https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70694
--- Comment #10 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #9)
> (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #8)
> > Author: iains
> > Date: Sat Aug 25 09:02:28 2018
> > New Revision: 263850
> >
> > URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65855
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||giuliano.belinassi at usp dot
br
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88186
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86735
--- Comment #30 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I have verified that the problem goes away when using the following as version:
GNU assembler (GNU Binutils) 2.31.51.20181124
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86735
--- Comment #31 from H.J. Lu ---
*** Bug 86828 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86828
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87866
--- Comment #6 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #5 from Iain Buclaw ---
> Based on what you described is the problem, I think this is done.
I'm pretty certain it is. I've successfully been using the following
similar p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88190
Bug ID: 88190
Summary: compile_options.allow_std does not allow to
distinguish between GFC_STD_GNU and GFC_STD_LEGACY
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88157
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||doko at debian dot org
--- Comment #9 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88171
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88073
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Nov 25 15:19:29 2018
New Revision: 266436
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266436&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-11-25 Thomas Koenig
Backport from trunk
PR fort
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88073
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Nov 25 15:23:18 2018
New Revision: 266437
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266437&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-11-25 Thomas Koenig
Backport from trunk
PR fort
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88073
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88191
Bug ID: 88191
Summary: [9 Regression] ada bootstrap failure on
alpha-linux-gnu ("SIGSYS" not declared in "Linux")
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88052
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Format contravening f2008 |Format contravening
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88047
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Side note: In principle I would have preferred something like this:
> ...
I agree that the patch is more general than my ad hoc check that a particular
pointer is not dereferenced.
> But that ICEs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88190
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88190
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
-gnu/9.0.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto
--prefix=/home/su/software/tmp/gcc/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 9.0.0 20181125 (experimental) [trunk revision 266435] (GCC)
$
$ g++tk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88194
Bug ID: 88194
Summary: can
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88194
coypu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88195
Bug ID: 88195
Summary: misleading error message for unsupported builtin
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ta
: posix
gcc version 9.0.0 20181125 (experimental) [trunk revision 266435] (GCC)
$
$ g++tk -std=c++2a tmp.cpp
tmp.cpp:5:14: internal compiler error: in convert_nontype_argument, at
cp/pt.c:7137
5 | B < C, &C::c > b;
| ^
0x962cb5 convert_nontype_argument
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54265
--- Comment #4 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: sandra
Date: Sun Nov 25 21:10:34 2018
New Revision: 266440
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266440&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-11-25 Sandra Loosemore
PR other/54265
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54265
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88190
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
With the patch
--- ../_clean/gcc/fortran/options.c 2018-11-21 09:27:43.0 +0100
+++ gcc/fortran/options.c 2018-11-25 21:29:39.0 +0100
@@ -38,12 +38,14 @@ gfc_option_t gfc_opti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88052
--- Comment #9 from Jerry DeLisle ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #8)
> > The error I found is not just violating a constraint in f2008 or above.
> > The same constraint with different wording is in f2003, f95 and f90.
>
> Ag
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87947
--- Comment #3 from comm+gnu at squotd dot net ---
Does this result in an exception to the answer you gave here about gcc being
able to link c++14 and c++17 object files together? (Or am I missing
something?)
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88190
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88190
--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #3)
> With the patch
>
> --- ../_clean/gcc/fortran/options.c 2018-11-21 09:27:43.0 +0100
> +++ gcc/fortran/options.c 2018-11-25 21:29:39
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79738
--- Comment #4 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: sandra
Date: Mon Nov 26 01:38:00 2018
New Revision: 266445
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266445&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-11-25 Sandra Loosemore
PR web/79738
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79738
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56682
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dodji at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88182
--- Comment #1 from Arseny Solokha ---
Eric, this PR is not about a vectorizer missed optimization, so I doubt it
should block the corresponding meta-bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57166
--- Comment #2 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: sandra
Date: Mon Nov 26 03:44:38 2018
New Revision: 266446
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266446&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-11-25 Sandra Loosemore
PR c/57166
gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57166
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68834
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
--- Comment #3
function 'foo':
gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr67265.c:13:1: internal compiler error: in
decompose_normal_address, at rtlanal.c:6381
13 | }
| ^
0x639fde decompose_normal_address
/var/tmp/portage/cross-powerpc-e300c3-linux-gnu/gcc-9.0.0_alpha20181125/work/gcc-9-20181125/gcc
38 matches
Mail list logo
