https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91995
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #46997|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91734
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Sat Oct 5 07:36:09 2019
New Revision: 276621
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276621&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/91734
* generic-match-head.c: Include
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91369
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Sat Oct 5 07:38:21 2019
New Revision: 276622
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276622&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/91369 - Implement P0784R7: constexpr new
c-family/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91987
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Another testcase, another reason:
int a[4] = { 1, 2, 3, 4 };
int b[4] = { 5, 6, 7, 8 };
int
foo (void)
{
int *x = a;
int r = x[(x = b, 3)];
if (x != b)
__builtin_abort ();
return r;
}
int
main (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59888
--- Comment #16 from Iain Sandoe ---
Author: iains
Date: Sat Oct 5 08:05:44 2019
New Revision: 276623
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276623&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[Darwin] Amend section for constants with reloactions.
Darwin's linker doe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91926
--- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Sat Oct 5 08:17:55 2019
New Revision: 276624
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276624&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-10-05 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/91926
* trans-expr.c (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91987
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Another testcase for the same reason as above:
int a[4] = { 1, 2, 3, 4 };
int c;
int
main ()
{
int *x = a;
c = 1;
int r = (c = 4, x)[(c *= 2, 3)];
if (c != 8 || r != 3)
__builtin_abort ();
c =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91999
Bug ID: 91999
Summary: pch_open_file picks up a first found precompiled
header even if it's not suitable
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91999
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91928
--- Comment #2 from akrl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: akrl
Date: Sat Oct 5 09:02:25 2019
New Revision: 276625
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276625&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport fix for PR jit/91928
gcc/ChangeLog
2019-10-05 Andrea C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91999
--- Comment #2 from Nicholas Guriev ---
Thank you for the clarification. The diagnostic message looks like no pch is
used at all that results in a misunderstanding.
At an end-user point of view, the -Winvalid-pch flag isn't so valuable. Who
care
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91999
Nicholas Guriev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #3 from Nicholas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17162
Nicholas Guriev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||guriev-ns at ya dot ru
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92000
Bug ID: 92000
Summary: Fortran array passing optimization
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92000
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |10.0
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92001
Bug ID: 92001
Summary: missing -Wclass-memaccess with array as first argument
to memset
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91994
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91497
--- Comment #22 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Sat Oct 5 14:27:26 2019
New Revision: 276626
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276626&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-10-05 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/91497
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91364
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92002
Bug ID: 92002
Summary: [10 regression] -Wuninitialized warning in
gcc/wide-int.cc
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92002
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47045
--- Comment #10 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Sat Oct 5 15:23:26 2019
New Revision: 276627
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276627&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-10-05 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/47045
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92003
Bug ID: 92003
Summary: constexpr-ness of char const* doesn't propagate
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47054
--- Comment #7 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Sat Oct 5 15:42:25 2019
New Revision: 276628
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276628&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-10-05 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/47054
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47054
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47045
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91364
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
Note to myself: while messing with this, perhaps implement DR 330 too for good
measure. Bug 88128.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89808
martin at log2 dot ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||martin at log2 dot ch
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92000
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92004
Bug ID: 92004
Summary: [10 Regression] Rejection of different ranks for dummy
array argument where actual argument is an element
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92004
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91209
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gaiusmod2 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91914
--- Comment #5 from Guillaume Morin ---
Just FYI, we've hit the same wrong-code bug compiling our codebase. And I can
confirm that the patch in comment #2 does fix the problem for us as well.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59888
--- Comment #17 from Iain Sandoe ---
by the way, I haven't been able to find a C reproducer for this issue - if you
feel we should have a testcase for it perhaps a link test for the fortran
example would work?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90004
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc-*-linux-gnu |
--- Comment #2 from Arseny Solokha --
35 matches
Mail list logo
