https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97677
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||7.5.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97682
Bug ID: 97682
Summary: Miscompiled tail call with -fPIC
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97683
Bug ID: 97683
Summary: [11 Regression] nios2 assembler branch offset errors
building glibc
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: assemble-fai
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97658
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97140
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6058b874ef98af1104a5cb4618e1f3bfa7e3761c
commit r11-4632-g6058b874ef98af1104a5cb4618e1f3bfa7e3761c
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Mon Sep 21 05:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97682
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab ---
Looks like the miscompilation happens in the pro_and_epilog pass.
Before:
(insn 2520 2519 2521 320 (set (reg:DI 6 t1)
(symbol_ref/i:DI
("_ZNSt6vectorIN4llvm26BlockFrequencyInfoImplBase13FrequencyDa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97681
--- Comment #5 from Luke Dalessandro ---
The more I think about this the more it bothers me.
I recognize that it might be very difficult to implement in gcc's
infrastructure, but I think the design decision that "if it _can_ be constant
evaluat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97267
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:18963d3bee780cd8a6477ad5a198410758ec4e60
commit r11-4634-g18963d3bee780cd8a6477ad5a198410758ec4e60
Author: Alan Modra
Date: Sun Sep
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97267
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma |https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97682
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab ---
I think the bug is really that riscv_legitimize_call_address uses
RISCV_PROLOGUE_TEMP, which can conflict with its uses in the epilogue, as seen.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97684
Bug ID: 97684
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in reg_preferred_class, at
reginfo.c:789
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97685
Bug ID: 97685
Summary: -march=tremont should enable
MOVDIRI/MOVDIR64B/CLDEMOTE/SGX/WAITPKG.
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97686
Bug ID: 97686
Summary: [11 regression] fortran.dg/pdt_14.f03 hangs after
r11-4586
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97679
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Summary|ICE with CTA
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97687
Bug ID: 97687
Summary: -Wfatal-errors prints some notes but not others
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80532
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38470
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90834
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77510
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70075
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58449
Tobias Renger changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gcc-im5revto at tobiasrenger
dot n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96789
--- Comment #36 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f5e18dd9c7dacc9671044fc669bd5c1b26b6bdba
commit r11-4637-gf5e18dd9c7dacc9671044fc669bd5c1b26b6bdba
Author: Kewen Lin
Date: Tue Nov 3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97676
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |11.0
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97320
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97678
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-11-03
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97680
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
Summary|new test case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97683
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97681
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-11-03
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97684
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code, ra
Target Mileston
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97682
Kito Cheng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97686
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97652
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97642
--- Comment #3 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1)
> The problem is that in the RTL representation there is nothing that would
> tell cse, forward propagation or combiner etc. not to optimize the
> (insn 7 6 8 2 (set
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97678
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
On x86_64 the initialization loop is miscompiled.
int
main ()
{
unsigned int i = 0;
signed char a[155 * 2];
unsigned short b[155 * 2];
for (i = 0; i < 155; i++)
{
a[i * 2] = i * 2 + i % 3;
101 - 134 of 134 matches
Mail list logo