https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100486
--- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou ---
> make BOOT_CFLAGS='-O1' V=1 all
>
> make BOOT_CFLAGS='-O0' V=1
>
> both fails the same way as the initial report.
That's not what I was asking for though, BOOT_CFLAGS should generally not be
fiddled with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70417
Anthony Sharp changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anthonysharp15 at gmail dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101313
Bug ID: 101313
Summary: [12 regression] ICE: tree check: expected class
‘type’, have ‘exceptional’ (error_mark) in
count_type_elements, at expr.c:6273
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101314
Bug ID: 101314
Summary: [12 Regression] ICE: in expand_call, at calls.c:4986
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101315
Bug ID: 101315
Summary: C++20 lambdas in unevaluated context: erroneously
fails with "incomplete type"
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100486
--- Comment #9 from ofv at wanadoo dot es ---
With those variables unset the build fails the same.
Other users reported that only DWARF crashes. If the build is configured for
SJLJ or SEH exception models, it completes.
A user speculated that t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101316
Bug ID: 101316
Summary: [[maybe_unused]] to the right of array size accepted
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97077
magiblot at hotmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||magiblot at hotmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100486
--- Comment #10 from ofv at wanadoo dot es ---
Setting CFLAGS/CXXFLAGS/BOOT_CFLAGS to -dwarf-4 has no effect: the build fails
the same.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57840
--- Comment #9 from Christopher Yeleighton ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #8)
> Already fixed in r12-1964
>
> You know doxygen output isn't the only way to look at the code, right?
I thought merged commits refresh the published d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100227
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100486
--- Comment #11 from Eric Botcazou ---
> Other users reported that only DWARF crashes. If the build is configured for
> SJLJ or SEH exception models, it completes.
>
> A user speculated that the problem might be related to Gcc 11 using DWARF 5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101301
--- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Looking at -fdump-tree-all-all, things are fine with "foo" until the
switchlower pass. Before that all nine switch cases and the default
case all had probability 0.10; after the switch conversion there
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101317
Bug ID: 101317
Summary: Bind(C): improve error checking in CFI_* functions
declared in ISO_Fortran_binding.h
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101314
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||error-recovery,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101313
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12 regression] ICE: tree |ICE: tree check: expected
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101314
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100536
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anbu1024.me at gmail dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100486
--- Comment #12 from ofv at wanadoo dot es ---
I don't see other failure messages on the previous dozens of lines but, if they
exist, they are not deemed serious enough to stop the build by the build
system.
BTW, we successfully built gcc-11-dwa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101039
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101287
--- Comment #3 from Eligor Kadaf ---
I had found this example during the investigation of one another exmaple from
real life, which was the bug in clang, and as fas as it is marked as error in
standard I had decided it must be compile time error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101287
Eligor Kadaf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101318
Bug ID: 101318
Summary: Comparison operator
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
Assign
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101318
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Comparison operator |[10 only] Comparison
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100269
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d07092a61d5a6907b2d92563e810bf5bb8e61c01
commit r12-1999-gd07092a61d5a6907b2d92563e810bf5bb8e61c01
Author: Iain Sandoe
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101319
Bug ID: 101319
Summary: Missing diagnostic for argument with type parameters
for assumed-type dummy
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101288
--- Comment #1 from Eligor Kadaf ---
Compiler shall provide diagnostics in the current example according to
https://eel.is/c++draft/basic.def.odr#15
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
Larkin Nickle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||me at larbob dot org
--- Comment #229 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100900
Dmitry V. Levin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ldv at sourceware dot org
--- Comment
gml4gtk graph viewer on sourceforge with the GNU GCC graph data
git describe
basepoints/gcc-12-1999-gd07092a61d5
gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 12.0.0 20210704 (experimental)
Copyright (C) 2021 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101320
Bug ID: 101320
Summary: Bind(C): Missing diagnostic for constraint C1557 on
allocatable/pointer arguments
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101301
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig ---
If I create a foo3 function with
int foo3 (int n)
{
if (__builtin_expect_with_probability (n >= 5, 1, 0.55))
{
if (__builtin_expect_with_probability (n >= 7, 1, 0.33/0.55))
{
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101298
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.2
Summary|Inclusion of a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101299
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|9.0 |12.0
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101311
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
float func(float a)
{
union { float f; unsigned u; } u;
u.f = a;
u.u ^= 0x8000;
return u.f;
}
is the example w/o TBAA issue and down to the point WRT refusing negate via
XOR.
movd%
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101299
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ccb4e0774b3e5859ea1d7f1864b02fa5826c4a79
commit r12-2002-gccb4e0774b3e5859ea1d7f1864b02fa5826c4a79
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101299
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
37 matches
Mail list logo
