https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88721
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88721
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou ---
> This patch allowed the bootstrap to finish.
There are 3 callers of function_arg_slotno so we would potentially need to add
6 initializations already. So I'd rather initialize pregno and ppadding at the
be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88723
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85381
--- Comment #11 from Tom de Vries ---
Author: vries
Date: Mon Jan 7 08:10:56 2019
New Revision: 267630
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267630&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[nvptx] Don't emit barriers for empty loops -- fix
When compiling an empt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88700
--- Comment #4 from Jonny Grant ---
Ok I see, thank you for the links. Yes, I would support amending/fixing for any
issues.
There are lots of APIs that have evolved. eg creat() still present, but I
wouldn't use it as there are better alternative
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88398
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85052
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Jan 7 08:49:08 2019
New Revision: 267632
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267632&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/85052
* tree-vect-generic.c: Include insn-config.h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88619
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Jan 7 08:50:57 2019
New Revision: 267633
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267633&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR sanitizer/88619
* cfgexpand.c (expand_stack_vars): Only
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88676
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Jan 7 08:51:59 2019
New Revision: 267634
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267634&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/88676
* tree-ssa-phiopt.c (two_value_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82521
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87525
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51765
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88677
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |9.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87943
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88606
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88680
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88678
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88733
Bug ID: 88733
Summary: [9 Regression] ICE in wide_int_to_tree_1, at
tree.c:1561
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88685
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |8.2.1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88702
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Version|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88711
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88714
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88702
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka ---
> You could also add match.pd rules merging stuff pair-wise...
>
> How's this a regression btw?
I was comparing with GCC 6 build where inlining apparently happened.
I believe inlining happens again - I am wai
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88692
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88676
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88735
Bug ID: 88735
Summary: Nested assignment triggers call of final method for
right hand side
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88734
Bug ID: 88734
Summary: [8/9 Regression] AArch64's ACLE intrinsics give an ICE
instead of compile error when option mismatch.
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88677
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88680
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88735
--- Comment #1 from martin ---
Remark: output should be one line
setting: 123
If the output starts with
finalising: 123
then this is wrong (as b%x%i is not associated when finalise is called for
b%x).
Also present in current g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88735
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88686
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|debug |rtl-optimization
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88690
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88692
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88723
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Jan 7 09:51:46 2019
New Revision: 267638
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267638&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR debug/88723
* dwarf2out.c (const_ok_for_output_1): Remo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88723
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Should be fixed, I'll let you test it before closing though.
That said, I think this exact UNSPEC should be delegitimized by the target
hook,
(define_insn "movsi_pic_gotdata_op"
[(set (match_operand:SI 0 "
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88619
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88734
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85486
--- Comment #2 from Tom de Vries ---
Author: vries
Date: Mon Jan 7 10:01:49 2019
New Revision: 267640
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267640&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[nvptx] Force vl32 if calling vector-partitionable routines
With PTX_MAX_V
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88601
Bug 88601 depends on bug 85052, which changed state.
Bug 85052 Summary: Implement support for clang's __builtin_convertvector
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85052
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88670
Bug 88670 depends on bug 85052, which changed state.
Bug 85052 Summary: Implement support for clang's __builtin_convertvector
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85052
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85052
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88723
--- Comment #6 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> Should be fixed, I'll let you test it before closing though.
I did last night and it worked fine. Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88697
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
you can add a new effective target (or adjust the existing one accordingly)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88701
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88723
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88723
--- Comment #8 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> I don't have access to Solaris, can you attach preprocessed
> testsuite_shared.cc
> + the g++ options used to compile it?
Just in case, there
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88704
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
--- Comment #1 from Ric
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88709
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88712
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88713
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88714
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88723
--- Comment #9 from Eric Botcazou ---
> That said, I think this exact UNSPEC should be delegitimized by the target
> hook,
> (define_insn "movsi_pic_gotdata_op"
> [(set (match_operand:SI 0 "register_operand" "=r")
> (unspec:SI [(match_o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88728
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88729
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
There was some intermediate related ICE introduced and now fixed, so maybe
re-try.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=448
--- Comment #41 from hainque at adacore dot com ---
> On 2 Jan 2019, at 23:33, joseph at codesourcery dot com
> wrote:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=448
>
> --- Comment #40 from joseph at codesourcery dot com dot com> ---
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88730
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88736
Bug ID: 88736
Summary: nullptr_t available without namespace qualification
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88732
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88733
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88686
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Single-source testcase:
volatile int a, b;
int c;
__attribute__ ((noipa))
void optimize_me_not (void)
{
asm volatile ("":"+g" (a), "+g" (b), "+g" (c));
}
int
main ()
{
int j;
for (; b < 10; b++)
{
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88737
Bug ID: 88737
Summary: RFE: Track ownership moves
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88737
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88737
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88737
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88737
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Wouldn't that break e.g. programs that
free (a);
return (uintptr_t) a % 16;
or similar (i.e. inspect the bits of the pointer rather than what it points
to)?
That should be valid even after free, free does
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88737
--- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 7 Jan 2019, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88737
>
> --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> Wouldn't that break e.g. programs that
> fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88733
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
See
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88737
--- Comment #4 from Neal H. Walfield ---
I'm not sure what '*a = {CLOBBER};' does and I'm having trouble finding
documentation for it so the following comment might be unnecessary.
Nevertheless: when I say "move", I don't mean that the object is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88738
Bug ID: 88738
Summary: treat shared_ptr and unique_ptr more like plain old
pointers
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88262
--- Comment #19 from Stephen Kim ---
Thank you for all of your comments! I have talked with our team members again.
It seems that there has been miscommunication. They seemed to have intended
that Go tools should give Scrt1.o. However, as Go to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88733
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
error_mark_node is used for the cases where the outlined region doesn't get
passed the corresponding size in any way.
See https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-05/msg01778.html and the
discussions in that t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88677
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88521
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88738
--- Comment #1 from Ulrich Drepper ---
BTW, this also applies to the "unused variable" warning as in the code below
but clang doesn't warn about that either.
#include
using type = std::shared_ptr;
type g;
int f(int a) {
auto p = g;
return
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88729
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85667
--- Comment #6 from mateuszb at poczta dot onet.pl ---
Now it is fixed for 64-bit GCC 9.
For 32-bit GCC 9 it is not fixed (return goes to st(0)).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88709
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Note, especially with large constructors, unlike other overlapping stores it
might not be feasible to merge the large clearing or memset with the other
stores, but still it might be possible to merge several
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88686
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85052
--- Comment #12 from Matthias Kretz ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #11)
> [...] though for 8x conversions we
> are e.g. on x86 already outside of the realm of natively supported vectors
> (we don't really want MMX and for 1024 bit an
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88739
Bug ID: 88739
Summary: union bug on ARM64
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unassign
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88568
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 45365
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45365&action=edit
gcc9-pr88568.patch
Full untested patch. Can somebody please bootstrap/regtest that on mingw or
cygwin?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88684
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88728
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> I think the proper way of booting with -Og would be setting BOOT_CFLAGS
> rather than CFLAGS/CXXFLAGS. Note the issue might be the use of -save-temps.
I saw th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88598
--- Comment #8 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Mon Jan 7 12:16:30 2019
New Revision: 267645
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267645&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[1/2] PR88598: Optimise x * { 0 or 1, 0 or 1, ... }
The
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88598
--- Comment #9 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Mon Jan 7 12:17:10 2019
New Revision: 267646
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267646&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[2/2] PR88598: Optimise reduc (bit_and)
This patch fold
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88598
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolutio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88684
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Please make |[7/8/9 Regression] Please
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88684
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
https://reviews.llvm.org/D11502
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88684
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Given that the GCC default is
#ifndef __GXX_MERGED_TYPEINFO_NAMES
// By default, typeinfo names are not merged.
#define __GXX_MERGED_TYPEINFO_NAMES 0
#endif
we should use strcmp on Linux too.
Note, what libsa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85949
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88701
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
igure --program-suffix=-99
--enable-version-specific-runtime-libs --enable-languages=c,c++,lto --no-create
--no-recursion
Thread model: posix
gcc version 9.0.0 20190107 (experimental) (GCC)
COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-v' '-save-temps' '-coverage' '-std=c++11'
&#x
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88263
--- Comment #5 from Csaba Ráduly ---
Created attachment 45367
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45367&action=edit
preprocessor output from -save-temps for the second version (with destructor)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88263
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
Confirmed, let me fix that.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88398
--- Comment #13 from Wilco ---
So to add some real numbers to the discussion, the average number of iterations
is 4.31. Frequency stats (16 includes all iterations > 16 too):
1: 29.0
2: 4.2
3: 1.0
4: 36.7
5: 8.7
6: 3.4
7: 3.0
8: 2.6
9: 2.1
10: 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88717
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88611
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88721
--- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou ---
>> This patch allowed the bootstrap to finish.
>
> There are 3 callers of function_arg_slotno so we would potentially need to add
> 6 initializati
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88587
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
1 - 100 of 264 matches
Mail list logo
