https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63377
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2014-10-05 00:00:00 |2021-8-13
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51545
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65406
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67746
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67746
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68257
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
There does seems some inconsitency though:
inline namespace n __attribute__((__abi_tag__(""))) {}
is rejected but
inline namespace n __attribute__((__abi_tag__())) {}
Is not.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101896
Bug ID: 101896
Summary: [12 Regression] ICE in expand_vec_perm_broadcast_1, at
config/i386/i386-expand.c:20481 since
r12-2837-g50b5877925ef5ae8
Product: gcc
Vers
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101896
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70551
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Hmm, on the trunk C++11 and C++14 still do the instantiation but C++17 and
C++20 do not. Was there a change in the C++ standard around this area, maybe a
defect report?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70551
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> Hmm, on the trunk C++11 and C++14 still do the instantiation but C++17 and
> C++20 do not. Was there a change in the C++ standard around this area,
> maybe a def
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101897
Bug ID: 101897
Summary: ICE Segmentation fault since
r12-2429-g62acc72a957b5614
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101897
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Summary|ICE Segmentation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70495
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
Seems fixed in GCC 7+. I cannot figure out what patch would have changed this
though.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101886
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Summary|[11/12
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101889
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101890
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70495
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70392
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Resol
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639
Bug 24639 depends on bug 70392, which changed state.
Bug 70392 Summary: [openacc] inconsistent line numbers in uninitialised
warnings for if clause
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70392
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71968
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||7.1.0, 8.5.0
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101896
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95589
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-08-13
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71968
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86177
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86172
--- Comment #7 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #6)
> Thanks for the information Eric.
>
> Will it help if the option is split into -Wnull-dereference and
> -Wmaybe-null-dereference (as suggested before)?
This
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92359
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
>but not with msvc.
Are you sure?
>The result is that function static variables get instantiated more than 1
>times.
That should not matter in even in shared libraries unless you are doing some
symbol hidd
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91075
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||10.1.0
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101261
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95686
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68709
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63707
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||richard-gccbugzilla@metafoo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101261
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #4 from Martin Lišk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77302
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Seems to work in GCC 8+.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79877
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81876
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||s-beyer at gmx dot net
--- Comment #9 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81139
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Is this true?
With the following updated C++20 testcase, clang, GCC and MSVC all cause the
static_assert to pass:
#include
template concept C = true;
C auto f(C auto) { return 0; }
void g() {
auto x =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101261
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
Reduced test-case:
$ cat iop_profile.i
void
__attribute__((target_clones("default", "avx2")))
dt_ioppr_transform_image_colorspace()
{
dt_ioppr_transform_image_colorspace();
}
$ gcc iop_profile.i -fno-sema
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101131
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Cleaned up test-case:
$ cat pr101131.c
int extern_declared_variable;
int static_function();
int global_defined_function() { static_function(); }
int
__attribute__((ifunc("resolver"))) static_function() {
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101103
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|marxin at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100909
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101147
Yang Wang changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83434
Yang Wang changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||njuwy at smail dot nju.edu.cn
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101191
Yang Wang changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85225
Yang Wang changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||njuwy at smail dot nju.edu.cn
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100888
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Keywords|ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92359
--- Comment #4 from Bence Szabó ---
>That should not matter in even in shared libraries unless you are doing some
>symbol hidding in the shared library really.
Hmm. I just run the attached example on linux (after some tuning) with -fPIC,
and i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100643
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
@Jason: Can you please take a look?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101556
Yang Wang changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101191
--- Comment #2 from Yang Wang ---
*** Bug 101556 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101623
Yang Wang changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101192
--- Comment #2 from Yang Wang ---
*** Bug 101623 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81334
Максим Прохоренко changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||maxim.prohorenko at gmail dot
com
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101898
Bug ID: 101898
Summary: [concepts] ICE with auto in concept definition
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101899
Bug ID: 101899
Summary: [OpenMP] Wrong results with !$omp taskloop – but only
in Fortran version
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: openm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101880
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101900
Bug ID: 101900
Summary: -mtune-ctrl=use_vector_fp_converts,use_vector_converts
doesn't work with AVX
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101900
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 51301
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51301&action=edit
A patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101261
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fa28520fadb9405f4387ceb419b0b7fc3ba0a61f
commit r12-2900-gfa28520fadb9405f4387ceb419b0b7fc3ba0a61f
Author: Martin Liska
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101261
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||12.0
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100788
--- Comment #15 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Martin Liska
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5f00ef3bc724e22628fdfd81855013115d115ebe
commit r11-8863-g5f00ef3bc724e22628fdfd81855013115d115ebe
Author: Martin Liska
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100788
--- Comment #16 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Martin Liska
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ff3978f5ea2672b208830a97d276cc1c856f6231
commit r10-10035-gff3978f5ea2672b208830a97d276cc1c856f6231
Author: Martin Liska
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100788
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101354
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4998404915bba9cb04c438a926cdf7126782a767
commit r12-2901-g4998404915bba9cb04c438a926cdf7126782a767
Author: Martin Liska
Date: Thu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101726
--- Comment #7 from Stefan Kneifel ---
OK works for me, thank you!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100413
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mjambor at suse dot cz
Assigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101056
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90589
--- Comment #18 from Mathieu Desnoyers
---
Created attachment 51302
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51302&action=edit
Interceptor library working-around glibc's intl issues for malloc interceptors
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101901
Bug ID: 101901
Summary: "warning: statement has no effect" in a variadic
template with empty parameter pack.
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51545
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||11.2.0, 12.0, 4.1.0
Last reconfirmed|20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100393
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
> Now, there's the possibility of doing a quick guess before doing this
> loop, once via using (end - start) and once via using 2 * (end - start).
> Only if the first can be handled and the second not we have
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100393
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4)
> I guess that's already done, so it has to be fixed in other ways, like by
> keeping the partial sum when decreasing the size in
I can confirm the decreasing wor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97657
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101902
Bug ID: 101902
Summary: [12 regression] g++.dg/warn/uninit-1.C has excess
errors after r12-2898
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101391
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gaiusmod2 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101259
--- Comment #3 from Gaius Mulley ---
"doko at debian dot org" writes:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101259
>
> Matthias Klose changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
> -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101259
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101898
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-08-13
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101734
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fb85d6eb6c392e829d1ee5b8a2e2b81c53c9840f
commit r12-2903-gfb85d6eb6c392e829d1ee5b8a2e2b81c53c9840f
Author: Martin Sebor
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101734
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639
Bug 24639 depends on bug 101734, which changed state.
Bug 101734 Summary: missing warning reading from a write-only object
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101734
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101899
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus ---
>From the gimple dump:
#pragma omp taskloop firstprivate(D.3968) private(i) firstprivate(offset.2) \
firstprivate(stride.1) firstprivate(a.0)
and omplower shows:
.omp_data_o.8.a.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95389
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67693
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||7.5.0
Resolution|DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67693
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94679
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
I suspect -fkeep-inline-functions is not really usable any more with C++ code
like this.
To make sure fooable constraint is valid, we need to instantiate
"IMove::operator()" which we don't know if it is going
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101897
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101817
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101764
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-08-13
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101686
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-08-13
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101620
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101524
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-08-13
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101903
Bug ID: 101903
Summary: [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE with invalid constexpr
constructor in template class
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keyword
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53286
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101904
Bug ID: 101904
Summary: Wrong result of decltype during instantiation of
std::result_of
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90443
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-08-13
Summary|-flto=n on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46322
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-08-13
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47018
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work|4.7.1 |
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60900
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to fail|4.10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51518
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59927
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zsojka at seznam dot cz
--- Comment #13
1 - 100 of 140 matches
Mail list logo
