[Bug middle-end/85956] [8/9 Regression] ICE in wide_int_to_tree_1, at tree.c:1549

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85956 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Jan 11 21:03:53 2019 New Revision: 267858 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267858&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR middle-end/85956 PR lto/88733 * tree-inline.h (

[Bug lto/88733] [9 Regression] ICE in wide_int_to_tree_1, at tree.c:1561

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88733 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/85956] [8 Regression] ICE in wide_int_to_tree_1, at tree.c:1549

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85956 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/88811] New: libstdc++-v3/src/filesystem/path.cc:503: possible cut'n'paste error ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88811 Bug ID: 88811 Summary: libstdc++-v3/src/filesystem/path.cc:503: possible cut'n'paste error ? Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/88806] extern "C" variables declared in different namespaces are considered different

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88806 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/88810] gcc/fortran/dependency.c:2200: possible cut'n'paste error ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88810 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/88699] [9 Regression] tree check fail: expected function_decl, have using_decl in add_method, at cp/class.c:1137

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88699 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/88312] [9 regression] Mishandled explicitly provided parameter pack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88312 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||eric at efcs dot ca --- Comment #2 from

[Bug c++/88555] [9 Regression] Pack expansion fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88555 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/88312] [9 regression] Mishandled explicitly provided parameter pack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88312 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug c++/88699] [9 Regression] tree check fail: expected function_decl, have using_decl in add_method, at cp/class.c:1137

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88699 --- Comment #6 from David Malcolm --- (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #5) [...] > This patch stops the crash for comment #4 (though maybe it's papering over > the problem): [...] It also fixes the ICE from the original reproducer.

[Bug c++/86740] [8/9 Regression] ICE with hana and nested lambdas (likely a regression, tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:15325)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86740 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug c++/88804] Inconsistently diagnosed unused but set static variable in lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88804 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/88423] [9 Regression] ICE in begin_move_insn, at sched-ebb.c:175

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88423 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug fortran/88803] gfortran documentation warning: '.' or ',' must follow @xref

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88803 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/88812] New: Implement C++20 LWG 2499/P0487R1 - Fixing operator>>(basic_istream&, CharT*)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88812 Bug ID: 88812 Summary: Implement C++20 LWG 2499/P0487R1 - Fixing operator>>(basic_istream&, CharT*) Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/88613] [9 Regression] ICE in size_binop_loc at fold-const.c:1900 since r267272

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88613 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Fri Jan 11 22:36:20 2019 New Revision: 267859 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267859&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/88613 - ICE with use of const var in lambda. The issue her

[Bug c++/88312] [9 regression] Mishandled explicitly provided parameter pack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88312 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Fri Jan 11 22:37:01 2019 New Revision: 267860 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267860&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/88312 - pack expansion of decltype. The standard doesn't r

[Bug c++/88294] [9 Regression] ICE on (invalid) C++11 code: in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:15391

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88294 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug fortran/88810] gcc/fortran/dependency.c:2200: possible cut'n'paste error ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88810 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libfortran/88807] misleading indentation warnings building libgfortran

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88807 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/88813] New: snprintf less optimal than sprintf for %s with big enough destination

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88813 Bug ID: 88813 Summary: snprintf less optimal than sprintf for %s with big enough destination Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/88692] [9 Regression] Spurious "redundant move in return statement"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88692 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Fri Jan 11 23:21:40 2019 New Revision: 267862 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267862&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/88692, c++/87882 - -Wredundant-move false positive with

[Bug c++/88692] [9 Regression] Spurious "redundant move in return statement"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88692 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/87882] -Wredundant-move false positive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87882 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/35031] ELEMENTAL procedure with BIND(C)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35031 --- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Fri Jan 11 23:41:04 2019 New Revision: 267864 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267864&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-01-11 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/35031

[Bug libstdc++/88812] Implement C++20 LWG 2499/P0487R1 - Fixing operator>>(basic_istream&, CharT*)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88812 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|enhancement |normal

[Bug libstdc++/88812] Implement C++20 LWG 2499/P0487R1 - Fixing operator>>(basic_istream&, CharT*)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88812 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/88814] New: transform snprintf into memccpy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88814 Bug ID: 88814 Summary: transform snprintf into memccpy Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimizat

[Bug libstdc++/88811] libstdc++-v3/src/filesystem/path.cc:503: possible cut'n'paste error ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88811 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/88815] New: [9 Regression] is_constexpr (based on narrowing conversion and expression SFINAE) broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88815 Bug ID: 88815 Summary: [9 Regression] is_constexpr (based on narrowing conversion and expression SFINAE) broken Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Se

[Bug libstdc++/88811] libstdc++-v3/src/filesystem/path.cc:503: possible cut'n'paste error ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88811 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Sat Jan 12 00:12:20 2019 New Revision: 267868 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267868&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR libstdc++/88811 fix typo introduced in r266569 PR libstdc++/8

[Bug libstdc++/88811] libstdc++-v3/src/filesystem/path.cc:503: possible cut'n'paste error ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88811 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/83306] filesystem_error is not nothrow copyable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83306 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Sat Jan 12 00:12:20 2019 New Revision: 267868 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267868&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR libstdc++/88811 fix typo introduced in r266569 PR libstdc++/8

[Bug fortran/35031] ELEMENTAL procedure with BIND(C)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35031 --- Comment #6 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Sat Jan 12 00:14:55 2019 New Revision: 267869 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267869&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-01-11 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/35031

[Bug libstdc++/88322] Implement C++20 library features.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88322 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- C+2a status is now documented at https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/manual/status.html#status.iso.2020

[Bug c++/88779] No fix-it hints for misspelled member initializers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88779 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libfortran/88807] misleading indentation warnings building libgfortran

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88807 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug fortran/35031] ELEMENTAL procedure with BIND(C)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35031 --- Comment #7 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Sat Jan 12 00:33:01 2019 New Revision: 267874 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267874&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-01-11 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/35031

[Bug fortran/35031] ELEMENTAL procedure with BIND(C)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35031 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--

[Bug fortran/32630] [meta-bug] ISO C binding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32630 Bug 32630 depends on bug 35031, which changed state. Bug 35031 Summary: ELEMENTAL procedure with BIND(C) https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35031 What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug c++/88762] C++17 Deduction guide and operator expression produces missing template argument error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88762 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libfortran/88807] misleading indentation warnings building libgfortran

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88807 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug libstdc++/88738] treat shared_ptr and unique_ptr more like plain old pointers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88738 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/88816] New: Constructor calls itself recursively

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88816 Bug ID: 88816 Summary: Constructor calls itself recursively Product: gcc Version: 8.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug fortran/61765] [7/8/9 Regression] [F03] Rejects valid BIND(C) ENTRY

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61765 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/37073] -fno-math-errno should be the default on FreeBSD

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37073 --- Comment #3 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Gerald Pfeifer from comment #2) > I'll see what I can do about this. Did you mean to put yourself as the assignee for this, instead of just on cc? I mean, since you changed the status to ASSIGNE

[Bug middle-end/64101] GCC considers that the erf math function does not set errno

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64101 --- Comment #3 from Eric Gallager --- possibly related to some of the other -fmath-errno bugs that have been under discussion lately?

[Bug fortran/61765] [7/8/9 Regression] [F03] Rejects valid BIND(C) ENTRY

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61765 --- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Related to/duplicate of pr34500.

[Bug fortran/34500] Bind(C): Character returning function with ENTRY gives ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34500 --- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Related to/duplicate of pr61765. Note that with the patch at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2019-01/msg00085.html, the spurious error pr34500.f90:4:43: 4 | character(len=1,kind=c_char) :: test

[Bug c++/88664] False positive -Waddress-of-packed-member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88664 Pavel Roskin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||proski at gnu dot org --- Comment #2 from

<    1   2