https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86816
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86820
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86823
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86825
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |9.0
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86824
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86763
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||alias
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86763
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||6.4.0
Summary|[8/9 Regressio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86774
Michael Cree changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mcree at orcon dot net.nz
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86763
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86763
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
The following seems to work, will test.
Index: gcc/cp/class.c
===
--- gcc/cp/class.c (revision 263209)
+++ gcc/cp/class.c (working c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86827
Bug ID: 86827
Summary: -Warray-bounds produces negative indicies
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86763
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86827
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86802
--- Comment #2 from Richard Earnshaw ---
I think the best thing to do in that case is to leave the port unfixed until
such time as you know what mitigation is appropriate. That way the compiler
will not define __HAVE_SPECULATION_SAFE_VALUE and u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85434
--- Comment #18 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
Author: thopre01
Date: Thu Aug 2 09:07:17 2018
New Revision: 263245
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263245&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[ARM] Fix PR85434: spilling of stack protector guard's address on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86022
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Thu Aug 2 09:32:58 2018
New Revision: 263246
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263246&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Cherry-pick compiler-rt revision 338606 (PR sanitizer/86022).
Fix sizeof(
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86022
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||9.0
Known to fail|9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86758
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86824
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolutio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86702
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Can you please provide info about affected target and precise options used?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86702
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
I must confirm that probabilities are lost, but as the switch will end up as
jump table, so they are not used..
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86828
Bug ID: 86828
Summary: [6/7 Regression] wrong-code bug with "-march=knl
-Ofast" (invalid memory reference)
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86828
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86817
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Thu Aug 2 10:17:34 2018
New Revision: 263248
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263248&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix gcov misleading error (PR gcov-profile/86817).
2018-08-02 Martin Lis
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86771
--- Comment #1 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Could you trace this down to some bad code generated, at least?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86815
--- Comment #6 from Gianfranco ---
Created attachment 44485
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44485&action=edit
another failing output
I'm attaching another file suffering from the same issue (mostly every cpp file
has this fa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86014
--- Comment #2 from jcw at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jcw
Date: Thu Aug 2 10:39:23 2018
New Revision: 263249
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263249&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
2018-08-02 Jackson Woodruff
PR target/86014
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86771
--- Comment #2 from Christophe Lyon ---
gfortran.log contains:
STOP 4
STOP 4
STOP 4
before the execution fails
I'll regenerate the 2 asm files.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86014
jcw at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86781
--- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton ---
Author: nickc
Date: Thu Aug 2 11:24:47 2018
New Revision: 263253
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263253&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/86781
* config/fr30/fr30.c (TARGET_HAVE_SPECULATI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86781
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86772
Bug 86772 depends on bug 86781, which changed state.
Bug 86781 Summary: fr30 port needs updating for CVE-2017-5753
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86781
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86829
Bug ID: 86829
Summary: Missing sin(atan(x)) and cos(atan(x)) optimizations
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86782
--- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton ---
Author: nickc
Date: Thu Aug 2 11:46:06 2018
New Revision: 263254
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263254&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/86782
* config/frv/frv.c (TARGET_HAVE_SPECULATION
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86787
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86772
Bug 86772 depends on bug 86787, which changed state.
Bug 86787 Summary: iq2000 port needs updating for CVE-2017-5753
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86787
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86829
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse ---
You shouldn't use float_type_node directly, since the operations might be on
double or long double.
Do you have a copyright assignment (https://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html) ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86782
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86772
Bug 86772 depends on bug 86782, which changed state.
Bug 86782 Summary: frv port needs updating for CVE-2017-5753
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86782
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86829
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization, patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86771
--- Comment #3 from Christophe Lyon ---
Created attachment 44487
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44487&action=edit
Wrong code generated
This is with trunk @r263197
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86828
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86771
--- Comment #4 from Christophe Lyon ---
Created attachment 44488
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44488&action=edit
Good code
This is with r263197 and r263067 (your patch) reverted
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86771
--- Comment #5 from Christophe Lyon ---
I think in the "ok" version we have:
add ip, sp, #60
...
ldm ip, {r0, r1}
...
add r2, sp, #72
ldm r2, {r0, r1}
in the "ko" version we have:
ldr r1, [sp, #64]
...
ldr r1, [sp, #76]
So in the "ko" version w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86787
--- Comment #2 from Nick Clifton ---
Author: nickc
Date: Thu Aug 2 12:14:52 2018
New Revision: 263255
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263255&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/86787
* config/iq2000/iq2000.c (TARGET_HAVE_SPECU
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86828
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Would be nice to know what fixed this (or maybe know if it just went latent).
I think I remember having some intermediate versions during the reductio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85434
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85434
--- Comment #20 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
(In reply to Christophe Lyon from comment #19)
> Created attachment 44489 [details]
> Source file causing ICE on aarch64
>
> With your patch, GCC crashes with target aarch64-none-linux-gnu
> aarch64-no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86789
--- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton ---
Author: nickc
Date: Thu Aug 2 12:31:29 2018
New Revision: 263256
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263256&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/86789
* config/m32r/m32r.c (TARGET_HAVE_SPECULATI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86789
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86772
Bug 86772 depends on bug 86789, which changed state.
Bug 86789 Summary: m32r port needs updating for CVE-2017-5753
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86789
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86829
--- Comment #3 from Giuliano Belinassi ---
(In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #1)
>
> Do you have a copyright assignment (https://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html) ?
No. Sorry, but I think I may need help getting this right. Are there any tips?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86830
Bug ID: 86830
Summary: Contiguous array pointer function result not
recognized as contiguous
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86816
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Aug 2 13:19:50 2018
New Revision: 263257
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263257&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-08-02 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/86816
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86816
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86828
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86831
Bug ID: 86831
Summary: three failures in gfortran.fortran-torture with
"-Ofast -march=native" on skylake-avx512
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86791
--- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton ---
Author: nickc
Date: Thu Aug 2 13:30:40 2018
New Revision: 263258
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263258&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/86791
* config/mcore/mcore.c (TARGET_HAVE_SPECULA
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86772
Bug 86772 depends on bug 86791, which changed state.
Bug 86791 Summary: mcore port needs updating for CVE-2017-5753
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86791
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86791
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86831
--- Comment #1 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to janus from comment #0)
> Running "make check-fortran" with this mod on a skylake-avx512 CPU yields
> the following failures:
>
> FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/in-pack.f90 exec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86797
--- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton ---
Author: nickc
Date: Thu Aug 2 14:02:32 2018
New Revision: 263259
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263259&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/86797
* config/msp430/msp430.c (TARGET_HAVE_SPECU
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86831
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to janus from comment #0)
> Running "make check-fortran" with this mod on a skylake-avx512 CPU yields
> the following failures:
None of them fails with -march=native alone.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86831
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to janus from comment #0)
> FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/intrinsic_nearest.f90 execution,
> -Ofast -march=native
> FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/nan_inf_fmt.f90 execut
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86505
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86763
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Aug 2 14:25:57 2018
New Revision: 263261
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263261&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-08-02 Richard Biener
PR c++/86763
* class.c (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86763
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||9.0
Summary|[7/8/9 Regressio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86831
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
"nan_inf_fmt" suggests that the 'fast' part in -Ofast might be the issue. So
try -O3 -march=native instead?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86772
Bug 86772 depends on bug 86797, which changed state.
Bug 86797 Summary: msp430 port needs updating for CVE-2017-5753
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86797
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86797
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86803
--- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton ---
Author: nickc
Date: Thu Aug 2 14:35:10 2018
New Revision: 263263
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263263&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/86803
* config/rx/rx.c (TARGET_HAVE_SPECULATION_S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86831
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4)
> "nan_inf_fmt" suggests that the 'fast' part in -Ofast might be the issue.
> So try -O3 -march=native instead?
All three tests pass with those flags.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86735
--- Comment #13 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/in-pack.f90 in the testsuite exhibits the same
problem as comment 0, I think. It also contains Fortran array operations and
fails with "-march=skylake-avx512 -Ofast
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86190
--- Comment #12 from Tony E Lewis ---
I confirm that Godbolt's GCC trunk now handles my testcase correctly.
Thanks very much for all work on this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86803
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86772
Bug 86772 depends on bug 86803, which changed state.
Bug 86803 Summary: rx port needs updating for CVE-2017-5753
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86803
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86827
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86190
--- Comment #13 from Marek Polacek ---
Thanks for taking the time to report the bug!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86810
--- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton ---
Author: nickc
Date: Thu Aug 2 15:57:06 2018
New Revision: 263264
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263264&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/86810
* config/v850/v850.c (TARGET_HAVE_SPECULATI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86660
--- Comment #16 from Tom de Vries ---
Author: vries
Date: Thu Aug 2 15:59:01 2018
New Revision: 263265
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263265&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[nvptx] Ignore c++ exceptions
The nvptx port can't support exceptions usi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86810
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86772
Bug 86772 depends on bug 86810, which changed state.
Bug 86810 Summary: v850 port needs updating for CVE-2017-5753
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86810
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86813
--- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton ---
Author: nickc
Date: Thu Aug 2 16:13:32 2018
New Revision: 263266
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263266&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/86813
* config/stormy16/stormy16.c (TARGET_HAVE_S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86772
Bug 86772 depends on bug 86813, which changed state.
Bug 86813 Summary: xstormy16 port needs updating for CVE-2017-5753
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86813
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86813
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86702
--- Comment #4 from Alexander Nesterovskiy ---
I've noticed performance regressions on different targets and with different
compilation options, not only highly optimized like "-march=skylake-avx512
-Ofast -flto -funroll-loops" but with "-O2" too
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86552
--- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor ---
Yes, that's also (partly) why I submitted a solution for pr71625 comment 15:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-07/msg01884.html
With that patch applied as well the strlen call is diagnosed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86832
Bug ID: 86832
Summary: GCC v8.2.0 tries to use native TLS with
-fstack-protector-strong on Windows (mingw-w64)
Product: gcc
Version: lto
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80744
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86828
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #3)
> I can't reproduce it with gcc version 7.3.1 20180609.
Just made a fresh build off today's 7-branch:
gcc version 7.3.1 20180802 [gcc-7-br
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86512
--- Comment #1 from Richard Earnshaw ---
Author: rearnsha
Date: Thu Aug 2 16:50:07 2018
New Revision: 263267
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263267&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
arm - correctly handle denormal results during softfp subtraction
2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86512
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86512
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80744
--- Comment #4 from Jonny Grant ---
Hi Martin
Thank you for your reply.
I appreciate that GCC isn't a static analyser
But I think (C) is probably easier to follow though if GCC was extended, and
(A) std::string harder, as needs knowledge o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81239
--- Comment #2 from Jonny Grant ---
Created attachment 44492
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44492&action=edit
Better test case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81239
--- Comment #3 from Jonny Grant ---
(In reply to Jonny Grant from comment #2)
> Created attachment 44492 [details]
> Better test case
wrong ticket. please ignore
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80744
--- Comment #5 from Jonny Grant ---
Created attachment 44493
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44493&action=edit
Better test case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86820
--- Comment #5 from Andreas Schwab ---
Author: schwab
Date: Thu Aug 2 17:23:13 2018
New Revision: 263269
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263269&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix invalid cc_status after [const_][us]mulsi3_highpart
Backpor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86820
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86784
--- Comment #1 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Thu Aug 2 17:24:59 2018
New Revision: 263270
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263270&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/86784
* config/h8300/h8300.c (TARGET_HAVE_SPECULA
1 - 100 of 138 matches
Mail list logo
