[Bug target/94954] Wrong code generation for vec_pack_to_short_fp32 builtin for Power

2020-07-06 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94954 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Will Schmidt : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5131f42d776eda08b3309c6596df9104b69987e9 commit r8-10346-g5131f42d776eda08b3309c6596df9104b69987e9 Author: Will Schmidt Date

[Bug fortran/95980] ICE in get_unique_type_string, at fortran/class.c:485

2020-07-06 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95980 --- Comment #9 from Steve Kargl --- On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 08:29:24PM +, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > I have the impression that there's a lot of bad things happening with > invalid input that is not always caught on x86_64. This has

[Bug target/94954] Wrong code generation for vec_pack_to_short_fp32 builtin for Power

2020-07-06 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94954 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Will Schmidt : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:972c78d3f65354aa9ea23d5e503835d68881f494 commit r9-8722-g972c78d3f65354aa9ea23d5e503835d68881f494 Author: Will Schmidt Date:

[Bug target/94954] Wrong code generation for vec_pack_to_short_fp32 builtin for Power

2020-07-06 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94954 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Will Schmidt : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2d980dd19d11d7e530922bea6eafad8ff6641df7 commit r10-8430-g2d980dd19d11d7e530922bea6eafad8ff6641df7 Author: Will Schmidt Dat

[Bug fortran/95980] ICE in get_unique_type_string, at fortran/class.c:485

2020-07-06 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95980 --- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Confirmed on preliminary tests (pr86551), full tests in progress: results > tomorrow). Regtested without regression.

[Bug jit/96089] New: Support initializers for global variables.

2020-07-06 Thread bouanto at zoho dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96089 Bug ID: 96089 Summary: Support initializers for global variables. Product: gcc Version: 10.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: jit

[Bug c++/96090] New: Inconsistent querying of differring exception specifications of explicitly defaulted functions

2020-07-06 Thread johelegp at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96090 Bug ID: 96090 Summary: Inconsistent querying of differring exception specifications of explicitly defaulted functions Product: gcc Version: 10.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/96042] Reference type of std::ranges::iota is __int128 with -std=c++2a?!

2020-07-06 Thread rs2740 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96042 TC changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rs2740 at gmail dot com --- Comment #4 from TC ---

[Bug tree-optimization/96091] New: ICE during dom: tree check: expected integer_cst, have poly_int_cst in to_wide, at tree.h:5911

2020-07-06 Thread qianchao9 at huawei dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96091 Bug ID: 96091 Summary: ICE during dom: tree check: expected integer_cst, have poly_int_cst in to_wide, at tree.h:5911 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/96091] ICE during dom: tree check: expected integer_cst, have poly_int_cst in to_wide, at tree.h:5911

2020-07-06 Thread qianchao9 at huawei dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96091 --- Comment #1 from Qian Chao --- Bootstrap and tested on aarch64 platform. No new regression witnessed. Any suggestions?

[Bug gcov-profile/96092] New: Should --coverage respect -ffile-prefix-map?

2020-07-06 Thread i at maskray dot me
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96092 Bug ID: 96092 Summary: Should --coverage respect -ffile-prefix-map? Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: gc

[Bug fortran/95980] ICE in get_unique_type_string, at fortran/class.c:485

2020-07-06 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95980 --- Comment #11 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #10) > > Confirmed on preliminary tests (pr86551), full tests in progress: results > > tomorrow). > > Regtested without regression. Thanks for con

[Bug fortran/95980] ICE in get_unique_type_string, at fortran/class.c:485

2020-07-06 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95980 --- Comment #12 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #9) > This has been true since I started working on gfortran some > 15+ years ago. Much of the code is written assuming a correctly > written Fortran program

<    1   2