https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102684
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Here is what optimized looks like on the trunk (after the main->f change):
[local count: 1073741824]:
_54 = operator new (16);
MEM [(char * {ref-all})_54] = 0xa000600040002;
[local co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102684
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-10-12
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102697
--- Comment #1 from Hongtao.liu ---
Change i to 0, still missing warning after vectorization
before vectorization
void max_B6_B4 (int i, struct B4_B6 * pb4_b6)
{
char * d;
char * q;
char * p;
[local count: 1073741824]:
[../test4.c:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102483
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:73c535a00bc4dfe9a939cd80facbe79a929cab3e
commit r12-4339-g73c535a00bc4dfe9a939cd80facbe79a929cab3e
Author: liuhongt
Date: Sat Oct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102628
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:342aedf0e5f324cc2fb026466a8cc5cc7f839183
commit r12-4341-g342aedf0e5f324cc2fb026466a8cc5cc7f839183
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102668
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:342aedf0e5f324cc2fb026466a8cc5cc7f839183
commit r12-4341-g342aedf0e5f324cc2fb026466a8cc5cc7f839183
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102668
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102628
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45471
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102700
Bug ID: 102700
Summary: [Diagnostics] uninitialized warning missing after O2
vectorization.
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102700
--- Comment #1 from Hongtao.liu ---
Maybe i should i -fno-tree-vectorize to this testcase.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102541
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:eb92cd57a1ebe7cd7589bdbec34d9ae337752ead
commit r12-4346-geb92cd57a1ebe7cd7589bdbec34d9ae337752ead
Author: Tobias Burnus
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102688
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80375
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.5 |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45683
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45683
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102698
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102701
Bug ID: 102701
Summary: CLASS (polymorphism) + symbol/expression attribute –
wrong attribute status (audit task)
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102541
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63426
Bug 63426 depends on bug 102541, which changed state.
Bug 102541 Summary: [12 Regression] runtime error: load of value 208393040,
which is not a valid value for type 'ar_type' since
r12-3897-g00f6de9c69119594f7dad3bd525937c94c8200d0
https://gcc.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102698
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Just one extra note:
!$omp atomic capture
x(idx(i), idy(i)) = ior(x(idx(i), idy(i)), fun(i))
o(idx(i), idy(i)) = x(idx(i), idy(i))
!$omp end atomic
is really (under the hood):
temp_expr =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102588
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a1a7d094307080c3d994209457f732005f59fa6a
commit r12-4348-ga1a7d094307080c3d994209457f732005f59fa6a
Author: Eric Botcazou
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102588
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1cedb519613006014eeb1a7464a5fbc3509a3a63
commit r11-9098-g1cedb519613006014eeb1a7464a5fbc3509a3a63
Author: Eric Botcazou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102588
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bde91c72cb2cc47cd169d2a59470177dd7a1d2b9
commit r10-10180-gbde91c72cb2cc47cd169d2a59470177dd7a1d2b9
Author: Eric Botcazou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102588
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54322
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
--- Comment #2 from Tobias
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102496
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102667
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2560bab6ceb7c1eb7c5cdadb5f0a608ac166b829
commit r11-9099-g2560bab6ceb7c1eb7c5cdadb5f0a608ac166b829
Author: Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102280
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:95d404d85c53e4ab821ac28cbbbedf0d68cac8da
commit r11-9102-g95d404d85c53e4ab821ac28cbbbedf0d68cac8da
Author: Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102270
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:63d91069ba8a9f1dc8bfa56ebfc10903a999f1cb
commit r11-9104-g63d91069ba8a9f1dc8bfa56ebfc10903a999f1cb
Author: Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102270
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9c2eea2841aa2ca165b9055763fffcee5008bf83
commit r11-9105-g9c2eea2841aa2ca165b9055763fffcee5008bf83
Author: Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102074
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:aeee9251c64fe59c3e548e843f08bbda302cb08b
commit r11-9106-gaeee9251c64fe59c3e548e843f08bbda302cb08b
Author: Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99876
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7df66a0c95a6b3678c73385969c1395a8aab2bd6
commit r11-9107-g7df66a0c95a6b3678c73385969c1395a8aab2bd6
Author: Jonathan Wakel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101761
--- Comment #16 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:90a4981e0951687056ec4735cfd3043b35a23502
commit r11-9109-g90a4981e0951687056ec4735cfd3043b35a23502
Author: Thomas Rodge
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102425
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:da206878f64ef66b1f7527c4d87e8baf9a5c5bfd
commit r11-9110-gda206878f64ef66b1f7527c4d87e8baf9a5c5bfd
Author: Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101923
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:73b0f810a17a5f529fc8342a2df31276d3538851
commit r11-9111-g73b0f810a17a5f529fc8342a2df31276d3538851
Author: Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101870
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:371e12a7fd0295251340eabae77dd060577054c3
commit r11-9113-g371e12a7fd0295251340eabae77dd060577054c3
Author: Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101960
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:00967465fe8093661a4d42356821eeb04170e09d
commit r11-9116-g00967465fe8093661a4d42356821eeb04170e09d
Author: Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102535
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7b4e6d75b18dbb52bf507dbfd4c8e694e476d2af
commit r11-9120-g7b4e6d75b18dbb52bf507dbfd4c8e694e476d2af
Author: Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101870
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102572
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
The to be vectorized IL is
[local count: 118111600]:
# i_21 = PHI
_2 = (int) i_21;
_32 = &(*d_16(D))[_2];
_3 = .MASK_LOAD (_32, 32B, h_15(D));
_5 = _3 != 0;
_23 = _5 & h_15(D);
prephitmp_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102698
--- Comment #4 from han.wu ---
Thank you very much for your prompt reply！
@Jakub Jelinek
One thing I don't quite understand is that if we modify the test case as
suggested as the extra note, then the value of temp_v may vary at each
execution, t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102698
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
!$omp atomic capture
v = x
x = ior(x, expr)
!$omp end atomic
etc. is conceptually similar to
!$omp atomic load
v = x
!$omp end atomic
!$omp atomic update
x = ior(x, expr)
!$omp end atomic
except that the cap
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102685
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Sum
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102572
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9f12a45ef147e563f099c24c293830727e8204cc
commit r12-4350-g9f12a45ef147e563f099c24c293830727e8204cc
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102686
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-10-12
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102696
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d1dcaa31453fa080a27938b064e53f02272d4aa1
commit r12-4351-gd1dcaa31453fa080a27938b064e53f02272d4aa1
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102572
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||12.0
Summary|[11/12 Regress
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102696
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102702
Bug ID: 102702
Summary: libiberty: heap/stack buffer overflow when decoding
user input
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102543
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
I would mostly expect less peeling for alignment being done (and thus slightly
smaller code size with the issue fixed).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102702
--- Comment #1 from Luís Ferreira ---
Submitted patch:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-September/579985.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101480
--- Comment #23 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The first thing a delete expression does is invoke the destructor, after that
there is no object anyway.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102649
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
All right, so being in the described situation I would recommend the following
steps:
1) please try bisecting GCC revisions and find the first on that fixed the
issue in between version 9.x and 10.x release.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101480
--- Comment #24 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #23)
> The first thing a delete expression does is invoke the destructor, after
> that there is no object anyway.
The situation where we avoid the escape only is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102535
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
Using built-in specs.
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 12.0.0 20211012 (experimental) (GCC)
Started with
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=2e96b5f14e4025691b57d2301d71aa6092ed44bc
(same as https://gcc.gnu.o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102704
Bug ID: 102704
Summary: NRVO for throw expression
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102691
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
Resol
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102283
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fchelnokov at gmail dot com
--- Comment
cfi_def_cfa_offset 8
ret
.cfi_endproc
gcc-trunk -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 12.0.0 20211012 (experimental) (GCC)
It started with
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102703
--- Comment #1 from Theodoros Theodoridis ---
(11.2.0 at -O3 can eliminate the call to foo but trunk at -O3 cannot)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102283
--- Comment #7 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to Fedor Chelnokov from comment #0 in PR102691)
> This code is valid:
> ```
> struct Foo {};
> struct Bar {};
>
> constexpr int Baz(const Foo&) { return 0; }
> constexpr int Baz(Bar&&) { return 1;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102703
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12 Regression] Dead Code |[12 Regression] Dead Code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102705
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102706
Bug ID: 102706
Summary: [12 regression] -O2 vectorization causes regression in
Warray-bounds-48.c on many targets
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102707
Bug ID: 102707
Summary: template coroutine generated code failed
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102707
--- Comment #1 from Net Can ---
the code is compiled success in msvc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102281
--- Comment #11 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8)
> Sure, you can, but just note that it is conservative and fast, it will
> return true even for types that don't have any padding.
> But for double, _
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102708
Bug ID: 102708
Summary: Improve ''array temporary was created for argument"
diagnostic
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102699
--- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to xin liu from comment #0)
>
> is it a bug or is there something wrong with my understanding?
I think you may be tripped up by "12.3.3.4 Stream access" where
one finds
P. 213
Whil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102281
--- Comment #12 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8)
> and if you have a variable that isn't addressable, you need to figure out
> what to do. I think it might be easiest not to clear anything, another
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102709
Bug ID: 102709
Summary: ICE: in build_function_type, at tree.c:7304
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102710
Bug ID: 102710
Summary: ICE: in build_function_type, at tree.c:7304
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102697
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[Diagnostics] overflow |[12 Regression] overflow
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102711
Bug ID: 102711
Summary: Infinite loop with extern calls removed with -O2 or
higher
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102181
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d9dfd7ad3e0196f60a3fc6df6d65a40fb905409f
commit r12-4355-gd9dfd7ad3e0196f60a3fc6df6d65a40fb905409f
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101960
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7481021364e75ba583972e15ed421a53988368ea
commit r12-4356-g7481021364e75ba583972e15ed421a53988368ea
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102710
康桓瑋 changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102709
--- Comment #1 from 康桓瑋 ---
*** Bug 102710 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102712
Bug ID: 102712
Summary: std::optional::operator* should assert on unset value
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102711
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.5
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102712
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102712
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
> Just compile with -D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS
Or the more heavyweight -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG which implies _GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102711
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102712
--- Comment #3 from Giuseppe Ottaviano ---
Oh well this is embarrassing, I was looking at _Optional_payload_base::_M_get()
instead of _Optional_base_impl::_M_get() .
Sorry for the noise and thanks for fixing this 4 years ago!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102181
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|SUSPENDED
Summary|std::adv
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102709
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99723
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|arm: ICE in |[11/12 Regression] arm: ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82524
--- Comment #21 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b37351e3279d192d5d4682f002abe5b2e133bba6
commit r12-4359-gb37351e3279d192d5d4682f002abe5b2e133bba6
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Tue O
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85730
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b37351e3279d192d5d4682f002abe5b2e133bba6
commit r12-4359-gb37351e3279d192d5d4682f002abe5b2e133bba6
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Tue O
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101960
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e748216c237cff2915390e9653de2db63b2161ac
commit r11-9121-ge748216c237cff2915390e9653de2db63b2161ac
Author: Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102667
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:be3fbe792444bc750a8a1b37481bac9a84528949
commit r10-10181-gbe3fbe792444bc750a8a1b37481bac9a84528949
Author: Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102280
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1a27df25a71bb0d6a5dfb0162d1867d308f8f33f
commit r10-10184-g1a27df25a71bb0d6a5dfb0162d1867d308f8f33f
Author: Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99876
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:154316697dbea9ba96bc14680b642b3ae35dadbd
commit r10-10186-g154316697dbea9ba96bc14680b642b3ae35dadbd
Author: Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102425
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:49f0936bdcdbad9903c3a1e9342205fd27cb8596
commit r10-10188-g49f0936bdcdbad9903c3a1e9342205fd27cb8596
Author: Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102280
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99876
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102425
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.5
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102706
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||crazylht at gmail dot com
Keyw
1 - 100 of 188 matches
Mail list logo
