https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91495
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91495
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91492
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91493
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91497
Bug ID: 91497
Summary: -Wconversion warns when doing explicit type conversion
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91491
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91490
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91492
pmderodat at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91498
Bug ID: 91498
Summary: [10 Regression] STV change in r274481 causes 300.twolf
regression on Haswell
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91498
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization, ra
Tar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91498
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Patch that causes gcc.target/i386/minmax-6.c to spill to the stack:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-08/msg01283.html
This makes SI/DImode chains handled by STV2 only (after combine). We can
take it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91154
--- Comment #33 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #32)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #31)
>
> > > No, IMO IRA should be "fixed" to avoid stack temporary and (based on some
> > > cost metric) use direct move for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91498
--- Comment #2 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Patch that causes gcc.target/i386/minmax-6.c to spill to the stack:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-08/msg01283.html
>
> This makes SI/DImode chains han
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91498
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Aug 20 08:45:56 2019
New Revision: 274694
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274694&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-08-20 Richard Biener
PR target/91498
* config/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91307
--- Comment #10 from Bernhard M. Wiedemann ---
After a full rebuild of openSUSE Tumbleweed, the GLOBAL__I_65535_ string
appears in diffs of 12 packages:
blog
libpt2
lodepng
nethogs
nodejs12
nvme-cli
python-python-crfsuite
qpid-cpp
Rivet
udp2raw-t
n): Call add_wild_read for non-const/memset tail calls
before reload if HARD_FRAME_POINTER_IS_ARG_POINTER.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/20190820-1.c
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/dse.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
n): Call add_wild_read for non-const/memset tail calls
before reload if HARD_FRAME_POINTER_IS_ARG_POINTER.
Added:
branches/gcc-9-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/20190820-1.c
- copied unchanged from r274708,
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/20190820-1.c
n): Call add_wild_read for non-const/memset tail calls
before reload if HARD_FRAME_POINTER_IS_ARG_POINTER.
Added:
branches/gcc-8-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/20190820-1.c
- copied unchanged from r274709,
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/20190820-1.c
n): Call add_wild_read for non-const/memset tail calls
before reload if HARD_FRAME_POINTER_IS_ARG_POINTER.
Added:
branches/gcc-7-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/20190820-1.c
- copied unchanged from r274710,
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/20190820-1.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91347
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91492
--- Comment #3 from pmderodat at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: pmderodat
Date: Tue Aug 20 09:47:44 2019
New Revision: 274714
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274714&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[Ada] Add missing dot at the end of lang.opt doc for -fd
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91488
ensadc at mailnesia dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ensadc at mailnesia dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91492
--- Comment #4 from pmderodat at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I just commited the fix. Can you double check that the test failure is fixed?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91499
Bug ID: 91499
Summary: Compile error when trying to aggregate-initialize a
member array of non-movable objects with virtual
functions
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91500
Bug ID: 91500
Summary: [9 REGRESSION] gcc-9 ICE on valid code
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91500
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91500
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
> ./cc1plus -quiet ccOfXKGA.ii -std=c++17
/clickhouse-18.16.1+ds/dbms/src/Storages/ColumnDefault.cpp: In function
‘std::string DB::toString(DB::ColumnDefaultKind)’:
/clickhouse-18.16.1+ds/dbms/src/Storages/C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91499
--- Comment #1 from Taras ---
(In reply to Taras from comment #0)
>
> Here's the code that fails to compile on GCC:
>
> class Test // non-copyable and non-movable class with virtual functions
> {
upd.:
The destructor isn't necessarily require
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91498
--- Comment #4 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Following patch
--cut here--
diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
index 49ab50ea41bf..11c75be113e0 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
@@ -18601,9 +18601,9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91482
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
So the easiest thing is to move the last forwprop pass across phiopt and after
fold_builtins. Another possibility would be to get rid of the redundant
second __builtin_assume_aligned as soon as we discover
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91455
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37242
--- Comment #28 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Aug 20 12:02:56 2019
New Revision: 274746
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274746&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-08-20 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/37242
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22586
Bug 22586 depends on bug 37242, which changed state.
Bug 37242 Summary: missed FRE opportunity because of signedness of addition
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37242
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37242
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91498
--- Comment #5 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #4)
> Following patch
HJ, can you please put the patch through some benchmarks? (I have no access to
SPEC).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91491
Simon McVittie changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||smcv at debian dot org
--- Comment #2 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91500
Rafael David Tinoco changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rafaeldtinoco at ubuntu dot com
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91492
--- Comment #5 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
It looks like all is well now:
New passes:
FAIL: compiler driver --help=ada option(s): "^ +-.*[^:.]\$" absent from output:
" -fdump-scos Dump Source Coverage Obligations"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91491
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Eh, "interesting". Thanks for the clarifications.
I suppose you did things like running under valgrind or compiling with
-fsanitize=address. The most obvious thing I expect from -fno-tree-pre
is stack lay
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91307
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Aug 20 13:14:59 2019
New Revision: 274748
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274748&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-08-20 Richard Biener
PR lto/91307
* ipa.c (cg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91500
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90834
--- Comment #13 from Iain Sandoe ---
The /usr/local/include thing needs to be handled carefully
"bare" clang (at least up to 9.x) behaves as per GCC, and prepends a given
--sysroot= to the usr/local paths too.
This is correct; imagine that you
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91307
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91154
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #34 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91492
pmderodat at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolutio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91501
Bug ID: 91501
Summary: Stack Optimization bug on function and lambda return
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91473
--- Comment #8 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
So for 481.wrf in cpu2006 add this to the config:
FPORTABILITY = -std=legacy
Add the same for 178.galgel, 187.facerec, and 191.fma3d in cpu2000.
For 200.sixtrack and 301.apsi in cpu2000 for some
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21485
--- Comment #67 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #49)
> PR 37242 is also needed from what I remember reading the IR.
That's fixed now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91493
--- Comment #2 from Rafael David Tinoco ---
Related:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91500
Possibly a duplicate.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91498
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #5)
> (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #4)
> > Following patch
>
> HJ, can you please put the patch through some benchmarks? (I have no access
> to SPEC).
Sure. We will
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89179
--- Comment #17 from Steve Ellcey ---
The bug I was seeing on aarch64 turns out to be PR 91404. It has now been
fixed. I don't know if that patch will also fix the original bug seen on
Darwin or not.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90306
Luca Bonissi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gcc at scarsita dot it
--- Comment #4 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91497
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91498
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu ---
Our SPEC CPU 2017 failed with
39 util.c:205:1: error: invalid rtl sharing found in the insn
40 205 | }
41 | ^
42 (insn 29 28 3 2 (set (subreg:V2DI (reg:DI 91) 0)
43 (vec_concat:V2DI (mem/c:DI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91480
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to frankhb1989 from comment #0)
> Also, in , `__cpp_lib_allocator_traits_is_always_equal` is
> wrongly spelled as `__cpp_lib_allocator_is_always_equal`.
This is incorrect. We *also* define __cpp_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91497
Manfred Schwarb changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91067
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|9.2 |9.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90606
Ruslan Nikolaev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nruslan_devel at yahoo dot com
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91502
Bug ID: 91502
Summary: suboptimal atomic_fetch_sub and atomic_fetch_add
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91497
--- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl ---
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 04:12:47PM +, manfred99 at gmx dot ch wrote:
>
> --- Comment #2 from Manfred Schwarb ---
> Of course. But not being able to silence such warnings renders
> this option rather usele
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91478
--- Comment #4 from John David Anglin ---
See PR lto/83452:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83452
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91498
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91154
--- Comment #35 from Rainer Orth ---
Between 20190819 (r274678) and 20190820 (r274749), a new failure was
introduced:
+FAIL: gcc.target/i386/minmax-6.c scan-assembler-not rsp
Seen on both i386-pc-solaris2.11 with -m64 and x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91497
--- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl ---
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 03:28:29PM +, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> --- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> Unfortunately, -Wconversion has a problem with false positives.
> You can, of co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91498
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
--- Comment #9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91503
Bug ID: 91503
Summary: ICE ira-build.i:17:1: error: shared rtx
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91502
--- Comment #1 from Ruslan Nikolaev ---
btw, the same problem for
#include
int func(_Atomic(long) *a)
{
return (atomic_fetch_sub(a, 1) <= 0);
}
In the previous case clang/llvm was just like gcc, i.e., unable to optimize; in
this case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91491
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> Eh, "interesting". Thanks for the clarifications.
>
> I suppose you did things like running under valgrind or compiling with
> -fsanitize=address. The most ob
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91426
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #4)
> The patch I've just attached ought to do this (though it's just a crude
> prototype - it only works for the gfc_error_opt case).
>
> With that caveat, how does
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91417
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91497
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #4)
> This diff will silence warnings for explicit conversion
> using REAL() and INT() for the -Wconversion option. It
> does not silence warnings for -Wconversion-extr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91497
--- Comment #6 from Steve Kargl ---
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 06:58:27PM +, tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91497
>
> --- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig ---
> (In reply to Steve Kargl from comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91504
Bug ID: 91504
Summary: Inlining misses some logical operation folding
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91505
Bug ID: 91505
Summary: [10 Regression] ICE in DECL_FUNCTION_CODE, at
tree.h:3896
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91478
--- Comment #5 from John David Anglin ---
Previously, we had in pr41893-1.o.debug.temp.o:
w gnu_lto_v1
w gnu_lto_v1
w gnu_lto_v1
w gnu_lto_v1
W pr41893_1.c.ebbf0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91497
--- Comment #7 from Manfred Schwarb ---
Hopefully this rings some bells: The warnings happen
only for parameters:
real b
double precision a,c,d
PARAMETER(a=3.1415927d0)
DATA c /3.1415927d0/
d=3.1415927d0
b=R
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91497
--- Comment #8 from Steve Kargl ---
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 07:50:06PM +, manfred99 at gmx dot ch wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91497
>
> --- Comment #7 from Manfred Schwarb ---
> Hopefully this rings some bells: The
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91505
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91426
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #46732|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91495
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Aug 20 21:03:11 2019
New Revision: 274754
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274754&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Implement new serial algorithms from Parallelism TS (P0024R2)
These new
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91491
--- Comment #5 from Simon McVittie ---
> I suppose you did things like running under valgrind or compiling with
-fsanitize=address.
I wasn't able to reproduce the bug earlier on, in a build with
-fsanitize=address, but this was probably because
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91371
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Aug 20 21:21:15 2019
New Revision: 274756
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274756&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/91371 make std::is_function handle other calling conventions
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91495
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91505
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Started with r274404.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91476
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91505
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
This should fix it:
diff --git a/gcc/attribs.c b/gcc/attribs.c
index b89be5834de..90055a612b9 100644
--- a/gcc/attribs.c
+++ b/gcc/attribs.c
@@ -1525,7 +1525,15 @@ duplicate_one_attribute (tree *attrs, tree a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90676
--- Comment #11 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Wed Aug 21 02:18:41 2019
New Revision: 274764
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274764&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR testsuite/91458
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/tree-ssa/ss
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91458
--- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Wed Aug 21 02:18:41 2019
New Revision: 274764
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274764&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR testsuite/91458
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/tree-ssa/ssa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91481
--- Comment #3 from Jeffrey Walton ---
Lloyd's finding can be confirmed on GCC135. For example,
gcc135:~$ /opt/at12.0/bin/gcc -O3 -mcpu=power9 -m64 darn.c -o darn
gcc135:~$ ./darn
9FBE0B8B6E861BD6
9FBE0B8B6E861BD6
9FBE0B8B6E8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91505
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
>This should fix it:
Except it is wrong.
builtin_decl_explicit should be only used with BUILT_IN_NORMAL class.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91506
Bug ID: 91506
Summary: Incorrectly issued error: parameter may not have
variably modified type
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
91 matches
Mail list logo
