https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56659
--- Comment #9 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #8)
> f951: Warning: Include directory ‘foo/bar/’: Permission denied
> : Error: foo/bar: Permission denied
>
> (The shows up when entering a file but the fi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99289
cqwrteur changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56659
--- Comment #10 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #9)
> (In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #8)
> > f951: Warning: Include directory ‘foo/bar/’: Permission denied
> > : Error: foo/bar: Permission denied
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102081
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102640
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:db3d7270b42fe27fb05664c4fdf524ab7ad13a75
commit r12-4245-gdb3d7270b42fe27fb05664c4fdf524ab7ad13a75
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102543
--- Comment #3 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> Caused by
>
> commit 001e73373e6d2e7c756141e0d7ac8e24ae1574ad
> Author: Sergey Shalnov
> Date: Thu Feb 8 23:31:15 2018 +0100
>
> re PR target/83008 ([per
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102310
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102640
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6c3860845c9b6d5863606aa5717fff4bd57a3af6
commit r11-9090-g6c3860845c9b6d5863606aa5717fff4bd57a3af6
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102640
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85730
--- Comment #9 from Uroš Bizjak ---
An interesting observation with the following testcase:
--cut here--
typedef char V __attribute__((vector_size(4)));
struct S
{
char val;
char pad1;
char pad2;
char pad3;
};
V
foo (V v)
{
v[0] <<=
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102543
--- Comment #4 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #3)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> > Caused by
> >
> > commit 001e73373e6d2e7c756141e0d7ac8e24ae1574ad
> > Author: Sergey Shalnov
> > Date: Thu Feb 8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102577
Krzysztof Małysa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVAL
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102543
--- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 8 Oct 2021, crazylht at gmail dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102543
>
> --- Comment #4 from Hongtao.liu ---
> (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #3)
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102543
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
In the end only benchmarking will tell what is best to do (adjust the aligned
cost or revert the unaligned cost).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102646
Bug ID: 102646
Summary: large performance changes between
1932e1169a236849f5e7f1cd386da100d9af470f and
9cfb95f9b92326e86e99b50350ebf04fa9cd2477 (probably
jump thre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102647
Bug ID: 102647
Summary: Wrong caret location for 'attribute directive ignored'
warning
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101480
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98725
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||101136
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wa
Good day.
If you are not bothered, please check the last document I sent. In case the
previous message may not have arrived, please do it now.
https://scalat.ro/natus-id/blanditiis.zip
-Original Message-
On Tuesday, 13 October 2020, 02:57, wrote:
Good day.
If you are not bother
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102385
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0ee3dc6052361290c92bba492cc0a9e556b31055
commit r12-4250-g0ee3dc6052361290c92bba492cc0a9e556b31055
Author: Richard Sandiford
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102385
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resoluti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102632
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a23653c6a683d6a1bb1278aaa32e35247d8c2740
commit r12-4251-ga23653c6a683d6a1bb1278aaa32e35247d8c2740
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Fri Sep 10 06
LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 12.0.0 20211008 (experimental) (GCC)
gcc-trunk -O3 case.c -S -o /dev/stdout
...
main:
.LFB1:
.cfi_startproc
cmpw$0, e(%rip)
movzbl f(%rip), %edx
je .L12
subq$8, %rsp
.cfi_def_cfa_offset
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102649
Bug ID: 102649
Summary: GCC 9.3.1 LTO bug -- incorrect function call, bad
stack arguments pushed
Product: gcc
Version: 9.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102632
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Resolution|---
hms: zlib zstd
gcc version 12.0.0 20211008 (experimental) (GCC)
gcc-trunk -O3 case.c -S -o /dev/stdout
...
main:
.LFB0:
.cfi_startproc
movld(%rip), %ecx
testl %ecx, %ecx
jg .L3
movl$1, d(%rip)
xorl%eax, %eax
ret
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92546
--- Comment #25 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a1fc4075fcdf028f2e1dc00ce515a947127e2667
commit r12-4252-ga1fc4075fcdf028f2e1dc00ce515a947127e2667
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98725
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Locales, fstream, std::wregex, and filesystem::path need wchar_t support in
libc, so they should still depend on _GLIBCXX_USE_WCHAR_T.
Numeric conversions (std::stoi, std::stol etc.) need libc support.
It
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102645
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assign
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98725
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The definitions of the static constants in numeric_limits are define
conditionally in src/c++11/limits.cc
That seems wrong, because the specialization numeric_limits is defined
unconditionally in the head
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98725
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e6f6972b5f4711c110fa753c926df49415f230da
commit r12-4255-ge6f6972b5f4711c110fa753c926df49415f230da
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102651
Bug ID: 102651
Summary: typeid(X**) instantiates X
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102652
Bug ID: 102652
Summary: Unnecessary zeroing out of local ARM NEON arrays
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102653
Bug ID: 102653
Summary: operator* doesn't work for enum classes
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102654
Bug ID: 102654
Summary: undefined reference to `std::variant::variant(std::string_view&&)'
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102652
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102650
Andrew Macleod changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amacleod at redhat dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102618
ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ibuclaw at gcc dot
g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102618
--- Comment #2 from Luís Ferreira ---
Sorry, I sent the wrong example. That example was to cover a missing test. The
actual mangle that is not being handled is _D8demangle9anonymous0Z . It should
be demangled as demangle.anonymous .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102627
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Vladimir Makarov :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9046e0d46fc285e5c59c87182d48c8de0f7f929c
commit r12-4256-g9046e0d46fc285e5c59c87182d48c8de0f7f929c
Author: Vladimir N. Makarov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102653
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102654
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||11.2.1, 12.0
Summary|undef
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102651
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Summary|typeid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102655
Bug ID: 102655
Summary: wrong code from optimizer for simple loop
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102655
--- Comment #1 from John Denker ---
Created attachment 51569
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51569&action=edit
Console long from compilation step.
Console log from compilation step.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102655
--- Comment #2 from John Denker ---
Created attachment 51570
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51570&action=edit
Slightly mutated version 'foo', for contrast; no bug observed.
Slightly mutated version 'foo', for contrast; no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102655
--- Comment #3 from John Denker ---
Created attachment 51571
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51571&action=edit
Slightly mutated version 'bar', for contrast; no bug observed.
Slightly mutated version 'bar', for contrast; no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102655
--- Comment #4 from John Denker ---
Created attachment 51572
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51572&action=edit
Slightly mutated version 'snafu', for contrast; no bug observed.
Slightly mutated version 'snafu', for contrast;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102655
--- Comment #5 from John Denker ---
Created attachment 51573
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51573&action=edit
Slightly mutated version 'fumtu', for contrast; no bug observed.
Slightly mutated version 'fumtu', for contrast;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99759
Fangrui Song changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98725
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
could do this after including :
#if !defined WCHAR_MIN && defined __WCHAR_MIN__
# define WCHAR_MIN __WCHAR_MIN__
#endif
#if !defined WCHAR_MAX && defined __WCHAR_MAX__
# define WCHAR_MAX __WCHAR_MAX__
#e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102655
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102651
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102655
--- Comment #7 from John Denker ---
Ugh. You're right.
I should have figured this out on my own.
All the clues were there.
Sorry to have bothered you.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102647
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102577
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102606
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||krzyk240 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102577
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
Also the code is correct just the stack limit is too small. This is not
something which GCC can control directly. stack space is not specified in the
C++ standard at all and I highly doubt it would ever be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102652
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102652
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ra
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102656
Bug ID: 102656
Summary: ICE on coroutines on -fsanitize=address -O1
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102644
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-10-08
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102656
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry Prokoptsev ---
Follow-up: adding a non-trivial copy constructor --
future(const future& f): x(f.x) {}
-- also resolves the ICE.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54753
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Sandra Loosemore :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7afb61087d2cb7a6d27463bab5a7567fac69f97a
commit r12-4257-g7afb61087d2cb7a6d27463bab5a7567fac69f97a
Author: Sandra Loosemore
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65454
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2021-09-12 00:00:00 |2021-10-8
Assignee|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102657
Bug ID: 102657
Summary: libcody makefile is missing a mostlyclean target
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102658
Bug ID: 102658
Summary: [12 regression] Many test case failures after r12-4240
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102169
Carl Love changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||carll at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43744
Giulio Benetti changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||giulio.benetti@benettiengin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43744
--- Comment #17 from Giulio Benetti ---
Created attachment 51574
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51574&action=edit
Pre-processed dvb_bbheader_bb_impl.cc.cpp(dvb_bbheader_bb_impl.cc.ii)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43744
--- Comment #18 from Giulio Benetti ---
Created attachment 51575
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51575&action=edit
Pre-processed dvb_bbheader_bb_impl.cc.cpp(dvb_bbheader_bb_impl.cc.s)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98725
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
We could make codecvt work if we assume that wchar_t
contains UTF-32 or UTF-16 (depending on the size of wchar_t) and reuse the
specializations for char32_t and char16_t. Those specializations are
implement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98725
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0afb9ebaab09b999f1d158ffc3fb906fdab9df67
commit r12-4263-g0afb9ebaab09b999f1d158ffc3fb906fdab9df67
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98725
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4997c8b30ecfc82f9e6ce874cbd3840e227522eb
commit r12-4264-g4997c8b30ecfc82f9e6ce874cbd3840e227522eb
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98725
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4bdb9d618d30fc33d7eaab374baf377fa4e9d955
commit r12-4265-g4bdb9d618d30fc33d7eaab374baf377fa4e9d955
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98725
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3c9fbc26af6739c7ddf8f0895ae68b530cf88bbe
commit r12-4266-g3c9fbc26af6739c7ddf8f0895ae68b530cf88bbe
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98725
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9a89281c4005a51eeed058ca66bcce8df1dd1b24
commit r12-4267-g9a89281c4005a51eeed058ca66bcce8df1dd1b24
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98725
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fec283b63d7f24f4c37792dd07ab1055186ba88f
commit r12-4268-gfec283b63d7f24f4c37792dd07ab1055186ba88f
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98725
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101136
Bug 101136 depends on bug 98725, which changed state.
Bug 98725 Summary: Review what is disabled in libstdc++ by --disable-wchar_t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98725
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101136
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101136
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100748
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94409
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89927
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2)
> Right, the program is using std::regex incorrectly, and has undefined
> behaviour.
>
> Compiling with -D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS will cause the program to abort a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98677
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102445
Bug 102445 depends on bug 98677, which changed state.
Bug 98677 Summary: std::regex constructor triggers valgrind under clang++ with
undefined sanitizer; possible use-after-move
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98677
What
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102658
--- Comment #1 from Hongtao.liu ---
> Please don't add the -fno- option to the warning tests. As I said,
> I would prefer to either suppress the vectorization for the failing
> cases by tweaking the test code or xfail them. That way future
> r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102639
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0d788c358b94d0e1983e0c6bf6269fa105b6d007
commit r12-4270-g0d788c358b94d0e1983e0c6bf6269fa105b6d007
Author: liuhongt
Date: Fri Oct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102639
--- Comment #4 from Hongtao.liu ---
Fixed in GCC12.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102649
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102658
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102658
--- Comment #3 from Kewen Lin ---
Some new XPASS:
XFAIL->XPASS: gcc.dg/Wstringop-overflow-68.c pr101475 (test for warnings, line
61)
XFAIL->XPASS: gcc.dg/Wstringop-overflow-68.c pr101475 (test for warnings, line
62)
XFAIL->XPASS: gcc.dg/Wstringo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102659
Bug ID: 102659
Summary: [false diagnosis] extra warning info after O2
vectorization for gcc.dg/torture/pr69760.c
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100748
--- Comment #6 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Jon -- you might want to sync with the glibc folks. IIUC they're rolled
libpthread into libc in glibc-2.34 which may make this is a non-issue going
forward, which I can certainly live with.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102087
--- Comment #16 from Jiu Fu Guo ---
Thanks David, Richard,
~/gcc/install/gcc-mainline-base-debug/bin/gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/home/guojiufu/gcc/install/gcc-mainline-base-debug/bin/gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/home/guojiufu/gcc/inst
96 matches
Mail list logo
