[Bug target/86772] [meta-bug] tracking port status for CVE-2017-5753

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86772 Bug 86772 depends on bug 86784, which changed state. Bug 86784 Summary: H8 port needs updating for CVE-2017-5753 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86784 What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug target/86784] H8 port needs updating for CVE-2017-5753

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86784 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30552 --- Comment #12 from Dave Pagan --- Yes, it did. I had assumed the bug status would get updated, but it wasn't. I'll set it to resolved.

gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30552 Dave Pagan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/86790] m68k port needs updating for CVE-2017-5753

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86790 --- Comment #1 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Thu Aug 2 17:50:16 2018 New Revision: 263272 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263272&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/86790 * config/m68k/m68k.c (TARGET_HAVE_SPECULATI

[Bug target/86762] Using -fstack-protector-all causes SIGSEV with gcc-8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86762 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/85644] -fstack-protector generates invalid read to %fs:0x0 on mac

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85644 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||shane at isara dot com --- Comment #1 fr

[Bug target/86832] GCC v8.2.0 tries to use native TLS with -fstack-protector-strong on Windows (mingw-w64)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86832 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-w64-mingw32 --- Comment #1 from A

[Bug target/86772] [meta-bug] tracking port status for CVE-2017-5753

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86772 Bug 86772 depends on bug 86790, which changed state. Bug 86790 Summary: m68k port needs updating for CVE-2017-5753 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86790 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug target/86790] m68k port needs updating for CVE-2017-5753

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86790 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c/86833] New: No Warning for uninitilized array unless optimization on

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86833 Bug ID: 86833 Summary: No Warning for uninitilized array unless optimization on Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug other/86834] New: [9 regression] several tests fail with ICE starting with r263245

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86834 Bug ID: 86834 Summary: [9 regression] several tests fail with ICE starting with r263245 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/55815] switch hash function of libstdc++ hash tables to siphash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55815 landave changed: What|Removed |Added CC||blog at landave dot io --- Comment #8 from lan

[Bug tree-optimization/86571] AIX NaNQ and NaNS output format conflicts with __builtin_sprintf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86571 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor -

[Bug target/86386] [8/9 Regression] unaligned load from stack with -Os -fno-tree-dce -mstringop-strategy=vector_loop -mavx512bw

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86386 --- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu --- I am testing this patch diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c index ee409cfe7e4..9971b369f45 100644 --- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c +++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c @@ -13281,8 +13281,7 @@ ix86_fin

[Bug libstdc++/55815] switch hash function of libstdc++ hash tables to siphash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55815 --- Comment #9 from landave --- I am on Fedora with gcc 8.1.1, and it seems this issue has not been resolved yet. I have attached an example for a multicollision, as well as a small program that inserts the strings into an std::unordered_set. Th

[Bug c/86835] New: [8/9 Regression] Bogus "is used uninitialized" warning with -ffast-math

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86835 Bug ID: 86835 Summary: [8/9 Regression] Bogus "is used uninitialized" warning with -ffast-math Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/86835] [8/9 Regression] Bogus "is used uninitialized" warning with -ffast-math

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86835 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/86705] [7/8/9 Regression] pr45678-2.c ICE with msp430-elf -mlarge

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86705 --- Comment #3 from jozefl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jozefl Date: Thu Aug 2 20:36:14 2018 New Revision: 263277 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263277&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-08-02 Jozef Lawrynowicz Backport from mainlin

[Bug target/86828] [6/7 Regression] wrong-code bug with "-march=knl -Ofast" (invalid memory reference)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86828 --- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > Would be nice to know what fixed this (or maybe know if it just went latent). Bisection indicates that the segfault disappeared at r254526.

[Bug target/86448] GCC 9 compiler generates slower code for spec 2006 milc on a power9 using -mcpu=power9 than using -mcpu=power8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86448 --- Comment #4 from kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org --- There are aspects of Michael's recent comment that I may not fully understand. I checked the source for milc, and it is C, so I added -fgnu89-inline to the list of OPTIMIZE options. Then I reran

[Bug middle-end/86705] [7/8/9 Regression] pr45678-2.c ICE with msp430-elf -mlarge

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86705 --- Comment #4 from jozefl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jozefl Date: Thu Aug 2 20:54:02 2018 New Revision: 263279 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263279&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-08-02 Jozef Lawrynowicz Backport from mainlin

[Bug c++/86836] New: internal compiler error on structured bindings with shadow parameter on templated function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86836 Bug ID: 86836 Summary: internal compiler error on structured bindings with shadow parameter on templated function Product: gcc Version: 8.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/86836] internal compiler error on structured bindings with shadow parameter on templated function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86836 --- Comment #1 from Christian Shelton --- Created attachment 44496 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44496&action=edit preprocessed source

[Bug c++/86836] internal compiler error on structured bindings with shadow parameter on templated function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86836 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/86705] [7/8/9 Regression] pr45678-2.c ICE with msp430-elf -mlarge

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86705 Jozef Lawrynowicz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/86732] Potential nullptr dereference does not propagate knowledge about the pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86732 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com --- Comment #5 fr

[Bug tree-optimization/86732] Potential nullptr dereference does not propagate knowledge about the pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86732 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/86836] internal compiler error on structured bindings with shadow parameter on templated function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86836 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code --- Comment #3 from

[Bug c++/86836] internal compiler error on structured bindings with shadow parameter on templated function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86836 --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek --- commit 357b96452a5fc70011df4f27b5d4dffc5e2f2603 Author: jason Date: Tue Nov 15 05:22:28 2016 + Various C++17 decomposition fixes. * tree.c (bitfield_p): New. * cp-tree.h:

[Bug target/86770] UNRESOLVED: 30_threads/call_once/call_once1.cc compilation failed to produce executable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86770 Jim Wilson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/86837] New: Optimization breaks an unformatted read with implicit loop on Mac OS X

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86837 Bug ID: 86837 Summary: Optimization breaks an unformatted read with implicit loop on Mac OS X Product: gcc Version: 8.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/79959] -Wimplicit-fallthrough doesn't recognize some more complex exit cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79959 --- Comment #3 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #2) > Should be possible to fix this. Mine. For gcc 9?

[Bug c++/81932] Template arguments of type unsigned generate incorrect debugging information

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81932 --- Comment #28 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #27) > (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #26) > > The demangled names are not in a canonical/standardized format, or > > unambiguous, or portable between different

[Bug c/84919] [8/9 Regression] error: passing argument 1 to restrict-qualified parameter aliases with argument 5 [-Werror=restrict]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84919 --- Comment #14 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #13) > I think this needs to defer to gcc-9. It's gcc-9 now.

[Bug target/86798] nds32 port needs updating for CVE-2017-5753

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86798 Chung-Ju Wu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/50360] [cleanup] use an ENUM for the return values of gfc_dep_compare_expr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50360 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC|dominiq at lps dot ens.fr | --- Comment #4 from Domin

[Bug tree-optimization/86732] Potential nullptr dereference does not propagate knowledge about the pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86732 --- Comment #7 from Marc Glisse --- (In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #5) > And FWIW, I think we should be using __builtin_trap rather than > __builtin_unreachable in many more places because of the security concerns. It would be better t

<    1   2