https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100486
--- Comment #17 from Eric Botcazou ---
Thanks for the data point. We have a working 11.2 compiler on the same
platform configured with:
../src/configure --enable-languages=ada,c,c++ --enable-checking=release
--enable-threads=win32 --enable-lto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102622
--- Comment #20 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:882d806c1a8f9d2d2ade1133de88d63e5d4fe40c
commit r12-4276-g882d806c1a8f9d2d2ade1133de88d63e5d4fe40c
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102622
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma |
|il/gcc-patches/2021
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102622
--- Comment #22 from Andrew Pinski ---
Here is the simple patch which I will test for both GCC 10 and GCC 9.
The question becomes does it make sense to make the same change to GCC 11 even
if it cannot be hit.
diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssa-phiopt.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102441
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9583b26f3701ea0456405d84f9a898451a2f7452
commit r12-4277-g9583b26f3701ea0456405d84f9a898451a2f7452
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102441
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:309827c85f14011166178c6efcb721d87a4577bb
commit r11-9093-g309827c85f14011166178c6efcb721d87a4577bb
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61355
--- Comment #6 from Ivan Sorokin ---
(In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #5)
> Fixed for GCC 12.
Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102441
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10/11/12 Regression] |[10 Regression] Incorrect
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102677
Bug ID: 102677
Summary: Extra testsuite failures with glibc 2.34
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: testsui
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49745
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102676
--- Comment #2 from Gabriel Ravier ---
Well, I think the assumption LLVM is making is that the allocation, being
unused, can just be eliminated and considered to have always succeeded. I don't
see how that would contradict the standard, although
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102566
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #51559|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102669
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||crazylht at gmail dot com
Ever confirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102678
Bug ID: 102678
Summary: GCC fails to compile immediately invoked lambda inside
fold expression
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102678
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100035
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||michael.gerhold at web dot de
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100035
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92910
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92911
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
--- Comment #2 from Andr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100486
--- Comment #18 from Óscar Fuentes ---
Adding --enable-frame-pointer makes no difference. No change either adding
--enable-large-address-aware --with-fpmath=sse --disable-sjlj-exceptions
--enable-frame-pointer --disable-libada --enable-libstdcx
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100486
--- Comment #19 from Óscar Fuentes ---
When I say that --enable-frame-pointer makes no difference, I'm talking about
the build failure that prompted this bug report. The build still fails with
/C/_/mingw-w64-gcc/src/build-i686-w64-mingw32/./p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102679
Bug ID: 102679
Summary: Failure to optimize out 64-bit multiplication to
32-bit multiplication when possible in circumstances
involving modifying a 64-bit variable that gets
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102679
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102680
Bug ID: 102680
Summary: lambda-expression in template-argument plus templateed
using leads to further using-directive being ignored
within template scope
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102521
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:74ccca380cde5e79e082d39214b306a90ded0344
commit r12-4278-g74ccca380cde5e79e082d39214b306a90ded0344
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date: S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99348
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:74ccca380cde5e79e082d39214b306a90ded0344
commit r12-4278-g74ccca380cde5e79e082d39214b306a90ded0344
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date: Su
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99348
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot
gnu.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102679
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102680
--- Comment #1 from hq.ks at web dot de ---
https://www.overleaf.com/learn/latex/Matrices
On 10/10/2021 20.51, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102680
>
> Andrew Pinski changed:
>
> Wh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102680
--- Comment #2 from hq.ks at web dot de ---
Ooops, terribly sorry, wanted to send that to someone else.
On 10/10/2021 20.56, Philipp Klenze wrote:
> https://www.overleaf.com/learn/latex/Matrices
>
> On 10/10/2021 20.51, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65141
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67972
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zbeekman at gmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65144
Bug 65144 depends on bug 65141, which changed state.
Bug 65141 Summary: ISO_10646 constant parameters convert kind when used with
substring references
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65141
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88488
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102672
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-10-10
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102675
--- Comment #2 from Gerald Pfeifer ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1)
> That file is FreeBSD specific. Can you use a local patch to force
> /usr/include/md5.h, like
>
> #include_next
I tried replacing #include by #include_next ; that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102675
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Gerald Pfeifer from comment #2)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1)
> > That file is FreeBSD specific. Can you use a local patch to force
> > /usr/include/md5.h, like
> >
> > #include_next
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102675
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
Another possibility is to add a configure test to locate the system
and include it instead of .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102622
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47770
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51778
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46029
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88096
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86735
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thomas at monjalon dot net
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67795
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102543
--- Comment #7 from Hongtao.liu ---
SPEC2017 data on CLX seems to ok after changing unaligned sse store cost.
fprate:
503.bwaves_rBuildSame
507.cactuBSSN_r -0.22
508.namd_r -0.02
510.parest_r-0.28
511.povray_r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102671
--- Comment #1 from eggert at cs dot ucla.edu ---
Created attachment 51582
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51582&action=edit
2nd test case illustrating the bug
I'm attaching a second test case, also taken from GNU Emacs, ill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45223
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71793
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|http://stackoverflow.com/qu |
|estions/38235112
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102669
--- Comment #2 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1)
> It is likely caused by r12-4240.
Yes, add -fno-tree-vectorize to it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102681
Bug ID: 102681
Summary: AArch64 bootstrap failure
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102669
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102669
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6d97315a4e1acb992580e84065c66d09d1342a77
commit r12-4280-g6d97315a4e1acb992580e84065c66d09d1342a77
Author: liuhongt
Date: Mon Oct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102669
--- Comment #5 from Hongtao.liu ---
Fixed in GCC12.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100316
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Kito Cheng :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4e5bc4e4506a7ae7bb88fc925a425652a1da6b2d
commit r12-4281-g4e5bc4e4506a7ae7bb88fc925a425652a1da6b2d
Author: Kito Cheng
Date: Thu Oct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102483
--- Comment #4 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #3)
> Also for reduc_umin/umax/smin/smax_scal_v4qi.
After providing expanders for reduc_umin/umax/smin/smax_scal_v4qi, perfomance
for below functions are a little bit fa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100316
Kito Cheng changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kito at gcc dot gnu.org
Status
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102681
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102669
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
59 matches
Mail list logo
