https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79201
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91103
--- Comment #9 from Peter Cordes ---
Thanks for implementing my idea :)
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #6)
> For elements located above 128bits, it seems always better(?) to use
> valign{d,q}
TL:DR:
I think we should still use vextracti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89954
--- Comment #5 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #4)
> It looks like there's splitter in aarch64 which combines
> load+xor+zero_extend to zero_extend(mem) + xor, x86 doesn't have. The simple
> way is to add corresponding
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54400
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97958
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98063
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98100
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98205
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99613
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99650
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99181
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89954
--- Comment #6 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #5)
> (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #4)
> > It looks like there's splitter in aarch64 which combines
> > load+xor+zero_extend to zero_extend(mem) + xor, x86 doesn't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99588
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99388
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99136
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92992
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99745
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100114
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100255
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97163
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97663
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100096
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100441
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82959
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94479
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93235
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98847
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100230
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86877
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97294
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33661
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98952
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98319
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45548
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102288
Bug ID: 102288
Summary: using .field = ({ static struct a a = {... }; &a; })
requires following field to be initialized
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102154
--- Comment #28 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #27)
> (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #22)
> > > Btw, I think this is a subreg that would be reasonable to handle.
> > > It's exactly the kind that x86 woul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102289
Bug ID: 102289
Summary: Concept declaration with multiple template-heads not
diagnosed
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102290
Bug ID: 102290
Summary: ICE with -gsplit-dwarf
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
Assigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102291
Bug ID: 102291
Summary: dubious overflow warning
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85915
--- Comment #16 from Luke Dashjr ---
GCC only supports defaults now?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102289
康桓瑋 changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hewillk at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from 康桓瑋
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102292
Bug ID: 102292
Summary: R_ARM_THM_JUMP24 incorrect link result if symbol
duplicated
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102292
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Are you sure this is not a linker issue?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85130
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot
gnu.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102290
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99090
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kilobyte at angband dot pl
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101327
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0d09acc0d627dcc7b3d82d873ee9da2f7546414e
commit r11-8979-g0d09acc0d627dcc7b3d82d873ee9da2f7546414e
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98490
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7ca5bcb0f12380a399c6f88f82fa01b530eb85e5
commit r11-8980-g7ca5bcb0f12380a399c6f88f82fa01b530eb85e5
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102291
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|dubious overflow warning|[9/10/11/12 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102291
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102291
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67972
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||11.2.1, 12.0
Known to fa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77565
--- Comment #4 from Michel Morin ---
It seems that the reason is:
`cp_keyword_starts_decl_specifier_p` in `cp/parser.c` does not include
`RID_TYPENAME`.
Note that `typedef` is a decl-specifier ([dcl.spec] p.1 in the Standard).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101994
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Ian Lance Taylor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:79513dc0b2d980bfd1b109d0d502de487c02b894
commit r12-3462-g79513dc0b2d980bfd1b109d0d502de487c02b894
Author: Ian Lance Taylor
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101994
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57125
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65794
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31035
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58090
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58110
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31179
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102285
--- Comment #5 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org ---
with the latest GCC, for all the 42647 c files under gcc/testsuite, with -c -g
-O2 -Wall -ftrivial-auto-var-init=zero, there is only one failure:
/home/opc/Install/latest/bin/gcc -c -g -ftrivial
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46763
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
--- Comment #4 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47397
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||6.4.0, 7.1.0, 7.5.0
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47397
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.5
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51232
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
> gcc_cv_initfini_array
Is set to yes always on Linux targets after r12-1328.
66 matches
Mail list logo