https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94425
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Well, there's no dependence visible to the compiler between the control word
stores and loads so it's obvious the asms cannot be pure. Is 'asm' a D
feature or a GCC extension? How does D model dependences
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94426
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||lto
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94428
Bug ID: 94428
Summary: Reintroduce -Wzero-length-array
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Ass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94043
--- Comment #21 from Kewen Lin ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #20)
> Re-open. It's marked as broken in GCC 9 so a backport is in oder (if the
> issue really reproduces there).
Thanks for pointing it out. I'll backport it two week
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91993
--- Comment #7 from Tony E Lewis ---
Thanks for all work on this. I confirm that the motivating testcase now
compiles successfully on Godbolt's trunk build ("10.0.1 20200331
(experimental)").
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94429
Bug ID: 94429
Summary: Bogus sequence point warning
Product: gcc
Version: 9.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assign
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94249
--- Comment #18 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:142d68f50b48309f48e34fc1d9d6dbbeecfde684
commit r10-7492-g142d68f50b48309f48e34fc1d9d6dbbeecfde684
Author: Martin Liska
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:142d68f50b48309f48e34fc1d9d6dbbeecfde684
commit r10-7492-g142d68f50b48309f48e34fc1d9d6dbbeecfde684
Author: Martin Liska
Date: Wed Apr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94392
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94423
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9ecb3ecc8cc0497a2cc815589c59547fd5af8512
commit r10-7493-g9ecb3ecc8cc0497a2cc815589c59547fd5af8512
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9ecb3ecc8cc0497a2cc815589c59547fd5af8512
commit r10-7493-g9ecb3ecc8cc0497a2cc815589c59547fd5af8512
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Wed Ap
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94423
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94340
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94324
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94314
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94291
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94168
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94397
--- Comment #6 from markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #5)
> (In reply to markeggleston from comment #4)
> > The compilation error reported is due this change in PR93484:
> >
> > --- a/gcc/fortran/match.c
> > +++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94386
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93822
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94168
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6)
> I read Josephs comment so that GCC is correct to reject the code and Martins
> quoting of the original testcase shows it's likely a genuine bug in the
> program (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94291
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93314
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92989
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92983
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92860
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|8.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93974
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Richard Sandiford said on this PR, probably lost due to sourceware migration:
Sorry for the slow reply, been a bit of a hectic week.
I think both fixes would be valid. Like you s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92546
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93974
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Any progress?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91954
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91886
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
--- Comment #38 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91807
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94426
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91626
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org |matz at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94430
Bug ID: 94430
Summary: [10 Regression] Test case failures
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91518
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94431
Bug ID: 94431
Summary: Can't compile GNU-C - Compiler on armv7l - DEBIAN
Product: gcc
Version: 9.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94432
Bug ID: 94432
Summary: Can't compile GNU-C - Compiler on armv7l - DEBIAN
Product: gcc
Version: 9.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94430
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94386
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||markeggleston at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92546
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Yes this is just a nice-to-have, not critical.
I already made some big improvements, but then some new features made the sizes
jump up again. I'll take another look for low-hanging fruit, but if it doesn't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94431
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Sta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94432
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
: analyzer
Assignee: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
>From today's run of cppcheck over the gcc trunk source code:
$ fgrep /analyzer/ cppcheck.20200401.out | fgrep constParameter
trunk.git/gcc/analyzer/diagnostic-manager.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94431
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
*** Bug 94432 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94428
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94434
Bug ID: 94434
Summary: [AArch64][SVE] ICE caused by incompatibility of SRA
and svst3 builtin-function
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90392
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94396
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94420
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58646
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.5
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94325
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94386
--- Comment #12 from markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 48155
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48155&action=edit
Proposed fix
Sorry for the duplicate (PR94430) I missed this PR.
The cause of the errors me
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94435
Bug ID: 94435
Summary: ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2294
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94435
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94435
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94432
--- Comment #2 from Matthias Krawutschke ---
Thank you, Jakob.
But how can I fix that?
Because I can't find an Error or Mistake on my Installation.
Best regards and take care
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94432
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
File it into debian bug tracking system?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94436
Bug ID: 94436
Summary: incompatible-pointer-types warning with container_of
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94246
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d3ee88fdb4e0f718aaba050a3eb7174b8934a29d
commit r10-7494-gd3ee88fdb4e0f718aaba050a3eb7174b8934a29d
Author: Martin Liska
Date: Wed Apr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94436
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
I think this was fixed already. What git commit are you at?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94436
Dominique Martinet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85527
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94436
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Indeed, this has been introduced with
r10-7127-gcb99630f254aaec6591e0a200b79905b31d24eb3
and fixed with r10-7237-g4e3d3e40726e1b68bf52fa205c68495124ea60b8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94437
Bug ID: 94437
Summary: Internal compiler error in avr-g++
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94437
--- Comment #1 from Giles Atkinson ---
Created attachment 48159
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48159&action=edit
Compiler commands
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94437
--- Comment #2 from Giles Atkinson ---
Created attachment 48160
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48160&action=edit
Compiler output
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94437
--- Comment #3 from Giles Atkinson ---
Bug goes away when the __attribute__ is removed (which also makes the code
pointless!)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94437
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |target
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94438
Bug ID: 94438
Summary: [8/9/10 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed:
position plus size exceeds size of referenced object
in 'bit_field_ref' with -mavx512vbmi -mavx512vl
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94426
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Adjusted testcase that ICEs already starting with the r10-7243 commit, again
-O2 -flto:
template struct b { static constexpr int c = a; };
template using d = b;
template auto ad() -> decltype(0);
struct m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94438
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-04-01
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90392
--- Comment #11 from ohaiziejohwahkeezuoz at xff dot cz ---
Try this:
touch a.a a.o
gcc -save-temps -Wl,-debug -o a a.o a.a -ldl
Outputs:
...
/usr/bin/ld -plugin /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/9.3.0/liblto_plugin.so
-plugin-opt=/usr/lib/gcc/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94438
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.5
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94386
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Mark Eggleston
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0c9a8a8c1030d072d598880c07f4d6a8d9e7deed
commit r10-7495-g0c9a8a8c1030d072d598880c07f4d6a8d9e7deed
Author: Mark Eggleston
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94386
markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resol
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91626
--- Comment #7 from Michael Matz ---
I've added it verbatim from PR48622, which itself was an autoreduced testcase
for
an ICE, at the time preventing bootstrapping. I haven't verified if making the
testcase conforming C (i.e. provide a definitio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91858
--- Comment #5 from Vincent Lefèvre ---
I can reproduce the issue on my Debian machine. Do you know which values are
passed to MPC?
I've tried with
mpc_init2 (x, 24);
mpc_init2 (y, 24);
mpc_set_ui_ui (x, 1, 1, MPC_RNDNN);
mpc_ta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94436
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e899d4b71255b9ae096a7ecd31a61fc76f200019
commit r10-7496-ge899d4b71255b9ae096a7ecd31a61fc76f200019
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94426
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94439
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||richard.sandiford at linaro
dot or
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94439
Bug ID: 94439
Summary: gcc: error:
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/builtin-complex-1.c:
‘-fcompare-debug’ failure since
r10-3499-g0ce77f463d1d150e
Product:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94437
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91858
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
mpc_tan (m, m, 0)
with
(gdb) p *m
$14 = {re = {{_mpfr_prec = 24, _mpfr_sign = 1, _mpfr_exp = 14,
_mpfr_d = 0x3713c48}}, im = {{_mpfr_prec = 24, _mpfr_sign = 1,
_mpfr_exp = 14, _mpfr_d = 0x3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94426
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Is this SUSPENDED on https://github.com/itanium-cxx-abi/cxx-abi/issues/94
resolution, or something else?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94440
Bug ID: 94440
Summary: [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in check_bool_attrs, at
recog.c:2168 since r7-5324-gb8cab8a5492e9639
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94440
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94441
Bug ID: 94441
Summary: [10 Regression] g++: error:
gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/constexpr-if2.C:
‘-fcompare-debug’ failure (length)
sincer10-7397-gda920d0c46c38fe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94441
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94442
Bug ID: 94442
Summary: [AArch64] Redundant ldp/stp instructions emitted at
-O3
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94439
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Slightly reduced testcase:
extern void exit (int);
extern void abort (void);
#define COMPARE_BODY(A, B, TYPE, COPYSIGN) \
do {
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94437
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94440
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94426
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|SUSPENDED |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #4 from Nathan Sid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91858
--- Comment #7 from Vincent Lefèvre ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6)
> I guess there's only one limb, the rest looks garbage.
Yes, and 1125899906842624 with _mpfr_exp = 14 corresponds to 1 as
expected (1125899906842624000
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94439
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94440
--- Comment #1 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Are you sure the bisection is correct?
Fairly current gcc-8 and gcc-9 branches work OK for me, but bisection points to
gcc-7 commit.
Also, I don't see anything wrong with the failing pattern:
#2 0x0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91858
--- Comment #8 from Vincent Lefèvre ---
The exponent range is important. With ltrace, I can see:
3472505 mpfr_set_emin(0x7f22, 0xbf92, 0xbf92, 46) = 0
3472505 mpfr_set_emax(0x8002, 0xbf92, 0x7fb7c2c9c420, 46) = 0
(BTW, t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91858
--- Comment #9 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 1 Apr 2020, vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91858
>
> --- Comment #7 from Vincent Lefèvre ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comme
1 - 100 of 210 matches
Mail list logo
