https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98041
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98043
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98045
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code |build, ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98048
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98054
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
Summary|ICE: in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98038
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98059
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98062
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98064
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98065
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98066
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98043
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|(Regression) ICE in |[10/11 Regression] ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98045
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-11-30
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98049
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Last reconfir
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22326
--- Comment #17 from luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to rsand...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #16)
> > 2) mad2.c
> >
> > float foo (double x, float y, float z)
> > {
> >return ( y * fabs (x) + z );
> > }
> >
> >
> > mad2.c.098t.cunrol
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98054
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confir
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98056
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98057
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-11-30
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98054
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||11.0
Summary|[11 Regression] I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98057
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98064
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE in |ICE in
|check_loop_clos
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98054
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ville.voutilainen at
gmail do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98057
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||10.2.0
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98067
Bug ID: 98067
Summary: [11 Regression] d: ICE in in force_decl_die, at
dwarf2out.c:26197 with -gdwarf-2 -gstrict-dwarf
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98067
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||98058
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97954
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97459
--- Comment #22 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4d87bd39bafae86747944b2f8c53fdbc43b8dac3
commit r11-5533-g4d87bd39bafae86747944b2f8c53fdbc43b8dac3
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98067
--- Comment #2 from Iain Buclaw ---
Backtrace:
0xaf0ca2 force_decl_die
../../gcc/dwarf2out.c:26197
0xae7bd6 force_decl_die
../../gcc/dwarf2out.c:26142
0xae7bd6 dwarf2out_imported_module_or_decl_1
../../gcc/dwarf2out.c:2680
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98067
--- Comment #3 from Iain Buclaw ---
It looks like the regressing change was r11-5003.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98066
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98067
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-11-30
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98056
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.3
Summary|internal compiler
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98066
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 49650
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49650&action=edit
Patch candidate
With the patch I see that the target can't expand it to RTL:
$ ./xgcc -B. pr98066.c -mvsx -O1 -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98066
--- Comment #4 from Arseny Solokha ---
Is it a duplicate of PR98065, then?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98045
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|marxin at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98066
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE in |[11 Regression] ICE:
|r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87818
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e855b30c28391b190eebb8e6afc8d2116a6d85de
commit r11-5535-ge855b30c28391b190eebb8e6afc8d2116a6d85de
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date: Sat No
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87818
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91816
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Stam Markianos-Wright
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3a936a9ecddef58ad5b6ee11697c3f791b942708
commit r8-10655-g3a936a9ecddef58ad5b6ee11697c3f791b942708
Author: Stam Mark
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91816
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Stam Markianos-Wright
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6b7ab0e565d79a7e6ae5dbbf17a5eb4eafe56dc8
commit r9-9081-g6b7ab0e565d79a7e6ae5dbbf17a5eb4eafe56dc8
Author: Stam Marki
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91816
Stam Markianos-Wright changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98054
--- Comment #4 from Ville Voutilainen ---
Patch at https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-November/560591.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98067
--- Comment #4 from Iain Buclaw ---
What fails is gen_decl_die()
---
case CONST_DECL:
─> if (!is_fortran () && !is_ada () && !is_dlang ())
{
/* The individual enumerators of an enum type get output when we output
the Dwarf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98067
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98067
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Iain Buclaw from comment #4)
> What fails is gen_decl_die()
>
> ---
> case CONST_DECL:
> ─> if (!is_fortran () && !is_ada () && !is_dlang ())
> {
>/* The individual enumerators of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98066
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5877c544c18259e6f8a07ec99e22bbfe8c6d64a6
commit r11-5538-g5877c544c18259e6f8a07ec99e22bbfe8c6d64a6
Author: Martin Liska
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98066
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98064
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
The issue is
t.C:11:24: note: extracting lane for live stmt _201 = (signed short) pretmp_25;
where the vectorized def of this out-of-loop definition is in-loop and thus
replacing its uses would require a L
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98057
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
I've got a patch candidate.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98048
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4bcded23eb87c55a1a3fcd23d5629a0c35aee4ba
commit r11-5539-g4bcded23eb87c55a1a3fcd23d5629a0c35aee4ba
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98063
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98048
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56549
--- Comment #7 from Julien Ruffin ---
Here is the patch for the current master. I have tested it on large C++ code
bases. So far, it builds successfully and significantly faster.
diff --git a/libcpp/files.c b/libcpp/files.c
index 301b2379a23..cb
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98043
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98064
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ebbe3f29518854c36574adbd4fa82fd56fa64056
commit r11-5542-gebbe3f29518854c36574adbd4fa82fd56fa64056
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98064
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98068
Bug ID: 98068
Summary: [11 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/atomic/pr65345-4.c -O2
-flto -fno-use-linker-plugin -flto-partition=none
(internal compiler error) by r11-3303
Product:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98068
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92729
--- Comment #20 from abebeos at lazaridis dot com ---
Testsuite comparison on local dev system looks quite good:
https://github.com/abebeos/avr-gnu/issues/1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92729
Senthil Kumar Selvaraj changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||saaadhu at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98067
--- Comment #6 from Iain Sandoe ---
although this was discovered on Darwin, I guess any platform supporting D could
be invoked with -gdwarf-2 and that ought not to ICE.
I suppose we could adjust configury to decline building D without DWARF >= 3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92729
--- Comment #22 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
(In reply to abebeos from comment #20)
> Testsuite comparison on local dev system looks quite good:
>
> https://github.com/abebeos/avr-gnu/issues/1
Just as a heads-up: Please keep in mind that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98068
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98005
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97867
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98068
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
I guess it's PR97172.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98067
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5)
> > Would it be correct to fallback on a lang_hooks.name comparison if
> > dwarf_version < 2?
>
> I wonder if we can instead "delay" applying "strict dwarf" to th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92729
--- Comment #23 from abebeos at lazaridis dot com ---
(In reply to Senthil Kumar Selvaraj from comment #21)
> (https://github.com/saaadhu/gcc-avr-cc0/tree/avr-cc0-squashed)
I can still do a test-run, to see if it produces less fails than pip's on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92729
--- Comment #24 from Richard Biener ---
Amending / adjusting
https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Building_Cross_Toolchains_with_gcc
(the only place that somewhat "documents" how to setup AVR testing) is
appreciated.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98043
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98013
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f4e7ea81d1369d4d6cb6d8e440aefb3407142e05
commit r11-5571-gf4e7ea81d1369d4d6cb6d8e440aefb3407142e05
Author: Tobias Burnus
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98010
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f4e7ea81d1369d4d6cb6d8e440aefb3407142e05
commit r11-5571-gf4e7ea81d1369d4d6cb6d8e440aefb3407142e05
Author: Tobias Burnus
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97867
--- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka ---
>
> FWIW, did you configure with --enable-host-shared ? Forgetting to enable that
> is the usual source of weird errors when building libgccjit.
I think it does not let you to build it otherwise, but I belie
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98011
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1d6f6ac693a8601bef9fe4ba72eb6fbf7b60b5cd
commit r11-5572-g1d6f6ac693a8601bef9fe4ba72eb6fbf7b60b5cd
Author: Tobias Burnus
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98013
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98010
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92729
--- Comment #25 from abebeos at lazaridis dot com ---
(In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #22)
[...]
> > https://www.gnu.org/prep/maintain/html_node/Copyright-Papers.html
FSF has a fascinating way to make trivial things complicate
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98011
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97172
--- Comment #12 from Richard Biener ---
unsharing the tree is correct AFAICS, avoiding the attribute for VLA types
would likely also be good (are those handled in any reasonable way?). Note
nothing will update those SSA names so they should not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98069
Bug ID: 98069
Summary: Miscompilation with -O3
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89057
Abhiraj Garakapati changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||abhiraj.garakapati at gmail
dot co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98068
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97172
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98067
--- Comment #8 from Iain Buclaw ---
As a last resort I could just not emit D manifest constants as CONST_DECLs.
They are a nice-to-have from the debugger, but functionally equivalent to C
macros.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98060
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80780
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80780
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I'm aware of
https://github.com/cplusplus/draft/pull/3749/commits/ade9b1552eed5b1b0b3fc2808e6575ee6b526301
and am working on that today incidentally.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92729
--- Comment #26 from abebeos at lazaridis dot com ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #24)
> Amending / adjusting
> https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Building_Cross_Toolchains_with_gcc
> (the only place that somewhat "documents" how to setup AVR t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98069
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Miscompilation with -O3 |[8/9/10/11 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98069
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||7.4.0
Known to fail|
une=generic --with-arch_32=x86-64 --disable-bootstrap
--disable-libunwind-exceptions --enable-gnu-unique-object
--enable-linker-build-id --with-linker-hash-style=gnu --enable-plugin
--enable-initfini-array --disable-libgcj --disable-multilib
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96679
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:28a7fdd81e857057f18f87a3c9dd180ad99b77f6
commit r11-5579-g28a7fdd81e857057f18f87a3c9dd180ad99b77f6
Author: Eugene Rozenfeld
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96679
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
Resolutio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19987
Bug 19987 depends on bug 96679, which changed state.
Bug 96679 Summary: Failure to optimize or+and+or pattern to and+or
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96679
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80780
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Oh great, thanks :-)
I might push my implementation of std::source_location, with some tests
commented out for now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98037
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f835e9f6562dda9c8a1384be2c9d4e45c112ed8e
commit r11-5580-gf835e9f6562dda9c8a1384be2c9d4e45c112ed8e
Author: Richard Sandiford
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97995
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97172
--- Comment #14 from Martin Sebor ---
I submitted a simple patch to do the unsharing as the first step toward fixing
this bug here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-November/559770.html
I'm not sure I understand correctly what you
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80780
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The default argument case is:
source_location f(source_location a = source_location::current()) {
return a;
}
int main()
{
auto loc = f(); // f's first argument corresponds to this line of code
VERI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80780
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 49653
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49653&action=edit
gcc11-pr80780-wip.patch
For the default argument, my current ugly hack is attached.
But guess it needs to be do
1 - 100 of 140 matches
Mail list logo
