https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95394
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||10.1.0
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95401
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95386
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||9.3.0
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95396
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|GCC produces incorrect code |[8/9/10/11 Regression] GCC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95402
Bug ID: 95402
Summary: freebsd make: "/usr/home/cqwrteur/gcc_build/Makefile"
line 26: Missing dependency operator
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95401
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95400
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Sta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95385
--- Comment #3 from Haoxin Tu ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> We likely eliminate the dead 0/0 and 0/b instructions but fail for the one in
> the loop at -O0. As soon as the actual instruction is carried out the
> program trap
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95401
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.2
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95403
Bug ID: 95403
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in nested_in_vect_loop_p at
gcc/tree-vectorizer.h:1260 since
r11-689-ge31cd607e999ca6a
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95403
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-05-29
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95404
Bug ID: 95404
Summary: and
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassign
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92455
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|marxin at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95403
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95399
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95393
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:07852a81f58532c63a57631d7c3757fc6bcea17d
commit r11-710-g07852a81f58532c63a57631d7c3757fc6bcea17d
Author: Richard Biener
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95393
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95256
--- Comment #6 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Arseny Solokha from comment #5)
> Is there some further work pending, or should this PR be closed now?
It's fixed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95211
--- Comment #9 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Arseny Solokha from comment #8)
> Is there some further work pending, or should this PR be closed now?
Fixed in GCC11.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95402
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
As mentioned in https://gcc.gnu.org/install/prerequisites.html one needs to use
GNU make to build gcc, are you sure make is a GNU make?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95405
Bug ID: 95405
Summary: Unnecessary stores with std::optional
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95052
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:43a4fc095e30188392cc42299c4081297e321104
commit r11-711-g43a4fc095e30188392cc42299c4081297e321104
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95315
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3d0675f3bb54b58903bc9214d05c8e6d20e5f313
commit r11-712-g3d0675f3bb54b58903bc9214d05c8e6d20e5f313
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95406
Bug ID: 95406
Summary: [11 regression] vshift-5.c fails since
g:e31cd607e999ca6ab47b7e65a7045b1594e4fba4
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95406
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95391
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95403
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:233ecb5e2c5a769429279afbbf7d275cb3940cde
commit r11-713-g233ecb5e2c5a769429279afbbf7d275cb3940cde
Author: Richard Biener
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
Bug 26163 depends on bug 95403, which changed state.
Bug 95403 Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in nested_in_vect_loop_p at
gcc/tree-vectorizer.h:1260 since r11-689-ge31cd607e999ca6a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95403
What
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95403
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95348
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95407
Bug ID: 95407
Summary: G++ allows access to base class members from a friend
of a derived class
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95332
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Martin Liska
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0579f339110acb85d5bda128588f4d57c45dfe7a
commit r10-8205-g0579f339110acb85d5bda128588f4d57c45dfe7a
Author: Martin Liska
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95332
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Martin Liska
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a243b6316937e4d4149e7ff5ad616f7baf4d4d34
commit r9-8636-ga243b6316937e4d4149e7ff5ad616f7baf4d4d34
Author: Martin Liska
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95408
Bug ID: 95408
Summary: Failure to optimize bitwise and with negated
conditional using the same operand to conditional with
decremented operand
Product: gcc
Versio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95332
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95332
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Martin Liska
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:406f6d0ad7325f872c4a084d360196302029fbeb
commit r8-10283-g406f6d0ad7325f872c4a084d360196302029fbeb
Author: Martin Liska
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95315
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95373
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95211
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95256
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95355
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
Can the bug be marked as resolved?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95362
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jan Hubicka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:11041c3151e30d197d1c2774721db24332eeccef
commit r11-716-g11041c3151e30d197d1c2774721db24332eeccef
Author: Jan Hubicka
Date: Fri May
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95409
Bug ID: 95409
Summary: Failure to xor register before usage of 8-bit part in
some bitshifting situations
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95402
--- Comment #2 from fdlbxtqi ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1)
> As mentioned in https://gcc.gnu.org/install/prerequisites.html one needs to
> use GNU make to build gcc, are you sure make is a GNU make?
Really? LLVM also provides a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95402
--- Comment #3 from fdlbxtqi ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1)
> As mentioned in https://gcc.gnu.org/install/prerequisites.html one needs to
> use GNU make to build gcc, are you sure make is a GNU make?
So sad nowadays LLVM just co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95402
--- Comment #4 from fdlbxtqi ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1)
> As mentioned in https://gcc.gnu.org/install/prerequisites.html one needs to
> use GNU make to build gcc, are you sure make is a GNU make?
g++ -fno-PIE -c -g -O2 -D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95356
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ddf90b72d2a723decc487db6d3131846b9a618de
commit r11-717-gddf90b72d2a723decc487db6d3131846b9a618de
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95410
Bug ID: 95410
Summary: Failure to optimize compare next to and properly
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95356
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95391
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95090
--- Comment #9 from Manfred Schwarb ---
I sprinkled some printf's into get_unique_type_string():
XXderived->name: strlen=63;
t2345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789_123
XXdt_name: strlen=63;
T234567890123456789012345678901234
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95349
--- Comment #9 from Ed Catmur ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #4)
> I don't know the answer, and I don't know why it's useful to try this anyway.
If I'm reading P0593 correctly (I may not be), this would be a valid
implementation o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95272
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c735929a2503a7d03ac4739bba5b25336bf954c3
commit r11-718-gc735929a2503a7d03ac4739bba5b25336bf954c3
Author: Richard Biener
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95272
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95079
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Franथà¤ois Dumont
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7688e5e8c4d46102a0cc0b9c25191ac7dde0d285
commit r11-719-g7688e5e8c4d46102a0cc0b9c25191ac7dde0d285
Author: François Dumont
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91276
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95400
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
[hjl@gnu-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95349
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Andrew Downing from comment #8)
> From the C standard:
> If a value is copied into an object having no declared type using memcpy or
> memmove, or is copied as an array of character type, then
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95400
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||11.0
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu ---
Fixed on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95411
Bug ID: 95411
Summary: Program compiled with nostdlib crashes if passing
double to variadic function
Product: gcc
Version: 9.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95412
Bug ID: 95412
Summary: Constexpr variables captured in templated lambdas
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95349
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Ed Catmur from comment #9)
> (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #4)
> > I don't know the answer, and I don't know why it's useful to try this
> > anyway.
>
> If I'm reading P0593 corre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91276
Lauri Kasanen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
orks... no
configure: error: in
`/var/gcc/gcc-11.0.0-20200529/4.20.4-gcc-32/i686-pc-linux-gnu/64/libgomp':
configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables
See `config.log' for more details
make[2]: *** [Makefile:20360: configure-stage1-target-libgomp] Error 1
config.log has
confi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95413
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95414
Bug ID: 95414
Summary: Wrong debug info for argc at -O2
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95411
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Component|c
e C compiler works... no
> configure: error: in
> `/var/gcc/gcc-11.0.0-20200529/4.20.4-gcc-32/i686-pc-linux-gnu/64/libgomp':
> configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables
> See `config.log' for more details
> make[2]: *** [Makefile:20360: configure-stage1-tar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95415
Bug ID: 95415
Summary: Add support for thread-local variables
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: jit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94591
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Alex Coplan
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:49824d35e0c87a5fdb3f5ea41223aa21d6ca6bfc
commit r10-8207-g49824d35e0c87a5fdb3f5ea41223aa21d6ca6bfc
Author: Alex Coplan
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95416
Bug ID: 95416
Summary: Several gcc.misc-tests/outputs.exp tests FAIL
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: test
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95416
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95417
Bug ID: 95417
Summary: Static storage duration objects that are constant
initialized should be destroyed after the destruction
of dynamically initialized object.
Product: gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94591
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Alex Coplan
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2631d84ba7dedc3c5c9f77e7065fbfbc11876ca6
commit r9-8638-g2631d84ba7dedc3c5c9f77e7065fbfbc11876ca6
Author: Alex Coplan
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94591
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Alex Coplan
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b64ec9c3eea5204b90936e332704e6f57470f6e5
commit r8-10285-gb64ec9c3eea5204b90936e332704e6f57470f6e5
Author: Alex Coplan
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95411
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab ---
Unaligned stack.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95052
Maxim Kuvyrkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94591
Alex Coplan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95417
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
The standard is unclear here I think. Better not change a common
implementation pattern since people may rely on current behavior.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95241
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e069285cdf457cc85070e522380c4e25b0d2ed25
commit r11-722-ge069285cdf457cc85070e522380c4e25b0d2ed25
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93698
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:020d86db8896f088435830595640e6fc21bc64ad
commit r11-723-g020d86db8896f088435830595640e6fc21bc64ad
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92652
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:020d86db8896f088435830595640e6fc21bc64ad
commit r11-723-g020d86db8896f088435830595640e6fc21bc64ad
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94128
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:020d86db8896f088435830595640e6fc21bc64ad
commit r11-723-g020d86db8896f088435830595640e6fc21bc64ad
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95241
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10/11 Regression] internal |[10 Regression] internal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95417
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
GCC, Clang and EDG all destroy b before a.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95349
--- Comment #12 from Ed Catmur ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #11)
> Note that for C++ types you can apply memcpy to the placement new is not
> needed since object re-use terminates lifetime of the previous object and
> starts lifet
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95349
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||richard-gccbugzilla@metafoo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95413
--- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> How did CET changes add -march=i486 -mtune=i686? Can you bisect to the commit?
Done: the reghunt identified
commit 4c1a5d8b71e29b71e0bc1004480c12c5fc427cb7
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95418
Bug ID: 95418
Summary: Static assert going off on MinGW
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libfortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95052
--- Comment #10 from Maxim Kuvyrkov ---
To reproduce:
1. Configure GCC for arm-linux-gnueabihf (e.g., for x86_64->armhf cross):
--with-gnu-as --with-gnu-ld --disable-libmudflap --enable-lto --enable-shared
--without-included-gettext --enable-nls
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95413
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu ---
I successfully bootstrapped
commit c92716b2b1d117a803775a2e2336b751050ff7c2
Author: Martin Liska
Date: Fri May 29 13:21:41 2020 +0200
Port bugzilla-close-candidate script to git.
with
CC="cc -m32 -fno-lt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95349
--- Comment #14 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 29 May 2020, ed at catmur dot uk wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95349
>
> --- Comment #12 from Ed Catmur ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #11)
> > N
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95413
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #2)
> > How did CET changes add -march=i486 -mtune=i686? Can you bisect to the
> > commit?
>
> Done: the reghunt identified
>
> commit 4c1a5d8b71e29b71e0bc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95311
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95052
--- Comment #11 from Maxim Kuvyrkov ---
Created attachment 48634
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48634&action=edit
Crash testcase (from Linux kernel)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95090
--- Comment #10 from Manfred Schwarb ---
I just tried to build a compiler with "-fno-omit-frame-pointer" to
get potentially better backtraces, but then the ICE vanishes ...
Is there a way to get useful backtraces? "--enable-checking=yes,extra"
s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95415
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm ---
Perhaps, but it looks non-trivial.
Notes to self:
c/c-tree.h: struct c_declspecs has:
/* Whether "__thread" or "_Thread_local" was specified. */
BOOL_BITFIELD thread_p : 1;
/* Whether "__thread" rath
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95413
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95419
Bug ID: 95419
Summary: [vax-openbsd] internal compiler error: in
assemble_integer, at varasm.c:2818 with -fexceptions
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94812
--- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Thanks :-)
1 - 100 of 185 matches
Mail list logo
