[Bug other/100174] Binary floating-point conversion under source-gcc/gcc/real.[c\h] test on x86-64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100174 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-04-21 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c/100150] ice in bp_unpack_string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100150 David Binderman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/100130] R section flag handling doesn't cope with intervening decls

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100130 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b67778b59932fdc64dc89a97550349e973ca0352 commit r12-17-gb67778b59932fdc64dc89a97550349e973ca0352 Author: Richard Sandiford Dat

[Bug middle-end/100130] R section flag handling doesn't cope with intervening decls

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100130 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Version|

[Bug tree-optimization/100171] autovectorizer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100171 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Compared to the non-self case where we see [local count: 357878152]: _19 = MEM [(const value_type &)arg1_3(D)][0]; _20 = MEM [(const value_type &)arg2_4(D)][0]; _21 = _19 + _20; _26 = MEM [(c

[Bug tree-optimization/100162] missed optimization for dead code elimination at -O3 (vs. -O2)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100162 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unknown |12.0 CC|

[Bug libstdc++/96416] to_address() is broken by static_assert in pointer_traits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96416 --- Comment #18 from Giuseppe D'Angelo --- Hello, (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #17) > (In reply to Giuseppe D'Angelo from comment #14) > > To summarize: > > > > * should a wording defect be raised against std::to_address(Ptr), to s

[Bug fortran/100154] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_procedure_call, at fortran/trans-expr.c:6131

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100154 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug target/100152] Possible 10.3 bad code generation regression from 10.2/9.3 on Mac OS 10.15.7 (Catalina)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152 --- Comment #15 from Iain Sandoe --- I have to try and figure out a way to be able to reproduce the run-time error. Yes, the assembler output is different between 10.2 and 10.3 - but that insn is not apparently in error (and I checked that the

[Bug target/94680] Missed optimization with __builtin_shuffle and zero vector

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94680 --- Comment #4 from Hongtao.liu --- Let me do this.

[Bug libstdc++/100164] [11/12 Regression] semaphore_impl not declared on AIX

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100164 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2d4c3af94f84c874cfddc753dc0f34ebf7fc11d9 commit r12-22-g2d4c3af94f84c874cfddc753dc0f34ebf7fc11d9 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: We

[Bug libstdc++/100164] [11/12 Regression] semaphore_impl not declared on AIX

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100164 --- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5) > The changelog said you want to use __thread_yield(); there instead... Yes, that was fixed in r11-7293 (the patch attached in comment 3 was r11-7248).

[Bug libstdc++/100164] [11/12 Regression] semaphore_impl not declared on AIX

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100164 --- Comment #13 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0857fc3820bee04771f60a86b9dd5627b3ea1904 commit r11-8270-g0857fc3820bee04771f60a86b9dd5627b3ea1904 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug ada/99360] [11/12 regression] ICE in generalized iteration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99360 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:53e85b38aaa10f5f8fe35eeea454a92c293cbc67 commit r11-8271-g53e85b38aaa10f5f8fe35eeea454a92c293cbc67 Author: Eric Botcazou D

[Bug ada/99360] [12 regression] ICE in generalized iteration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99360 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|ebotcazou at gcc

[Bug other/100175] New: ICE in cp_parser_lookup_name, at cp/parser.c:28265

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100175 Bug ID: 100175 Summary: ICE in cp_parser_lookup_name, at cp/parser.c:28265 Product: gcc Version: 10.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compon

[Bug ipa/98815] Redundant free_dominance_info in cgraph_node::analyze()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98815 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:021607e12cb9c40d0859b78490f44bb3f7da5812 commit r12-23-g021607e12cb9c40d0859b78490f44bb3f7da5812 Author: Martin Liska Date: Tue Ja

[Bug ipa/98815] Redundant free_dominance_info in cgraph_node::analyze()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98815 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/100176] New: gcc.dg/compat/struct-layout-1_generate.c contains errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100176 Bug ID: 100176 Summary: gcc.dg/compat/struct-layout-1_generate.c contains errors Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug testsuite/100176] gcc.dg/compat/struct-layout-1_generate.c contains errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100176 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug fortran/100136] [11/12 Regression] ICE, regression, using flag -fcheck=pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100136 --- Comment #3 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Only handles the ICE... Patch posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-April/055949.html

[Bug rtl-optimization/100148] [10/11/12 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure (length) with -O2 -fno-dce -fno-tree-dce -fno-tree-dominator-opts -fno-tree-sink

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100148 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:022f6ee3ad67ee30f62c8c2aeeb4156494f3284e commit r12-24-g022f6ee3ad67ee30f62c8c2aeeb4156494f3284e Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Wed

[Bug rtl-optimization/100148] [10/11/12 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure (length) with -O2 -fno-dce -fno-tree-dce -fno-tree-dominator-opts -fno-tree-sink

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100148 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:63353b2aebd2cf171ee8aa747b2dc84f5534de6b commit r10-9741-g63353b2aebd2cf171ee8aa747b2dc84f5534de6b Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug rtl-optimization/100148] [11 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure (length) with -O2 -fno-dce -fno-tree-dce -fno-tree-dominator-opts -fno-tree-sink

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100148 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[10/11/12 Regression] |[11 Regression] |-fco

[Bug testsuite/100176] gcc.dg/compat/struct-layout-1_generate.c contains errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100176 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d8f953819e8f72e646f22c7803d79bd2b56d1e30 commit r12-25-gd8f953819e8f72e646f22c7803d79bd2b56d1e30 Author: Richard Biener Date: W

[Bug testsuite/100176] gcc.dg/compat/struct-layout-1_generate.c contains errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100176 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:89ddb58cda7b4a54626170f9491fc2a0f82d85f5 commit r11-8272-g89ddb58cda7b4a54626170f9491fc2a0f82d85f5 Author: Richard Biener

[Bug testsuite/100176] gcc.dg/compat/struct-layout-1_generate.c contains errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100176 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:525c2634c1f945072eaa14b6d264b1904b6f81ea commit r10-9742-g525c2634c1f945072eaa14b6d264b1904b6f81ea Author: Richard Biener

[Bug testsuite/100176] gcc.dg/compat/struct-layout-1_generate.c contains errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100176 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:56e4a73c7fbe6d436f765fec7b0a6af76733c428 commit r9-9452-g56e4a73c7fbe6d436f765fec7b0a6af76733c428 Author: Richard Biener

[Bug testsuite/100176] gcc.dg/compat/struct-layout-1_generate.c contains errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100176 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug testsuite/100176] gcc.dg/compat/struct-layout-1_generate.c contains errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100176 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e4053fb7beb551794cfba43c7a9623c43eb3e808 commit r8-10854-ge4053fb7beb551794cfba43c7a9623c43eb3e808 Author: Richard Biener

[Bug demangler/100177] New: Rust demangler tests fail on big-endian hosts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100177 Bug ID: 100177 Summary: Rust demangler tests fail on big-endian hosts Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: de

[Bug demangler/100177] Rust demangler tests fail on big-endian hosts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100177 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug demangler/100177] Rust demangler tests fail on big-endian hosts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100177 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Andreas Schwab : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:53bc2e123cd44dc26ae3d2c42b85ee2463f2a7c6 commit r12-28-g53bc2e123cd44dc26ae3d2c42b85ee2463f2a7c6 Author: Andreas Schwab Date: T

[Bug demangler/100177] Rust demangler tests fail on big-endian hosts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100177 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Andreas Schwab : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4cdb510fb0d4e285b0565f402883025998ba6250 commit r11-8273-g4cdb510fb0d4e285b0565f402883025998ba6250 Author: Andreas Schwab

[Bug demangler/100177] Rust demangler tests fail on big-endian hosts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100177 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/100178] New: Should the “short” be promoted to “int” when use inline asm？

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100178 Bug ID: 100178 Summary: Should the “short” be promoted to “int” when use inline asm？ Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/100179] New: [12 regression] xtreme-header-2_a.H fails on arm-eabi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100179 Bug ID: 100179 Summary: [12 regression] xtreme-header-2_a.H fails on arm-eabi Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compo

[Bug analyzer/98447] incorrect -Wanalyzer-shift-count-overflow warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98447 --- Comment #6 from Vincent Lefèvre --- On the test on godbolt, this is still failing with: gcc (Compiler-Explorer-Build) 12.0.0 20210420 (experimental)

[Bug libstdc++/100179] [12 regression] xtreme-header-2_a.H fails on arm-eabi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100179 --- Comment #1 from Christophe Lyon --- Similar errors noticed in libstdc++ testsuite: 17_intro/headers/c++2020/all_attributes.cc (test for excess errors) 17_intro/headers/c++2020/all_no_exceptions.cc (test for excess errors) 17_intr

[Bug libstdc++/100180] New: experimental/net/internet/address/v6/members.cc fails on arm-eabi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100180 Bug ID: 100180 Summary: experimental/net/internet/address/v6/members.cc fails on arm-eabi Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/99995] [11/12 Regression] should not include in c++20 mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- Similarly, unconditionally includes POSIX even if we're not going to use it.

[Bug c++/88115] Incorrect result from alignof in templates, if also using __alignof__.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88115 --- Comment #13 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a34c19926b87f9cadd5ea84f5c5b93ae76b14558 commit r8-10855-ga34c19926b87f9cadd5ea84f5c5b93ae76b14558 Author: Patrick Palka D

[Bug libstdc++/97273] [8/9 Regression] Strange behaviour of unordered_set when vector is included (i686)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97273 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a34c19926b87f9cadd5ea84f5c5b93ae76b14558 commit r8-10855-ga34c19926b87f9cadd5ea84f5c5b93ae76b14558 Author: Patrick Palka Da

[Bug libstdc++/97273] [8/9 Regression] Strange behaviour of unordered_set when vector is included (i686)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97273 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/88115] Incorrect result from alignof in templates, if also using __alignof__.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88115 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug target/100181] New: hot-cold partitioned code doesn't assemble

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100181 Bug ID: 100181 Summary: hot-cold partitioned code doesn't assemble Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: targe

[Bug target/100181] hot-cold partitioned code doesn't assemble

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100181 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||assemble-failure Target|

[Bug target/100181] hot-cold partitioned code doesn't assemble

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100181 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Created attachment 50648 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50648&action=edit example assembly file Example file that fails to assemble.

[Bug c++/64194] [C++14] for function template with auto return

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64194 --- Comment #19 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9499fe0403e310f4eb1f23279bff84259e120e76 commit r9-9453-g9499fe0403e310f4eb1f23279bff84259e120e76 Author: Patrick Palka Da

[Bug target/100181] hot-cold partitioned code doesn't assemble

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100181 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- llvm-mc from llvm 9.0.1 ICEs: > llvm-mc-9.0.1 -o t.o pr93515.xamdgcn-amdhsa.mkoffload.2.s > -triple=amdgcn--amdhsa -mcpu=fiji -filetype=obj Stack dump: 0. Program arguments: llvm-mc-9.0.1 -o t.o pr93

[Bug target/100181] hot-cold partitioned code doesn't assemble

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100181 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||94278 --- Comment #4 from Richard Bien

[Bug target/100181] hot-cold partitioned code doesn't assemble

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100181 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|assemble-failure| Depends on|94278

[Bug target/94278] [amdgcn] Offloading build failures due to 'llvm-mc' SIGSEGV

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94278 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- I'm running into the same issue (and filed PR100181) but with llvm11 based llvm-mc the CUs are instead rejected due to a section crossing jump: ./pr93515.xamdgcn-amdhsa.mkoffload.2.s:634:2: error: undefined

[Bug target/100181] hot-cold partitioned code doesn't assemble

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100181 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug target/94278] [amdgcn] Offloading build failures due to 'llvm-mc' SIGSEGV

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94278 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- *** Bug 100181 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug target/100182] New: [8/9/10/11/12 Regression] Miscompilation of atomic_float/1.cc on i686

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100182 Bug ID: 100182 Summary: [8/9/10/11/12 Regression] Miscompilation of atomic_float/1.cc on i686 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/100182] [8/9/10/11/12 Regression] Miscompilation of atomic_float/1.cc on i686

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100182 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-04-21 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/100181] hot-cold partitioned code doesn't assemble

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100181 --- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus --- I can reproduce this one with LLVM trunk when compiled with '-save-temps -O2' and then llvm-mc --triple=amdgcn--amdhsa -mcpu=fiji -filetype=obj --amdhsa-code-object-version=3 a.xamdgcn-amdhsa.mkoffload.1.s

[Bug target/100181] hot-cold partitioned code doesn't assemble

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100181 --- Comment #8 from Thomas Schwinge --- (In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #7) > (I could not reproduce the LLVM 9 issue in PR94278 back then.) Hmm, but didn't you say in the LLVM issue (liked

[Bug target/95816] Aarch64 jumps between Hot/Cold sections does not clobber registers x16/x17

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95816 --- Comment #2 from Richard Earnshaw --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > Confirmed, I wonder if x16 and x17 should not be considered as temps alive > across all jumps in aarch64 really; not just jumps between hot and cold > sections

[Bug target/95816] Aarch64 jumps between Hot/Cold sections does not clobber registers x16/x17

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95816 --- Comment #3 from Richard Earnshaw --- The best thing to do for now is to disable hot/cold partitioning, as we do on Arm.

[Bug libstdc++/86742] Documented function std::to_chars(char* first, char* last, double value) is not implemented

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86742 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED See Also|

[Bug target/94278] [amdgcn] Offloading build failures due to 'llvm-mc' SIGSEGV

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94278 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- If people can/cannot reproduce the issue with the same revs. on the same testcase double-checking the RTL bb-reorder dumps might be in order to rule out some memory corruption on the BB counts.

[Bug target/100152] Possible 10.3 bad code generation regression from 10.2/9.3 on Mac OS 10.15.7 (Catalina)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152 --- Comment #16 from lucier at math dot purdue.edu --- I have figured out how to build and then run the app in lldb to reliably reproduce the error. To configure and build Gambit, the Scheme->C compiler: 51 8:56mkdir gambit-test 52

[Bug c++/99586] Use of class template identifier checked for CTAD before instantiation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99586 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug target/99988] aarch64: GCC generates excessive consecutive bti j instructions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99988 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Alex Coplan : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fe11882ae34c49f6214f93867783ed1332f35f0f commit r12-34-gfe11882ae34c49f6214f93867783ed1332f35f0f Author: Alex Coplan Date: Wed Apr

[Bug target/99988] aarch64: GCC generates excessive consecutive bti j instructions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99988 --- Comment #4 from Alex Coplan --- Fixed on trunk. Keeping open for backports (once it's had some decent baking time).

[Bug target/94278] [amdgcn] Offloading build failures due to 'llvm-mc' SIGSEGV

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94278 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- The patch from comment#3 fixes the issue for me. The tests still fail one or another way (most not finding libgfortran.a - maybe an error on my side, and a few with unresolved symbols).

[Bug libstdc++/100164] [11/12 Regression] semaphore_impl not declared on AIX

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100164 --- Comment #14 from David Edelsohn --- Thanks for the patch. This now removes the failure that semaphore_impl is not found. Because the platform semaphore code never was exercised due to the bug in the macro, there are more latent bugs. /tmp/

[Bug libstdc++/97600] [ranges] satisfaction value of range affected by prior use of basic_istream_view::begin()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97600 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/100182] [8/9/10/11/12 Regression] Miscompilation of atomic_float/1.cc on i686

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100182 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- In this particular case it is the sync.md:398 peephole2: (define_peephole2 [(set (match_operand:DF 0 "memory_operand") (match_operand:DF 1 "any_fp_register_operand")) (set (mem:BLK (scratch:SI))

[Bug libstdc++/100164] [11/12 Regression] semaphore_impl not declared on AIX

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100164 --- Comment #15 from Thomas Rodgers --- >From the most recent patch - +_GLIBCXX_ALWAYS_INLINE bool +_M_try_acquire() noexcept +{ + for (;;) + { + auto __err = sem_trywait(&_M_semaphore); + if (__err && (er

[Bug libstdc++/100180] experimental/net/internet/address/v6/members.cc fails on arm-eabi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100180 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- I think I need to backport another piece. This should not have happened on trunk though.

[Bug libstdc++/100179] [12 regression] xtreme-header-2_a.H fails on arm-eabi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100179 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- I have a patch for this.

[Bug c++/95486] ICE for alias CTAD with non-dependent argument and constrained constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95486 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4806f9157a26cfd66c083bcc01596ff33009c0d6 commit r10-9743-g4806f9157a26cfd66c083bcc01596ff33009c0d6 Author: Patrick Palka D

[Bug c++/95486] ICE for alias CTAD with non-dependent argument and constrained constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95486 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/100180] experimental/net/internet/address/v6/members.cc fails on arm-eabi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100180 --- Comment #2 from Christophe Lyon --- On trunk, the error message is: FAIL: experimental/net/internet/address/v6/members.cc (test for excess errors) Excess errors: /aci-gcc-fsf/builds/gcc-fsf-gccsrc/obj-arm-none-eabi/gcc3/arm-none-eabi/thumb/v

[Bug fortran/100183] New: Segmentation fault at runtime when passing an internal procedure as argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100183 Bug ID: 100183 Summary: Segmentation fault at runtime when passing an internal procedure as argument Product: gcc Version: 10.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug target/100181] hot-cold partitioned code doesn't assemble

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100181 --- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus --- (In reply to Thomas Schwinge from comment #8) > (In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #7) > > (I could not reproduce the LLVM 9 issue in PR94278 back then.) > > Hmm, but didn't you say in the LLVM issue >

[Bug c++/94475] [9 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected class 'type', have 'exceptional' (error_mark) in element_mode, at tree.c:13813

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94475 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/100180] experimental/net/internet/address/v6/members.cc fails on arm-eabi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100180 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f0d22d31ceb1373f17045f2527ef2f2251d93be8 commit r10-9744-gf0d22d31ceb1373f17045f2527ef2f2251d93be8 Author: Jonathan Wake

[Bug libstdc++/100180] experimental/net/internet/address/v6/members.cc fails on arm-eabi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100180 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:34976f3bf8ff146e31b1ccee9351c5803604d7ae commit r9-9454-g34976f3bf8ff146e31b1ccee9351c5803604d7ae Author: Jonathan Wakely

[Bug libstdc++/100180] experimental/net/internet/address/v6/members.cc fails on arm-eabi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100180 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Christophe Lyon from comment #2) > On trunk, the error message is: > FAIL: experimental/net/internet/address/v6/members.cc (test for excess > errors) > Excess errors: > /aci-gcc-fsf/builds/gcc

[Bug rtl-optimization/99332] ICE:inreset_sched_cycles_in_current_ebb, at sel-sched.c:7147 with -fprofile-generate -O3 -fselective-scheduling -fselective-scheduling2 -fsel-sched-pipelining

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99332 Alex Coplan changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/100172] ICE with "concept concept" keyword

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100172 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC|

[Bug c++/96380] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE in tree check: expected integer_cst, have view_convert_expr in get_len, at tree.h:5954

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96380 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:001c63d15e31bc0a1545426d889a0b9f671b4961 commit r12-42-g001c63d15e31bc0a1545426d889a0b9f671b4961 Author: Marek Polacek Date: Tue

[Bug c++/96380] [10/11 Regression] ICE in tree check: expected integer_cst, have view_convert_expr in get_len, at tree.h:5954

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96380 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[10/11/12 Regression] ICE |[10/11 Regression] ICE in

[Bug libstdc++/100164] [11/12 Regression] semaphore_impl not declared on AIX

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100164 --- Comment #16 from Thomas Rodgers --- The _M_try_acquire() change should be on master and gcc-11 now.

[Bug libstdc++/100164] [11/12 Regression] semaphore_impl not declared on AIX

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100164 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/98143] arm: missed vectorization with MVE compared to Neon

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98143 --- Comment #1 from Christophe Lyon --- Current trunk generates for MVE: ldr r3, .L3+16 @ 5 [c=12 l=4] *thumb2_movsi_vfp/5 vldr.64 d6, .L3 @ 7 [c=8 l=4] *mve_movv8hi/8 vldr.64 d7, .L3+8 ldr

[Bug target/100152] Possible 10.3 bad code generation regression from 10.2/9.3 on Mac OS 10.15.7 (Catalina)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/100182] [8/9/10/11/12 Regression] Miscompilation of atomic_float/1.cc on i686

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100182 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- In addition to r7-1112 r8-3856 also added some similar peephole2s. I'm afraid I'm getting lost in them, in several other peephole2s there the store that is optimized away is an atomic store and that is quite

[Bug libstdc++/100017] error: 'fenv_t' has not been declared in '::' x86_64-w64-mingw32 host cross toolchain fails to build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100017 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- >From IRC: It works if I add -nostdinc++ manually to the compile line that fails then I don't get the error

[Bug target/100182] [8/9/10/11/12 Regression] Miscompilation of atomic_float/1.cc on i686

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100182 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 50649 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50649&action=edit gcc12-pr100182.patch Untested patch for this particular peephole2. But, 1) I'm not sure it is 100% safe even

[Bug target/100182] [8/9/10/11/12 Regression] Miscompilation of atomic_float/1.cc on i686

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100182 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|jakub at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/100149] Seg fault passing to CHARACTER(*), DIMENSION(*), INTENT(IN), OPTIONAL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100149 Scot Breitenfeld changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||10.3.0 Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug c/100184] New: Detect variables which are only "used" in updating themselves

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100184 Bug ID: 100184 Summary: Detect variables which are only "used" in updating themselves Product: gcc Version: 10.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/100185] New: transparent_union fails when the union has a destructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100185 Bug ID: 100185 Summary: transparent_union fails when the union has a destructor Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug bootstrap/100186] New: lto-wrapper.c assumes std::thread

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100186 Bug ID: 100186 Summary: lto-wrapper.c assumes std::thread Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap

[Bug bootstrap/100186] lto-wrapper.c assumes std::thread

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100186 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0 Last reconfirmed|

  1   2   >