https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80257
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Is this PR still valid (over a year without feedback)?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44589
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
(b) is pr30802.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88819
Bug ID: 88819
Summary: ICE (segfault) when compiling C++ code with -std=c++2a
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34706
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #5 from Domin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38619
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31592
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
In the F2018 draft I see
10.1.11 Specification expression
...
5 A function is a specification function if it is a pure function,
is not a standard intrinsic function, is not an internal function,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59345
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Jan 13 11:06:03 2019
New Revision: 267903
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267903&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-01-13 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/59345
* trans-ar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59345
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35267
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56789
--- Comment #19 from Thomas Koenig ---
I have asked in
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!search/comp.lang.fortran$20contiguous$20dummy%7Csort:date/comp.lang.fortran/QiFkx8b48uw/wtQE9M_aFwAJ
.
Let's see what sort of answers there will be, apart f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88820
Bug ID: 88820
Summary: ICE in in C++2a mode for code which is able to be
compiled in C++17 mode
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67277
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86356
ensadc at mailnesia dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ensadc at mailnesia dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67277
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|tkoenig at gcc do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88803
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #1)
> More annoying than the warnings id the text displayed in the manual:
>
> the See CONVERT specifier on the open statement or the See
> GFORTRAN_CONVERT_UNI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57992
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88664
--- Comment #6 from Nathan Sidwell ---
There's STRIP_NOPS, isn't there?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56789
--- Comment #20 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com ---
Hi Thomas,
I was mulling this over a few months ago and came to the conclusion
that copy-in/copy-out was the only thing that made sense.
The IBM manual is explicit about this:
https:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56789
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|pault at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88821
Bug ID: 88821
Summary: Inline packing of non-contiguous arguments
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57992
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Chris Elrod from comment #3)
> Created attachment 45014 [details]
> Code that produces lots of unnecessary and performance-crippling
> _gfortran_internal_pack@PLT and _gfortran_internal_unpack@PL
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59345
--- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Jan 13 14:57:39 2019
New Revision: 267905
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267905&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-01-13 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/57992
* trans-ar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57992
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Jan 13 14:57:39 2019
New Revision: 267905
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267905&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-01-13 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/57992
* trans-ar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88664
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Nathan Sidwell from comment #6)
> There's STRIP_NOPS, isn't there?
The updated patch is posted at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-01/msg00732.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57992
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36854
Bug 36854 depends on bug 57992, which changed state.
Bug 57992 Summary: Pointless packing of contiguous arrays for simply contiguous
functions results as actual arguments
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57992
What|Rem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88822
Bug ID: 88822
Summary: Strange inconsistency between types of qualified
rvalues.
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88823
Bug ID: 88823
Summary: ivopts introduces -1(OVF)
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87689
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||40976
--- Comment #8 from Thomas Koenig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52351
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
See
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56789
--- Comment #22 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #21)
> Hi Paul,
>
> > I was mulling this over a few months ago and came to the conclusion
> > that copy-in/copy-out was the only thing that made sense.
>
> Well, in th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88824
Bug ID: 88824
Summary: ICE on invalid
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassign
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88825
Bug ID: 88825
Summary: ICE on (invalid) C++11 code: tree check: expected
class ‘type’, have ‘exceptional’ (error_mark) in
can_do_nrvo_p, at cp/typeck.c:9361
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88820
--- Comment #1 from Hana Dusíková ---
I think I found a related problem. It's about deducting argument of a class
when instantiating subtype. I created a minimal case. I'm attaching.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88092
--- Comment #6 from Hana Dusíková ---
Created attachment 45421
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45421&action=edit
argument deduction of parent type
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88092
--- Comment #7 from Hana Dusíková ---
If you compile it with:
g++-HEAD minimal.cpp -std=c++2a -DREFERENCE
=> correct
g++-HEAD minimal.cpp -std=c++2a -DAUTO
=> correct
g++-HEAD minimal.cpp -std=c++2a -DCNTTP
minimal.cpp: In member functio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82215
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88826
Bug ID: 88826
Summary: ICE (segfault) when compiling invalid C++ code with
-std=c++2a
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88824
Zhendong Su changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88820
--- Comment #2 from Hana Dusíková ---
Created attachment 45422
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45422&action=edit
referencing subtype unable to deduce parent type
~/projekty/ice-gcc > g++-HEAD minimal.cpp -std=c++2a -DREFERE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88092
--- Comment #8 from Hana Dusíková ---
Please ignore two last comments, I sent them to wrong bug, it was supposed to
be for #88820.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88647
Anders Granlund changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88820
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88800
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56386
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477
Bug 87477 depends on bug 56386, which changed state.
Bug 56386 Summary: [F03] ICE with ASSOCIATE construct and an derived type array
component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56386
What|Removed |Ad
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88827
Bug ID: 88827
Summary: Rejects valid program using &* operator combination.
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58618
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477
Bug 87477 depends on bug 58618, which changed state.
Bug 58618 Summary: Wrong code with character substring and ASSOCIATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58618
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88729
Nicolas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88828
Bug ID: 88828
Summary: Inefficient update of the first element of vector
registers
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88803
--- Comment #3 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dominiq
Date: Sun Jan 13 19:18:46 2019
New Revision: 267906
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267906&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-01-13 Dominique d'Humieres
PR fortran/88803
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88820
--- Comment #4 from Hana Dusíková ---
The ICE will not happen if you comment out line 464 from first example.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88803
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88829
Bug ID: 88829
Summary: Failure to deduce size of array of 2^31 chars
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80354
--- Comment #11 from Martin Sebor ---
(In reply to Alejandro Colomar from comment #10)
> Many other warnings are supressed with (void), why is this one so special?
Not too many warnings can be suppressed by casts. Those that can must be at
leas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88830
Bug ID: 88830
Summary: ice in maybe_emit_vtables
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88825
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Status|U
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88820
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
This reduced test ICEs left and right with -std=c++17/14 since r236221, but the
ICE changed into another ICE with r248433.
template <__SIZE_TYPE__> class basic_fixed_string;
struct empty_subject;
template
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88830
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88830
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Started with r267855.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88830
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88819
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88825
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.5
Summary|ICE on (invalid)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88776
--- Comment #7 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Mon Jan 14 00:22:00 2019
New Revision: 267910
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267910&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-01-13 Jerry DeLisle
PR libfortran/88776
* io/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86655
--- Comment #5 from emsr at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 45423
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45423&action=edit
Final patch that passes.
2018-01-14 Edward Smith-Rowland <3dw...@verizon.net>
PR libstdc++/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88738
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Yes, I would guess that clang's "dumb" warning is fine for 99% of cases, and
the handful of exceptions could use #pragma to disable the warning.
But until/unless G++ gets such a warning, decorating the lib
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88776
--- Comment #8 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Mon Jan 14 01:12:27 2019
New Revision: 267911
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267911&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-01-13 Jerry DeLisle
PR libfortran/88776
* io/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88776
--- Comment #9 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Mon Jan 14 02:03:34 2019
New Revision: 267912
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267912&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-01-13 Jerry DeLisle
Backport from trunk
PR li
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88776
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56549
leonard gerard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||leolchat at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87329
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85368
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
--- Comment #17
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88828
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88738
--- Comment #8 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #7)
> Yes, I would guess that clang's "dumb" warning is fine for 99% of cases, and
> the handful of exceptions could use #pragma to disable the warning.
Or an attribut
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88832
Bug ID: 88832
Summary: the layout of .data section of a binary is slightly
changed when -g option is enabled.
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88831
Bug ID: 88831
Summary: the layout of .data section of a binary is slightly
changed when -g option is enabled.
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Se
77 matches
Mail list logo
