[Bug rtl-optimization/88652] sel-sched.c:1545:11: runtime error: index 2 out of bounds for type 'long unsigned int [2]'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88652 --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- Any progress on this please?

[Bug c/89549] [7/8/9 Regression] -Wmisleading-indentation is disabled from this point onwards, since column-tracking was disabled due to the size of the code/headers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89549 --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 45877 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45877&action=edit test-case

[Bug c/89549] [7/8/9 Regression] -Wmisleading-indentation is disabled from this point onwards, since column-tracking was disabled due to the size of the code/headers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89549 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- Unreduced test-case: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Fp8OE7frCHNglDQ5CTGyBaQXHkeeD-vZ/view?usp=sharing

[Bug target/86952] Avoid jump table for switch statement with -mindirect-branch=thunk

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86952 --- Comment #17 from Martin Liška --- > I leave that up to you guys, but I would at min probably implement something > like s390 folks did for gcc, commit db7a90aa0de5 ("S/390: Disable prediction > of indirect branches"), see s390_case_values_thr

[Bug c/89549] [7/8/9 Regression] -Wmisleading-indentation is disabled from this point onwards, since column-tracking was disabled due to the size of the code/headers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89549 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Target Milestone|---

[Bug middle-end/89551] [9 regression] Test case gcc.dg/uninit-pred-8_b.c fails after r269302

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89551 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/89550] [8/9 Regression] Spurious array-bounds warning when using __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ as a string_view

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89550 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/89557] [7/8/9 regression] 4*movq to 2*movaps IPC performance regression on znver1 with -Og

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89557 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-*-*, i?86-*-* Status

[Bug preprocessor/66505] -Wno-error=pedantic does not reverse -Werror -Wpedantic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66505 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug bootstrap/89560] [9 regression] ICE In function 'rtx_def* gen_vec_extract_lo_v64qi(rtx, rtx)'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89560 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-*-*, i?86-*-* Target Milestone

[Bug c++/89561] feature request: undefined behaviour compile-time configuration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89561 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/89567] [missed-optimization] Should not be initializing unused struct parameter members

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89567 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/89571] [9 Regression] ICE in nothrow_spec_p, at cp/except.c:1238

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89571 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/89570] [9 Regression] ICE in prepare_cmp_insn, at optabs.c:4001

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89570 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Component|middle-end

[Bug tree-optimization/89572] ICE in dyn_cast(gimple*) / get_loop_exit_condition(loop const*)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89572 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ipa/89567] [missed-optimization] Should not be initializing unused struct parameter members

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89567 --- Comment #2 from Eyal Rozenberg --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > You are looking for IPA DSE I'm not a compiler expert and don't know what this means. Even literally, I don't know what these acronyms stand for. > by marsha

[Bug c/89573] New: -fexcess-precision=standard doesn't work for conversion to integer of multiplication

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89573 Bug ID: 89573 Summary: -fexcess-precision=standard doesn't work for conversion to integer of multiplication Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severi

[Bug tree-optimization/89566] [9 Regression] ICE on compilable C++ code: in gimple_call_arg, at gimple.h:3166

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89566 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug tree-optimization/89572] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE in dyn_cast(gimple*) / get_loop_exit_condition(loop const*)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89572 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milest

[Bug c++/89571] [9 Regression] ICE in nothrow_spec_p, at cp/except.c:1238

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89571 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/88368] [7/8 Regression] Improper ``use of deleted function''

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88368 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- The above change introduced PR89571.

[Bug middle-end/89551] [9 regression] Test case gcc.dg/uninit-pred-8_b.c fails after r269302

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89551 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 f

[Bug tree-optimization/19792] Missed optimizations due to signedness in the way

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19792 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2016-08-06 00:00:00 |2019-3-4 CC|

[Bug fortran/89574] New: internal compiler error: in conv_function_val, at fortran/trans-expr.c:3792

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89574 Bug ID: 89574 Summary: internal compiler error: in conv_function_val, at fortran/trans-expr.c:3792 Product: gcc Version: 8.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: nor

[Bug middle-end/56770] Partial sums loop optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56770 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|steven at gcc d

[Bug c/89573] -fexcess-precision=standard doesn't work for conversion to integer of multiplication

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89573 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug tree-optimization/55629] Missed value numbering to a constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55629 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2012-12-09 00:00:00 |2019-3-4 --- Comment #2 from Steven Bo

[Bug rtl-optimization/45026] struct passed as argument in memory compiles to dead stores

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45026 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Target|ia64-unknown-linux-gnu | Last reconfirmed|2011-02-25 23:15:1

[Bug testsuite/19095] testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect.exp is not precise enough on x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19095 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2006-03-05 03:54:36 |2019-3-4 --- Comment #7 from Steven Bo

[Bug tree-optimization/19792] Missed optimizations due to signedness in the way

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19792 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- I think for foo the "solution" is to only consider indices with well-defined behavior, that is, for size_lookup[] indices in [0,257] which means we should be safely able to truncate the index to unsigned cha

[Bug target/44532] x86-64 unnecessary parameter extension

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44532 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Last reconfirmed|2010-06-14

[Bug target/89570] [9 Regression] ICE in prepare_cmp_insn, at optabs.c:4001

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89570 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/89570] [9 Regression] ICE in prepare_cmp_insn, at optabs.c:4001

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89570 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Or perhaps as an alternative, we shouldn't use the match.pd code here to tweak the conditions of VEC_COND_EXPRs exactly because the conditions themselves might be valid solely in VEC_COND_EXPR's first argumen

[Bug c++/89568] constexpr functions are implicitly noexcept

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89568 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/87603] [C++17] noexcept isn't special cased for constant expressions anymore

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87603 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||barry.revzin at gmail dot com --- Comm

[Bug c++/71425] GCC does not implement C++/WG21 DR 1399/1388

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71425 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid Status|UNC

[Bug target/89570] [9 Regression] ICE in prepare_cmp_insn, at optabs.c:4001

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89570 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- At the minimum guarding those simplifications with something like expand_vec_cmp_expr_p test for @0 if we can figure out mask type somehow (what would IFN_COND_* need), and a check whether IFN_COND_* is suppo

[Bug rtl-optimization/14504] Missed Bit Twiddling Optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14504 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2009-04-22 23:02:33 |2019-3-4 --- Comment #9 from Steven Bo

[Bug sanitizer/86899] [8/9 regression] TSAN incorrect warning: control reaches end of non-void function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86899 Sergey Semushin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||Predelnik at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug libstdc++/88322] Implement C++20 library features.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88322 Bug 88322 depends on bug 88334, which changed state. Bug 88334 Summary: Implement P0482R6, C++20 char8_t. https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88334 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug libstdc++/88305] Implement P0019R8, C++20 std::atomic_ref

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88305 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- *** Bug 88340 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/88334] Implement P0482R6, C++20 char8_t.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88334 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/88340] Implement P0019R8, C++20 std::atomic_ref.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88340 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/88323] implement C++20 language features.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88323 Bug 88323 depends on bug 88334, which changed state. Bug 88334 Summary: Implement P0482R6, C++20 char8_t. https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88334 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug libstdc++/88322] Implement C++20 library features.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88322 Bug 88322 depends on bug 88340, which changed state. Bug 88340 Summary: Implement P0019R8, C++20 std::atomic_ref. https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88340 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug tree-optimization/89570] [9 Regression] ICE in prepare_cmp_insn, at optabs.c:4001

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89570 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug rtl-optimization/89575] New: LRA for msp430 - Max. number of generated reload insns - frame pointer subreg simplification

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89575 Bug ID: 89575 Summary: LRA for msp430 - Max. number of generated reload insns - frame pointer subreg simplification Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/89575] LRA for msp430 - Max. number of generated reload insns - frame pointer subreg simplification

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89575 --- Comment #1 from Jozef Lawrynowicz --- Created attachment 45882 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45882&action=edit ira dump

[Bug rtl-optimization/89575] LRA for msp430 - Max. number of generated reload insns - frame pointer subreg simplification

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89575 --- Comment #2 from Jozef Lawrynowicz --- Created attachment 45883 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45883&action=edit reload dump

[Bug tree-optimization/89570] [9 Regression] ICE in prepare_cmp_insn, at optabs.c:4001

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89570 --- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Mon, 4 Mar 2019, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89570 > > Jakub Jelinek changed: > >What|Removed |Added >

[Bug ipa/89567] [missed-optimization] Should not be initializing unused struct parameter members

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89567 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug tree-optimization/89572] [7/8 Regression] ICE in dyn_cast(gimple*) / get_loop_exit_condition(loop const*)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89572 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/89572] [7/8 Regression] ICE in dyn_cast(gimple*) / get_loop_exit_condition(loop const*)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89572 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Mar 4 12:23:17 2019 New Revision: 269363 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269363&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-03-04 Richard Biener PR middle-end/89572 * tre

[Bug c++/89576] New: constexpr not working if implicitly captured in a lambda in a function template (gcc 8.3+)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89576 Bug ID: 89576 Summary: constexpr not working if implicitly captured in a lambda in a function template (gcc 8.3+) Product: gcc Version: 8.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/45144] SRA optimization issue of bit-field

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45144 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/89437] [9 regression] incorrect result for sinl (atanl (x))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89437 --- Comment #1 from Wilco --- Author: wilco Date: Mon Mar 4 12:36:04 2019 New Revision: 269364 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269364&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix PR89437 Fix PR89437. Fix the sinatan-1.c testcase to not run without a C99 ta

[Bug tree-optimization/15241] [tree-ssa] Convert a <= 7 && b <= 7 into (a | b) <= 7.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15241 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/19987] [meta-bug] fold missing optimizations in general

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19987 Bug 19987 depends on bug 15241, which changed state. Bug 15241 Summary: [tree-ssa] Convert a <= 7 && b <= 7 into (a | b) <= 7. https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15241 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug tree-optimization/41320] XFAIL gcc.dg/tree-ssa/forwprop-12.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41320 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Actually reconstructing array-refs is dangerous so I think the testcase looks for something unwanted...

[Bug ipa/89567] [missed-optimization] Should not be initializing unused struct parameter members

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89567 --- Comment #4 from Eyal Rozenberg --- > In the first excample, the interproceudral constant propagation pass > (IPA-CP) found that foo1 is so small that copying all of it might be > worth not passing the unused argument and so it does, that is

[Bug tree-optimization/63864] Missed late memory CSE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63864 --- Comment #4 from Steven Bosscher --- Code looks pretty much the same for "test_ok" and "test_slow" since GCC 6 for x86-64, and since GCC 7 for i686. GCC 6.3 x86-64: test_ok(float (*) [3], float, float, float, float, float): mulss %x

[Bug rtl-optimization/37516] ~(-2 - a) is not being optimized into a + 1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37516 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- A match.pd rule should be reasonably easy to write. Beware that ~a is not undefined but -a - 1 might be if it overflows. That is (simplify (bit_not (minus INTEGER_CST@0 @1)) (plus @1 (minus (negate @

[Bug tree-optimization/21982] GCC should combine adjacent stdio calls

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21982 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING Last reconfirmed|2006-02-05

[Bug other/89577] New: In the manual, replace -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage by the simpler --coverage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89577 Bug ID: 89577 Summary: In the manual, replace -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage by the simpler --coverage Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: n

[Bug other/89394] libiberty :stack overflow in nm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89394 Cheng Wen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wcventure at 126 dot com --- Comment #4 from

[Bug tree-optimization/14455] Structs that cannot alias are not SRA'd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14455 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/89576] [8/9 Regression] constexpr not working if implicitly captured in a lambda in a function template (gcc 8.3+)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89576 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/78824] multiple add should in my opinion be optimized to multiplication

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78824 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/89394] libiberty :stack overflow in nm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89394 --- Comment #5 from Cheng Wen --- So many similar cases and repetitive CVEs. This problem has been fixed before, but it has not been completely fixed. https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85122 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?

[Bug tree-optimization/14844] [tree-ssa] narrow types if wide result is not needed for unsigned types or when wrapping is true

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14844 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/19986] [meta-bug] fold missing optimizations (compared to RTL)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19986 Bug 19986 depends on bug 14844, which changed state. Bug 14844 Summary: [tree-ssa] narrow types if wide result is not needed for unsigned types or when wrapping is true https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14844 What|Remov

[Bug tree-optimization/65964] [meta] Operand Shortening

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65964 Bug 65964 depends on bug 14844, which changed state. Bug 14844 Summary: [tree-ssa] narrow types if wide result is not needed for unsigned types or when wrapping is true https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14844 What|Remov

[Bug c/89569] line number is not accurate on large file gcc compared to clang

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89569 --- Comment #1 from David Malcolm --- I don't think the word "accurate" is right here: both gcc and clang print the wrong line number - they're just getting it wrong in different ways.

[Bug tree-optimization/83352] Missed optimization in math expression: sqrt(sqrt(a)) == pow(a, 1/4)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83352 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/86011] Inefficient code generated for ldivmod with constant value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86011 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW

[Bug target/40072] Nonoptimal code - CMOVxx %eax,%edi; mov %edi,%eax; retq

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40072 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|NEW Last reconfirmed|2009-05-08 16:0

[Bug ipa/89567] [missed-optimization] Should not be initializing unused struct parameter members

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89567 --- Comment #5 from Martin Jambor --- (In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #4) > > In the first excample, the interproceudral constant propagation pass > > (IPA-CP) found that foo1 is so small that copying all of it might be > > worth not pas

[Bug tree-optimization/17217] not removing removal of nested structs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17217 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|WAITING --- Comment #6 from Steven Bos

[Bug gcov-profile/89577] In the manual, replace -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage by the simpler --coverage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89577 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/89437] [9 regression] incorrect result for sinl (atanl (x))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89437 Wilco changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/17217] not removing removal of nested structs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17217 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED Ever confirmed|1

[Bug target/89578] New: [9 Regression] 5% runtime regression for 481.wrf at -Ofast -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89578 Bug ID: 89578 Summary: [9 Regression] 5% runtime regression for 481.wrf at -Ofast -flto Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/89538] [7.3.0] GCC miscompiling LLVM because of wrong vectorization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89538 --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška --- > > So I investigated further to figure out which instruction actually sets > "0x0" to the new location, and found that instruction 202aef4 below is the > one > > 202aed0: 48 c7 00 00 00 00 00 movq $0x0,

[Bug target/89578] [9 Regression] 5% runtime regression for 481.wrf at -Ofast -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89578 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needs-bisection Status|UNCONF

[Bug target/89578] [9 Regression] 5% runtime regression for 481.wrf at -Ofast -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89578 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-bisection | Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug target/68211] Free __m128d subreg of double

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68211 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|NEW Last reconfirmed|2016-04-19 00:0

[Bug target/89578] [9 Regression] 5% runtime regression for 481.wrf at -Ofast -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89578 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/89579] New: -Wclobbered warning false positive when compiling with -Og

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89579 Bug ID: 89579 Summary: -Wclobbered warning false positive when compiling with -Og Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: diagnostic, rejects-va

[Bug c++/89580] New: overload resolution for pointers fails to consider conversion operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89580 Bug ID: 89580 Summary: overload resolution for pointers fails to consider conversion operator Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug bootstrap/89560] [9 regression] ICE In function 'rtx_def* gen_vec_extract_lo_v64qi(rtx, rtx)'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89560 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/89560] [9 regression] ICE In function 'rtx_def* gen_vec_extract_lo_v64qi(rtx, rtx)'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89560 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 45885 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45885&action=edit gcc9-pr89560.patch Fix the buffer overflow. Unlike most other trees, CALL_EXPR has variable size, on 64-bit ta

[Bug target/88530] [8 Regression] AArch64 Unsupported options passed to assemblers when it doesn't need to.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88530 --- Comment #7 from Tamar Christina --- Author: tnfchris Date: Mon Mar 4 15:48:49 2019 New Revision: 269366 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269366&root=gcc&view=rev Log: AArch64: Make test options_set_10.c not run on native. The test opti

[Bug target/89581] New: Unneeded stack alignment on windows x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89581 Bug ID: 89581 Summary: Unneeded stack alignment on windows x86 Product: gcc Version: 8.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug target/89582] New: Suboptimal code generated for floating point struct in -O3 compare to -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89582 Bug ID: 89582 Summary: Suboptimal code generated for floating point struct in -O3 compare to -O2 Product: gcc Version: 8.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norma

[Bug target/89581] Unneeded stack alignment on windows x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89581 --- Comment #1 from Yichao Yu --- The problem is still there when compiled with -O2 ``` f: pushq %rbp vmovq (%r8), %xmm1 movq%rcx, %rax vmovq 8(%r8), %xmm0 vaddsd (%rdx), %xmm1, %xmm1 va

[Bug ada/89583] New: GNAT.Sockets.Bind_Socket fails with IPv4 address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89583 Bug ID: 89583 Summary: GNAT.Sockets.Bind_Socket fails with IPv4 address Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: ad

[Bug c++/89579] -Wclobbered warning false positive when compiling with -Og

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89579 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/89579] -Wclobbered warning false positive when compiling with -Og

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89579 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/89579] -Wclobbered warning false positive when compiling with -Og

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89579 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com Assigne

[Bug c++/89561] feature request: undefined behaviour compile-time configuration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89561 bugsthecode at mail dot ru changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|

  1   2   >