https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94558
Bug ID: 94558
Summary: Designated initializer inside _Generic is
misinterpreted
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94559
Bug ID: 94559
Summary: Nitpick: constexpr_fill test isn't constexpr
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: li
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94559
Eyal Rozenberg changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94494
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f883c46b4877f637e0fa5025b4d6b5c9040ec566
commit r10-7687-gf883c46b4877f637e0fa5025b4d6b5c9040ec566
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Sat Ap
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94560
Bug ID: 94560
Summary: ICE on recursive templated alias
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Ass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94494
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:59eddd9769057ee094cdae09b15b257cc3db690f
commit r9-8491-g59eddd9769057ee094cdae09b15b257cc3db690f
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94494
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d2fee90546d0f04595301af8f3786b8e1671814a
commit r9-8492-gd2fee90546d0f04595301af8f3786b8e1671814a
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94494
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90526
Hannes Domani changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ssbssa at yahoo dot de
--- Comment #1 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86327
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94561
Bug ID: 94561
Summary: [10 Regression] ICE in ix86_get_ssemov
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86327
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4ded16a7782fd3a9e7b37291d04bca596b00b8bd
commit r10-7688-g4ded16a7782fd3a9e7b37291d04bca596b00b8bd
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: Sa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86327
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 86327, which changed state.
Bug 86327 Summary: Spurious error on non-constant expression in constexpr
function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86327
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94477
--- Comment #5 from Arseny Solokha ---
Is there some further work pending, or can this PR be closed?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93069
--- Comment #7 from Arseny Solokha ---
Is there some further work pending, or can this PR be closed?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93069
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Yes, there is a larger patch approved for GCC11, but not for GCC10.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94477
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94560
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-04-11
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55588
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||94404
Assignee|unassigned at g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89494
--- Comment #13 from Piotr Kubaj ---
Breakage in GCC 10 was caused after 201900818 snapshot, but before 201900825
(201900825 is the first broken).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89494
--- Comment #14 from Piotr Kubaj ---
Exact error for 10.0:
In file included from
/usr/ports/lang/gcc10-devel/work/gcc-10-20190825/libgcc/libgcc2.c:56:
/usr/ports/lang/gcc10-devel/work/gcc-10-20190825/libgcc/libgcc2.c: In function
'__multi3':
/usr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94561
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-04-11
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94109
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Last reconf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94104
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94562
Bug ID: 94562
Summary: C++20: std::shared_ptr{} <=> nullptr ill-formed
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94109
--- Comment #2 from Antony Lewis ---
This may be the test case, though I'm not 100% sure:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94361
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94562
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
No, it's because that operator isn't implemented yet.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94091
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot
gnu.org
Las
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94563
Bug ID: 94563
Summary: Relational operations between pointer and nullptr
accepted
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94563
--- Comment #1 from Daniel Krügler ---
To clarify the actual bug character of this issue, the following example shows
it more clearly:
template
bool test(T*)
{
return true;
}
int main()
{
test((int*)(nullptr));
}
This program should be ill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94564
Bug ID: 94564
Summary: C++20: Three-way comparison between pointer and
nullptr accepted
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94565
Bug ID: 94565
Summary: C++20: Comparing comparison category types against
0/nullptr is not noexcept
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94566
Bug ID: 94566
Summary: conversion between std::strong_ordering and int
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94550
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-04-11
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87972
Nicolas Boulenguez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIR
: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: qrzhang at gatech dot edu
Target Milestone: ---
It's a recent regression. Bisection points to g:529ea7d9596b26ba103578eeab
$ gcc-trunk -v
gcc version 10.0.1 20200411 (experimental) [master rev
37 matches
Mail list logo
