https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91656
--- Comment #12 from Alan Modra ---
Author: amodra
Date: Sat Sep 28 07:12:14 2019
New Revision: 276236
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276236&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix endian issue in pr91656 testcases
PR testsuite/91676
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91676
--- Comment #3 from Alan Modra ---
Author: amodra
Date: Sat Sep 28 07:12:14 2019
New Revision: 276236
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276236&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix endian issue in pr91656 testcases
PR testsuite/91676
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91676
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85993
--- Comment #6 from Oleg Endo ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Sat Sep 28 07:23:10 2019
New Revision: 276237
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276237&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
2018-09-28 Oleg Endo
Backport from mainline
2018-0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85993
--- Comment #7 from Oleg Endo ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Sat Sep 28 07:29:06 2019
New Revision: 276239
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276239&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
2019-09-28 Oleg Endo
Backport from mainline
2018-0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80672
--- Comment #3 from Oleg Endo ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #1)
> Unrelated issue in the same file:
>
> trunk/gcc/config/sh/sh.c:10817]: (style) Expression is always false because
> 'else if' condition matches previous condition
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80672
--- Comment #4 from Oleg Endo ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #3)
>
> That's a dup of PR 85993, which was reported by you already and has been
> fixed in GCC 9 some time ago. I have backported the fix to GCC 7 and GCC 8
> for your conve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91928
Bug ID: 91928
Summary: libgccjit fails on subsequent compilations in ipa-cp
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80672
--- Comment #5 from Oleg Endo ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Sat Sep 28 08:33:31 2019
New Revision: 276240
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276240&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
2019-09-28 Oleg Endo
PR target/80672
* config/sh/s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80672
--- Comment #6 from Oleg Endo ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Sat Sep 28 08:37:23 2019
New Revision: 276241
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276241&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
2019-09-28 Oleg Endo
Backport from mainline
2019-0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80672
--- Comment #7 from Oleg Endo ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Sat Sep 28 08:39:40 2019
New Revision: 276242
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276242&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
2019-09-28 Oleg Endo
Backport from mainline
2019-0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80672
--- Comment #8 from Oleg Endo ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Sat Sep 28 08:41:09 2019
New Revision: 276243
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276243&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
2019-09-28 Oleg Endo
Backport from mainline
2019-0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80672
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89863
Bug 89863 depends on bug 80672, which changed state.
Bug 80672 Summary: gcc/config/sh/sh.c:716: prefer compare to find.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80672
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86805
--- Comment #2 from Oleg Endo ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Sat Sep 28 08:53:27 2019
New Revision: 276244
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276244&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
2019-09-28 Oleg Endo
PR target/86805
* config/sh/s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86805
--- Comment #3 from Oleg Endo ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Sat Sep 28 08:55:03 2019
New Revision: 276245
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276245&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
2019-09-28 Oleg Endo
Backport from mainline
2019-0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86772
Bug 86772 depends on bug 86805, which changed state.
Bug 86805 Summary: sh port needs updating for CVE-2017-5753
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86805
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86805
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86712
--- Comment #3 from Oleg Endo ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Sat Sep 28 09:11:02 2019
New Revision: 276246
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276246&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
libitm/
2019-09-28 Oleg Endo
Backport from mainline
201
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86712
--- Comment #4 from Oleg Endo ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Sat Sep 28 09:12:34 2019
New Revision: 276247
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276247&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
libitm/
2019-09-28 Oleg Endo
Backport from mainline
201
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86712
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70885
--- Comment #1 from Oleg Endo ---
Actually this could be useful on every (embedded) target, where functions can
be aligned on 2 byte boundaries. Then either the MSB or LSB can be used for
the tag.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91929
Bug ID: 91929
Summary: missing inline subroutine information in static build
using sin/cos
Product: gcc
Version: 9.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91929
--- Comment #1 from Milian Wolff ---
Created attachment 46972
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46972&action=edit
code to reproduce the issue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91929
--- Comment #2 from Milian Wolff ---
the binary exceeds the 1mb size threshold, but I hope it's easy enough to
reproduce directly from the source code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91913
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91929
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|missing inline subroutine |missing inline subroutine
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91923
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Sat Sep 28 11:36:36 2019
New Revision: 276248
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276248&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/91923 - failure-to-SFINAE with class type NTTP in C++17.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91923
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10 Regression] |[9 Regression]
|Failur
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91921
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Sat Sep 28 11:46:33 2019
New Revision: 276249
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276249&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/91921 - stray warning with -Woverloaded-virtual.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91921
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91925
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91923
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Sat Sep 28 11:50:11 2019
New Revision: 276250
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276250&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/91923 - failure-to-SFINAE with class type NTTP in C++17.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91923
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91925
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek ---
Right, place_field hasn't been called for that FIELD_DECL yet and I meant to
fix it similarly.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69286
--- Comment #2 from Ulrich Weigand ---
Yes, it does appear I checked in this code, but the tpf-unwind.h changes were
actually provided by Jim Johnston on the IBM TPF team:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-07/msg02104.html
In any case, fee
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91889
--- Comment #13 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Sat Sep 28 15:35:37 2019
New Revision: 276251
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276251&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/91889 - follow-up fix for DR 2352.
* call.c (in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91889
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91588
--- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Sat Sep 28 15:48:35 2019
New Revision: 276252
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276252&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-09-28 Paul Thomas
Backport from mainline
PR fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91588
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91864
--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Sat Sep 28 16:26:43 2019
New Revision: 276253
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276253&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-09-28 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/91864
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91802
--- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Sat Sep 28 17:10:34 2019
New Revision: 276254
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276254&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-09-28 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/91802
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91926
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54582
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49905
--- Comment #24 from Martin Sebor ---
*** Bug 54582 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89863
Bug 89863 depends on bug 54582, which changed state.
Bug 54582 Summary: gap in FORTIFY checking of buffer lengths
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54582
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91889
--- Comment #15 from Marek Polacek ---
Looks like this fix worked:
$ ./b2 toolset=gcc-10 -a
[...]
The Boost C++ Libraries were successfully built!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91593
--- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Sep 28 19:14:47 2019
New Revision: 276255
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276255&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-09-28 Jerry DeLisle
PR libfortran/91593
* io/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82920
--- Comment #21 from Iain Sandoe ---
Author: iains
Date: Sat Sep 28 19:54:00 2019
New Revision: 276257
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276257&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[X86, Darwin] Backport fix for pr82920 (part 1).
The various thunks output
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78237
--- Comment #3 from Mike Crowe ---
Proposed fix for std::timed_mutex and std::shared_timed_mutex in series posted
for review at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-09/msg01646.html .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91906
--- Comment #1 from Mike Crowe ---
Proposed fix for std::timed_mutex and std::shared_timed_mutex in series posted
for review at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-09/msg01646.html .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82920
--- Comment #22 from Iain Sandoe ---
Author: iains
Date: Sat Sep 28 20:00:22 2019
New Revision: 276258
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276258&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[X86, Darwin] Backport fix for pr82920 (part 2).
Darwin doesn't support mx
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82920
--- Comment #23 from Iain Sandoe ---
Author: iains
Date: Sat Sep 28 20:05:38 2019
New Revision: 276259
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276259&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[X86, Darwin] Backport fix for pr82920 (part 4).
As part of the backport f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91930
Bug ID: 91930
Summary: [10 Regression] internal compiler error: in
lazily_declare_fn, at cp/method.c:2423 with -fconcepts
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91930
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91867
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91867
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
namespace std {
template class initializer_list {
int *_M_array;
unsigned long _M_len;
public:
int *begin();
int *end();
};
template class A { void insert(initializer_list<_CharT>); };
} // namespa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78804
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91474
--- Comment #6 from Joey Dumont ---
Sorry for the delay, had trouble setting up the test toolchain.
>From what I can see, this does not solve the issue. In fact, the generated
paralle_settings.ii is identical to the one generated before.
To te
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91802
--- Comment #3 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Sep 29 02:35:58 2019
New Revision: 276265
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276265&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-09-28 Jerry DeLisle
PR fortran/91802
* decl.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89012
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89012
--- Comment #7 from Rich Felker ---
I think all the FDPIC work done to use bsrf like this was probably a mistake.
It ends up greatly enlarging functions that make a lot of such calls, for
example soft-float that does it for each floating point op
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89012
--- Comment #8 from Oleg Endo ---
Converting the FDPIC from bsrf back to jsr sounds like quite some work.
However, I think chances of success are higher of it does the same thing as the
normal PIC code.
Do you know what the main reason was to u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86358
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89860
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iverbin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67026
--- Comment #8 from postmas...@trippelsdorf-de.bounceio.net ---
Your email was bounced...
-
... because something went wrong between you and your recipient. Ugh!
What to do next?
Well,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67026
--- Comment #9 from postmas...@trippelsdorf-de.bounceio.net ---
Created attachment 46976
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46976&action=edit
attachment-52942-1.eml
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91931
Bug ID: 91931
Summary: [10 Regression] ICE in decompose, at rtl.h:2277
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-checking, ice-on-valid-code
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88630
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 f
69 matches
Mail list logo
