https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou ---
> For this, I need you to tell me what "a Debian quirk" is.
> Does some (non Debian) architecture
> - use TARGET-gcc-VERSION with TARGET/=Sdefault.Target_Name?
> - use TARGET-gcc-VERSION with VERSION/=Gnatvsn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87874
Bug ID: 87874
Summary: [8/9 Regression] ICE in simplify_subreg, at
simplify-rtx.c:6396
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8
Arnaud Charlet changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||charlet at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87875
Bug ID: 87875
Summary: Address sanitizer doen't work with nested functions
with enabled stack-use-after-return check
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87836
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25844
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87875
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8
Nicolas Boulenguez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #44913|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87876
Bug ID: 87876
Summary: Mac failing: conversion from longdouble to long int is
ambiguous
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87836
--- Comment #4 from Gary Mills ---
sparcv7 is a file path component. It implies that this is a 32-bit executable
running on a 64-bit kernel. That's normal behavior on OI and Solaris builds.
Generally there are both 32 and 64-bit builds. The 64
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87836
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou ---
> I don't see anything in the various FLAGS that might cause this ICE.
CFLAGS='-g -O2' LDFLAGS=-m32
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70260
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87865
--- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #3 from Iain Buclaw ---
> (In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #2)
>> > --- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw ---
>> > This is part of the dmd frontend which
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87876
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87788
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mcccs at gmx dot com
--- Comment #15 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87865
--- Comment #5 from Iain Buclaw ---
(In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #4)
> Given that Solaris 10 support will be removed in GCC 10 and Solaris 11
> has no problem here, I guess dealing with this isn't worth the trouble:
> b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58372
--- Comment #41 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Sun Nov 4 19:22:50 2018
New Revision: 265776
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265776&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/58372
* cfgexpand.c (pass_expand::e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87672
--- Comment #13 from Bernd Edlinger ---
Author: edlinger
Date: Sun Nov 4 19:46:08 2018
New Revision: 265777
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265777&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc:
2018-11-04 Bernd Edlinger
PR tree-optimization/87672
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86572
--- Comment #3 from Bernd Edlinger ---
Author: edlinger
Date: Sun Nov 4 19:51:09 2018
New Revision: 265778
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265778&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc:
2018-11-04 Bernd Edlinger
PR tree-optimization/86572
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87672
Bernd Edlinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86572
Bernd Edlinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83819
Bug 83819 depends on bug 86572, which changed state.
Bug 86572 Summary: unsafe strlen folding of const arguments with non-const
offset
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86572
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87872
--- Comment #3 from John Bytheway ---
Created attachment 44955
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44955&action=edit
Proposed patch
Sure, here's a proposed patch. Tested in the sense that I have compiled and
run a program again
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87865
--- Comment #6 from ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ibuclaw
Date: Sun Nov 4 23:34:44 2018
New Revision: 265780
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265780&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Merge dmd upstream 6243fa6d2
This introduces a new header t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87865
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87866
--- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw ---
I backported a fix from the D sources so it should no longer segfault at least.
From what I can see, it should pick up the object.d source correctly.
-nostdinc -I /vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/libphobos/lib
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79191
--- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager ---
Where exactly in the compiler is this optimization supposed to be done and
who's the maintainer of that file?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79221
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87469
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87877
Bug ID: 87877
Summary: dyld: Library not loaded
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87878
Bug ID: 87878
Summary: dyld: Library not loaded
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87877
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 87878 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87878
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87877
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87806
--- Comment #7 from Ulrich Windl ---
(In reply to Tavian Barnes from comment #4)
> Perhaps this is reasonable for types that are defined in the file itself,
> not in an included header?
That's what I was thinking about. However it seems the comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87806
--- Comment #8 from Ulrich Windl ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #6)
> I don't think there are any, only for local typedefs. That's already enabled
> by -Wall so I assumed this was a request to add a new warning *and* enable
> it in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87583
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Any progress on that Segher?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77698
--- Comment #9 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Mon Nov 5 07:32:48 2018
New Revision: 265784
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265784&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix setting of hotness in non-LTO mode (PR gcov-profile/77698).
2018-11-0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87811
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87829
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Mon Nov 5 07:33:58 2018
New Revision: 265786
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265786&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Remove options that are not disabled with -Os (PR web/87829).
2018-11-05
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87811
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Mon Nov 5 07:33:30 2018
New Revision: 265785
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265785&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Verify that last argument of __builtin_expect_with_probability is a real c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87829
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77698
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87813
--- Comment #6 from Aldy Hernandez ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #5)
> The sprintf pass doesn't do any optimization at -O0 but it still runs to
> diagnose the subset of mistakes that are detectable even without
> optimization.
Yes,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87874
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60503
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Nov 5 07:46:52 2018
New Revision: 265787
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265787&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/60503 - wrong lambda attribute syntax.
This patch fixes tw
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87873
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87715
--- Comment #4 from David Binderman ---
Line is
/home/dcb/gcc/working/./prev-gcc/xgcc -B/home/dcb/gcc/working/./prev-gcc/
-B/usr
/local/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ -B/usr/local/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/
-B/usr/loc
al/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/lib/ -isys
48 matches
Mail list logo