[Bug c++/97433] C++20 Coroutines, Unexpected reordering of await_resume, return_value and yield_value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97433 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-10-16 Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug c++/97452] [coroutines] incorrect sequencing of await_resume() when multiple co_await expressions occur in a single statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97452 --- Comment #1 from Iain Sandoe --- probably a dup of 97433.

[Bug target/97194] optimize vector element set/extract at variable position

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97194 --- Comment #15 from Hongtao.liu --- I'm working on add the expander, i encounter a problem. for V32HI vec_set with constant index, the expander existed under TARGET_AVX512F, but for variable index, the expander should be existed under TARGET_AV

[Bug target/97194] optimize vector element set/extract at variable position

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97194 --- Comment #16 from Hongtao.liu --- (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #15) > I'm working on add the expander, i encounter a problem. > > for V32HI vec_set with constant index, the expander existed under > TARGET_AVX512F, but for variable in

[Bug libstdc++/97449] [11 Regression] libstdc++ cannot be compiled with clang after 3427e31331677ca826c5588c87924214f7e5c54b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97449 --- Comment #2 from Ville Voutilainen --- Patch available: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-October/556323.html

[Bug target/97194] optimize vector element set/extract at variable position

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97194 --- Comment #17 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #15) > I'm working on add the expander, i encounter a problem. > > for V32HI vec_set with constant index, the expander existed under > TARGET_AVX512F, but for variable

[Bug target/97194] optimize vector element set/extract at variable position

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97194 --- Comment #18 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #16) > (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #15) > > I'm working on add the expander, i encounter a problem. > > > > for V32HI vec_set with constant index, the expand

[Bug ada/95953] UTF Convert for UTF_16 to UTF_8 fails for values in U+10000 to U+10FFFF.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95953 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Pierre-Marie de Rodat : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cfe989ca49dab9a3fda9e5401a932db168848304 commit r11-3984-gcfe989ca49dab9a3fda9e5401a932db168848304 Author: Arnaud Charlet D

[Bug ipa/97404] [9/10/11 Regression] aarch64: Wrong code since r9-3666-g74ca1c01d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97404 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a86623902767122c71c7229150a8b8a79cbb3673 commit r11-3997-ga86623902767122c71c7229150a8b8a79cbb3673 Author: Martin Liska Date: Thu

[Bug target/97194] optimize vector element set/extract at variable position

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97194 --- Comment #19 from Hongtao.liu --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #17) > (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #15) > > I'm working on add the expander, i encounter a problem. > > > > for V32HI vec_set with constant index, the expand

[Bug target/97194] optimize vector element set/extract at variable position

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97194 --- Comment #20 from Hongtao.liu --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #18) > (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #16) > > (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #15) > > > I'm working on add the expander, i encounter a problem. > > > >

[Bug ipa/97404] [9/10/11 Regression] aarch64: Wrong code since r9-3666-g74ca1c01d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97404 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||11.0 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --

[Bug fortran/97454] New: Decls for Fortran library procedures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97454 Bug ID: 97454 Summary: Decls for Fortran library procedures Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug target/97194] optimize vector element set/extract at variable position

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97194 --- Comment #21 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Fri, 16 Oct 2020, crazylht at gmail dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97194 > > --- Comment #20 from Hongtao.liu --- > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1

[Bug fortran/97454] Decls for Fortran library procedures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97454 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED See Also|

[Bug fortran/97455] New: ICE on invalid code (wrong pointer assignment) in SELECT TYPE construct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97455 Bug ID: 97455 Summary: ICE on invalid code (wrong pointer assignment) in SELECT TYPE construct Product: gcc Version: 9.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug ipa/97404] [9/10 Regression] aarch64: Wrong code since r9-3666-g74ca1c01d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97404 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Martin Liska : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:92fedd32d8568f2336050b064da50b3c6441d029 commit r10-8896-g92fedd32d8568f2336050b064da50b3c6441d029 Author: Martin Liska Dat

[Bug ipa/97404] [9/10 Regression] aarch64: Wrong code since r9-3666-g74ca1c01d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97404 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug ipa/97404] [9/10 Regression] aarch64: Wrong code since r9-3666-g74ca1c01d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97404 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Martin Liska : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3faef34e9e0888ad82a115a5a7d775d299863c4f commit r9-8999-g3faef34e9e0888ad82a115a5a7d775d299863c4f Author: Martin Liska Date:

[Bug sanitizer/97414] AddressSanitizer CHECK failed: detect_stack_use_after_return and detect_invalid_pointer_pairs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97414 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mail at milianw dot de --- Comment #2 fro

[Bug sanitizer/97416] pointer-compare sanitizer + use-after-return: CHECK failed: /build/gcc/src/gcc/libsanitizer/asan/asan_thread.cpp:369 "((bottom)) != (0)" (0x0, 0x0)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97416 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

Re: How to fix GCC Upgrade issues(which always disappeared by add some trace prints)?

This mailing list is for automated mails from our bug database. Please use the gcc-help mailing list for questions like this.

[Bug ipa/96394] [10/11 Regression] ICE in add_new_edges_to_heap, at ipa-inline.c:1746 (-O3 PGO)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96394 --- Comment #22 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Martin Jambor : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a9e64bb6d0801f29d65f357f90e6d7a2daeb6ca9 commit r10-8897-ga9e64bb6d0801f29d65f357f90e6d7a2daeb6ca9 Author: Martin Jambor

[Bug ipa/96394] [10/11 Regression] ICE in add_new_edges_to_heap, at ipa-inline.c:1746 (-O3 PGO)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96394 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/97426] [11 regression] new test case gcc.dg/ipa/modref-1.c fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97426 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jan Hubicka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e27c8cc931f6b48a732f69b0f9d48d4166ab5522 commit r11-4003-ge27c8cc931f6b48a732f69b0f9d48d4166ab5522 Author: Jan Hubicka Date: Fri Oc

[Bug bootstrap/97355] [11 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure!

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97355 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|WAITING

[Bug bootstrap/97451] [11 Regression] r11-3959 failed --with-build-config=bootstrap-cet

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97451 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug c++/97456] New: An incorrect optimization causes a function to always return the same value when using -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97456 Bug ID: 97456 Summary: An incorrect optimization causes a function to always return the same value when using -flto Product: gcc Version: 10.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/97456] An incorrect optimization causes a function to always return the same value when using -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97456 --- Comment #1 from Anonym Spaghetti --- Created attachment 49384 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49384&action=edit Preprocessed file

[Bug bootstrap/97355] [11 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure!

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97355 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #14

[Bug libgomp/97291] [SIMT] Move SIMT_XCHG_* out of non-uniform execution region

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97291 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by SRINATH PARVATHANENI : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:377535881166969dba43794f298170978d797ef6 commit r11-4004-g377535881166969dba43794f298170978d797ef6 Author: Srinath Parvathane

[Bug libgomp/97291] [SIMT] Move SIMT_XCHG_* out of non-uniform execution region

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97291 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by SRINATH PARVATHANENI : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4199cfa3d18eb99893456bd461061daa75115711 commit r10-8899-g4199cfa3d18eb99893456bd461061daa75115711 Author: Srinath P

[Bug libgomp/97291] [SIMT] Move SIMT_XCHG_* out of non-uniform execution region

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97291 SRINATH PARVATHANENI changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sripar01 at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug ipa/97456] [10/11 Regression] An incorrect optimization causes a function to always return the same value when using -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97456 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/97271] [ARM MVE]: Wrong code generated for scatter store with writeback intrinsics with -O2.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97271 SRINATH PARVATHANENI changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/97386] [8/9/10/11 Regression] wrong code with __builtin_bswap16() of rotated 64bit value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97386 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1a98b22b0468214ae8463d075dacaeea1d46df15 commit r10-8902-g1a98b22b0468214ae8463d075dacaeea1d46df15 Author: Jakub Jelinek D

[Bug middle-end/95886] suboptimal memcpy with embedded zero bytes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95886 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:75a016e24a335db9c93ccd2478433adfe773d898 commit r10-8903-g75a016e24a335db9c93ccd2478433adfe773d898 Author: Martin Sebor Da

[Bug c++/97197] With -O2, Incorrect -Werror=maybe-uninitialized thrown, leads to 'target_mem_ref' and 'dump_expr' in message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97197 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7790a71c07029546110a039f47611dfa967adc51 commit r10-8900-g7790a71c07029546110a039f47611dfa967adc51 Author: Jakub Jelinek D

[Bug sanitizer/97294] ASAN "dynamic-stack-buffer-overflow" false positive with OpenMP reduction to std::vector

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97294 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a30fcfb3b848e4b895cb47378b4a250184af3afe commit r10-8901-ga30fcfb3b848e4b895cb47378b4a250184af3afe Author: Jakub Jelinek D

[Bug middle-end/95886] suboptimal memcpy with embedded zero bytes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95886 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0cf293649b6c495249854133159ef66bf9c43904 commit r10-8904-g0cf293649b6c495249854133159ef66bf9c43904 Author: H.J. Lu Date:

[Bug target/95032] [11 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2294 since r11-187-g98329e3f5b85acc50d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95032 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/97386] [8/9 Regression] wrong code with __builtin_bswap16() of rotated 64bit value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97386 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9/10/11 Regression] |[8/9 Regression] wrong code

[Bug tree-optimization/95056] [11 Regression] slp-perm-9.c fails on aarch64 after gbc484e250990393e887f7239157cc85ce6fadcce

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95056 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug target/95151] [9/10/11 Regression] Add cmpmemM pattern for -minline-all-stringops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95151 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/95192] [11 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected tree_list, have error_mark in handle_assume_aligned_attribute, at c-family/c-attribs.c:2996

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95192 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug target/95234] [11 Regression] 416.gamess Miscompare of exam29.out since r11-455-g94f687bd9ae37ece

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95234 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/95238] [11 Regression] Invalid *pushsi2_rex64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95238 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug target/95261] [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr80695-p8.c and gcc.target/powerpc/pr80695-p9.c fail starting with r11-478

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95261 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|WAITING

[Bug lto/95362] [11 regression] pr34457-1.c and pr92088-1.c fail on arm and aarch64 since g:a746f952abb78af9db28a7f3bce442e113877c9c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95362 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug lto/95376] [11 regression] ICE in gcc.dg/torture/pr92088-1.c after r11-611

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95376 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW

[Bug lto/95362] [11 regression] pr34457-1.c and pr92088-1.c fail on arm and aarch64 since g:a746f952abb78af9db28a7f3bce442e113877c9c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95362 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com --- C

[Bug target/95381] [11 Regression]: Bootstrap on m68k fails with ICE: in operator[], at vec.h:867

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95381 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- Still broken?

[Bug rtl-optimization/95394] [11 Regression] ICE in emit_move_insn, at expr.c:3814 since r11-165-geb72dc663e9070b2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95394 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug c++/95388] [11 Regression] C++20 & 17 Lambda capture of *this by Value causes ICE "in tsubst_decl at cp/pt.c"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95388 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/95381] [11 Regression]: Bootstrap on m68k fails with ICE: in operator[], at vec.h:867

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95381 --- Comment #8 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #7) > Still broken? Unfortunately, yes: > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gcc-snapshot&arch=m68k&ver=1%3A20201002-1&stamp=1601807222&raw=0

[Bug target/97457] [10/11 Regression] SVE: wrong code since r10-4752-g2d56600c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97457 Alex Coplan changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||11.0 Keywords|

[Bug target/95436] [11 Regression] ICE in store_expr, at expr.c:5845 since r11-711-g43a4fc095e30188392cc42299c4081297e321104

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95436 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/97457] New: [10/11 Regression] SVE: wrong code since r10-4752-g2d56600c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97457 Bug ID: 97457 Summary: [10/11 Regression] SVE: wrong code since r10-4752-g2d56600c Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug middle-end/95757] [11 regression] missing warning in gcc.dg/Wstringop-overflow-25.c since r11-1517

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95757 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug testsuite/95900] [11 Regression] New test case gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-pr95866.c in r11-1647 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95900 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-10-16 Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug c++/96045] [11 Regression] Wrong line and column diagnostic message in a class template instantiation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96045 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug testsuite/96098] [11 regression] gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-pr68892.c fails since r11-205

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96098 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Assignee|unassigned at gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/96129] [11 regression] gcc.dg/vect/vect-alias-check.c etc. FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96129 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||linkw at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug target/97457] [10/11 Regression] SVE: wrong code since r10-4752-g2d56600c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97457 --- Comment #1 from Alex Coplan --- To be clear, the second beq .L8 is in the body of the main loop is not taken either in the execution described here. The lack of a comment there might have suggested otherwise.

[Bug c++/96162] [11 Regression] ICE in discriminator_for_local_entity, at cp/mangle.c:1910

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96162 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug tree-optimization/96147] [11 regression] gcc.dg/vect/slp-43.c etc. FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96147 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-10-16 Priority|P3

[Bug target/96375] [11 regression] arm/lob[2-5].c fail on some configurations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96375 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/96376] [11 regression] vect/vect-alias-check.c and vect/vect-live-5.c fail on armeb

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96376 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Priority|P3

[Bug middle-end/95757] [11 regression] missing warning in gcc.dg/Wstringop-overflow-25.c since r11-1517

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95757 --- Comment #4 from Christophe Lyon --- Yes I still see FAIL: gcc.dg/Wstringop-overflow-25.c pr92814 (test for warnings, line 378) for arm-none-linux-gnueabihf --with-cpu=cortex-a5 arm-none-eabi -mcpu=cortex-m[034] but for instance arm-none-linu

[Bug middle-end/96680] [11 Regression][OpenMP][LTO] Declare variant + ICE in lto_fixup_prevailing_decls, at lto/lto-common.c:2595

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96680 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener

[Bug target/95234] [11 Regression] 416.gamess Miscompare of exam29.out since r11-455-g94f687bd9ae37ece

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95234 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/26163] [meta-bug] missed optimization in SPEC (2k17, 2k and 2k6 and 95)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163 Bug 26163 depends on bug 95234, which changed state. Bug 95234 Summary: [11 Regression] 416.gamess Miscompare of exam29.out since r11-455-g94f687bd9ae37ece https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95234 What|Removed

[Bug other/96800] [11 regression] compilation error for 20_util/function_objects/searchers.cc after r11-2857

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96800 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/96840] [11 Regression] Recursive substitution in constrained commutative operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96840 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Ever confirmed|0

[Bug tree-optimization/96376] [11 regression] vect/vect-alias-check.c and vect/vect-live-5.c fail on armeb

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96376 --- Comment #3 from Christophe Lyon --- I mentioned the configuration flags above: --target armeb-none-linux-gnueabihf --with-mode arm --with-cpu cortex-a9 --with-fpu neon-fp16

[Bug other/96927] [11 regression] ICE in libstdc++-v3/include/chrono:442

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96927 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/96901] [11 Regression] Many libstdc++ tests FAIL on i686-linux due to a PCH FE bug

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96901 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug ipa/97456] [10/11 Regression] An incorrect optimization causes a function to always return the same value when using -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97456 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- A bit reduced test-case: $ #include auto wrong(float &pos) -> int { auto a = std::complex(pos, pos); auto b = std::complex(0.0f, 0.0f); b = b + a; if (b == 0.0f) return 1; printf("%f\n", b.

[Bug fortran/96983] [11 regression] ICE compiling gfortran.dg/pr96711.f90 starting with r11-3042

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96983 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug tree-optimization/97104] [11 Regression] aarch64, SVE: ICE in vect_get_loop_mask since r11-3070-g783dc66f9cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97104 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug target/97056] aarch64/sve/cost_model_2.c fails on aarch64_be since r11-3148

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97056 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|11.0|--- Summary|[11 regression]

[Bug ipa/97264] [11 Regression] -fpa-modref breaks va_arg on glibc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97264 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug testsuite/97301] [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/sse-movlps-1.c fails after r11-3434

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97301 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Component|ipa |testsuite --- Comment #1 from Richard B

[Bug ada/95953] UTF Convert for UTF_16 to UTF_8 fails for values in U+10000 to U+10FFFF.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95953 Arnaud Charlet changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/97428] -O3 is great for basic AoSoA packing of complex arrays, but horrible one step above the basic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97428 --- Comment #9 from Michael_S --- Hopefully, you did regression tests for all main AoS<->SoA cases. I.e. typedef struct { double re, im; } dcmlx_t; void soa2aos(double* restrict dstRe, double* restrict dstIm, const dcmlx_t src[], int nq) { for

[Bug tree-optimization/97360] [11 Regression] ICE in range_on_exit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97360 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 CC|

[Bug bootstrap/97451] [11 Regression] r11-3959 failed --with-build-config=bootstrap-cet

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97451 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug testsuite/97426] [11 regression] new test case gcc.dg/ipa/modref-1.c fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97426 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug analyzer/97411] [11 regression] bogus message from gcc.dg/analyzer/malloc-vs-local-1b.c after r11-3840

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97411 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug c++/97237] [10/11 Regression] static_assert does not accept fpermissive code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97237 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.3

[Bug target/96759] [10/11 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2294

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96759 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.3

[Bug c++/96379] [10/11 Regression] GCC accepts totally invalid template declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96379 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.3

[Bug c++/97458] New: C++ parsing fails when calling specialized template method inside lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97458 Bug ID: 97458 Summary: C++ parsing fails when calling specialized template method inside lambda Product: gcc Version: 8.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/96425] [8/9/10/11 regression] internal compiler error in maybe_process_partial_specialization()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96425 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.5

[Bug c++/97372] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE in Tracy 0.7.3 in template class since r8-2836-gb54d4018b17c8e7b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97372 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.5

[Bug target/96914] missing MVE intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96914 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by SRINATH PARVATHANENI : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f5d0b57da1a0529a44da772f4f0b227cd5c50fd5 commit r10-8905-gf5d0b57da1a0529a44da772f4f0b227cd5c50fd5 Author: Christop

[Bug target/96914] missing MVE intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96914 --- Comment #12 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by SRINATH PARVATHANENI : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c4fb78e5d79b02ae720b2db42fa00e2c8d2d7ed5 commit r10-8906-gc4fb78e5d79b02ae720b2db42fa00e2c8d2d7ed5 Author: Christop

[Bug target/96914] missing MVE intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96914 --- Comment #13 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by SRINATH PARVATHANENI : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7591fc054f40c96fabe05d74d61d1c144798354b commit r10-8907-g7591fc054f40c96fabe05d74d61d1c144798354b Author: Christop

[Bug tree-optimization/97428] -O3 is great for basic AoSoA packing of complex arrays, but horrible one step above the basic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97428 --- Comment #10 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Michael_S from comment #9) > Hopefully, you did regression tests for all main AoS<->SoA cases. We only test what we have in the testsuite ;) > I.e. > > typedef struct { double re, im; } dcml

[Bug rtl-optimization/97459] New: __uint128_t remainder for division by 3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97459 Bug ID: 97459 Summary: __uint128_t remainder for division by 3 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimi

  1   2   >