[Bug target/93073] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2294 (error: unrecognizable insn)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93073 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:51e010b5f75c1fff06425a72702c1bf82a3ab053 commit r10-6104-g51e010b5f75c1fff06425a72702c1bf82a3ab053 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Tu

[Bug c++/93331] [10 Regression] ICE in build2, at tree.c:4792

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93331 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/93334] -O3 generates useless code checking for overlapping memset ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93334 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/93335] [9/10 Regression] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2310 with __builtin_sub_overflow_p() on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93335 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug fortran/93337] [9/10 Regression] ICE in gfc_dt_upper_string, at fortran/module.c:441

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93337 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/93333] ICE: RTL check: expected code 'const_int', have 'and' in riscv_rtx_costs, at config/riscv/riscv.c:1645

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Jim Wilson from comment #2) > I can reproduce. Reproducing requires enabling rtl checking which is not on > by default. I suspect that there are other similar problems, as we probably > haven't

[Bug fortran/93338] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in make_ssa_name_fn, at tree-ssanames.c:282

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93338 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/93340] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in check_constant_initializer, at fortran/trans-decl.c:5450

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93340 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Target Milestone|---

[Bug fortran/93339] [9/10 Regression] ICE in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.c:2830

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93339 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/93275] [9/10 Regression] ICE: unexpected expression 'N' of kind template_parm_index

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93275 --- Comment #6 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #5) > (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #3) > > Confirmed, started with r9-6404-g1ce59b6cad83d5ca6f1efee83f910d8b677a976a. > > Are you sure? It's only a daily bum

[Bug tree-optimization/93334] -O3 generates useless code checking for overlapping memset ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93334 --- Comment #2 from bin cheng --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > Confirmed. The issue is that the overlap would be an issue if the stores > were using different values like > > void test_simple_code(long l, double* mem, long ofs

[Bug c++/93275] [9/10 Regression] ICE: unexpected expression 'N' of kind template_parm_index

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93275 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/93279] [9/10 Regression] C++ Template substitution ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93279 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tahasuf at gmail dot com --- Comment #3

[Bug tree-optimization/93334] -O3 generates useless code checking for overlapping memset ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93334 --- Comment #3 from N Schaeffer --- Hi, Thanks for pointing out the issue about writing different values. This makes sense. However, since memset deals with bytes, whenever the type of array is floating point data (or anything longer than bytes)

[Bug c++/93331] [10 Regression] ICE in build2, at tree.c:4792

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93331 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/93342] wrong AVX mask generation with -funsafe-math-optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93342 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-*-*, i?86-*-* Status

[Bug tree-optimization/93344] interchange does not work when using the address rather than direct array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93344 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/93345] [10 Regression] ICE in nothrow_spec_p, at cp/except.c:1247

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93345 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Target Milestone|---

[Bug ipa/93347] [10 Regression] ICE: verify_cgraph_node failed (error: calls_comdat_local is set outside of a comdat group)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93347 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/93297] internal compiler error: in set_constraints, at cp/constraint.cc:

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93297 --- Comment #6 from Martin Liška --- Can't reproduce with a cross-compiler: $ ./xg++ -B. ~/Programming/testcases/sha1.ii -c -Ofast -std=c++2a -s -msse2 -maes -msha [work fine] Can you please test latest GCC snapshot?

[Bug target/93346] gcc does not generate BZHI

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93346 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Target|

[Bug c/93348] [10 Regression] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:14378

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93348 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/93334] -O3 generates useless code checking for overlapping memset ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93334 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug tree-optimization/92768] [8/9 Regression] Maybe a wrong code for vector constants

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92768 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nathanael.schaeffer at gmail dot c

[Bug middle-end/93342] wrong AVX mask generation with -funsafe-math-optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93342 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c/93348] [10 Regression] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:14378

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93348 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/93345] [10 Regression] ICE in nothrow_spec_p, at cp/except.c:1247

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93345 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/93343] coroutine ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93343 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/93341] [10 Regression] ICE in aarch64_do_track_speculation, at config/aarch64/aarch64-speculation.cc:221

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93341 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|2020-01-20 00:00:0

[Bug fortran/93340] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in check_constant_initializer, at fortran/trans-decl.c:5450

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93340 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/93341] [10 Regression] ICE in aarch64_do_track_speculation, at config/aarch64/aarch64-speculation.cc:221

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93341 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |richard.sandiford at arm dot com

[Bug fortran/93339] [9/10 Regression] ICE in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.c:2830

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93339 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/93341] [10 Regression] ICE in aarch64_do_track_speculation, at config/aarch64/aarch64-speculation.cc:221

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93341 --- Comment #2 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- The assert triggering is: enum rtx_code inv_cond_code = reversed_comparison_code (cond, insn); /* We should be able to reverse all conditions. */

[Bug c++/92593] [10 Regression] ICE with CTAD using undeclared constraint

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92593 --- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini --- Another testcase: template struct ref_view { ref_view(T) { }; }; ref_view r{1};

[Bug fortran/93338] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in make_ssa_name_fn, at tree-ssanames.c:282

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93338 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug fortran/93337] [9/10 Regression] ICE in gfc_dt_upper_string, at fortran/module.c:441

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93337 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug target/93341] [10 Regression] ICE in aarch64_do_track_speculation, at config/aarch64/aarch64-speculation.cc:221

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93341 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- /* We should be able to reverse all conditions. */ gcc_assert (inv_cond_code != UNKNOWN); Obvious this code is broken because The quiet UN* was converted into the an unordered-si

[Bug fortran/93337] [9/10 Regression] ICE in gfc_dt_upper_string, at fortran/module.c:441

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93337 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ipa/92372] [10 Regression] ICE in ipa_update_overall_fn_summary at gcc/ipa-fnsummary.c:3671 since r277780

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92372 Florian Weimer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fw at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 fr

[Bug target/93341] [10 Regression] ICE in aarch64_do_track_speculation, at config/aarch64/aarch64-speculation.cc:221

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93341 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED C

[Bug target/91276] Doc typos in __builtin_crypto_vpmsum*

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91276 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ipa/92372] [10 Regression] ICE in ipa_update_overall_fn_summary at gcc/ipa-fnsummary.c:3671 since r277780

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92372 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #4) > Is this the bug that causes graph-tool to > fail to build with GCC 10? Can you please provide a build log?

[Bug c++/91277] test.cpp:5:55: internal compiler error: in synthesize_implicit_template_parm, at cp/parser.c:41206

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91277 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/91274] vec_splat_[us]64 missing for ppc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91274 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug ipa/92372] [10 Regression] ICE in ipa_update_overall_fn_summary at gcc/ipa-fnsummary.c:3671 since r277780

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92372 --- Comment #6 from Florian Weimer --- Created attachment 47686 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47686&action=edit Preprocessed C++ sources from graph-tool (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #5) > (In reply to Florian Wei

[Bug target/93341] [10 Regression] ICE in aarch64_do_track_speculation, at config/aarch64/aarch64-speculation.cc:221

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93341 --- Comment #5 from Richard Earnshaw --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) > /* We should be able to reverse all conditions. */ > gcc_assert (inv_cond_code != UNKNOWN); > > Obvious this code is broken becau

[Bug fortran/93263] [9/10 Regression] -fno-automatic and RECURSIVE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93263 --- Comment #19 from Janne Blomqvist --- This latest commit fixes the testsuite failure. Thanks for the quick fix.

[Bug target/93341] [10 Regression] ICE in aarch64_do_track_speculation, at config/aarch64/aarch64-speculation.cc:221

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93341 --- Comment #6 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Richard Earnshaw from comment #5) > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) > > /* We should be able to reverse all conditions. */ > > gcc_assert (

[Bug tree-optimization/92152] [10 Regression] Wrong code (Resurrection of PR53663)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92152 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4) > OK, so this happens in visit_reference_op_store which hits > > if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS)) > fprintf (dump_file, "Store matched

[Bug c/93348] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:14378

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93348 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|10.0|8.4 Summary|[10 Regression]

[Bug driver/91220] -Q --help=common displays options limited to subsets of languages

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91220 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/91413] [F2018]: Procedures are recursive by default; switching from stack to static allocation is not safe

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91413 --- Comment #7 from Janne Blomqvist --- (In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #6) > Currently, direct recursive use is still not permitted: > > Error: Function ‘faculty’ at (1) cannot be called recursively, as it is not > RECURSIVE > > This h

[Bug analyzer/93349] New: ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: location references block not in block tree)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93349 Bug ID: 93349 Summary: ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: location references block not in block tree) Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: i

[Bug libfortran/92836] segfault with inquire()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92836 --- Comment #17 from Janne Blomqvist --- (In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #15) > Did we conclude that this is an expected race condition? > > I run the example comment 14 and it just hangs for me. Well, hangs in what sense? For me it ru

[Bug analyzer/93349] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: location references block not in block tree)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93349 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||openmp --- Comment #1 from Richard Bien

[Bug tree-optimization/93321] Unlimited recursion in prepare_block_for_update

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93321 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6fc2f9337311c11dabcc464c808cbef205f17a52 commit r10-6106-g6fc2f9337311c11dabcc464c808cbef205f17a52 Author: Andrew Pinski Date: Tu

[Bug tree-optimization/93321] Unlimited recursion in prepare_block_for_update

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93321 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/93348] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:14378

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93348 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug tree-optimization/92203] [9 Regression] ICE in eliminate_stmt, at tree-ssa-sccvn.c:5492

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92203 Bug 92203 depends on bug 92328, which changed state. Bug 92328 Summary: [10 Regression] ICE in eliminate_stmt, at tree-ssa-sccvn.c:5497 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92328 What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug tree-optimization/92328] [10 Regression] ICE in eliminate_stmt, at tree-ssa-sccvn.c:5497

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92328 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/92328] [10 Regression] ICE in eliminate_stmt, at tree-ssa-sccvn.c:5497

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92328 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Guenther : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:01e9f1812c72c940172700971179d7726b7a3050 commit r10-6107-g01e9f1812c72c940172700971179d7726b7a3050 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/90883] Generated code is worse if returned struct is unnamed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90883 Bug 90883 depends on bug 92328, which changed state. Bug 92328 Summary: [10 Regression] ICE in eliminate_stmt, at tree-ssa-sccvn.c:5497 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92328 What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug analyzer/93350] New: ICE in make_region_for_type, at analyzer/region-model.cc:5975, or in get_lvalue_1, at analyzer/region-model.cc:4609

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93350 Bug ID: 93350 Summary: ICE in make_region_for_type, at analyzer/region-model.cc:5975, or in get_lvalue_1, at analyzer/region-model.cc:4609 Product: gcc Version: 1

[Bug preprocessor/80005] cpp expands __has_include() filename parts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80005 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug preprocessor/80005] cpp expands __has_include() filename parts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80005 --- Comment #7 from Florian Weimer --- (In reply to Nathan Sidwell from comment #6) > Reopening. Sadly my fear turned out to be true. real code out there > presumes __has_include__ (with the trailing underbars) is how to get at this > feature.

[Bug ipa/93351] New: [10 Regression] ICE in ipa_update_overall_fn_summary at gcc/ipa-fnsummary.c:4014

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93351 Bug ID: 93351 Summary: [10 Regression] ICE in ipa_update_overall_fn_summary at gcc/ipa-fnsummary.c:4014 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug ipa/92372] [10 Regression] ICE in ipa_update_overall_fn_summary at gcc/ipa-fnsummary.c:3671 since r277780

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92372 --- Comment #7 from Martin Liška --- > > I'm attaching the preprocessed sources. Build with -std=gnu++17 -fopenmp -O2 > x86-64-linux-gnu. It's something different, please take a look at PR93351.

[Bug ipa/93351] [10 Regression] ICE in ipa_update_overall_fn_summary at gcc/ipa-fnsummary.c:4014

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93351 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/93309] Wrong error about duplicate implicit none

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93309 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b31f80231df9ce6d9b50c62d28b8d2a4654ef564 commit r10-6108-gb31f80231df9ce6d9b50c62d28b8d2a4654ef564 Author: Tobias Burnus Date: Tu

[Bug fortran/93309] Wrong error about duplicate implicit none

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93309 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug preprocessor/80005] cpp expands __has_include() filename parts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80005 --- Comment #8 from Florian Weimer --- (And now the glibc stable release branches are fixed as well. Oops.)

[Bug preprocessor/80005] cpp expands __has_include() filename parts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80005 --- Comment #9 from Nathan Sidwell --- Florian, the trouble is the older glibcs are out there and people's code will immediately break. That would be bad.

[Bug tree-optimization/93334] -O3 generates useless code checking for overlapping memset ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93334 --- Comment #5 from N Schaeffer --- Elaborating a bit on this: I can eliminate this problem by using: -O3 -fno-tree-loop-distribute-patterns -fno-tree-loop-vectorize I wonder why -fno-tree-loop-distribute-patterns is not enough ? In that cas

[Bug tree-optimization/92152] [10 Regression] Wrong code (Resurrection of PR53663)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92152 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener --- In particular this testcase seems to be exactly what is tested in gcc.dg/tree-ssa/alias-access-path-4.c: struct a {int v1; int v2;}; struct b {struct a a[0];}; union c {struct b b;}; int test2 (s

[Bug analyzer/93352] New: ICE: qsort checking failed (error: qsort comparator not anti-symmetric: -2147483648, -2147483648)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93352 Bug ID: 93352 Summary: ICE: qsort checking failed (error: qsort comparator not anti-symmetric: -2147483648, -2147483648) Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug preprocessor/80005] cpp expands __has_include() filename parts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80005 --- Comment #10 from Florian Weimer --- It only affects RISC-V, and the use is not in an installed header, so I think the glibc case is rather harmless. (But that's only because I watched out for this particular issue and requested changes from

[Bug target/93353] New: ICE: in final_scan_insn_1, at final.c:3073 (error: could not split insn)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93353 Bug ID: 93353 Summary: ICE: in final_scan_insn_1, at final.c:3073 (error: could not split insn) Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-

[Bug middle-end/20623] ICE: fold check: original tree changed by fold with --enable-checking=fold

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20623 --- Comment #41 from Zdenek Sojka --- (In reply to Zdenek Sojka from comment #40) > Follown file fails at all opt levels at both x86_64 and i?86: > > -- testcase.cpp -- > namespace { > bool bar(int i) { return i; } > } > int fo

[Bug target/91274] vec_splat_[us]64 missing for ppc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91274 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/91274] vec_splat_[us]64 missing for ppc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91274 --- Comment #3 from Lauri Kasanen --- Then why is every other type supported, but not 64? It makes no sense.

[Bug tree-optimization/91123] [10 Regression] no longer removes redundant store

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91123 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- The mentioned issue should be fixed but we're now no longer using VN_WALKREWRITE because that would pick up unrelated alias-sets from an earlier store.

[Bug web/91321] commit mails with PR d/1234 do not get to bugzilla

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91321 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug d/91238] internal compiler error: in add_expr, at tree.c:7794

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91238 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug analyzer/93350] ICE in make_region_for_type, at analyzer/region-model.cc:5975, or in get_lvalue_1, at analyzer/region-model.cc:4609

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93350 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug analyzer/93352] ICE: qsort checking failed (error: qsort comparator not anti-symmetric: -2147483648, -2147483648)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93352 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug analyzer/93349] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: location references block not in block tree)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93349 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/93354] New: [10 Regression] Bogus remove of redundant store

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93354 Bug ID: 93354 Summary: [10 Regression] Bogus remove of redundant store Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tr

[Bug middle-end/93181] -Wuninitialized fails to warn about uninitialized value; -Wmaybe-uninitialized should also warn.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93181 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/93178] PPC: inefficient 64-bit constant generation if msb is off in low 16 bit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93178 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/93176] PPC: inefficient 64-bit constant consecutive ones

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93176 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug other/93168] Error messages are full of control code garbage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93168 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/93165] avoidable 2x penalty on unpredicted overwrite

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93165 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/93354] [10 Regression] Bogus remove of redundant store

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93354 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Priority|P3

[Bug c++/93164] variadic template function passed an initializer list fails with argument count mismatch error rather than expected "couldn't deduce template parameter" error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93164 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug fortran/93158] Coarray ICE when module and submodule are in separate files

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93158 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/93157] gcc should use -mabi=elfv2 on powerpc64-*-linux-*musl* target by default.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93157 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/93154] can't constrain captured functions to be invocable w/ lambda arg - func/lambda template args mixed up?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93154 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/93127] PPC altivec vec_promote creates unnecessary xxpermdi instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93127 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug preprocessor/80005] cpp expands __has_include() filename parts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80005 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|SUSPENDED --- Comment #11 from Nathan S

[Bug target/93126] PPC altivec -Wunused-but-set-variable false positive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93126 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

  1   2   3   >