[Bug c++/55004] [meta-bug] constexpr issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004 Bug 55004 depends on bug 70489, which changed state. Bug 70489 Summary: ICE in cxx_eval_increment_expression initializing a VLA in a constexpr function https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70489 What|Removed

[Bug c++/97749] ICE: Segmentation Fault on C++20 NTTP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97749 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org Se

[Bug tree-optimization/86707] Missed optimization: optimizing set of if statements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86707 Andrew Macleod changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amacleod at redhat dot com --- Comment

[Bug target/97866] [11 Regression] bootstrap error in libasan building a s390x-linux-gnu cross compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97866 Ilya Leoshkevich changed: What|Removed |Added CC||iii at linux dot ibm.com --- Comment

[Bug c++/97878] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr, at cp/constexpr.c:6825

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97878 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug libstdc++/97876] stop_token header doesn't compile on clang-8 with -std=c++20

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97876 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- It works fine in Clang 9.0.0 though. We've never really set a hard limit on how many old versions of Clang we support, but given that 9 and 10 (and trunk) work, I'm inclined to think that three versions see

[Bug libstdc++/97876] stop_token header doesn't compile on clang-8 with -std=c++20

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97876 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- Changing the _Stop_state_ref default constructor to: _Stop_state_ref() noexcept {} allows it to compile. It shouldn't be needed, but I suppose since the constructor is already non-trivial (due to the

[Bug c++/97837] ICE on requires with *this in destructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97837 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC|

[Bug c++/97801] overload resolution ambiguity isn't detected when rvalue ref qualifier is involved

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97801 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/97751] C++20 NTTP: class template argument deduction failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97751 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org Reso

[Bug c++/93083] copy deduction rejected when doing CTAD for NTTP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93083 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||janpmoeller at gmx dot de --- Comment #4

[Bug c++/93083] copy deduction rejected when doing CTAD for NTTP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93083 --- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek --- Short test from Bug 97751: template struct use_as_nttp {}; template struct has_nttp {}; template using has_nttp_2 = has_nttp;

[Bug ipa/92535] [10/11 regression] ICF is relatively expensive and became less effective

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92535 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Com

[Bug ipa/92535] [10/11 regression] ICF is relatively expensive and became less effective

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92535 --- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka --- Created attachment 49577 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49577&action=edit Memory use of GCC trunk (11) with ICF

[Bug ipa/92535] [10/11 regression] ICF is relatively expensive and became less effective

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92535 --- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka --- Created attachment 49578 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49578&action=edit Memory use of GCC trunk (11) without ICF

[Bug target/97866] [11 Regression] bootstrap error in libasan building a s390x-linux-gnu cross compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97866 --- Comment #2 from Ilya Leoshkevich --- Never mind, I managed to reproduce it now: ubuntu-focal-amd64$ git rev-parse --short HEAD 77f67db2a47 ubuntu-focal-amd64$ ../configure --target=s390x-linux-gnu --exec-prefix=/usr --disable-bootstrap --di

[Bug target/97866] [11 Regression] bootstrap error in libasan building a s390x-linux-gnu cross compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97866 --- Comment #3 from Ilya Leoshkevich --- I believe it's already fixed by: commit 253c415a1acba50711c82693426391743ac18040 Author: Vladimir N. Makarov Date: Sun Nov 15 11:22:19 2020 -0500 Do not put reload insns in the last empty BB.

[Bug ipa/92535] [10/11 regression] ICF is relatively expensive and became less effective

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92535 --- Comment #10 from Jan Hubicka --- Here are main reason for miscompares: 1125 libxul.so.wpa.076i.icf: false returned: 'variables types are different' in equals at ../../gcc/ipa-icf.c:1697 1171 libxul.so.wpa.076i.icf: false returned: 'DE

[Bug target/97870] [11 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: too many outgoing branch edges from bb 2)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97870 --- Comment #2 from Vladimir Makarov --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > Possibly related to the asm goto enhancements. This test should work only for x86-64. Running it on other targets can give an error. So error about inc

[Bug libstdc++/97876] stop_token header doesn't compile on clang-8 with -std=c++20

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97876 --- Comment #3 from Eric Niebler --- It seems like GitHub actions uses the latest libstdc++ by default when testing even with old (e.g., clang-4) toolsets. That seems busted, but regardless, this is now breaking _all_ my Linux clang tests for any

[Bug c/97882] New: Segmentation Fault on improper redeclaration of function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97882 Bug ID: 97882 Summary: Segmentation Fault on improper redeclaration of function Product: gcc Version: 10.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug target/97865] MACOSX_DEPLOY_TARGET needs to be updated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97865 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug target/97865] MACOSX_DEPLOY_TARGET needs to be updated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97865 --- Comment #11 from Iain Sandoe --- Created attachment 49581 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49581&action=edit regenerated files the second patch is all the regenerated files .. much larger :)

[Bug c++/97877] [11 Regression] ICE in cp_genericize_r, at cp/cp-gimplify.c:968

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97877 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Nathan Sidwell : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e0da4aed176a8de042a8482beb65499e29448556 commit r11-5108-ge0da4aed176a8de042a8482beb65499e29448556 Author: Nathan Sidwell Date:

[Bug c++/97877] [11 Regression] ICE in cp_genericize_r, at cp/cp-gimplify.c:968

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97877 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/92535] [10/11 regression] ICF is relatively expensive and became less effective

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92535 --- Comment #11 from Jan Hubicka --- Created attachment 49582 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49582&action=edit Memory use of GCC 10 release branch with ICF

[Bug tree-optimization/22326] promotions (from float to double) are not removed when they should be able to

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22326 --- Comment #7 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- I agree that match.pd is a sensible place for this (and the front end is not, we should be getting optimizations out of the front ends). I'd encourage anyone looking at this also to look at

[Bug tree-optimization/91029] missed optimization regarding value of modulo operation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91029 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Andrew Macleod : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1e27e7a582a9b86bcf86f5c103cd947672746e97 commit r11-5111-g1e27e7a582a9b86bcf86f5c103cd947672746e97 Author: Andrew MacLeod Date:

[Bug target/97865] libtool needs to be updated for Darwin20.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97865 --- Comment #12 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- config.sub and config.guess are imported, unmodified, from upstream config.git. libtool has lots of local changes, hopefully all of them submitted upstream but maybe not and maybe some no

[Bug target/97865] libtool needs to be updated for Darwin20.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97865 --- Comment #13 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #12) > config.sub and config.guess are imported, unmodified, from upstream > config.git. thanks I will try to do that and test it over the next days (I've be

[Bug libstdc++/94936] pmr::synchronized_pool_resource crashes without -pthread

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94936 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cbc9dab25fb807278d2e09ec3e89e466385c9fce commit r9-9054-gcbc9dab25fb807278d2e09ec3e89e466385c9fce Author: Jonathan Wakely

[Bug libstdc++/94936] pmr::synchronized_pool_resource crashes without -pthread

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94936 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/97882] [8/9/10/11 Regression] Segmentation Fault on improper redeclaration of function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97882 Joseph S. Myers changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-11-17 Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/91029] missed optimization regarding value of modulo operation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91029 Andrew Macleod changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amacleod at redhat dot com

[Bug tree-optimization/85316] [meta-bug] VRP range propagation missed cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85316 Bug 85316 depends on bug 91029, which changed state. Bug 91029 Summary: missed optimization regarding value of modulo operation https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91029 What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/91191] vrp and boolean arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91191 Andrew Macleod changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aldyh at redhat dot com,

[Bug libstdc++/93421] futex.cc use of futex syscall is not time64-compatible

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93421 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1e3e6c700f04fe6992b9077541e434172c1cbdae commit r11-5114-g1e3e6c700f04fe6992b9077541e434172c1cbdae Author: Jonathan Wakely Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/91029] missed optimization regarding value of modulo operation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91029 --- Comment #5 from Bruno Haible --- Nice! Thank you.

[Bug tree-optimization/97744] [11 regression] 32 bit floating point result errors after r11-4637

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97744 Kewen Lin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/97883] New: [C++20] Segmentation fault on template with braced initializer list A<{}>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97883 Bug ID: 97883 Summary: [C++20] Segmentation fault on template with braced initializer list A<{}> Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug demangler/85304] Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85304 Nikhil changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nmahalle at in dot ibm.com --- Comment #5 from

[Bug target/97873] Failure to optimize abs optimally (at least one completely useless instruction on x86)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97873 Hongtao.liu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||crazylht at gmail dot com --- Comment #3 f

[Bug other/97417] RISC-V Unnecessary andi instruction when loading volatile bool

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97417 --- Comment #39 from Levy --- Checked all pass from 250r.shorten_memrefs to 270r.ce2 In 269r.combine I saw the following combination merged the replaced address: --- modifying insn i327: r9

[Bug c/97884] New: INT_MIN falsely expanded to 64 bit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97884 Bug ID: 97884 Summary: INT_MIN falsely expanded to 64 bit Product: gcc Version: 10.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c A

[Bug c/97884] INT_MIN falsely expanded to 64 bit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97884 --- Comment #1 from s.baur...@tu-berlin.de --- Created attachment 49584 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49584&action=edit preprocessed source

[Bug ipa/92535] [10/11 regression] ICF is relatively expensive and became less effective

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92535 --- Comment #12 from Jan Hubicka --- With ODR name hashing fix and fix to streaming the access types we now get: 957 false returned: 'different references' in compare_symbol_references at ../../gcc/ipa-icf.c:465 961 false returned: '

[Bug tree-optimization/85315] missed range optimisation opportunity for derefences where index must be 0 or otherwise constrained

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85315 --- Comment #11 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Andrew Macleod from comment #10) > OK, so whats the deal here. I can't really follow what the final request, or > action is. > > Is there a conclusion on what needs to be done? if anything? S

<    1   2