https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93555
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93553
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93561
Bug ID: 93561
Summary: [bounds checking] memory overflow for spill_for
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93554
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93552
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92295
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92819
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Guenther :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fc98d038618b792c413212759057b2125507d3ef
commit r10-6425-gfc98d038618b792c413212759057b2125507d3ef
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91123
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91123
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Guenther :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5f0653a8b75a5ad5a5405a27dd92d3a5759eed4c
commit r10-6426-g5f0653a8b75a5ad5a5405a27dd92d3a5759eed4c
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92822
Bug 92822 depends on bug 92819, which changed state.
Bug 92819 Summary: [10 Regression] Worse code generated on avx2 due to
simplify_vector_constructor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92819
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92819
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93562
Bug ID: 93562
Summary: [10 Regression] unique_ptr::swap requires complete
type
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93562
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93562
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88999
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93528
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93563
Bug ID: 93563
Summary: Wrong code makes the compiler hang
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93532
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93538
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93493
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93543
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93552
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93553
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||openmp
Summary|ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93554
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||openacc
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93564
Bug ID: 93564
Summary: [10 Regression] 470.lbm regresses by 25% on znver2
with -Ofast -march=native LTO and PGO since
r10-6384-g2a07345c4f8dabc2
Product: gcc
Vers
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93564
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93545
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c04babd9dfa5c63c10d65f1bd3fb8cf503ab739d
commit r10-6428-gc04babd9dfa5c63c10d65f1bd3fb8cf503ab739d
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93562
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Rejecting this example is a new regression because r271158 moved the
move-assignment effects into __uniq_ptr_impl, so they are now triggered by
unique_ptr::swap.
But there's also an older regression introd
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93401
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91333
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93466
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93562
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work|9.2.0 |6.5.0
Target Milestone|10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93562
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9962493ca2f71d3f3dd06b0e9cd19fcf849e3e4b
commit r10-6431-g9962493ca2f71d3f3dd06b0e9cd19fcf849e3e4b
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93545
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93557
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 47776
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47776&action=edit
gcc10-pr93557.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93327
--- Comment #3 from Chen Ming ---
Below is the compiler flags I extract from the output of './configure
COMPILED_BY="test"'
Compiler flags: -pipe -Wno-multichar -Wno-write-strings
-fno-enforce-eh-specs -Wno-non-template-friend -s -O3 -ffast
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93543
Sebastian Huber changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sebastian.huber@embedded-br
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93565
Bug ID: 93565
Summary: Combine duplicates count trailing zero instructions
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93543
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10 regression] bootstrap |[10 regression] bootstrap
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93355
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Missing diagnostic for |Missing diagnostic for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93538
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Guenther :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5124c34fcc62f0f880ae947542678e28aa2ce703
commit r10-6433-g5124c34fcc62f0f880ae947542678e28aa2ce703
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93553
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93230
--- Comment #8 from Bill Schmidt ---
Yes, the variable element numbers were the difficulties in question that slowed
things down last time, as I recall. We may want to try to fold the simple
cases in gimple and let the rest run through to expand
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93538
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93566
Bug ID: 93566
Summary: [8/9/10 Regression] tree-nested.c ICE on C OpenMP
array section reduction
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93566
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code, openmp
St
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93493
--- Comment #2 from Erick Ochoa ---
Hi Martin,
Thanks for the quick reply. I tried both suggestions and the dump file is still
kept in "/tmp".
I also tried a variation where I used -fipa-cp and -fdump-ipa-cp and the same
thing happens. I provid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93553
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Already r0-73699-gb98e315984edf44807d166f1ada5ee9a8eaec8db ICEs, most likely
ICEs already from r0-73597-g6c7a4dfdb63246a89869089cbafef03d157c5c56 when the
-fopenmp support has been added for Fortran.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93555
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92731
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Component|c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93567
Bug ID: 93567
Summary: G edit descriptor uses E instead F editing in rounding
mode UP
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91052
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bergner at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93493
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Can you please paste the content of --verbose output?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93543
--- Comment #4 from Sebastian Huber ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #3)
> Thanks. Does the patch in comment #1 fix it for you?
I tested the patch on FreeBSD 12.1 with LLVM 8.0.1 and it fixes the issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93562
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9/10 Regression] |[8/9 Regression]
|un
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93493
--- Comment #4 from Erick Ochoa ---
[eochoa@osprey1 temp2]$ $HOME/code/gcc-inst/bin/gcc --verbose
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/home/eochoa/code/gcc-inst/bin/gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/home/eochoa/code/gcc-inst/libexec/gcc/aarch64-unknown-linu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93543
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1dae549dccfec1edb0cb4e65feadc4722bb3bcc8
commit r10-6434-g1dae549dccfec1edb0cb4e65feadc4722bb3bcc8
Author: David Malcolm
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93543
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93568
Bug ID: 93568
Summary: [10 regression] r10-6418 causes many ICEs
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90977
--- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #2)
> Please open a separate bug for the powerpc ICE?
I just tried and couldn't reproduce the ICE with the gcc-9 ppc64el
cross-compiler I have now. Maybe that ICE i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93569
Bug ID: 93569
Summary: [10 regression] r10-6419 causes ICE in
gcc.target/powerpc/vsx-builtin-15d.c
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 81862, which changed state.
Bug 81862 Summary: [C++11][constexpr] Constructor Parenthesized Initialization
of Member Array Crash
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81862
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81862
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86917
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dsanders11 at ucsbalum dot com
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92812
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93570
Bug ID: 93570
Summary: PPC: __builtin_mtfsf does not return a value
Product: gcc
Version: 8.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: targ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93555
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93571
Bug ID: 93571
Summary: PPC: fmr gets used instead of faster xxlor
Product: gcc
Version: 8.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93572
Bug ID: 93572
Summary: internal compiler error: q from h referenced in main
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93573
Bug ID: 93573
Summary: internal compiler error: in force_constant_size, at
gimplify.c:733
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93574
Bug ID: 93574
Summary: internal compiler error: tree check: expected class
‘type’, have ‘exceptional’ (error_mark) in
c_expr_sizeof_expr, at c/c-typeck.c:2925
Product: gcc
Priority: P3
Component: modula2
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: doko at ubuntu dot com
Target Milestone: ---
the modula2 frontend fails to build with a profiled bootstrap, seen with trunk
20200204.
/<>/build/./prev-gcc/xgcc -B/<>/buil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93576
Bug ID: 93576
Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (in
gimplify.c)
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93577
Bug ID: 93577
Summary: internal compiler error: tree check: expected
integer_cst, have non_lvalue_expr in get_len, at
tree.h:5902
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93578
Bug ID: 93578
Summary: [10 Regression] ICE in add_init_expr_to_sym, at
fortran/decl.c:1949
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87923
G. Steinmetz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Summary|[D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93579
Bug ID: 93579
Summary: [9/10 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_substring_expr, at
fortran/trans-expr.c:8587
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93579
G. Steinmetz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93580
Bug ID: 93580
Summary: [9/10 Regression] ICE in gfc_validate_kind(): Got bad
kind
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93580
G. Steinmetz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93581
Bug ID: 93581
Summary: [9/10 Regression] ICE in gfc_get_dataptr_offset, at
fortran/trans-array.c:6951
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93532
--- Comment #11 from Jim Wilson ---
I'm able to reproduce with the gcc-8-branch now. Maybe I made a mistake with
my earlier build. Anyways, it looks like it is going wrong here in the reload
dump
(
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93582
Bug ID: 93582
Summary: -Warray-bounds gives error: array subscript 0 is
outside array bounds of struct E[1]
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93582
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Miles
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: doko at ubuntu dot com
Target Milestone: ---
seen with trunk 20200204 5124c34fcc62f0f880ae947542678e28aa2ce703 on
powerpc64le-linux-gnu.
during RTL pass: expand
../../src/gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93583
--- Comment #1 from Matthias Klose ---
a build without lto seems to succeed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92812
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93582
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor ---
Below is a simplified C test case. The warning is justified and works
correctly, but the index and the type it prints might be a little confusing.
The index corresponds to the MEM_REF offset which is set to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93576
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Status|UN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92812
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a1c9c9ff06ab15e697d5bac6ea6e5da2df840cf5
commit r10-6436-ga1c9c9ff06ab15e697d5bac6ea6e5da2df840cf5
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86917
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a1c9c9ff06ab15e697d5bac6ea6e5da2df840cf5
commit r10-6436-ga1c9c9ff06ab15e697d5bac6ea6e5da2df840cf5
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93576
--- Comment #2 from Yongheng Chen ---
Hi Martin,
I included the CMD line "gcc -o tmp poc.c" in the report but not the stack
dump. Is the stack dump necessary? I didn't include it because I think the POC
is enough to reproduce the problem and the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86917
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9/10 Regression] ICE in |[8/9 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93442
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9/10 Regression] lambda |[8/9 Regression] lambda in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92625
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93576
--- Comment #3 from Yongheng Chen ---
It seems I overwrote Andrew Pinski's comment by mistake. Sorry about that LOL
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93582
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
This is about us not accepting the code anymore, I think it's what libXt relies
on. Quoting Adam J.:
"Where GRABEXT here is just doing the standard C trick for incrementing
past the current struct and retur
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 92625, which changed state.
Bug 92625 Summary: [8/9/10 Regression] Internal compiler error accessing
element in static constexpr char array in template class using alias
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92625
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92625
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90966
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||haoranni at terpmail dot
umd.edu
--- Co
1 - 100 of 180 matches
Mail list logo