https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93565
--- Comment #23 from Andreas Schwab ---
gcc.target/aarch64/pr93565.c fails with -mabi=ilp32.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93589
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93755
Bug ID: 93755
Summary: nested quotes in command line options errors
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: trans
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78756
Mojca Miklavec changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93756
Bug ID: 93756
Summary: typo: compatable
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
Assignee: unassig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93757
Bug ID: 93757
Summary: [GCOV] incorrect coverage for inline function with
"a?b:c" expression
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93758
Bug ID: 93758
Summary: Building x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc (mingw-w64) on macOS
Catalina results in "internal compiler error:
Segmentation fault"
Product: gcc
Version
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93743
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|uros at gcc do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93749
--- Comment #3 from Roland Illig ---
Even though the GCC warnings are suppressed, these strings still show up in the
translatable strings. In the German translation I'm just copying them 1:1,
since that makes sense to me.
I still don't understan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93747
Roland Illig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93759
Bug ID: 93759
Summary: Invalid % in param
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: translation
Assignee:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93760
Bug ID: 93760
Summary: wrong grammar in diagnostic
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ipa
Assignee
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93760
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Should be "while the other does not"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93756
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93760
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93759
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab ---
Apparently the problem is that "% p" looks like a valid c-format.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93744
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:187dd955dbee3939c3a2ca7b6839e7f70125
commit r10-6646-g187dd955dbee3939c3a2ca7b6839e7f70125
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Sa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93744
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
As for the signed zeros, I can't really reproduce it. Tried with:
__attribute__((noipa)) void
foo (int x)
{
double a = 0.0;
double b = -0.0;
_Bool c = x > 0;
_Bool d = x > 1;
double e = c;
double
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93744
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:498055331393d3c32fea5a6142c926b6a7700b8d
commit r9-8241-g498055331393d3c32fea5a6142c926b6a7700b8d
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93744
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e24c48585721fc4122ae10282e32af49aff4c380
commit r8-10025-ge24c48585721fc4122ae10282e32af49aff4c380
Author: Jakub Jelinek
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93744
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
--- Comment #182 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2020-02-14 11:04 p.m., peter.bisroev at groundlabs dot com wrote:
> However just below this check, configure looks for GNU linker, and if one not
> found, disables COMDAT group support even
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90764
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4d5bb56b1d3e6873a7d08dc8f5f4a4997e51bfde
commit r10-6647-g4d5bb56b1d3e6873a7d08dc8f5f4a4997e51bfde
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Sa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92583
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d71365427670a791c5b54bfec6e3d41210844a8a
commit r10-6648-gd71365427670a791c5b54bfec6e3d41210844a8a
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Sa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
--- Comment #183 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2020-02-15 12:49 a.m., peter.bisroev at groundlabs dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
>
> --- Comment #180 from Peter Bisroev ---
> (In reply to dave.anglin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
--- Comment #184 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2020-02-15 12:56 a.m., peter.bisroev at groundlabs dot com wrote:
> So we made some progress here. I have rebuilt 4.7.4 with --enable-comdat. 3
> stage bootstrap went fine (running 'make che
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92556
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1e166191ef330f3491d405bf3eb09b2b796c9b0e
commit r10-6649-g1e166191ef330f3491d405bf3eb09b2b796c9b0e
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Sa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68061
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:acff02ef1f4bc951ab7b4e3fdc117e0646d5d8f5
commit r10-6650-gacff02ef1f4bc951ab7b4e3fdc117e0646d5d8f5
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Sa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367
Bug 54367 depends on bug 92556, which changed state.
Bug 92556 Summary: [10 Regression] ICE if using dependent name inside lambda
expression in simple-requirement since r10-3735-gcb57504a55015891
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92556
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92556
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91847
--- Comment #2 from Barry Revzin ---
In the Prague meeting, this paper
(https://brevzin.github.io/cpp_proposals/2095_lambda_pack_cwg/p2095r0.html) was
adopted into what will become the C++20 standard, which moves the & in the
grammar to the left
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93759
--- Comment #2 from Roland Illig ---
(In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #1)
> Apparently the problem is that "% p" looks like a valid c-format.
Then there's a bug in either gettext or the GCC definitions of where c-format
strings may appea
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
--- Comment #185 from Peter Bisroev ---
(In reply to dave.anglin from comment #184)
> On 2020-02-15 12:56 a.m., peter.bisroev at groundlabs dot com wrote:
> > So we made some progress here. I have rebuilt 4.7.4 with --enable-comdat. 3
> > stage b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93761
--- Comment #1 from Christopher Di Bella ---
Created attachment 47846
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47846&action=edit
Iterator temp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93761
Bug ID: 93761
Summary: ICE when compiling a standard header as a header unit
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
--- Comment #186 from Peter Bisroev ---
Created attachment 47847
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47847&action=edit
Basic compiler tests v00
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93741
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
--- Comment #187 from Peter Bisroev ---
(In reply to dave.anglin from comment #183)
> On 2020-02-15 12:49 a.m., peter.bisroev at groundlabs dot com wrote:
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
> >
> > --- Comment #180 from Peter
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93762
Bug ID: 93762
Summary: Truncation of deferred-length string when passing as
optional
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93751
--- Comment #3 from Alexey Neyman ---
Well, why not fix it then? :) It should be a fairly low risk change, since it
does not remove any DIEs - I think it is quite unlikely that any user depends
on the *absence* of DIEs. And it aligns DWARF with s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93763
Bug ID: 93763
Summary: ice in propagate_vals_across_arith_jfunc, at
ipa-cp.c:2039
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93764
Bug ID: 93764
Summary: lzo 2.10 test suite fails with -O2 and -O3
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93763
--- Comment #1 from David Binderman ---
Reduced C code is:
typedef struct a a;
struct a {
a *b
} d;
e, k, ah, al;
f(aa) {
if (aa & 1)
goto g;
f(aa | 2);
g:
h();
}
l() {
{
f(072);
i(e, d, 92);
}
}
ag() {
{ i(e, d, 36); }
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93710
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93710
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:eef65c474e6836cc0470eb84f28895050161fcb8
commit r10-6657-geef65c474e6836cc0470eb84f28895050161fcb8
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93710
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93764
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Component|c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93763
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93753
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
--- Comment #1 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93758
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93720
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
51 matches
Mail list logo
