Curdeius ---
For other users with this problem, a workaround is to use a named struct. So
here, it would look like:
```
typedef struct {
const void* content;
} put_t;
typedef struct {
union {
put_t p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101583
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Oops, yes, I thought I'd included this in my backports. Doing it now ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101263
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #1)
> We might first need to implement P2231 (for constexpr optional) before this
> function can be properly constexpr.
Implemented in r12-4389
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101583
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3bf56cdf5ec5e07ea34e6be0110ab8fc76641d87
commit r11-9153-g3bf56cdf5ec5e07ea34e6be0110ab8fc76641d87
Author: Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101583
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Thanks for noticing I missed it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102736
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
Ass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93934
--- Comment #18 from Uroš Bizjak ---
The following patch fixes the PR, see the comment inline:
--cut here--
diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386-expand.c b/gcc/config/i386/i386-expand.c
index 6e2b7920d2b..b87490fe544 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/i3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102736
--- Comment #4 from Aldy Hernandez ---
Here are some debugging tips for when I'm not around ;-).
When the jump threader is suspected, I find it useful to do some bisecting to
find the actual jump thread that is causing the problem. Note that s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102736
--- Comment #5 from Aldy Hernandez ---
Created attachment 51598
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51598&action=edit
proposed patch in testing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102352
Ard Biesheuvel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ardb at kernel dot org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102703
--- Comment #9 from Aldy Hernandez ---
(In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #8)
> On Wed, Oct 13, 2021, 11:37 pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org <
> gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102703
> >
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102708
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus ---
Actually, it prints the line number at the call site. Thus, there is probably
no need for adding the name of callee.
However, related to the fsym/proc_name passing:
Currently, the callers in gfc_conv_proce
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93934
--- Comment #19 from Zoltan Vajda ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #18)
> The following patch fixes the PR, see the comment inline:
>
> --cut here--
> diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386-expand.c b/gcc/config/i386/i386-expand.c
> index 6e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102735
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|xfail |
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93934
--- Comment #20 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #16)
> I don't think this bug is anything to do with -fsignaling-nans, for the
> same reason as applies to bug 58416 and bug 71460.
The situation is hopeless
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93934
--- Comment #21 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Zoltan Vajda from comment #19)
> The problem does not only apply for conditional moves! I can turn on sse,
> for example.
>
> https://gcc.godbolt.org/z/jP3Kne8T5
>
> Then the problematic code wi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93934
--- Comment #22 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 14 Oct 2021, ubizjak at gmail dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93934
>
> --- Comment #20 from Uroš Bizjak ---
> (In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102743
Bug ID: 102743
Summary: build failure for i686-w64-mingw32 target because of
patch yesterday
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102743
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|build failure for |[12 Regression] build
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102743
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Assignee|unassigned at gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102736
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Aldy Hernandez :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a311163fd81babd6116e2856f4551c3ca13d8914
commit r12-4395-ga311163fd81babd6116e2856f4551c3ca13d8914
Author: Aldy Hernandez
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102736
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102681
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.or
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102659
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9b2ad21ab3ebc21a3408108327fa1a7cbedaf217
commit r12-4398-g9b2ad21ab3ebc21a3408108327fa1a7cbedaf217
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102744
Bug ID: 102744
Summary: [12 regression] -O2 vectorization causes
Wzero-length-array-bounds-2.c to fail on arc-elf
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102557
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jan Hubicka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fecd145359fc981beb2802f746190227c5cc010a
commit r12-4401-gfecd145359fc981beb2802f746190227c5cc010a
Author: Jan Hubicka
Date: Thu O
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102743
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5e3f88838994b67580594c4679c839fff7cdeba0
commit r12-4404-g5e3f88838994b67580594c4679c839fff7cdeba0
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93934
--- Comment #23 from Zoltan Vajda ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #20)
> (In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #16)
> > I don't think this bug is anything to do with -fsignaling-nans, for the
> > same reason as applies to b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102745
Bug ID: 102745
Summary: CLASS → TYPE check fails after RESHAPE
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: accepts-invalid, diagnostic
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102743
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|jwakely at redhat dot com |
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102746
Bug ID: 102746
Summary: gcov returns 0 un erroneuos incovation
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: gcov-prof
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102557
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
Can we close it as fixed now?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102747
Bug ID: 102747
Summary: gcov returns 0 when invoked on gcda generated by
previous gcc version
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102746
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-10-14
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102747
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102746
--- Comment #2 from Илья Шипицин ---
I came to this situation using wrong powershell approach. I found all "gcda"
and merged them into single string. Powershell executed "gcov" and passed 1
(!!) argument as concatenated string.
Actually, if gco
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101263
--- Comment #5 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #4)
> (In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #1)
> > We might first need to implement P2231 (for constexpr optional) before this
> > function can be properly conste
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101263
--- Comment #6 from Barry Revzin ---
The "real" answer is allowing constexpr placement new, but that obviously
doesn't help you right now.
But I think the helpful answer is that you can add a constructor to your
storage like storage(init_from_i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102748
Bug ID: 102748
Summary: static_assert on concept leads to undefined reference
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101263
TC changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rs2740 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #7 from TC --
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102627
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Vladimir Makarov
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:99d21577f8a00196f3133fe1066de6e3e7d180c1
commit r11-9154-g99d21577f8a00196f3133fe1066de6e3e7d180c1
Author: Vladimir N.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102627
--- Comment #8 from Vladimir Makarov ---
I've committed the patch to gcc-11 branch too after nobody made complaints
about the patch in the trunk. I've also successfully tested and bootstrapped
the patch on the branch too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102749
Bug ID: 102749
Summary: ambigous call on different std::variant types with
iterators
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93934
--- Comment #24 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Thu, 14 Oct 2021, ubizjak at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs wrote:
> The situation is hopeless from the beginning. Please consider this testcase:
>
> --cut here--
> #include
> #include
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102663
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101296
--- Comment #10 from Martin Jambor ---
Looking at the LNT graph, I guess this bug should be either closed or suspended
(not sure what the suspended state means for the blocked metabug, so probably
closed).
Yeah, it's weird.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101583
Thiago Macieira changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thiago at kde dot org
--- Comment #10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102750
Bug ID: 102750
Summary: 433.milc regressed by 10% on AMD zen2 at -Ofast
-march=native -flto after r12-3893-g6390c5047adb75
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102744
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org
Last recon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102751
Bug ID: 102751
Summary: [12 regression] new test case
cc.dg/tree-ssa/pr102736.c fails
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102752
Bug ID: 102752
Summary: [12 Regression] Recent change to ldist causing ICE on
msp430-elf, rl78-elf, and xstormy16-elf
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102752
--- Comment #1 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr45427.c shows the same issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93934
--- Comment #25 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #24)
> This is a fundamentally different test, because it involves (in the
> abstract machine) lvalue-to-rvalue conversion of a sNaN representation.
> That
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102738
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andrew Macleod :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f0b7d4cc49ddb1c2c7474cc3f61e260aa93a96c0
commit r12-4413-gf0b7d4cc49ddb1c2c7474cc3f61e260aa93a96c0
Author: Andrew MacLeod
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102738
Andrew Macleod changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amacleod at redhat dot com
Res
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102753
Bug ID: 102753
Summary: ICE on invalid use of pointer to a consteval member
function
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102752
--- Comment #2 from Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
---
It looks like I missed to take the TREE_TYPE of reduction_var. I just did a
quick test with
diff --git a/gcc/tree-loop-distribution.c b/gcc/tree-loop-distribution.c
index fb9250031b5..0559b9c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102752
--- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
No worries. This is why we have testing systems.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102753
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102716
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1b115daf62d94337b3d0b2962b0bbbf005a450e0
commit r12-4414-g1b115daf62d94337b3d0b2962b0bbbf005a450e0
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102717
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b47490c572c5938f887b54240af6096a7c90f640
commit r12-4415-gb47490c572c5938f887b54240af6096a7c90f640
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102754
Bug ID: 102754
Summary: collisions in double constant template mangling for
negative values
Product: gcc
Version: 9.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102754
--- Comment #1 from hq.ks at web dot de ---
Created attachment 51602
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51602&action=edit
compile, grep object symbols
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102754
--- Comment #2 from hq.ks at web dot de ---
Created attachment 51603
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51603&action=edit
output
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102754
hq.ks at web dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98216
hq.ks at web dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hq.ks at web dot de
--- Comment #11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102753
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99008
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102685
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98216
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102755
Bug ID: 102755
Summary: Built gcc cross compiler always tries to use "as"
instead of cross assembler
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102755
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-10-14
Component|c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102755
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102752
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-10-14
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102748
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102756
Bug ID: 102756
Summary: [12 Regression] Vectorizer change creates poor code
for c-c++-common/torture/vector-compare-2.c
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102756
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102756
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102744
--- Comment #2 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #1)
> Here's the relevant part of the test with line numbers:
>
> 68char cbuf1[1 * sizeof (struct C)];
> 69char cbuf2[2 * sizeof (struct C)] = {
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102757
Bug ID: 102757
Summary: ICE on amd64 (internal compiler error: in
expand_expr_real_1, at expr.c:10014)
Product: gcc
Version: 9.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102757
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86216
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sam at gentoo dot org
--- Comment #12 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102758
Bug ID: 102758
Summary: [x86] Failure to use registers optimally when swapping
between (identically represented) vector types
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102758
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
--enable-languages=c,c++,lto --enable-checking-yes --enable-multiarch
--prefix=/scratch/software/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 12.0.0 20211014 (experimental) [master -gee9fa8a57] (GCC)
$ cat mutant.c
baz4(int[(int)+1.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102758
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |minor
Keywords|needs-bisectio
--enable-checking-yes --enable-multiarch
--prefix=/scratch/software/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 12.0.0 20211014 (experimental) [master -gee9fa8a57] (GCC)
$ cat mutant.c
a4() { void fa4(int[]); }
void fa4();
call_fa4() { fa4
1 - 100 of 124 matches
Mail list logo
