[Bug c++/95728] [11 Regression] tree check: expected tree_list, have error_mark in tsubst_copy_and_build, at cp/pt.c:19594

2020-06-17 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95728 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug c++/93711] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE: [[no_unique_address] when constructing via template helper

2020-06-17 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93711 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|ICE: [[no_unique_address] |[9/10/11 Regression] ICE:

[Bug c++/95723] GCC get confused while parsing a code

2020-06-17 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95723 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/95725] Confusing error diagnostic in an invalid template

2020-06-17 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95725 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/95725] Confusing error diagnostic in an invalid template

2020-06-17 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95725 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- Garbage in, garbage out.

[Bug target/95732] New: Use CPU dispatching to support mixing -fcf-protection with -mindirect-branch and -mfunction-return

2020-06-17 Thread josephcsible at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95732 Bug ID: 95732 Summary: Use CPU dispatching to support mixing -fcf-protection with -mindirect-branch and -mfunction-return Product: gcc Version: 10.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/94969] [8/10 Regression] Invalid loop distribution since r8-2390-gdfbddbeb1ca912c9

2020-06-17 Thread amker at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94969 --- Comment #16 from bin cheng --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #15) > I don't see the commit on the GCC 10 branch nor the GCC 8 branch. Master > and GCC 9 are fixed though. Will backport the 10 and 8, thanks for reminding.

[Bug regression/95733] New: Building on PowerPC 64 Tests Fail With GCC 11

2020-06-17 Thread xerofoify at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95733 Bug ID: 95733 Summary: Building on PowerPC 64 Tests Fail With GCC 11 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: regr

[Bug c++/95725] Confusing error diagnostic in an invalid template

2020-06-17 Thread haoxintu at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95725 --- Comment #6 from Haoxin Tu --- Hi, there. I hold the view that the compiler should have good fault tolerance, which means giving an input(even invalid), the compiler might emit appropriate error message diagnostics so that we can fix them int

[Bug bootstrap/95734] New: [11 regression] lots of ICEs after r11-1445

2020-06-17 Thread seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95734 Bug ID: 95734 Summary: [11 regression] lots of ICEs after r11-1445 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootst

[Bug bootstrap/95712] configure-target-libgcc fails on s390x target because xgcc is not being built

2020-06-17 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95712 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build Component|libgcc

[Bug c++/86441] instantiate_class_template() unable to re-execute constexpr function

2020-06-17 Thread boris at kolpackov dot net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86441 Boris Kolpackov changed: What|Removed |Added Version|8.1.0 |10.1.0 --- Comment #2 from Boris Kolpa

[Bug target/95732] Use CPU dispatching to support mixing -fcf-protection with -mindirect-branch and -mfunction-return

2020-06-17 Thread josephcsible at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95732 --- Comment #1 from Joseph C. Sible --- Thinking about this a bit more, it's a win for performance even if we ignore CET completely. In particular, it would let a single binary use retpolines only on CPUs that have the Spectre vulnerabilities tha

[Bug c++/95735] New: ICE on invalid non-type template argument

2020-06-17 Thread johelegp at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95735 Bug ID: 95735 Summary: ICE on invalid non-type template argument Product: gcc Version: 10.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/95725] Confusing error diagnostic in an invalid template

2020-06-17 Thread haoxintu at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95725 --- Comment #7 from Haoxin Tu --- By the way, can you take a look at bug 95597 and bug 95659? I think GCC should accept the first case and shouldn't miss the error message in the second code. Those cases are different from this report.

[Bug bootstrap/95712] configure-target-libgcc fails on s390x target because xgcc is not being built

2020-06-17 Thread egorenar at linux dot ibm.com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95712 --- Comment #8 from Alexander Egorenkov --- $ make --version GNU Make 4.1 Built for s390x-ibm-linux-gnu In my top Makefile the dependecny on maybe-all-gcc is missing: configure-target-libgcc: ... I attached the top Makefile.

[Bug bootstrap/95712] configure-target-libgcc fails on s390x target because xgcc is not being built

2020-06-17 Thread egorenar at linux dot ibm.com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95712 --- Comment #9 from Alexander Egorenkov --- Created attachment 48751 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48751&action=edit top gcc Makefile

[Bug bootstrap/95712] configure-target-libgcc fails on s390x target because xgcc is not being built

2020-06-17 Thread egorenar at linux dot ibm.com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95712 --- Comment #10 from Alexander Egorenkov --- When i add the dependency in Makefile manually, then the parallel build works. Regards

<    1   2