[Bug c++/96605] ICE in tsubst, at cp/pt.c:14929 on C++20 code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96605 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|ICE on C++20 code |ICE in tsubst, at |

[Bug bootstrap/96612] New: [11 Regression][submitted patch] Fails to bootstrap with older --build= than --host= compiler due to missing -std=c++11

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96612 Bug ID: 96612 Summary: [11 Regression][submitted patch] Fails to bootstrap with older --build= than --host= compiler due to missing -std=c++11 Product: gcc Versio

[Bug analyzer/96611] ICE in get_or_create_cluster

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96611 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Sta

[Bug c/96610] ICE: in gimplify_va_arg_expr, at gimplify.c:15150 since r7-2847-gba9bbd6f584afe29

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96610 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-08-14 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug bootstrap/96612] [11 Regression][submitted patch] Fails to bootstrap with older --build= than --host= compiler due to missing -std=c++11

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96612 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Version|10.0|11.0 Target Milestone|---

[Bug analyzer/93388] ensure -fanalyzer works with our C code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93388 --- Comment #18 from David Binderman --- (In reply to Arseny Solokha from comment #17) > After the recent analyzer overhaul it's probably time to update this list > once again. Done. $ cat 20200814.ana.O2.c.out | fgrep "int

[Bug libfortran/96613] New: SIGFPE on min1() with -ffpe-trap=invalid switch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96613 Bug ID: 96613 Summary: SIGFPE on min1() with -ffpe-trap=invalid switch Product: gcc Version: 10.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/95514] constexpr dynamic memory allocation compile error with inheritance and the this pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95514 Paul Keir changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/96614] New: constexpr deletion failure through pointer to base with virtual base class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96614 Bug ID: 96614 Summary: constexpr deletion failure through pointer to base with virtual base class Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norma

[Bug tree-optimization/96615] New: Failure to optimize out loop that eventually ends but has no side effects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96615 Bug ID: 96615 Summary: Failure to optimize out loop that eventually ends but has no side effects Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug lto/95362] [11 regression] pr34457-1.c and pr92088-1.c fail on arm and aarch64 since g:a746f952abb78af9db28a7f3bce442e113877c9c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95362 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jan Hubicka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:630474c8904cf797d0ee022d2ab177e25932c1d7 commit r10-8629-g630474c8904cf797d0ee022d2ab177e25932c1d7 Author: Jan Hubicka Date:

[Bug target/96607] GCC feeds SPARC/Solaris linker with unrecognized TLS sequences

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96607 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug target/96607] GCC feeds SPARC/Solaris linker with unrecognized TLS sequences

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96607 --- Comment #2 from Rainer Orth --- Created attachment 49063 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49063&action=edit Non-reduced test case.

[Bug libfortran/96613] SIGFPE on min1() with -ffpe-trap=invalid switch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96613 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug analyzer/96616] New: Many new analyzer failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96616 Bug ID: 96616 Summary: Many new analyzer failures Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: analyzer A

[Bug fortran/96613] SIGFPE on min1() with -ffpe-trap=invalid switch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96613 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Component|libfortran |fortran --- Comment #2 from ka

[Bug lto/96617] New: [11 regression] ICE in gcc.dg/pr34457-2.c after r10-8624

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96617 Bug ID: 96617 Summary: [11 regression] ICE in gcc.dg/pr34457-2.c after r10-8624 Product: gcc Version: 10.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug lto/96617] [11 regression] ICE in gcc.dg/pr34457-2.c after r10-8624

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96617 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bergner at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug lto/96617] [11 regression] ICE in gcc.dg/pr34457-2.c after r10-8624

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96617 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug analyzer/96616] Many new analyzer failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96616 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Ever confirmed|0

[Bug lto/95548] ice in tree_to_shwi, at tree.c:7321

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95548 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jan Hubicka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:eae728e6597727393b96886c77dbf0727a9fa720 commit r10-8630-geae728e6597727393b96886c77dbf0727a9fa720 Author: Jakub Jelinek Dat

[Bug c++/95407] [DR 1873] G++ allows access to base class members from a friend of a derived class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95407 Arthur O'Dwyer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||arthur.j.odwyer at gmail dot com --- C

[Bug c++/90254] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ice on aggregate initialization of unmovable base

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90254 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:320054784250e572cb75d6f69ab44b2330d61d8b commit r11-2704-g320054784250e572cb75d6f69ab44b2330d61d8b Author: Jason Merrill Date: We

[Bug c++/93711] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE: [[no_unique_address] when constructing via template helper

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93711 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:320054784250e572cb75d6f69ab44b2330d61d8b commit r11-2704-g320054784250e572cb75d6f69ab44b2330d61d8b Author: Jason Merrill Date: W

[Bug c++/90254] [8/9/10 Regression] ice on aggregate initialization of unmovable base

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90254 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9/10/11 Regression] ice |[8/9/10 Regression] ice on

[Bug c++/93711] [9/10 Regression] ICE: [[no_unique_address] when constructing via template helper

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93711 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[9/10/11 Regression] ICE: |[9/10 Regression] ICE:

[Bug lto/96617] [10 regression] ICE in gcc.dg/pr34457-2.c after r10-8624

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96617 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[11 regression] ICE in |[10 regression] ICE in

[Bug testsuite/96618] New: [10 regression] excess errors for g++.dg/torture/pr95548.C after r10-

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96618 Bug ID: 96618 Summary: [10 regression] excess errors for g++.dg/torture/pr95548.C after r10- Product: gcc Version: 10.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/96618] [10 regression] excess errors for g++.dg/torture/pr95548.C after r10-

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96618 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|-

[Bug analyzer/93388] ensure -fanalyzer works with our C code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93388 --- Comment #19 from David Binderman --- I tried out the C++ code with -g -O2 -fanalyzer and got the following: $ cat 20200814.ana.O2.cpp.out | fgrep "internal c" | fgrep analyzer ./g++.dg/expr/ptrmem7.C:20:3: internal compiler

[Bug c/96619] New: attribute deprecated immediately before a parameter has no effect

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96619 Bug ID: 96619 Summary: attribute deprecated immediately before a parameter has no effect Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/96620] New: bogus -Wdeprecated-declarations on attribute deprecated immediately preceding parameter name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96620 Bug ID: 96620 Summary: bogus -Wdeprecated-declarations on attribute deprecated immediately preceding parameter name Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug analyzer/96611] ICE in get_or_create_cluster

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96611 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ee88b536069db8f870c444c441182a9c76ec5bba commit r11-2707-gee88b536069db8f870c444c441182a9c76ec5bba Author: David Malcolm Date: Fr

[Bug analyzer/96611] ICE in get_or_create_cluster

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96611 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug libfortran/93727] Fortran 2018: EX edit descriptor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93727 --- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at charter dot net --- Interesting language if not sort of weird: "exp is a binary exponent expressed as a decimal integer" I am in early stages of choosing how to do this.

[Bug testsuite/96609] new test case gcc.dg/analyzer/init.c has many failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96609 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2867118ddda9b56d991c16022f7d3d634ed08313 commit r11-2708-g2867118ddda9b56d991c16022f7d3d634ed08313 Author: David Malcolm Date: Fr

[Bug analyzer/96616] Many new analyzer failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96616 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2867118ddda9b56d991c16022f7d3d634ed08313 commit r11-2708-g2867118ddda9b56d991c16022f7d3d634ed08313 Author: David Malcolm Date: Fr

[Bug testsuite/96609] new test case gcc.dg/analyzer/init.c has many failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96609 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug analyzer/96616] Many new analyzer failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96616 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug analyzer/96616] Many new analyzer failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96616 --- Comment #4 from David Malcolm --- The init.c issue should be fixed by commit r11-2708-g2867118ddda9b56d991c16022f7d3d634ed08313 I'm still investigating the pr93032-mztools.c -Wanalyzer-too-complex warnings (affects at least arm and aarch64 a

[Bug analyzer/96608] Build failure due to cast to type long on MinGW

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96608 --- Comment #1 from David Malcolm --- Thanks for filing this; sorry for not fixing this today, I hope to get to this early next week. If you need a temporary workaround to unbreak your build, the analyzer code can be disabled altogether at confi

[Bug tree-optimization/78257] missing memcmp optimization with constant arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78257 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:866626efd749ed3e2b7014e88e4340b5a4c73560 commit r11-2709-g866626efd749ed3e2b7014e88e4340b5a4c73560 Author: Martin Sebor Date: Fri

[Bug analyzer/96608] Build failure due to cast to type long on MinGW

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96608 --- Comment #2 from Markus Böck --- Don't worry there's no rush! It's the master branch after all. Just wanted to make sure people are aware of it as soon as possible.

[Bug tree-optimization/78257] missing memcmp optimization with constant arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78257 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||11.0 Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/96621] fold strlen relational expressions after nul stores

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96621 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement Blocks|

[Bug tree-optimization/96621] New: fold strlen relational expressions after nul stores

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96621 Bug ID: 96621 Summary: fold strlen relational expressions after nul stores Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug gcov-profile/96622] New: gcov misses to count break statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96622 Bug ID: 96622 Summary: gcov misses to count break statement Product: gcc Version: 10.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: gcov-profil

[Bug fortran/96320] gfortran 8-10 shape mismatch in assumed-length dummy argument character array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96320 --- Comment #23 from Damian Rouson --- A related issue arises if the procedure in question is a pure function as demonstrated below. The code compiles cleanly if either 1. The result-spec is absent and the procedure is renamed new_foo in both th

[Bug gcov-profile/96622] gcov misses to count break statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96622 --- Comment #1 from Roland Illig --- In my own code coverage measurer for Go programs, I took the approach of creating a coverage counter for every true and false branch of a boolean condition. https://github.com/rillig/gobco/blob/6be01424/instr

[Bug c++/96623] New: [10/11 Regression] ICE in inject_parm_decls, at cp/parser.c:23893

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96623 Bug ID: 96623 Summary: [10/11 Regression] ICE in inject_parm_decls, at cp/parser.c:23893 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-invalid

[Bug c++/96387] gnu gmp c source edit g++ internal compiler error appear

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96387 cents2823 at yahoo dot co.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolutio

[Bug c++/96387] gnu gmp c source edit g++ internal compiler error appear

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96387 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---