[Bug c/98086] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2315

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98086 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.4 Keywords|

[Bug middle-end/98086] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2315

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98086 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||error-recovery Component|c

[Bug c/98087] [11 Regression] ICE: Floating point exception

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98087 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug middle-end/98088] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in expand_oacc_collapse_init, at omp-expand.c:1533

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98088 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code, openmp Comp

[Bug c/98090] ICE in simd_clone_adjust_argument_types, at omp-simd-clone.c:591

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98090 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid, |

[Bug target/98092] [11 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2315 (error: unrecognizable insn)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98092 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0

[Bug c/98087] [11 Regression] ICE: Floating point exception

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98087 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|jakub at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Com

[Bug tree-optimization/98069] [8/9/10/11 Regression] Miscompilation with -O3 since r8-2380-g2d7744d4ef93bfff

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98069 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- The following helps: diff --git a/gcc/tree-data-ref.c b/gcc/tree-data-ref.c index 3bf460cccfd..a7606b3db99 100644 --- a/gcc/tree-data-ref.c +++ b/gcc/tree-data-ref.c @@ -754,9 +759,10 @@ split_constant_offs

[Bug c++/97452] [coroutines] incorrect sequencing of await_resume() when multiple co_await expressions occur in a single statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97452 --- Comment #6 from David Ledger --- Is this the right place for me to track this bug?

[Bug c++/97452] [coroutines] incorrect sequencing of await_resume() when multiple co_await expressions occur in a single statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97452 --- Comment #7 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to David Ledger from comment #6) > Is this the right place for me to track this bug? yes - it's just waiting for someone to have time to address it.

[Bug middle-end/98086] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2315

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98086 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/98094] New: ICE in decompose, at wide-int.h:984

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98094 Bug ID: 98094 Summary: ICE in decompose, at wide-int.h:984 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimizat

[Bug tree-optimization/98094] ICE in decompose, at wide-int.h:984

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98094 --- Comment #1 from Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus --- Reduced program: struct { unsigned a : 10 } b;

[Bug tree-optimization/98094] ICE in decompose, at wide-int.h:984

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98094 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c/98087] [11 Regression] ICE: Floating point exception

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98087 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:337d6362458ab033d3bfe287dda37f9da5577406 commit r11-5647-g337d6362458ab033d3bfe287dda37f9da5577406 Author: Martin Liska Date: Wed

[Bug c/98087] [11 Regression] ICE: Floating point exception

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98087 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug rtl-optimization/97459] __uint128_t remainder for division by 3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97459 --- Comment #24 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:037fe26ee1ac18581bf0ad646d48591c97d10bd3 commit r11-5648-g037fe26ee1ac18581bf0ad646d48591c97d10bd3 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: W

[Bug tree-optimization/98094] ICE in decompose, at wide-int.h:984

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98094 --- Comment #3 from Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus --- I still run into the same error with e4c02ce4ab6fce1148f4025360096f18764deadf

[Bug tree-optimization/98094] ICE in decompose, at wide-int.h:984

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98094 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|1 |0 Status|WAITING

[Bug tree-optimization/98094] ICE in decompose, at wide-int.h:984

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98094 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Ah, so maybe g:c961e94901eb793b1a18d431a1acf7f682eaf04f which has * gimple-if-to-switch.cc (find_conditions): Require equal precision for low and high of a range.

[Bug tree-optimization/98094] ICE in decompose, at wide-int.h:984

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98094 Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|U

[Bug tree-optimization/96698] [10 Regression] ICE during GIMPLE pass:vect

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96698 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:66dd83c8840a9a28f6209922b8abd5783a255207 commit r10-9106-g66dd83c8840a9a28f6209922b8abd5783a255207 Author: Richard Biener

[Bug tree-optimization/96698] [10 Regression] ICE during GIMPLE pass:vect

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96698 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e563687cf9d3d1278f45aaebd03e0f66531076c9 commit r10-9107-ge563687cf9d3d1278f45aaebd03e0f66531076c9 Author: Richard Biener

[Bug tree-optimization/96920] [10 Regression] ICE segmentation fault in tree-vectorizer at -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96920 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e563687cf9d3d1278f45aaebd03e0f66531076c9 commit r10-9107-ge563687cf9d3d1278f45aaebd03e0f66531076c9 Author: Richard Biener

[Bug tree-optimization/96698] [10 Regression] ICE during GIMPLE pass:vect

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96698 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||10.2.0 Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/96920] [10 Regression] ICE segmentation fault in tree-vectorizer at -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96920 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/98095] New: Optimize __builtin_unordered (...) || __builtin_is{less,greater}{,equal}

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98095 Bug ID: 98095 Summary: Optimize __builtin_unordered (...) || __builtin_is{less,greater}{,equal} Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enha

[Bug debug/97060] Missing DW_AT_declaration=1 in dwarf data

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97060 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/97630] [11 Regression] SLP vectorizer leaks memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97630 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- The least resistance attempt to fix it would be to keep track of allocated SLP trees in _slp_tree::operator new/delete using a hash_set<> for example and call the DTOR on still allocated ones when destroying

[Bug tree-optimization/98084] [11 Regression] ICE in error: non-integral type switch statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98084 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d01ebe56c2f54bf4ac91ce389ecef734f557ea3e commit r11-5651-gd01ebe56c2f54bf4ac91ce389ecef734f557ea3e Author: Martin Liska Date: Wed

[Bug tree-optimization/98094] ICE in decompose, at wide-int.h:984

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98094 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7

[Bug debug/96383] [8/9/10 Regression] Full ABI information missing from GCC compiled C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96383 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/96370] [8/9 Regression] ICE with -ffast-math since r7-950-g8a85cee26eabf5cf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96370 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a5fff78405c3bfea287434e7711c6f10a770cb0a commit r9-9087-ga5fff78405c3bfea287434e7711c6f10a770cb0a Author: Richard Biener D

[Bug tree-optimization/96579] [8/9 Regression] ICE in gimple check: expected gimple_assign(error_mark), have gimple_nop() in gimple_assign_rhs1, at gimple.h:2605 since r7-950-g8a85cee26eabf5cf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96579 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:92b6627874cc924eeed9084a09f09504e20b5387 commit r9-9088-g92b6627874cc924eeed9084a09f09504e20b5387 Author: Richard Biener D

[Bug tree-optimization/96514] [9 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: control flow in the middle of basic block 3)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96514 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6178c27b4bbea186305ecbfeb4b9939dece75a9d commit r9-9086-g6178c27b4bbea186305ecbfeb4b9939dece75a9d Author: Richard Biener D

[Bug tree-optimization/97255] [8/9 Regression] Vectorizer gives a boolean a value of 255

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97255 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f720a0d776252aac3002a0a9307a96465f1975bd commit r9-9091-gf720a0d776252aac3002a0a9307a96465f1975bd Author: Richard Biener D

[Bug tree-optimization/97081] [8/9 Regression] wrong code for rotate vectorization (x86 target)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97081 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:86b25a1a5e1956c30fe7eaee80ebf719b759d631 commit r9-9089-g86b25a1a5e1956c30fe7eaee80ebf719b759d631 Author: Richard Biener

[Bug tree-optimization/97081] [8/9 Regression] wrong code for rotate vectorization (x86 target)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97081 --- Comment #12 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f75352bdb139c40abb400746c03d9242a0c30bd6 commit r9-9090-gf75352bdb139c40abb400746c03d9242a0c30bd6 Author: Jakub Jelinek D

[Bug tree-optimization/97812] [9 Regression] Wrong output when compiling the testcase with -O2 -flto since r9-4558-g476a31b55b5471262

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97812 --- Comment #15 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:165ae61a9f7e484cd9cc1ad09f477ecad59c77e9 commit r9-9092-g165ae61a9f7e484cd9cc1ad09f477ecad59c77e9 Author: Richard Biener

[Bug debug/96383] [8/9/10 Regression] Full ABI information missing from GCC compiled C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96383 --- Comment #28 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 2 Dec 2020, aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96383 > > Alexandre Oliva changed: > >What|Removed |Adde

[Bug tree-optimization/97812] [9 Regression] Wrong output when compiling the testcase with -O2 -flto since r9-4558-g476a31b55b5471262

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97812 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/96514] [9 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: control flow in the middle of basic block 3)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96514 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Known to fail|

[Bug fortran/80255] Segfault from accessing class(*) component in an array of any-type-wrappers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80255 pedsxing at gmx dot net changed: What|Removed |Added Version|7.0.1 |10.1.0 --- Comment #3 from peds

[Bug target/92729] [avr] Convert the backend to MODE_CC so it can be kept in future releases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92729 --- Comment #29 from abebeos at lazaridis dot com --- (In reply to abebeos from comment #23) > (In reply to Senthil Kumar Selvaraj from comment #21) > > (https://github.com/saaadhu/gcc-avr-cc0/tree/avr-cc0-squashed) > > I can still do a test-run,

[Bug testsuite/97959] Random FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/save-temps c_lto_save-temps_0.o-c_lto_save-temps_0.o link, -O -flto -save-temps

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97959 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/92729] [avr] Convert the backend to MODE_CC so it can be kept in future releases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92729 --- Comment #30 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to abebeos from comment #29) > My understanding is that you have already contributor status here, so could > you make the patch available to the project? I don't think that's true, is it? I thin

[Bug tree-optimization/96369] [8/9 Regression] Wrong evaluation order of || operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96369 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:505767905735a3c8f171c140108ee263f9fdcad6 commit r9-9093-g505767905735a3c8f171c140108ee263f9fdcad6 Author: Richard Biener D

[Bug tree-optimization/96075] [8/9 Regression] bogus alignment for negative step grouped access

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96075 --- Comment #12 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:53d76fe758a3e8e0c1f049e75030278427a8fe5d commit r9-9094-g53d76fe758a3e8e0c1f049e75030278427a8fe5d Author: Richard Biener

[Bug target/92729] [avr] Convert the backend to MODE_CC so it can be kept in future releases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92729 --- Comment #31 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #30) > I don't think that's true, is it? I think Senthil Kumar needs to complete > the paperwork with the FSF for the patches to be "available to the pro

[Bug rtl-optimization/97459] __uint128_t remainder for division by 3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97459 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/93195] -fpatchable-function-entries : __patchable_function_entries should consider comdat groups

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93195 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:694d4a6d0c466d0fbc97920a9c6641a7b349ca35 commit r11-5656-g694d4a6d0c466d0fbc97920a9c6641a7b349ca35 Author: H.J. Lu Date: Wed Dec 2 05:3

[Bug middle-end/93197] -fpatchable-function-entries : __patchable_function_entries does not survive under --gc-sections

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93197 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:694d4a6d0c466d0fbc97920a9c6641a7b349ca35 commit r11-5656-g694d4a6d0c466d0fbc97920a9c6641a7b349ca35 Author: H.J. Lu Date: Wed Dec 2 05:3

[Bug middle-end/93195] -fpatchable-function-entries : __patchable_function_entries should consider comdat groups

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93195 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug inline-asm/98096] New: Inconsistent operand numbering for asm goto with in-out operands

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98096 Bug ID: 98096 Summary: Inconsistent operand numbering for asm goto with in-out operands Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug plugins/98059] [11 regression] Plugins don't compile with c++20

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98059 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug target/92729] [avr] Convert the backend to MODE_CC so it can be kept in future releases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92729 --- Comment #32 from abebeos at lazaridis dot com --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #30) > (In reply to abebeos from comment #29) > > My understanding is that you have already contributor status here, so could > > you make the patch av

[Bug ipa/98075] [10/11 Regression] ICE: verify_cgraph_node failed (error: malloc attribute should be used for a function that returns a pointer) since r10-6699-g33351ff9faa21c4c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98075 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f5850e7da93a6b1e4bec3e8740d08e985433eef3 commit r11-5657-gf5850e7da93a6b1e4bec3e8740d08e985433eef3 Author: Martin Liska Date: Wed

[Bug ipa/98075] [10/11 Regression] ICE: verify_cgraph_node failed (error: malloc attribute should be used for a function that returns a pointer) since r10-6699-g33351ff9faa21c4c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98075 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/92729] [avr] Convert the backend to MODE_CC so it can be kept in future releases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92729 --- Comment #33 from abebeos at lazaridis dot com --- (In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #31) [...] > The question will also be who will get to claim the bounty? If everyone > contributes something, it will be more difficult to de

[Bug tree-optimization/98097] New: Missing warning about strcmp (char[4], "BARZ")

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98097 Bug ID: 98097 Summary: Missing warning about strcmp (char[4], "BARZ") Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tre

[Bug tree-optimization/98097] Missing warning about strcmp (char[4], "BARZ")

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98097 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic CC|

[Bug target/98086] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2315

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98086 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug plugins/98059] [11 regression] Plugins don't compile with c++20

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98059 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bad800c03d00a57fc21718c160459d9a1e8d747a commit r11-5660-gbad800c03d00a57fc21718c160459d9a1e8d747a Author: Scott Snyder Date: Wed

[Bug tree-optimization/97630] [11 Regression] SLP vectorizer leaks memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97630 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:feb93adf76eda52385a73eb57c5bef7c870a2564 commit r11-5661-gfeb93adf76eda52385a73eb57c5bef7c870a2564 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/97630] [11 Regression] SLP vectorizer leaks memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97630 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/98060] Failure to optimize cmp+setnb+add to cmp+sbb

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98060 --- Comment #2 from Uroš Bizjak --- Created attachment 49662 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49662&action=edit Testcases

[Bug target/98060] Failure to optimize cmp+setnb+add to cmp+sbb

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98060 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ubizjak at gmail dot com

[Bug tree-optimization/98097] Missing warning about strcmp (char[4], "BARZ")

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98097 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |msebor at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/98097] Missing warning about strcmp (char[4], "BARZ")

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98097 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug plugins/98059] [11 regression] Plugins don't compile with c++20

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98059 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- This change is incorrect, r11-532-g4b38d56dbac6742b038551a36ec80200313123a1 is wrong to reject that assignment operator. The declarator-id is "operator=" and so doesn't contain a template-id at all.

[Bug rtl-optimization/98037] ICE in dse.c:find_shift_sequence for large non-integer modes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98037 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fb9ee3e7419178e6530c09b99272022d062b50f3 commit r10-9108-gfb9ee3e7419178e6530c09b99272022d062b50f3 Author: Richard Sand

[Bug tree-optimization/97904] ICE with AArch64 SVE intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97904 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:20fc59de1e21aaddc9ae08bc9d7e060df6706579 commit r10-9110-g20fc59de1e21aaddc9ae08bc9d7e060df6706579 Author: Richard Sand

[Bug plugins/98059] [11 regression] Plugins don't compile with c++20

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98059 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- Well, strictly speaking the change isn't wrong, and arguably it's an improvement. But it's incorrect for GCC to require it in C++20 mode.

[Bug libstdc++/98098] New: std::call_once throws std::system_error in statically linked executable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98098 Bug ID: 98098 Summary: std::call_once throws std::system_error in statically linked executable Product: gcc Version: 8.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug plugins/98059] [11 regression] Plugins don't compile with c++20

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98059 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- We were using: template struct S { private: S (const S &) = delete; S operator = (const S &) = delete; }; With the change we are using: template struct S { private: S (const S &) = delete; S operato

[Bug plugins/98059] [11 regression] Plugins don't compile with c++20

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98059 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to CVS Commits from comment #2) > Apparently vec.h doesn't build with -std=c++20/gnu++20, since the > DR2237 r11-532 change. > template > class auto_delete_vec > { > priva

[Bug plugins/98059] [11 regression] Plugins don't compile with c++20

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98059 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/98098] std::call_once throws std::system_error in statically linked executable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98098 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/58909] C++11's condition variables fail with static linking

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58909 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||g.bonacci at libero dot it --- Comment

[Bug libstdc++/68735] FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/libfundts.cc print ab

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68735 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug libstdc++/68735] FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/libfundts.cc print ab

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68735 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- Ah, I think the problem is that Python 2 has a 42-bit int and so casting a big endian pointer to int loses half the bits.

[Bug inline-asm/69899] gcc ICE on invalid code on x86_64-linux-gnu in "replace_reg"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69899 G. Steinmetz changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gs...@t-online.de --- Comment #4 from G.

[Bug c/98099] New: ICE in gen_lowpart_common, at emit-rtl.c:1554

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98099 Bug ID: 98099 Summary: ICE in gen_lowpart_common, at emit-rtl.c:1554 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug gcov-profile/96919] [GCOV] uncovered line of stack allocation while using virutal destructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96919 --- Comment #9 from Bhavana Kilambi --- Hi, The problem seems to be with the code in add_line_counts() function in gcov.c. Specifically with this statement - line->blocks.push_back (block); This line is present inside the line!= NULL condition

[Bug c/98100] New: ICE in expand_debug_locations, at cfgexpand.c:5610

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98100 Bug ID: 98100 Summary: ICE in expand_debug_locations, at cfgexpand.c:5610 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug gcov-profile/96919] [GCOV] uncovered line of stack allocation while using virutal destructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96919 --- Comment #10 from Bhavana Kilambi --- Created attachment 49664 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49664&action=edit Removes the push_back() statement

[Bug c++/98101] New: ICE in mark_reachable_handlers, at tree-eh.c:4033

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98101 Bug ID: 98101 Summary: ICE in mark_reachable_handlers, at tree-eh.c:4033 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/98102] New: [9/10/11 Regression] ICE tree check: expected block, have function_decl in change_scope, at final.c:1480

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98102 Bug ID: 98102 Summary: [9/10/11 Regression] ICE tree check: expected block, have function_decl in change_scope, at final.c:1480 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFI

[Bug c++/98101] ICE in mark_reachable_handlers, at tree-eh.c:4033

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98101 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-12-02 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/98103] New: [10/11 Regression] ICE tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl minimal' structure, have 'integer_cst' in cxx_eval_dynamic_cast_fn, at cp/constexpr.c:2003

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98103 Bug ID: 98103 Summary: [10/11 Regression] ICE tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl minimal' structure, have 'integer_cst' in cxx_eval_dynamic_cast_fn, at cp/constexpr.c:2003

[Bug c++/98103] [10/11 Regression] ICE tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl minimal' structure, have 'integer_cst' in cxx_eval_dynamic_cast_fn, at cp/constexpr.c:2003

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98103 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-12-02 Keywords|

[Bug ipa/98082] [11 Regression] ICE in set_rtl, at cfgexpand.c:178 since r11-3257-g225a08220e444371

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98082 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6

[Bug c++/98072] [9/10 Regression] ICE in cp_parser_omp_var_list_no_open, at cp/parser.c:34843

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98072 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[9/10/11 Regression] ICE in |[9/10 Regression] ICE in

[Bug libstdc++/68735] FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/libfundts.cc print ab

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68735 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |redi at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug libstdc++/68735] FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/libfundts.cc print ab

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68735 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #5) > Ah, I think the problem is that Python 2 has a 42-bit int 32-bit of course. But there's also something else going on. I have a patch.

[Bug target/97457] [10 Regression] SVE: wrong code since r10-4752-g2d56600c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97457 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:75a5af680a1788ba844902fd0681958da8e2a4ce commit r10-9112-g75a5af680a1788ba844902fd0681958da8e2a4ce Author: Richard Sand

[Bug rtl-optimization/98037] ICE in dse.c:find_shift_sequence for large non-integer modes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98037 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|A

[Bug libstdc++/68735] FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/libfundts.cc print ab

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68735 --- Comment #7 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- Currently, we also have the following two additional fails: FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/91997.cc print a FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/91997.cc print a

[Bug tree-optimization/97904] ICE with AArch64 SVE intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97904 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|A

[Bug target/97457] [10 Regression] SVE: wrong code since r10-4752-g2d56600c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97457 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolutio

  1   2   >