https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88550
--- Comment #5 from Harry Wong ---
Hi, I've uploaded it to OneDrive, here's the link:
https://1drv.ms/u/s!Ajvq6dgV7abtgogPYN8IdLx2lyQ4zQ
Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81210
--- Comment #6 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dominiq
Date: Sun Dec 30 10:51:49 2018
New Revision: 267474
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267474&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-12-30 Dominique d'Humieres
PR tree-optimiza
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68356
--- Comment #17 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dominiq
Date: Sun Dec 30 10:51:49 2018
New Revision: 267474
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267474&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-12-30 Dominique d'Humieres
PR tree-optimiz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81693
--- Comment #33 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dominiq
Date: Sun Dec 30 10:51:49 2018
New Revision: 267474
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267474&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-12-30 Dominique d'Humieres
PR tree-optimiz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81693
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88637
Bug ID: 88637
Summary: GCC should mention C++17 in warnings, not C++1z
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68356
--- Comment #18 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dominiq
Date: Sun Dec 30 12:28:54 2018
New Revision: 267476
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267476&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-12-30 Dominique d'Humieres
PR tree-optimiz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81210
--- Comment #7 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dominiq
Date: Sun Dec 30 12:28:54 2018
New Revision: 267476
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267476&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-12-30 Dominique d'Humieres
PR tree-optimiza
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68356
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81210
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88343
--- Comment #9 from Iain Sandoe ---
Author: iains
Date: Sun Dec 30 13:20:19 2018
New Revision: 267477
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267477&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
fix PR target/88343 for 32b powerpc.
2018-12-30 Iain Sandoe
bac
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88343
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88637
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88638
Bug ID: 88638
Summary: [9 Regression] FAIL: *string-format-1.* on darwin
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88639
Bug ID: 88639
Summary: FAIL: gfortran.dg/ieee/ieee_10.f90 -O0 (test for
excess errors)
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88639
--- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #0)
> On a 12-core x86-64 machine with
>
> $ make -j 12 -k check RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board='unix{-m32,}'"
>
> I got
>
> /export/gnu/import/git/sources/gcc/gcc
gfortran.dg/ieee/ieee_10.f90 -O3 -g (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/ieee/ieee_10.f90 -Os (test for excess errors)
=== gfortran Summary ===
# of unexpected failures6
# of unresolved testcases 6
/export/build/gnu/tools-build/gcc/build-x86_64-linux
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88639
--- Comment #3 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Sun Dec 30 17:36:05 2018
New Revision: 267478
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267478&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Use dg-additional-options instead of dg-options
Use dg-additional-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88639
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88632
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||link-failure
Priority|P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87768
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88636
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88612
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85596
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88612
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88612
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88421
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Host||shle--netbsdelf
Build|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16615
--- Comment #10 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Patch was posted here. I'd like some review on methodology for the
mechanically-generated parts before checking in the whole mess.
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-12/msg01732.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86315
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88640
Bug ID: 88640
Summary: ICE in mark_reachable_handlers, at tree-eh.c:3926
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, needs-bisection
Severi
30 matches
Mail list logo