[Bug tree-optimization/94335] False positive -Wstringop-overflow warning with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94335 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- You should be using (intptr_t)t - (intptr_t)this when computing the relative pointer, not sure if that makes a difference but pointer difference between pointers to different objects invokes undefined behavi

[Bug c/94337] Incorrect "dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules" warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94337 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- The warning only looks at the single expression it quotes which isn't really enough to discover you are doing right. It tries to be helpful - if you know better then disable the warning.

[Bug target/91518] [9/10 Regression] segfault when run CPU2006 465.tonto since r263875

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91518 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P1 |P3 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener

[Bug target/91518] [9/10 Regression] segfault when run CPU2006 465.tonto since r263875

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91518 luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug tree-optimization/94269] widening_mul should consider block frequency

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94269 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d21dff5b4fee51ae432143065bededfc763dc344 commit r10-7391-gd21dff5b4fee51ae432143065bededfc763dc344 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug fortran/93365] KIND inquiry and zero-sized array generates wrong code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93365 markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||markeggleston at gcc do

[Bug rtl-optimization/92264] [10 Regression] Compile time hog in 521.wrf_r with -Ofast -march=znver2 -g since r276318

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92264 --- Comment #36 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9708ca2be40399d6266bc85c99e085e3fe27a809 commit r10-7392-g9708ca2be40399d6266bc85c99e085e3fe27a809 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: T

[Bug debug/94272] [8/9/10 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure (length) with -O -fnon-call-exceptions since r8-5241

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94272 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5a1706f63a2024a5c2d878f2efeb8d198214542f commit r10-7393-g5a1706f63a2024a5c2d878f2efeb8d198214542f Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Th

[Bug testsuite/94334] new tests gcc.dg/lto/pr94271 fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94334 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Target Milestone|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/92264] [10 Regression] Compile time hog in 521.wrf_r with -Ofast -march=znver2 -g since r276318

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92264 --- Comment #37 from Martin Liška --- @Jakub: Can we close it? Or do you plan any other patch for it?

[Bug tree-optimization/94335] False positive -Wstringop-overflow warning with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94335 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confir

[Bug rtl-optimization/92264] [10 Regression] Compile time hog in 521.wrf_r with -Ofast -march=znver2 -g since r276318

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92264 --- Comment #38 from Jakub Jelinek --- No, far from it.

[Bug tree-optimization/94043] [9/10 Regression] ICE in superloop_at_depth, at cfgloop.c:78

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94043 --- Comment #13 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Kewen Lin from comment #12) > Created attachment 48122 [details] > ppc64le tested patch > > Thanks Richi! > > A patch draft attached to ensure on the right track, also > bootstrapped/regresst

[Bug debug/94272] [8/9 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure (length) with -O -fnon-call-exceptions since r8-5241

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94272 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/81349] Classes with deleted constructor templates incorrectly labeled as non-aggregates

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81349 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dab932d1519ba07fb4c49e6849ee7ceb02c0d603 commit r10-7394-gdab932d1519ba07fb4c49e6849ee7ceb02c0d603 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Th

[Bug c++/94333] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault ( when trying use structure binding in requires(requires{}))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94333 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Sta

[Bug c++/81349] Classes with deleted constructor templates incorrectly labeled as non-aggregates

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81349 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/94335] False positive -Wstringop-overflow warning with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94335 --- Comment #4 from Romain Geissler --- Thanks Richard. Indeed, beyond the false positive described in this bug, our whole code that implement "relative pointer" is I think quite hacky and not very compiler friendly (around alignment, aliasing r

[Bug c/94338] New: struct member alignment is not carried over to alignment of struct variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94338 Bug ID: 94338 Summary: struct member alignment is not carried over to alignment of struct variable Product: gcc Version: lto Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norma

[Bug tree-optimization/94043] [9/10 Regression] ICE in superloop_at_depth, at cfgloop.c:78

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94043 --- Comment #14 from Kewen Lin --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #13) > > + /* Find all SSA NAMEs in stmts which is defined in current loop, > create > +PHIs for them, and replace them with phi results accordingly. */ >

[Bug c/94338] struct member alignment is not carried over to alignment of struct variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94338 --- Comment #1 from huaixin chang --- I have tested on x86_64 with gcc version 4.8.5 20150623, and also arm with gcc version 9.2.1 20190812. They behaves the same.

[Bug driver/94330] No warning if jobserver not available

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94330 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug tree-optimization/94043] [9/10 Regression] ICE in superloop_at_depth, at cfgloop.c:78

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94043 --- Comment #15 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Thu, 26 Mar 2020, linkw at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94043 > > --- Comment #14 from Kewen Lin --- > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #13)

[Bug testsuite/94334] new tests gcc.dg/lto/pr94271 fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94334 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 from

[Bug ipa/94271] [8/9 Regression] lto1: error: two or more sections for .gnu.lto_fast_clamp.default.9.564bf999b130b5e since r8-1461-g871cc215f7507cbe

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94271 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5 from

[Bug debug/94281] [8/9/10 Regression] g++: error: hash.cpp: ‘-fcompare-debug’ failure (length) since r8-5241-g8697bf9f46f36168

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94281 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:10ea09ee846eaa345161a3a3f519b3780d6101fa commit r10-7395-g10ea09ee846eaa345161a3a3f519b3780d6101fa Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Th

[Bug c/94337] Incorrect "dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules" warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94337 --- Comment #2 from Vincent Lefèvre --- Why not having a level with no false positives? This would avoid to disable the warning globally. IMHO, using it when a union is involved is likely to generate false positives.

[Bug testsuite/94334] new tests gcc.dg/lto/pr94271 fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94334 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d6730f06420106af01e26414f046626b5292565d commit r10-7396-gd6730f06420106af01e26414f046626b5292565d Author: Martin Liska Date: Thu

[Bug testsuite/94334] new tests gcc.dg/lto/pr94271 fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94334 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/94338] struct member alignment is not carried over to alignment of struct variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94338 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug ipa/94271] [8/9 Regression] lto1: error: two or more sections for .gnu.lto_fast_clamp.default.9.564bf999b130b5e since r8-1461-g871cc215f7507cbe

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94271 --- Comment #6 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #5) > Unfortunately, apart from PR testsuite/94334, the patch introduced another > failure: > > +FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr81213-2.c (test for excess errors) > > Excess er

[Bug debug/94323] [10 Regression] g++: error: x.cpp: ‘-fcompare-debug’ failure since r10-7359-g6e771c087b10d5b730240ea35478eab8694c9c5d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94323 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:da920d0c46c38fe25ee0b597a8698d3a4d098f3c commit r10-7397-gda920d0c46c38fe25ee0b597a8698d3a4d098f3c Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Th

[Bug middle-end/94339] New: [10 regression] ICE in tree_class_check_failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94339 Bug ID: 94339 Summary: [10 regression] ICE in tree_class_check_failed Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug driver/94330] No warning if jobserver not available

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94330 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma

[Bug debug/94323] [10 Regression] g++: error: x.cpp: ‘-fcompare-debug’ failure since r10-7359-g6e771c087b10d5b730240ea35478eab8694c9c5d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94323 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug lto/94320] [OpenMP][Offloading] lto1 ICE during IPA pass: inline – offline_size at gcc/ipa-inline-analysis.c:453

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94320 --- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1) > tried > + && !lto_stream_offload_p With that patch, I get 6 times "has been referenced in offloaded code but hasn't been marked to be included in the offloa

[Bug c++/94336] template keyword accepted before destructor names

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94336 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-03-26 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug middle-end/94339] [10 regression] ICE in tree_class_check_failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94339 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.0 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug middle-end/94339] [10 regression] ICE in tree_class_check_failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94339 --- Comment #2 from Christophe Lyon --- Created attachment 48123 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48123&action=edit ada-lang.ii.xz

[Bug sanitizer/94328] Logging of defects to file does not work with Asan and Ubsan combined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94328 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|marxin at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug middle-end/94339] [10 regression] ICE in tree_class_check_failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94339 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug middle-end/94339] [10 regression] ICE in tree_class_check_failed since r10-7344-gca6c722561ce9b9d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94339 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Summa

[Bug debug/94340] New: [9/10 Regression] -fcompare-debug -O failure on cpp1z/nodiscard3.C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94340 Bug ID: 94340 Summary: [9/10 Regression] -fcompare-debug -O failure on cpp1z/nodiscard3.C Product: gcc Version: 9.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug debug/94340] [9/10 Regression] -fcompare-debug -O failure on cpp1z/nodiscard3.C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94340 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-03-26 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug debug/94340] [8/9/10 Regression] -fcompare-debug -O failure on cpp1z/nodiscard3.C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94340 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.4 |8.5 CC|

[Bug target/94220] libgcc FTB for ARM Thumb when optimizing for size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94220 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Earnshaw : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e519d644999d04e0a341cb034f4d954963b1d2d2 commit r10-7399-ge519d644999d04e0a341cb034f4d954963b1d2d2 Author: Richard Earnshaw Date

[Bug target/94220] libgcc FTB for ARM Thumb when optimizing for size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94220 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/94339] [10 regression] ICE in tree_class_check_failed since r10-7344-gca6c722561ce9b9d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94339 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-reduction | --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- Re

[Bug target/94341] New: mve_mov can produce ICE on latest trunk

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94341 Bug ID: 94341 Summary: mve_mov can produce ICE on latest trunk Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug target/94341] mve_mov can produce ICE on latest trunk

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94341 Matthew Malcomson changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/94342] New: GCC ignores attribute((section(...))) for static variables inside templates

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94342 Bug ID: 94342 Summary: GCC ignores attribute((section(...))) for static variables inside templates Product: gcc Version: 9.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: nor

[Bug middle-end/94339] [10 regression] ICE in tree_class_check_failed since r10-7344-gca6c722561ce9b9d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94339 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/94342] GCC ignores attribute((section(...))) for static variables inside templates

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94342 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ipa/93369] [10 regression] g++.dg/lto/pr64076 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93369 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #16

[Bug c++/94257] ICE in inline nested namespace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94257 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/94326] g++: error: pack.ii: ‘-fcompare-debug’ failure (length)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94326 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Component|debug |c++ --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug c++/94326] g++: error: pack.ii: ‘-fcompare-debug’ failure (length)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94326 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- $ rm -f pr94326.C.*; ./cc1plus -quiet -std=c++11 pr94326.C -Wreturn-local-addr -da; grep REG_EH_REGION pr94326.C.* pr94326.C: In instantiation of ‘const int& A< >::m_fn1() [with = int]’: pr94326.C:5:45: r

[Bug tree-optimization/91322] [10 regression] alias-4 test failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91322 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/94043] [9/10 Regression] ICE in superloop_at_depth, at cfgloop.c:78

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94043 Kewen Lin changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #48122|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c++/94336] template keyword accepted before destructor names

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94336 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug debug/94273] [10 Regression] ICE in splice_child_die, at dwarf2out.c:5657 since r10-7235-g52b3aa8be1893848

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94273 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug debug/94273] [10 Regression] ICE in splice_child_die, at dwarf2out.c:5657 since r10-7235-g52b3aa8be1893848

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94273 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/94342] GCC ignores attribute((section(...))) for static variables inside templates

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94342 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- I think it should belong to the same .comdat group as other parts of the template instantiation (there's one static var per instantiation) so I don't see how the section specification can be easily honored.

[Bug c++/94342] GCC ignores attribute((section(...))) for static variables inside templates

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94342 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Hmm, I see clang produces COMDAT group section [3] `.group' [_Z5IndexIiEvi] contains 2 sections: [Index]Name [4] .text._Z5IndexIiEvi [5] .rela.text._Z5IndexIiEvi COMDAT group s

[Bug c++/94342] GCC ignores attribute((section(...))) for static variables inside templates

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94342 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- So the section attribute then only provides naming of the comdat section used and cannot be used to group things. Not sure that is what you are looking after.

[Bug tree-optimization/94043] [9/10 Regression] ICE in superloop_at_depth, at cfgloop.c:78

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94043 --- Comment #17 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Kewen Lin from comment #16) > Created attachment 48125 [details] > untested patch LGTM

[Bug tree-optimization/91322] [10 regression] alias-4 test failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91322 Wilco changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wdijkstr at arm dot com --- Comment #2 from Wilc

[Bug c++/94326] g++: error: pack.ii: ‘-fcompare-debug’ failure (length)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94326 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug c++/94326] g++: error: pack.ii: ‘-fcompare-debug’ failure (length)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94326 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- --- gcc/cp/call.c.jj2020-03-25 08:05:07.153731580 +0100 +++ gcc/cp/call.c 2020-03-26 15:03:42.432909693 +0100 @@ -333,11 +333,14 @@ set_flags_from_callee (tree call) && internal_fn_flags

[Bug target/94282] [amdgcn] ld: error: undefined symbol: __gxx_personality_v0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94282 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug debug/94329] [8/9/10 Regression] error: use_only.f90: ‘-fcompare-debug’ failure (length)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94329 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|gcc-9: error: use_only.f90: |[8/9/10 Regression] error:

[Bug ipa/93621] [10 Regression] ICE in redirect_call_stmt_to_callee, at cgraph.c:1443 since r10-5567

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93621 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||10.0, 9.3.0 Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/91322] [10 regression] alias-4 test failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91322 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Wilco from comment #2) > (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1) > > I've just run the test-case on aarch64 and it works fine (-O2, -O2 -flto, > > -O3 -flto -fno-early-inlining). And lto.exp te

[Bug libstdc++/90415] [9/10 Regression] std::is_copy_constructible> is incomplete

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90415 Barry Revzin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||barry.revzin at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug target/94343] New: [10 Regression] invalid AVX512VL vpternlogd instruction emitted for -march=knl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94343 Bug ID: 94343 Summary: [10 Regression] invalid AVX512VL vpternlogd instruction emitted for -march=knl Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: m

[Bug ipa/93621] [10 Regression] ICE in redirect_call_stmt_to_callee, at cgraph.c:1443 since r10-5567

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93621 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work|9.2.0 |9.3.0 Known to fail|9.3.0

[Bug target/94343] [10 Regression] invalid AVX512VL vpternlogd instruction emitted for -march=knl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94343 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jbeulich at suse dot com,

[Bug target/94343] [10 Regression] invalid AVX512VL vpternlogd instruction emitted for -march=knl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94343 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug rtl-optimization/94344] New: Rotate pattern not recognized anymore

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94344 Bug ID: 94344 Summary: Rotate pattern not recognized anymore Product: gcc Version: 9.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimiz

[Bug rtl-optimization/94344] Rotate pattern not recognized anymore

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94344 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- g:c4c5ad1d6d1

[Bug rtl-optimization/94344] [9/10 Regression] Rotate pattern not recognized anymore

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94344 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Rotate pattern not |[9/10 Regression] Rotate

[Bug target/94343] [10 Regression] invalid AVX512VL vpternlogd instruction emitted for -march=knl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94343 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- Created attachment 48126 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48126&action=edit A patch Jakub, this is what I have. Feel free to ignore it.

[Bug target/94343] [10 Regression] invalid AVX512VL vpternlogd instruction emitted for -march=knl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94343 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- I was thinking about --- gcc/config/i386/sse.md.jj 2020-03-06 11:35:46.284074858 +0100 +++ gcc/config/i386/sse.md 2020-03-26 17:35:23.690515228 +0100 @@ -12800,10 +12800,18 @@ (xor:VI (match_op

[Bug libstdc++/94345] New: std::chrono overflows due to c++14 non-compliance

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94345 Bug ID: 94345 Summary: std::chrono overflows due to c++14 non-compliance Product: gcc Version: 9.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/94343] [10 Regression] invalid AVX512VL vpternlogd instruction emitted for -march=knl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94343 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 48127 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48127&action=edit gcc10-pr94343.patch That of course doesn't work if the input operand is memory. This should.

[Bug target/94343] [10 Regression] invalid AVX512VL vpternlogd instruction emitted for -march=knl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94343 --- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5) > Created attachment 48127 [details] > gcc10-pr94343.patch > > That of course doesn't work if the input operand is memory. This should. LGTM. Thanks.

[Bug c++/94342] GCC ignores attribute((section(...))) for static variables inside templates

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94342 --- Comment #5 from Anton --- Looking at the COMDAT groups for the example with 2 instantiations (Index and Index), I think this is what is actually expected: section for Index must not be grouped with section for Index. In general, different ins

[Bug c++/94342] GCC ignores attribute((section(...))) for static variables inside templates

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94342 --- Comment #6 from Anton --- I also don't understand why all the parts of a template instantiation need to be kept in the same COMDAT group. Neither clang nor gcc does it: template voi

[Bug libstdc++/94345] std::chrono overflows due to c++14 non-compliance

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94345 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Status|UNCON

[Bug c/94338] struct member alignment is not carried over to alignment of struct variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94338 --- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- It's a mistake to be referring to the C standard for the interpretation of alignment attributes. The C standard way of specifying alignment is _Alignas, not __attribute__, and if you write

[Bug target/94343] [10 Regression] invalid AVX512VL vpternlogd instruction emitted for -march=knl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94343 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Though, there are other issues. There is only vpternlog{d,q}, so for V*[QH]Imode we shouldn't pretend we have masking support.

[Bug target/94282] [amdgcn] ld: error: undefined symbol: __gxx_personality_v0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94282 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #1) > The symbol __gxx_personality_v0 is part of libsupc++ – which I believe is > not build to to lacking/restricted C++ support. It is also exception handling related

[Bug target/94282] [amdgcn] ld: error: undefined symbol: __gxx_personality_v0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94282 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Stubbs --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2) > (In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #1) > > The symbol __gxx_personality_v0 is part of libsupc++ – which I believe is > > not build to to lacking/restricted C

[Bug target/94343] [10 Regression] invalid AVX512VL vpternlogd instruction emitted for -march=knl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94343 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #48127|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug debug/94273] [10 Regression] ICE in splice_child_die, at dwarf2out.c:5657 since r10-7235-g52b3aa8be1893848

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94273 --- Comment #7 from Alexey Neyman --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6) > (In reply to Alexey Neyman from comment #4) > > Or add a similar "return if debug level is terse" at the beginning of > > `gen_type_die` - I didn't notice that i

[Bug c++/94346] New: [9/10 Regression] ICE due to handle_copy_attribute since r9-3982

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94346 Bug ID: 94346 Summary: [9/10 Regression] ICE due to handle_copy_attribute since r9-3982 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/94346] [9/10 Regression] ICE due to handle_copy_attribute since r9-3982

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94346 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/94343] [10 Regression] invalid AVX512VL vpternlogd instruction emitted for -march=knl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94343 --- Comment #9 from Matthias Kretz (Vir) --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8) > Created attachment 48128 [details] > gcc10-pr94343.patch The avx512vl-pr94343.c test should ideally fail because `_mm_andnot_si128 ((__m128i) (~v ^ a), (_

[Bug fortran/94347] New: Assignment pointer at declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94347 Bug ID: 94347 Summary: Assignment pointer at declaration Product: gcc Version: 8.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug tree-optimization/94335] False positive -Wstringop-overflow warning with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94335 --- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor --- Few middle-end warnings consider control flow -- most simply look at a single statement at a time and consider ranges of argument values (if any). Those that do consider control flow (e.g., -Wreturn-local-add

  1   2   >