https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102714
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102703
--- Comment #3 from Aldy Hernandez ---
This seems to be some limitation of the RTL optimizers in the presence of more
aggressive jump threading.
Neither the old backward threader nor the old VRP threader could find any
threading possibilities:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102543
--- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 13 Oct 2021, crazylht at gmail dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102543
>
> --- Comment #9 from Hongtao.liu ---
> I'm curious why we need peeling for unalig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102715
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102715
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102718
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102719
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102720
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102720
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|testsuite |tree-optimization
Summary|[
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100464
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Yes. You'll get an error, like:
error: t.c: ‘-fcompare-debug’ failure (length)
or
error: t.c: ‘-fcompare-debug’ failure
Under the hood, the driver invokes the compiler once with
the options you've given pl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102703
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
There is a missed optimization at the gimple level for sure.
if (d_11 > 1)
goto ; [59.00%]
else
goto ; [41.00%]
[local count: 391808389]:
[local count: 955630225]:
# iftmp.1_6 = PHI <
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102724
Bug ID: 102724
Summary: [11/12 Regression] ICE in genericize_spaceship, at
cp/method.c:1089
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: error-reco
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102703
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #3)
> This seems to be some limitation of the RTL optimizers in the presence of
> more aggressive jump threading.
But the more aggressive jump threading is actually
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100285
--- Comment #13 from Christophe Lyon ---
Sure, here is what I have in libstdc++.log:
In file included from
/aci-gcc-fsf/builds/gcc-fsf-gccsrc/obj-aarch64-none-elf/gcc3/aarch64-none-elf/libstdc++-v3/include/experimental/net:42,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102725
Bug ID: 102725
Summary: [12 Regression] -fno-builtin leads to call of strlen
since r12-4283-g6f966f06146be768
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102725
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
You need -fno-tree-loop-distribution -fno-tree-loop-distribute-patterns to turn
it off. There is another older bug about this for memcpy.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102725
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> You need -fno-tree-loop-distribution -fno-tree-loop-distribute-patterns to
> turn it off. There is another older bug about this for memcpy.
Well, I would expect
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102704
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102725
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #2)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> > You need -fno-tree-loop-distribution -fno-tree-loop-distribute-patterns to
> > turn it off. There is another olde
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102704
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102721
--- Comment #4 from qingzhe huang ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> Note it is not array related either:
> template<>
> void A::foo(const decltype(+[]{}))
> {}
Yes, it is not array-related. But it is definitely member function i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100912
--- Comment #6 from Qiu Chaofan ---
By changing the order of linked objects (move .libs/compatibility-ldbl.o
.libs/compatibility-ldbl-alt128.o .libs/compatibility-ldbl-alt128-cxx11.o after
the series of convenience archives), the result under `-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86286
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I don't know how common it is, but a realistic example is std::unique_ptr
where the deleter D::operator() is not inline (so the compiler can't see
whether it throws) and is not noexcept (maybe it throws in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100912
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102703
--- Comment #6 from Aldy Hernandez ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> There is a missed optimization at the gimple level for sure.
>
>
> if (d_11 > 1)
> goto ; [59.00%]
> else
> goto ; [41.00%]
>
>[local count:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102714
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:23cd18c60c8188e3d68eda721cdb739199e85e5b
commit r12-4366-g23cd18c60c8188e3d68eda721cdb739199e85e5b
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102714
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12 Regression] A|[11 Regression] A
|v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102703
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
Because:
if (d_11 > 1)
goto ; [59.00%]
else
goto ; [41.00%]
[local count: 391808389]:
[local count: 955630225]:
# iftmp.1_6 = PHI <0(3), 2(4)>
If the phi node was removed, the original
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102703
--- Comment #8 from Aldy Hernandez ---
On Wed, Oct 13, 2021, 11:37 pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org <
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102703
>
> --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
> Because:
> if
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100509
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:379382c438652b594f0e91a61dbfce05eab080bd
commit r9-9768-g379382c438652b594f0e91a61dbfce05eab080bd
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100934
--- Comment #15 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e89b09601907f3f3ba6c988ebef7b978af40b83a
commit r9-9769-ge89b09601907f3f3ba6c988ebef7b978af40b83a
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101105
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:641bea75ab2b3567dfa66370dea8b810b504d3cc
commit r9-9770-g641bea75ab2b3567dfa66370dea8b810b504d3cc
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101394
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a091e66e510804a29ba2a685b027f5d15aa69f1b
commit r9-9771-ga091e66e510804a29ba2a685b027f5d15aa69f1b
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101280
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5d2771db571323bc7ea25c61b5ed9e5309950f18
commit r9-9772-g5d2771db571323bc7ea25c61b5ed9e5309950f18
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101173
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5d2771db571323bc7ea25c61b5ed9e5309950f18
commit r9-9772-g5d2771db571323bc7ea25c61b5ed9e5309950f18
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101173
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101394
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100509
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100934
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101001
Bug 101001 depends on bug 100934, which changed state.
Bug 100934 Summary: [9 Regression] wrong code at -O3 during unrolling since
r9-6299
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100934
What|Removed |Adde
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101105
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102720
Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||stefansf at linux dot ibm.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93934
--- Comment #9 from Zoltan Vajda ---
As I understand it, it is acknowledged, that this is a bug. However, the issue
is in state NEW for a quite long time. The issue is still present in GCC 11.2.
Do you see any chances for some progress in this ca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98478
--- Comment #4 from Hongtao.liu ---
Arm implemented vector boolean mode in
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-October/581534.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102714
--- Comment #5 from Bo Duan ---
The patch works. Thanks you.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93934
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||uros at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101824
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a68a1e06f2eea2f510649aa9bbb17303ef1efb9c
commit r10-10205-ga68a1e06f2eea2f510649aa9bbb17303ef1efb9c
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101868
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:95a95ec274cd0ec125ce48ab002fad4e400e345b
commit r10-10206-g95a95ec274cd0ec125ce48ab002fad4e400e345b
Author: Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101373
--- Comment #18 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:95a95ec274cd0ec125ce48ab002fad4e400e345b
commit r10-10206-g95a95ec274cd0ec125ce48ab002fad4e400e345b
Author: Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101925
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:66615029ec831da23b481cd3a01e90cff02c6891
commit r10-10207-g66615029ec831da23b481cd3a01e90cff02c6891
Author: Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102046
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:967219bb3ef1869f6bd1c5efffea65544a310836
commit r10-10208-g967219bb3ef1869f6bd1c5efffea65544a310836
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101925
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||10.3.1
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102046
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||10.3.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102659
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3c0194d7ff21d61c02f3c6b111c83ef24a69e1f0
commit r12-4369-g3c0194d7ff21d61c02f3c6b111c83ef24a69e1f0
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102659
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102725
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
I think that 'strlen' is only used when it is explicitely declared. Hmm, maybe
I'm mistaken and it's 'implicit' already because it is standard.
So loop distribution could check for builtin_decl_declared_p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102726
Bug ID: 102726
Summary: Does not warn for enum constant in boolean context
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102727
Bug ID: 102727
Summary: Warning for guaranteed interoperable type kind
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102721
--- Comment #5 from qingzhe huang ---
(In reply to qingzhe huang from comment #4)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> > Note it is not array related either:
> > template<>
> > void A::foo(const decltype(+[]{}))
> > {}
>
> Yes, it is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102709
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12 Regression] ICE: in |[11/12 Regression] ICE: in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102711
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102715
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102711
--- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 13 Oct 2021, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102711
>
> Martin Liška changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102724
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93934
--- Comment #11 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Zoltan Vajda from comment #9)
> As I understand it, it is acknowledged, that this is a bug. However, the
> issue is in state NEW for a quite long time. The issue is still present in
> GCC 11.2. Do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102339
--- Comment #1 from Gaius Mulley ---
Confirmed as a bug and now fixed in the repository - many thanks for the
report.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102688
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e415bc4c035b1b655cf2cafcbe515382d1cefc93
commit r12-4370-ge415bc4c035b1b655cf2cafcbe515382d1cefc93
Author: Martin Liska
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102688
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90364
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:72e0c742bd01f8e7e6dcca64042b9ad7e75979de
commit r12-4372-g72e0c742bd01f8e7e6dcca64042b9ad7e75979de
Author: Martin Liska
Date: Thu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102340
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gaiusmod2 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93934
--- Comment #12 from Zoltan Vajda ---
Using -mfpmath=sse here does not help on a 32 bit platfrom.
https://gcc.godbolt.org/z/hs1Ef6aj4
At line 31 the assembly code performs the speculative load.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90364
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
Bug 26163 depends on bug 90364, which changed state.
Bug 90364 Summary: 521.wrf_r is 8-17% slower with PGO at -Ofast and native
march/mtune
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90364
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100187
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cb261f0e8fc08fb49f74002582ad5713cda684f7
commit r11-9145-gcb261f0e8fc08fb49f74002582ad5713cda684f7
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100237
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cb261f0e8fc08fb49f74002582ad5713cda684f7
commit r11-9145-gcb261f0e8fc08fb49f74002582ad5713cda684f7
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100249
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cb261f0e8fc08fb49f74002582ad5713cda684f7
commit r11-9145-gcb261f0e8fc08fb49f74002582ad5713cda684f7
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100287
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cb261f0e8fc08fb49f74002582ad5713cda684f7
commit r11-9145-gcb261f0e8fc08fb49f74002582ad5713cda684f7
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100237
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:139bafaaba0c775ca65712621bd60e079b488d73
commit r10-10210-g139bafaaba0c775ca65712621bd60e079b488d73
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100187
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:139bafaaba0c775ca65712621bd60e079b488d73
commit r10-10210-g139bafaaba0c775ca65712621bd60e079b488d73
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100249
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:139bafaaba0c775ca65712621bd60e079b488d73
commit r10-10210-g139bafaaba0c775ca65712621bd60e079b488d73
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100287
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:139bafaaba0c775ca65712621bd60e079b488d73
commit r10-10210-g139bafaaba0c775ca65712621bd60e079b488d73
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100187
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100237
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100287
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102728
Bug ID: 102728
Summary: requires statement fails to recognize lambda in
unevaluated context
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93934
--- Comment #13 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Zoltan Vajda from comment #12)
> Using -mfpmath=sse here does not help on a 32 bit platfrom.
> https://gcc.godbolt.org/z/hs1Ef6aj4
> At line 31 the assembly code performs the speculative load.
Ye
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102611
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 51595
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51595&action=edit
gcc12-P2128R6-WIP.patch
Untested WIP, just template handling hasn't been added yet, so it is useful
only witho
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102729
Bug ID: 102729
Summary: Assumed rank: ICE when passing noncontiguous to
CONTIGUOUS assume rank (assumed-rank loop handling)
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102720
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102720
--- Comment #6 from Christophe Lyon ---
On aarch64, this also causes gcc.dg/loop-unswitch-4.c to fail
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93934
--- Comment #14 from Alexander Monakov ---
Zoltan, excuse me, could you please clarify what specifically you are worried
about? Your bug title says "results in UB" and the opening comment said "the
behavior [..] is unpredictable", but as far as I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102726
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-10-13
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102730
Bug ID: 102730
Summary: Consistency of deprecation warning emission with type
alias
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90787
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4be4888d6bddbcc106efeb19e18c380e7c1d041a
commit r10-10214-g4be4888d6bddbcc106efeb19e18c380e7c1d041a
Author: Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100464
--- Comment #15 from Chengnian Sun ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #14)
> Yes. You'll get an error, like:
> error: t.c: ‘-fcompare-debug’ failure (length)
> or
> error: t.c: ‘-fcompare-debug’ failure
> Under the hood, the driver inv
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99580
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2021-03-14 00:00:00 |2021-10-13
Summary|False posit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102729
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||102641
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102731
Bug ID: 102731
Summary: inconsistent handling of dereferncing a null pointer
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102731
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||56456, 88443
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77608
Kees Cook changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kees at outflux dot net
--- Comment #5 from
1 - 100 of 146 matches
Mail list logo