https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88001
--- Comment #8 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Fri Dec 14 08:29:34 2018
New Revision: 267122
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267122&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
match_asm_constraints: Use copy_rtx where needed (PR88001)
The new
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88280
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Confirmed. g and h end up like this before RTL expansion (initial folding
> produces this):
>
> j_6 = i_4(D) & a_5(D);
> _1 = i_4(D) != 0;
> _2 = j_6 !=
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65496
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
#c0 got fixed or made latent with r235905.
The #c4 testcase went latent with r249450 (though no idea why it hasn't been
filed separately).
In any case, not sure if it is worth keeping this open when it is eit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88454
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88481
Heinrich Seebauer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88311
--- Comment #10 from Alan Modra ---
Author: amodra
Date: Fri Dec 14 09:03:50 2018
New Revision: 267123
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267123&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[RS6000] PR88311, mlongcall indirections are optimised away
Masking CALL_L
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88224
--- Comment #3 from avieira at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: avieira
Date: Fri Dec 14 09:04:24 2018
New Revision: 267124
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267124&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/88224: Fix FPU configuration of Cortex-R7 and Cort
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65496
--- Comment #7 from Zdenek Sojka ---
Please feel free to close this one; I might open another PR if I trigger this
ICE again.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65496
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88492
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||aarch64
Status|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88462
--- Comment #9 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #8 from Iain Buclaw ---
>> Trying to load 32 bits from a non-4 byte aligned pointer is a no-no on a
>> strict-alignment target like sparc...
>
> I saw that on HPPA as well
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88013
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87871
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87871
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88491
--- Comment #1 from Tom de Vries ---
Author: vries
Date: Fri Dec 14 09:43:41 2018
New Revision: 267127
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267127&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[testsuite] Remove bashism from libbacktrace/allocfail.sh
Test-case libbac
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88491
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88311
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88493
Bug ID: 88493
Summary: Inconsistent error messages for unknown types
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88469
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ABI
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88468
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||avr
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88253
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|avr |avr-*-*
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88473
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88478
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |rtl-optimization
Version|8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88489
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88478
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88487
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88489
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|x86 |x86_64-*-*, i?86-*-*
Target Milestone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88473
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kyukhin at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88490
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88224
avieira at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88492
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88253
Senthil Kumar Selvaraj changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||saaadhu at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88473
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The rationale for doing it the way it currently is done:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-11/msg02612.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88464
--- Comment #11 from Moritz Kreutzer ---
Jakub, I can confirm it's working for masked gathers (we have a similar pattern
elsewhere in our code) with the latest trunk. Thanks for looking at the
scatters as well!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88490
--- Comment #3 from Daniel Fruzynski ---
In this case s->d is pointer to pointer to double, and both pointer levels have
restrict qualifier. I wonder if you could add some tag that s->d[n] and s->d[k]
points to separate memory areas. This tag cou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88490
--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 14 Dec 2018, bugzi...@poradnik-webmastera.com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88490
>
> --- Comment #3 from Daniel Fruzynski ---
> In this case s->d is pointer to p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88483
--- Comment #1 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Dec 14 12:38:04 2018
New Revision: 267133
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267133&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
x86: Don't use get_frame_size when finalizing stack frame
get_fram
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87370
--- Comment #14 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to trashyankes from comment #12)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #11)
> > (In reply to trashyankes from comment #10)
> >
> > Which GCC are you using? GCC 8.2 generates:
>
> GCC Explorer :D
>
> g++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88483
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88494
Bug ID: 88494
Summary: [9 Regression] polyhedron 10% mdbx runtime regression
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88494
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88261
--- Comment #6 from Bernd Edlinger ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #5)
> Right, but we're not supposed to ICE, even on invalid code.
Yes, ideed.
I think what would be needed is adding this C-error to the C++FE:
array-6.c: In funct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88044
samtebbs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||samtebbs at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88495
Bug ID: 88495
Summary: An OpenACC async queue is always synchronized with
itself
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: openacc, patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88044
--- Comment #7 from samtebbs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I can confirm this test fails on arm-none-linux-gnueabihf when invoking with
"-mcpu=cortex-a5 -mfpu=vfpv3-d16-fp16", as Christophe wrote. Please see the
attached log.
unction
f2:
.LFB0:
.cfi_startproc
xorl%eax, %eax
xorl%edx, %edx
ret
.cfi_endproc
.LFE0:
.size f2, .-f2
.ident "GCC: (GNU) 9.0.0 20181214 (experimental)"
.section.note.GNU-stack,"",@progbits
[hjl@gnu-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88497
Bug ID: 88497
Summary: Improve Accumulation in Auto-Vectorized Code
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88497
kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87835
--- Comment #1 from Tom de Vries ---
(In reply to Thomas Schwinge from comment #0)
> After r264397 "[nvptx] Remove use of CUDA unified memory in libgomp", I'm
> seeing (intermittently only, and only on some systems):
>
I see the failure reprodu
Thread model: posix
gcc version 9.0.0 20181214 (experimental) [trunk revision 267123] (GCC)
[hjl@gnu-skx-1 gcc]$
--with-arch=native --with-cpu=native is equivalent to -march=skylake-avx512.
It used to pass before r265827.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88498
Bug ID: 88498
Summary: [9 Regression] FAIL:
gcc.target/i386/avx512vl-pr79299-1.c (internal
compiler error)
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88498
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88462
Johannes Pfau changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||johannespfau at gmail dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88499
Bug ID: 88499
Summary: Check for less than zero removed before floating point
division causes division by zero (fast-math mode)
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONF
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88499
--- Comment #1 from Teodor Petrov ---
Here are the commands used to reproduce the bug:
$ g++ -g -fPIC -Ofast -msse4.2 -std=c++11 -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections
-ffast-math -fvisibility=hidden -fexceptions -Wno-c++11-extensions
gcc_division.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88462
--- Comment #11 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #10 from Johannes Pfau ---
> I guess the proper fix to the alignment problem is using
> 'https://dlang.org/phobos/std_traits.html#classInstanceAlignment' (or rather
> the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88500
Bug ID: 88500
Summary: [SH]: SETCONTEXT_CLOBBERS_TLS needs to be handled in
libgo
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88499
--- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse ---
I don't think using fenv.h with -ffast-math makes much sense.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88261
--- Comment #7 from Bernd Edlinger ---
Created attachment 45238
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45238&action=edit
untested patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88474
--- Comment #2 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Fri Dec 14 17:04:48 2018
New Revision: 267137
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267137&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/88474
* internal-fn.def (HYPOT): New.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88487
--- Comment #4 from Daniel Fruzynski ---
OK, I see. Is there any workaround for this? I tried to assign pointer to local
variable directly and with intermediate casting via void*, but it did not help.
Casting S1* to S2* also does not work.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88464
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88489
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The test FAILs even at -O0 when built with -mavx512vl, when built e.g. with
-mavx512{bw,dq} it works fine.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88501
Bug ID: 88501
Summary: Improve suggested alternative to be closer to typo
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88499
--- Comment #3 from Teodor Petrov ---
@Marc Glisse: Would it be possible to give an explanation why this is not a
good idea? Link to some kind of a documentation which explains that this
behaviour is expected?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88489
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88261
Bernd Edlinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot
de
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88490
--- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Fri, 14 Dec 2018, rguenther at suse dot de wrote:
> Note I do not think the C standard is sufficiently clear with regarding
> to restrict qualified pointers loaded from memory.
I think
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88499
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88501
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87436
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 14 19:36:33 2018
New Revision: 267142
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267142&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/82294
PR c++/87436
* init.c (build_vec_init
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82294
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 14 19:36:33 2018
New Revision: 267142
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267142&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/82294
PR c++/87436
* init.c (build_vec_init
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87436
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 14 19:37:38 2018
New Revision: 267143
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267143&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/82294
PR c++/87436
* expr.h (categorize_cto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82294
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 14 19:37:38 2018
New Revision: 267143
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267143&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/82294
PR c++/87436
* expr.h (categorize_cto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88498
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88497
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88497
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Obviously, in either case for -ffast-math only.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86823
--- Comment #7 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Fri Dec 14 20:06:15 2018
New Revision: 267144
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267144&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR86823] retain deferred access checks from outside firewall
We used
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88261
--- Comment #9 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Thanks for running with this Bernd. My brain was too mushy last night to get
anywhere. I agree that digest_init_r seems like the right place to try and
address this problem.
ISTM we could either add the D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88370
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Author: tschwinge
Date: Fri Dec 14 20:42:08 2018
New Revision: 267147
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267147&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR88370] acc_get_cuda_stream/acc_set_cuda_stream: acc_async_sync,
a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88407
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Author: tschwinge
Date: Fri Dec 14 20:42:40 2018
New Revision: 267150
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267150&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR88407] [OpenACC] Correctly handle unseen async-arguments
... whi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88484
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Author: tschwinge
Date: Fri Dec 14 20:42:50 2018
New Revision: 267151
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267151&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR88484] OpenACC wait directive without wait argument but with asyn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88495
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Author: tschwinge
Date: Fri Dec 14 20:43:02 2018
New Revision: 267152
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267152&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR88495] An OpenACC async queue is always synchronized with itself
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88497
--- Comment #4 from Bill Schmidt ---
Yes, reassociation sounds like the right place to look at this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78986
Balakrishnan B changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||balakrishnan.erode at gmail
dot co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88001
--- Comment #9 from Vineet Gupta ---
Can this be stable backported to gcc-8-branch as well.
glibc folks use that branch for their regular smoke testing and without that
ARC tools don't even build.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88502
Bug ID: 88502
Summary: Inline built-in asinh, acosh, atanh for -ffast-math
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
ty: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: petschy at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
class Parent;
class Derived;
Derived* foo(Parent* p)
{
return static_cast(p);
}
$ g++-9.0.0 -Wall -Wextra -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88501
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87814
--- Comment #8 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Fri Dec 14 21:57:07 2018
New Revision: 267155
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267155&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR c++/87814] undefer deferred noexcept on tsubst if request
tsubst_e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79738
--- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Fri Dec 14 22:16:43 2018
New Revision: 267156
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267156&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR 79738 - Documentation for __attribute__((const)) slightly misleading
g
()
{
}
void baz2(Foo f_)
{
}
void baz3()
{
Foo foo;
}
Foo g_foo;
$ g++-9.0.0 -Wall -Wextra -c 20181214-fwddecl_value.cpp
20181214-fwddecl_value.cpp:10:6: error: field ‘m_foo’ has incomplete type ‘Foo’
10 | Foo m_foo;
| ^
20181214-fwddecl_value.cpp:1:8: note: forward
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87096
--- Comment #12 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Fri Dec 14 22:38:08 2018
New Revision: 267157
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267157&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/87096 - Optimised snprintf is not POSIX conformant
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87096
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88372
--- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Fri Dec 14 22:45:55 2018
New Revision: 267158
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267158&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/88372 - alloc_size attribute is ignored on function
p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88372
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87436
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[7/8/9 Regression] G++ |[7/8 Regression] G++
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88478
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 14 23:17:03 2018
New Revision: 267159
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267159&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/88478
* cselib.c (cselib_record_sets):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88505
Bug ID: 88505
Summary: missing -Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch on a
declaration with incompatible attributes
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87992
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
