[Bug tree-optimization/99220] [11 Regression] ICE during vectorization when multiple instances do the same calculation but have different num lanes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99220 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0

[Bug c/99224] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in location_wrapper_p, at tree.h:4052

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99224 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.4 Assignee|unassigned at gc

[Bug fortran/99226] [11 Regression] ICE in expand_expr_real_1, at expr.c:10279

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99226 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/99228] blend/shuffle

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99228 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unknown |11.0 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener

[Bug debug/99230] [11 Regression] gcc.dg/pr83527.c excess errors: '-fcompare-debug' failure (length)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99230 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0

[Bug target/99231] FAIL: c-c++-common/attr-retain-5.c -std=gnu++98 (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99231 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug testsuite/99173] [11 Regression] new test case c-c++-common/attr-retain-5.c added in r11-7284 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99173 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug testsuite/99233] [11 regression] new test case gcc.target/powerpc/pr96264.c in r11-7285 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99233 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0

[Bug c++/99237] New: [modules] internal compiler error: in write_macro_maps

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99237 Bug ID: 99237 Summary: [modules] internal compiler error: in write_macro_maps Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compon

[Bug c++/99238] New: [modules] internal compiler error: segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99238 Bug ID: 99238 Summary: [modules] internal compiler error: segmentation fault Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compone

[Bug c++/99239] New: [modules] internal compiler error: in duplicate_decls

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99239 Bug ID: 99239 Summary: [modules] internal compiler error: in duplicate_decls Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compone

[Bug c++/99240] New: internal compiler error: in get_merge_kind, at cp/module.cc:10169

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99240 Bug ID: 99240 Summary: internal compiler error: in get_merge_kind, at cp/module.cc:10169 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/99241] New: internal compiler error: in install_entity, at cp/module.cc:7584

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99241 Bug ID: 99241 Summary: internal compiler error: in install_entity, at cp/module.cc:7584 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/99242] New: internal compiler error: in lookup_mark, at cp/tree.c:2403

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99242 Bug ID: 99242 Summary: internal compiler error: in lookup_mark, at cp/tree.c:2403 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug c++/99243] New: internal compiler error: in set_filename, at cp/module.cc:19143

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99243 Bug ID: 99243 Summary: internal compiler error: in set_filename, at cp/module.cc:19143 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/99244] New: internal compiler error: in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:16581

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99244 Bug ID: 99244 Summary: internal compiler error: in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:16581 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prior

[Bug c++/99245] New: internal compiler error: in write_cluster, at cp/module.cc:14600

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99245 Bug ID: 99245 Summary: internal compiler error: in write_cluster, at cp/module.cc:14600 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/99246] New: internal compiler error: in write_location, at cp/module.cc:15687

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99246 Bug ID: 99246 Summary: internal compiler error: in write_location, at cp/module.cc:15687 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/99247] New: internal compiler error: in write_macro_maps, at cp/module.cc:16154

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99247 Bug ID: 99247 Summary: internal compiler error: in write_macro_maps, at cp/module.cc:16154 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/99248] New: internal compiler error: tree check: expected binding_vector, have overload in lookup_elaborated_type_1, at cp/name-lookup.c:8013

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99248 Bug ID: 99248 Summary: internal compiler error: tree check: expected binding_vector, have overload in lookup_elaborated_type_1, at cp/name-lookup.c:8013 Product: gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/99074] gcc 8 and above is crashing with dynamic_cast<>() on null pointer with optimization level -O1 and above

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99074 --- Comment #5 from Keith Halligan --- Thanks Martin, I appreciate your work on this. - Keith

[Bug target/98746] [11 Regression] memory hog for a lto+pgo build on powerpc64*-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98746 --- Comment #4 from Matthias Klose --- trunk 20210220 with 8441545d4f2afb9e9342e0dac378eafd03f00462 reverted uses less than 100MB for the compilation.

[Bug target/98746] [11 Regression] memory hog for a lto+pgo build on powerpc64*-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98746 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|WAITING

[Bug tree-optimization/94092] Code size and performance degradations after -ftree-loop-distribute-patterns was enabled at -O[2s]+

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94092 --- Comment #8 from Mel Chen --- Sorry for using the bad example to describe the problem I am facing. Let me clarify my question with a more precise example. void array_mul(int N, int *C, short *A, short *B) { int i, j; for (i = 0; i < N; i+

[Bug tree-optimization/94092] Code size and performance degradations after -ftree-loop-distribute-patterns was enabled at -O[2s]+

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94092 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Mel Chen from comment #8) > Sorry for using the bad example to describe the problem I am facing. Let me > clarify my question with a more precise example. > > void array_mul(int N, int *C, shor

[Bug c/99224] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in location_wrapper_p, at tree.h:4052

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99224 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:084963dcaca2f0836366fdb001561e29ecbfb483 commit r11-7353-g084963dcaca2f0836366fdb001561e29ecbfb483 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug c/99224] [9/10 Regression] ICE in location_wrapper_p, at tree.h:4052

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99224 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Summary|[9/10/11 Regressi

[Bug tree-optimization/99149] [11 Regression] ICE during vectorization when shared trees contain different complex patterns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99149 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Tamar Christina : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5296bd57d0605d1fec900d85e3ab3875197e609a commit r11-7355-g5296bd57d0605d1fec900d85e3ab3875197e609a Author: Tamar Christina Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/99149] [11 Regression] ICE during vectorization when shared trees contain different complex patterns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99149 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/98384] [11 Regression] new test case 20_util/to_chars/long_double.cc in r11-6249 fails on powerpc64 BE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98384 --- Comment #12 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #11 from Patrick Palka --- > I posted a patch at > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-February/565726.html that does > this, but also salvages the verification

[Bug fortran/99226] [11 Regression] ICE in expand_expr_real_1, at expr.c:10279

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99226 --- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1) > This is invalid and should have been rejected, when teams is nested in > target, it must be the only thing nested in it, you can't have two teams > directives nes

[Bug tree-optimization/99220] [11 Regression] ICE during vectorization when multiple instances do the same calculation but have different num lanes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99220 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- Created attachment 50245 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50245&action=edit patch So sth like diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-slp.c b/gcc/tree-vect-slp.c index 091e727bbc3..24962af903f 10064

[Bug fortran/99226] [11 Regression] ICE in expand_expr_real_1, at expr.c:10279

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99226 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #2) > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1) > > This is invalid and should have been rejected, when teams is nested in > > target, it must be the only thing neste

[Bug tree-optimization/99225] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE in wide_int_to_tree_1, at tree.c:1644

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99225 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6e646abbe02f2c79cc3ba1f3de705ee62ff9dcd1 commit r11-7356-g6e646abbe02f2c79cc3ba1f3de705ee62ff9dcd1 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: We

[Bug fortran/99124] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in gfc_get_class_from_expr, at fortran/trans-expr.c:541

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99124 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Paul Thomas : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:01af81169f0b92ee2823e86c37066f8f002c21c0 commit r10-9387-g01af81169f0b92ee2823e86c37066f8f002c21c0 Author: Paul Thomas Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/99225] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in wide_int_to_tree_1, at tree.c:1644

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99225 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE |[8/9/10 Regression] ICE in

[Bug target/99249] New: SVE: ICE in aarch64_expand_sve_const_vector (during RTL pass: early_remat)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99249 Bug ID: 99249 Summary: SVE: ICE in aarch64_expand_sve_const_vector (during RTL pass: early_remat) Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norma

[Bug c++/96251] [constexpr, coroutines] co_yield incorrectly rejected in non-explicitly-constexpr generic lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96251 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f13d9e48eeca7ed8f8df55c9a62fc9980d5606ad commit r11-7357-gf13d9e48eeca7ed8f8df55c9a62fc9980d5606ad Author: Iain Sandoe Date: Tue

[Bug c++/96251] [constexpr, coroutines] co_yield incorrectly rejected in non-explicitly-constexpr generic lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96251 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.3 --- Comment #9 from Iain Sandoe ---

[Bug target/99249] SVE: ICE in aarch64_expand_sve_const_vector (during RTL pass: early_remat)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99249 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||10.2.1 Status|U

[Bug fortran/99124] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in gfc_get_class_from_expr, at fortran/trans-expr.c:541

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99124 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Paul Thomas : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cd34d8b7b50f0f3592deb76983191c3d9a5dbcb9 commit r9-9249-gcd34d8b7b50f0f3592deb76983191c3d9a5dbcb9 Author: Paul Thomas Date:

[Bug libgcc/99236] Undefined behaviour in libgcc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99236 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-02-24 Assignee|unassigned

[Bug libgcc/99236] Undefined behaviour in libgcc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99236 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 50246 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50246&action=edit gcc11-pr99236.patch Untested fix.

[Bug fortran/99124] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in gfc_get_class_from_expr, at fortran/trans-expr.c:541

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99124 --- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas --- Fixed on all three branches. Thanks for the report. I hope that the constraint on class-valued elemental functions doesn't spoil any code. Cheers Paul

[Bug fortran/99124] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in gfc_get_class_from_expr, at fortran/trans-expr.c:541

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99124 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/98707] ICE using std::string in a module partition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98707 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/99237] [modules] internal compiler error: in write_macro_maps

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99237 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug libstdc++/99172] Build failure with slibtool and vtv

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99172 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cmtice at google dot com,

[Bug libgcc/99236] Undefined behaviour in libgcc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99236 --- Comment #2 from Vittorio Zecca --- After patching libgcc2.c the test case runs fine without sanitizer messages.

[Bug tree-optimization/99101] optimization bug with -ffinite-loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99101 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- The following reduced testcase fails in the described way at -O2 with the C++ FE and with the C FE if you specify -ffinite-loops in addition to -O2. Already CDDCE1 does the problematic transform which means

[Bug fortran/99226] [11 Regression] ICE in expand_expr_real_1, at expr.c:10279

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99226 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Ever

[Bug tree-optimization/99101] optimization bug with -ffinite-loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99101 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener --- Another fix for the finite-loop issue would be to avoid considering loops not post-dominated by the exit block as finite. Like with the imperfect diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-niter.c b/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-

[Bug tree-optimization/99101] optimization bug with -ffinite-loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99101 --- Comment #10 from Richard Biener --- Created attachment 50248 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50248&action=edit dot of the CFG as CD-DCE sees it

[Bug tree-optimization/99101] optimization bug with -ffinite-loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99101 --- Comment #11 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #10) > Created attachment 50248 [details] > dot of the CFG as CD-DCE sees it (gdb) p debug_dominance_info (CDI_POST_DOMINATORS) 2 3 3 11 4 6 5 9 6 7 7 1 9 11 11 4 1

[Bug tree-optimization/99149] [11 Regression] ICE during vectorization when shared trees contain different complex patterns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99149 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Tamar Christina : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:96c5a8589e0dd22819bae34cac3381ad381d3989 commit r11-7358-g96c5a8589e0dd22819bae34cac3381ad381d3989 Author: Tamar Christina Date:

[Bug fortran/98411] [10/11] Pointless: Array larger than ‘-fmax-stack-var-size=’, moved from stack to static storage for main program variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98411 Ignacio Fernández Galván changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jellby at yahoo dot com --- C

[Bug c++/99215] coroutines: debugging with gdb

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99215 --- Comment #5 from Nils Gladitz --- Apparently when the coroutine happens to be a member function (even a static one) printing *frame_ptr results in "{}". Ideally I'd want to have non-static member coroutines and would like to be able to inspec

[Bug tree-optimization/99101] optimization bug with -ffinite-loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99101 --- Comment #12 from Richard Biener --- So we can massage post-dom compute to make control dependence which is defined in terms of pdom do what we want. We have void dom_info::calc_dfs_tree () { ... /* In the post-dom case we may have nod

[Bug libstdc++/98384] [11 Regression] new test case 20_util/to_chars/long_double.cc in r11-6249 fails on powerpc64 BE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98384 --- Comment #13 from Patrick Palka --- (In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #12) > > --- Comment #11 from Patrick Palka --- > > I posted a patch at > > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-February/565726.html that

[Bug tree-optimization/99220] [11 Regression] ICE during vectorization when multiple instances do the same calculation but have different num lanes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99220 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Tamar Christina : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6c35e79b47ab582e18d851f6c5df776bac766eaf commit r11-7359-g6c35e79b47ab582e18d851f6c5df776bac766eaf Author: Tamar Christina Date:

[Bug fortran/99226] [11 Regression] ICE in expand_expr_real_1, at expr.c:10279

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99226 --- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3) > So, either we diagnose ... in check_omp_nesting_restrictions. See comment 4. * * * Only for completeness, the ICE is itself is due to: '.omp_data_i' showing

[Bug tree-optimization/99220] [11 Regression] ICE during vectorization when multiple instances do the same calculation but have different num lanes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99220 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/99215] coroutines: debugging with gdb

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99215 --- Comment #6 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Nils Gladitz from comment #5) > Apparently when the coroutine happens to be a member function (even a static > one) printing *frame_ptr results in "{}". > > Ideally I'd want to have non-static mem

[Bug target/95798] [10/11 Regression] Initialization code --- suboptimal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95798 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug libstdc++/98384] [11 Regression] new test case 20_util/to_chars/long_double.cc in r11-6249 fails on powerpc64 BE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98384 --- Comment #14 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #13 from Patrick Palka --- [...] > So: > > 1. The hex-form conversion specifier doesn't trim trailing zeroes. Which according to ISO C 2017, p.228, is allowed: "trailing

[Bug fortran/99250] New: [F2018] coshape intrinsic is missing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99250 Bug ID: 99250 Summary: [F2018] coshape intrinsic is missing Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug libstdc++/98384] [11 Regression] new test case 20_util/to_chars/long_double.cc in r11-6249 fails on powerpc64 BE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98384 --- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek --- printf("%L.1000f\n", 1.0L); The length modifier needs to come after precision, not before it, so you should be using printf("%.1000Lf\n", 1.0L); instead. But the test nor libstdc++ itself doesn't do that, d

[Bug target/99234] Regression: wrong result for 1.0/3.0 when -fno-omit-frame-pointer -frounding-math used together

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99234 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug fortran/97977] Fortran deferred length strings incompatible with OMP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97977 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug c/97172] [11 Regression] ICE: tree code ‘ssa_name’ is not supported in LTO streams since r11-3303-g6450f07388f9fe57

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97172 --- Comment #34 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ea5a82df9ba0c9d23e386290d24fc920968a8695 commit r11-7360-gea5a82df9ba0c9d23e386290d24fc920968a8695 Author: Martin Sebor Date: Wed

[Bug libgcc/99157] [ARM] libgcc -mcmse check always fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99157 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Christophe Lyon : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:be30dd89926d5dd19d72f90c1586b0e2557fde43 commit r11-7361-gbe30dd89926d5dd19d72f90c1586b0e2557fde43 Author: Christophe Lyon Date:

[Bug c/97172] [11 Regression] ICE: tree code ‘ssa_name’ is not supported in LTO streams since r11-3303-g6450f07388f9fe57

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97172 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/98342] Allocatable component in call to assumed-rank routine causes invalid pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98342 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5159b88ef1a1774ec8851c6b92794ae2bf6e0b74 commit r11-7362-g5159b88ef1a1774ec8851c6b92794ae2bf6e0b74 Author: Paul Thomas Date: Wed Fe

[Bug libgcc/99157] [ARM] libgcc -mcmse check always fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99157 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Christophe Lyon : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fcfd5cc0f428262fcce874a4c3b41e06d1296901 commit r10-9388-gfcfd5cc0f428262fcce874a4c3b41e06d1296901 Author: Christophe Lyo

[Bug libgcc/99157] [ARM] libgcc -mcmse check always fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99157 Christophe Lyon changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug libstdc++/98384] [11 Regression] new test case 20_util/to_chars/long_double.cc in r11-6249 fails on powerpc64 BE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98384 --- Comment #16 from Patrick Palka --- (In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #14) > > --- Comment #13 from Patrick Palka --- > [...] > > So: > > > > 1. The hex-form conversion specifier doesn't trim trailing zeroes. > > Which

[Bug fortran/97977] Fortran deferred length strings incompatible with OMP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97977 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||97084 --- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus

[Bug libstdc++/86934] Feature test macros in should respect _GLIBCXX_HOSTED

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86934 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.4 Status|NEW

[Bug target/99234] Regression: wrong result for 1.0/3.0 when -fno-omit-frame-pointer -frounding-math used together

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99234 --- Comment #2 from Vadim Zeitlin --- Created attachment 50250 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50250&action=edit Compressed output of the preprocessor (-E)

[Bug target/99234] Regression: wrong result for 1.0/3.0 when -fno-omit-frame-pointer -frounding-math used together

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99234 --- Comment #3 from Vadim Zeitlin --- Created attachment 50251 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50251&action=edit File created by -fdump-tree-optimized

[Bug libstdc++/91480] Nonconforming definitions of standard library feature-test macros

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91480 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW

[Bug libstdc++/87193] symbols in have inconsistent types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87193 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||frankhb1989 at gmail dot com --- Comme

[Bug c++/99251] New: Strange -Wnonnull warning behaviour with dynamic_cast

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99251 Bug ID: 99251 Summary: Strange -Wnonnull warning behaviour with dynamic_cast Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compone

[Bug target/99234] Regression: wrong result for 1.0/3.0 when -fno-omit-frame-pointer -frounding-math used together

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99234 --- Comment #4 from Vadim Zeitlin --- Created attachment 50252 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50252&action=edit Assembly output (-S)

[Bug target/99234] Regression: wrong result for 1.0/3.0 when -fno-omit-frame-pointer -frounding-math used together

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99234 --- Comment #5 from Vadim Zeitlin --- > Works fine on x86_64-linux. Yes, I mentioned this :-/ > Can you attach preprocessed source (most developers don't have access to > Windows) If you can install MinGW cross-compiler and Wine, you don't ne

[Bug libstdc++/98384] [11 Regression] new test case 20_util/to_chars/long_double.cc in r11-6249 fails on powerpc64 BE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98384 --- Comment #17 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #16) > (In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #14) > > > --- Comment #13 from Patrick Palka --- [..] > > Which according to ISO C 2017, p.228, is allo

[Bug libstdc++/99172] Build failure with slibtool and vtv

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99172 ctice at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ctice at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug fortran/95868] Derived-type deferred-length character component handling broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95868 --- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus --- The patch of comment 0 re-appeared in slightly different flavor for PR99125 (https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-February/565768.html); thus, that part is now fixed. Still, the tests in the testca

[Bug libstdc++/98384] [11 Regression] new test case 20_util/to_chars/long_double.cc in r11-6249 fails on powerpc64 BE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98384 --- Comment #18 from Patrick Palka --- FWIW, here's a complete corrected version of the Solaris test in comment #13 which should be fully free of warnings: #include int main() { printf("%La\n", 1.0L); // trailing zeros present (not nonc

[Bug target/99252] New: SVE: ICE in maybe_legitimize_operand with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99252 Bug ID: 99252 Summary: SVE: ICE in maybe_legitimize_operand with LTO Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: targ

[Bug libstdc++/99172] Build failure with slibtool and vtv

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99172 --- Comment #8 from gcc-user at riseup dot net --- > Is there something here that you want/need me to take care of? If you can make it so that -lvtv is never passed to libtool so that slibtool will also work with --enable-vtable-verify as describ

[Bug debug/99230] [11 Regression] gcc.dg/pr83527.c excess errors: '-fcompare-debug' failure (length)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99230 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug libstdc++/98389] [11 regression] libstdc++-abi/abi_check fails after r11-6249 on powerpc64 big endian

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98389 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f90027d18a94d02ba8f3b7503c5f0835f432a89e commit r11-7365-gf90027d18a94d02ba8f3b7503c5f0835f432a89e Author: Jonathan Wakely Date:

[Bug target/99252] SVE: ICE in maybe_legitimize_operand with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99252 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Known to fail|

[Bug libstdc++/98389] [11 regression] libstdc++-abi/abi_check fails after r11-6249 on powerpc64 big endian

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98389 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/99253] New: tree-vect-loop wrong code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99253 Bug ID: 99253 Summary: tree-vect-loop wrong code Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code Severity: normal Priority: P3 Comp

[Bug libstdc++/99172] Build failure with slibtool and vtv

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99172 --- Comment #9 from ctice at gcc dot gnu.org --- I will work on fixing that.

[Bug c++/99251] [11 Regression] inconsistent -Wnonnull warning behaviour with dynamic_cast

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99251 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||95507 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/99251] [11 Regression] inconsistent -Wnonnull warning behaviour with dynamic_cast

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99251 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |msebor at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/99072] [modules] Compiling header unit with partial preprocessing (-E -fdirectives-only) twice causes CRC mismatch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99072 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Nathan Sidwell : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a13be187cb2987db851b3f096f5319d5fe3a7301 commit r11-7366-ga13be187cb2987db851b3f096f5319d5fe3a7301 Author: Nathan Sidwell Date:

  1   2   >