https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90796
Bug ID: 90796
Summary: GCC: O2 vs O3 output differs on simple test
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89365
--- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #7)
> > I agree with the analysis of the standard and will add the corrected
> > testcase
> > to the testsuite.
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> Can you please extend the analy
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90791
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90797
Bug ID: 90797
Summary: gcc reject valid code
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unas
;
buffer[1] = sum1;
buffer[2] = sum2;
buffer[3] = sum3;
}
Gcc crashes, with the following parameters:
g++ -Os | g++ -O3 | g++ -O1 | gcc -Os | gcc -O3 | gcc -O1 |
n file included from
/opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-trunk-20190609/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/10.0.0/include/immintrin.h:37
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90799
Bug ID: 90799
Summary: noexcept specification dependent on template argument
throws internal compiler error when trying to deduce
it from a function argument
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89365
--- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Sun Jun 9 09:43:37 2019
New Revision: 272090
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272090&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-06-09 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/89365
* gfortran.dg/as
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89365
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90796
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90796
--- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse ---
-fdisable-tree-unrolljam helps, which may (or may not) point at a potential
culprit.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67894
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90799
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|U
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90797
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I think this violates [basic.scope.class] p2 and so is not valid. I'm not
positive though.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90800
Bug ID: 90800
Summary: exe crash when pasting characters
Product: gcc
Version: 8.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90800
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60366
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Sun Jun 9 15:41:07 2019
New Revision: 272092
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272092&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/60366
* g++.dg/cpp0x/lambda/lambda-ice32.C: New
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367
Bug 54367 depends on bug 60366, which changed state.
Bug 60366 Summary: ICE with self-invoking lambdas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60366
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60366
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90795
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90743
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57284
--- Comment #10 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Sun Jun 9 18:26:33 2019
New Revision: 272093
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272093&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-06-09 Paul Thomas
Backport from trunk
PR fortran/5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57284
--- Comment #11 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Sun Jun 9 18:31:11 2019
New Revision: 272094
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272094&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-06-09 Paul Thomas
Backport from trunk
PR fortran/5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57284
--- Comment #12 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Sun Jun 9 18:31:58 2019
New Revision: 272095
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272095&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-06-09 Paul Thomas
Backport from trunk
PR fortran/5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90798
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90798
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88879
Jason Duerstock changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason.duerstock at gmail dot
com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90801
Bug ID: 90801
Summary: A recurring hang
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90801
--- Comment #1 from zhonghao at pku dot org.cn ---
Here is the url of the previous bug report:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59659
(In reply to zhonghao from comment #0)
> A previous bug report complains that gcc hangs when compili
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90802
Bug ID: 90802
Summary: optimization accepts invalid
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65175
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Sun Jun 9 23:18:28 2019
New Revision: 272098
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272098&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/65175
* g++.dg/cpp0x/alias-decl-69.C: New test.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65175
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90803
Bug ID: 90803
Summary: gcc accepts invalid code
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67533
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code, patch
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90804
Bug ID: 90804
Summary: function declaration cannot have variably modified
type
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90736
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90805
Bug ID: 90805
Summary: Overflow in switch case is not detected
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90715
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90792
--- Comment #3 from Richard Smith ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> Related to the upstream ABI issue:
> https://github.com/itanium-cxx-abi/cxx-abi/issues/38
I don't think so, except that they're both about the 'sr' mangling in g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65794
--- Comment #5 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to coypu from comment #4)
> Hi,
>
> It's probably a setup/configuration issue for everyone reporting this issue.
> It's hard to debug, my patch helps with figuring out the problem - but
> doesn't f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89585
--- Comment #35 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Matthias Klose from comment #34)
> Author: doko
> Date: Sun Mar 10 07:25:13 2019
> New Revision: 269546
>
> URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269546&root=gcc&view=rev
> Log:
> gcc/cp/
>
> 2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57284
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52281
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90803
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I think this is a duplicate of an existing bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90804
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90805
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
Status|UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90498
--- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Mon Jun 10 05:48:44 2019
New Revision: 272103
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272103&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-06-10 Paul Thomas
Backport from trunk
PR fortran/90
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90498
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54569
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
48 matches
Mail list logo
