https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95067
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.4
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95072
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|-Warray-bounds false|[10/11 Regression]
|p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95075
Bug ID: 95075
Summary: gcc/d/dmd/dscope.c: 2 * strange assignments ?
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95018
--- Comment #19 from Richard Biener ---
Is libgfortran built with -O2 -funroll-loops or with -O3 (IIRC -O3?). Note we
see
Estimating sizes for loop 3
BB: 14, after_exit: 0
size: 1 _20 = count[n_95];
size: 1 _21 = _20 + 1;
size: 1 c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95076
Bug ID: 95076
Summary: Failure to optimize out stack alignment on function
call of different type
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12345
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=gcc.git;h=a62236b9d579315a0482cdd6deb409f76381c233
commit r10-5848-ga62236b9d579315a0482cdd6deb409f76381c233
Author:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95018
--- Comment #20 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jiu Fu Guo from comment #18)
> Currently, I'm thinking to enhance GCC 'cunroll' as:
> if the loop has multi-exits or upbound is not a fixed number, we may not do
> 'complete unroll' for the loo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95077
Bug ID: 95077
Summary: Wrong backtrace infromation at O1
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95073
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94980
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d17a896da1e898928d337596d029f0ece0039d55
commit r11-311-gd17a896da1e898928d337596d029f0ece0039d55
Author: Richard Sandiford
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94980
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:14605b6bd8c37fffd8065c5c3fe6b1b9d7b2a294
commit r11-312-g14605b6bd8c37fffd8065c5c3fe6b1b9d7b2a294
Author: Richard Sandiford
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94980
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4c0283b9ad75b128b79c507d78d678123fe9f471
commit r11-313-g4c0283b9ad75b128b79c507d78d678123fe9f471
Author: Richard Sandiford
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93244
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=gcc.git;h=af213b4c4ca30e55de64f8b1e0bf442df08f3e6d
commit r10-5851-gaf213b4c4ca30e55de64f8b1e0bf442df08f3e6d
Author:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93223
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=gcc.git;h=8a37df5e5cb2de8302f9412173103593ec53961e
commit r10-5852-g8a37df5e5cb2de8302f9412173103593ec53961e
Author: M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94980
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolutio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95063
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:99b0c9ec47d563d1f780cb678c04d37c9835440f
commit r11-314-g99b0c9ec47d563d1f780cb678c04d37c9835440f
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93244
--- Comment #14 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to CVS Commits from comment #13)
> The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=gcc.git;
> h=af213b4c4ca30e55de64f8b1e0bf442df08f3e6d
>
> commit r1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93223
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95033
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6b41920bd5c68998a53de749b4fe5c0b8875db6c
commit r11-315-g6b41920bd5c68998a53de749b4fe5c0b8875db6c
Author: Martin Liska
Date: Tue M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95051
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6b41920bd5c68998a53de749b4fe5c0b8875db6c
commit r11-315-g6b41920bd5c68998a53de749b4fe5c0b8875db6c
Author: Martin Liska
Date: Tue M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95033
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95051
Bug 95051 depends on bug 95033, which changed state.
Bug 95033 Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in set_parm_rtl, at cfgexpand.c:1310
since r11-165-geb72dc663e9070b2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95033
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95051
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95073
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
This part is still useful, to show the one that *was* found, but couldn't be
called:
q.C:9:15: note: declared here
9 | extern void f();
| ^
If that is replaced then it's not cle
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84766
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I don't think we want to use another TLS entry just for this handler, so I'm
leaning towards the nice suggestion to say "reentrant" instead.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95074
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-05-12
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94906
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dc103060c18656affaecfdd57faa4e0237dadcd3
commit r10-8136-gdc103060c18656affaecfdd57faa4e0237dadcd3
Author: Jonathan Wakel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94933
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8836c35d5d6fefa514cb78cb6800670869fb1df2
commit r10-8135-g8836c35d5d6fefa514cb78cb6800670869fb1df2
Author: Jonathan Wakel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77892
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95078
Bug ID: 95078
Summary: Missing fwprop for SIB address
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
As
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95018
--- Comment #21 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #19)
> Is libgfortran built with -O2 -funroll-loops or with -O3 (IIRC -O3?).
Just plain -O2 (for size reasons), with matmul as an exception
where we add -funroll-lo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95018
--- Comment #22 from Thomas Koenig ---
Here are the details of how I tested this.
I generated the in_pack_r4.i and in_unpack_r4.i by adding -save-temps to the
Makefile options in ~/trunk-bin/powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu/libgfortran ,
then remov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95018
--- Comment #23 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #20)
> (In reply to Jiu Fu Guo from comment #18)
> > Currently, I'm thinking to enhance GCC 'cunroll' as:
> > if the loop has multi-exits or upbound is not a fixed n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94672
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8aeffc4c9f47dd09ccc6a82d9fae35931414eb4d
commit r10-8137-g8aeffc4c9f47dd09ccc6a82d9fae35931414eb4d
Author: Tobias Burnus
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94672
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95060
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95018
--- Comment #24 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 12 May 2020, tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95018
>
> --- Comment #21 from Thomas Koenig ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95005
Michael Kuhn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #48482|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95079
Bug ID: 95079
Summary: unorderd_map::insert_or_assign and try_emplace should
only hash and mod once unless there is a rehash.
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94689
--- Comment #4 from pmatos at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Unfortunately a fix for this didn't make it into 10.1. We can still not analyze
racket source code due to this issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95035
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:90aea3e8d4f6119a9b666275b274bc4c251a7c91
commit r11-317-g90aea3e8d4f6119a9b666275b274bc4c251a7c91
Author: Eric Botcazou
Date: Tue
pc-linux-gnu
--with-ld=/usr/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-ld
--with-as=/usr/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-as --disable-libstdcxx-pch
--prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-r11-314-20200512100527-g99b0c9ec47d-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-amd64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 11.0.0 20200512 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95035
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95080
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95079
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95081
Bug ID: 95081
Summary: Copyright infringement by ROS2
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Ass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84685
Cyril Hrubis changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||chrubis at suse dot cz
--- Comment #4 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94933
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95078
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
TER should go away, not be extended. So you are suggesting that we replace
leaq44(%rdi,%rdx,4), %rdx --- redundant could be fwprop
movl(%rdx), %eax
movl$3, (%rsi)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95081
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-05-12
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95077
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||9.3.1
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95081
Paco Arjonilla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #48518|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94924
--- Comment #1 from rhalbersma ---
I just became aware of [depr.array.comp] in N4861
"Equality and relational comparisons (7.6.10, 7.6.9) between two operands of
array type are deprecated."
This is very surprising to say the least and disqualif
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94988
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57359
Bug 57359 depends on bug 94988, which changed state.
Bug 94988 Summary: [11 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr64110.c
scan-assembler vmovd[\\t ]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94988
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95076
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Failure to optimize out |Failure to tail-call on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95032
--- Comment #1 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Ah. I couldn't reproduce this, but I used -mcpu=future.
Please don't use -mfuture, it does not work, it cannot work.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94924
--- Comment #2 from rhalbersma ---
OK, Alisdair Meredith points out on Twitter that in [class.compare.default]/6
there is a special sentence on array class data members
In that list, any subobject of array type is recursively expanded to the
seq
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95032
--- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(It currently enables p10 insns, but it leaves p9 insns disabled (and any
older insns your compiler doesn't default to as well)).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94988
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:119a7db1e05c9741803b3ff93266b00fd535732a
commit r11-320-g119a7db1e05c9741803b3ff93266b00fd535732a
Author: Richard Biener
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57359
Bug 57359 depends on bug 94988, which changed state.
Bug 94988 Summary: [11 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr64110.c
scan-assembler vmovd[\\t ]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94988
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94988
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95058
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95021
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
The problem is since df_lr_bb_local_compute has
/* If the def is to only part of the reg, it does
not kill the other defs that reach here. */
if (!(DF_REF_FLAGS (def) & (DF_REF_PARTIAL |
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95076
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-05-12
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95076
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> GCC doesn't tail-call because the return types are not compatible. With a
> call
> it cannot optimize the stack adjustment because of the ABI.
>
> Note I'm not sure
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95076
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu ---
This ia32 psABI return value discussion also applies here:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/ia32-abi/return$20value%7Csort:date/ia32-abi/9H4BBrIdkmk/sjWw06ZPnS4J
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95076
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95082
Bug ID: 95082
Summary: LE implementations of vec_cnttz_lsbb and
vec_cntlz_lsbb are wrong
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95082
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95021
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu ---
STV generates:
8d b6 00 00 00 00 lea0x0(%esi),%esi
a1 00 00 00 00 mov0x0,%eax R_386_32target_p
83 ec 08sub$0x8,%esp
f3 0f 7e 00
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95083
Bug ID: 95083
Summary: x86 fp_movcc expansion depends on real_cst sharing
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95083
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|10.0|11.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95084
Bug ID: 95084
Summary: code sinking prevents if-conversion
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimizat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95021
--- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 12 May 2020, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95021
>
> --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
> The problem is since df_lr_bb_local_compute has
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95085
Bug ID: 95085
Summary: diagnostic on designated-initializer from
braced-init-list could be better
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95086
Bug ID: 95086
Summary: brace initialization in captures doesn't work with
function calls
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95086
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95069
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nico at josuttis dot de
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95069
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-05-12
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95085
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95081
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95074
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95087
Bug ID: 95087
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in gimplify_expr, at
gimplify.c:14382
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95046
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6416f67273aaeafd6ad89c2c82076dabb50f8dbe
commit r11-322-g6416f67273aaeafd6ad89c2c82076dabb50f8dbe
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Tue May
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95046
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2a2dea6b63ae600eb1d084c06d8a3ba42c66dd6b
commit r11-323-g2a2dea6b63ae600eb1d084c06d8a3ba42c66dd6b
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Tue May
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44665
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68033
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86142
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78752
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fa31a3cdbf1571286671d8d3a83e31676862583e
commit r11-330-gfa31a3cdbf1571286671d8d3a83e31676862583e
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95088
Bug ID: 95088
Summary: ICE in gfc_build_class_symbol, at fortran/class.c:653
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95046
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:955b1f929906cabc5b17c40cbc7d767eebd64cc7
commit r11-331-g955b1f929906cabc5b17c40cbc7d767eebd64cc7
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Tue May
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 78752, which changed state.
Bug 78752 Summary: [concepts] ICE with constrained variadic member function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78752
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78752
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95089
Bug ID: 95089
Summary: ICE in gfc_get_derived_type, at
fortran/trans-types.c:2843
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95090
Bug ID: 95090
Summary: ICE: identifier overflow: 129
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
As
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95091
Bug ID: 95091
Summary: ICE in gfc_hash_value, at fortran/class.c:538
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fort
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87847
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
See
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95080
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95092
Bug ID: 95092
Summary: new test case gcc.dg/asan/pr95051.c fails
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: testsuit
1 - 100 of 158 matches
Mail list logo
