[Bug c/86719] New: case label does not reduce to an integer constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86719 Bug ID: 86719 Summary: case label does not reduce to an integer constant Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug c/86719] case label does not reduce to an integer constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86719 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/2534] const int variables in case label

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2534 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zhonghao at pku dot org.cn --- Comment #3

[Bug c/86719] case label does not reduce to an integer constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86719 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pin

[Bug c/2534] const int variables in case label

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2534 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |INVALID --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski

[Bug c/201] Switch statement will not accept constant integer variable as case label

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bug1 at optushome dot com.au --- Comment #

[Bug c/2534] const int variables in case label

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2534 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |DUPLICATE --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pins

[Bug c/201] Switch statement will not accept constant integer variable as case label

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |INVALID --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski

[Bug c/201] Switch statement will not accept constant integer variable as case label

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zhonghao at pku dot org.cn --- Comment #5

[Bug c/86719] case label does not reduce to an integer constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86719 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- Actually bug 201. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 201 ***

[Bug c/32040] Including a header file inside a function block results compilation error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32040 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Suma Sharma from comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > This works as designed. > > > > > Thank you for your reply. > Please confirm whether it is expected behaviour (that means it is not

[Bug lto/48200] Implement function attribute for symbol versioning (.symver)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48200 --- Comment #25 from Xi Ruoyao --- This attribute should also apply to objects.

[Bug c/86720] New: Missing symbol name in directive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86720 Bug ID: 86720 Summary: Missing symbol name in directive Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assign

[Bug middle-end/84823] [6 Regression] x86 LRA hang on valid code (no ICE) with -fno-omit-frame-pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84823 A. Wilcox (awilfox) changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||6.4.0 --- Comment #2 from A. Wilco

[Bug c/86721] New: use of undeclared identifier

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86721 Bug ID: 86721 Summary: use of undeclared identifier Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee:

[Bug fortran/86704] Segmentation fault when using matmul in combination with transpose

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86704 --- Comment #3 from Stanislav Paláček --- Also tried with gcc-7.2.0 - no problem gcc-8.1.0,gcc-8-2-0 - this bug appeared

[Bug target/86651] [8/9 Regression] lto-wrapper.exe: fatal error: simple_object_copy_lto_debug_sections not implemented: Invalid argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86651 Andris Pavenis changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andris at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug fortran/86704] [8/9 Regression] Segmentation fault when using matmul in combination with transpose

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86704 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|WAITING

[Bug c/86720] Missing symbol name in directive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86720 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/86716] use of parameter outside function body before ‘++’ token

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86716 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/86722] New: ifcvt produces x&0 that is never cleaned up

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86722 Bug ID: 86722 Summary: ifcvt produces x&0 that is never cleaned up Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: normal

[Bug c++/86706] [8/9 Regression] ICE in build_base_path, at cp/class.c:294

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86706 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill --- Created attachment 44460 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44460&action=edit fix

[Bug c++/86723] New: G++ not optimizing with bswap when inlining with constexpr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86723 Bug ID: 86723 Summary: G++ not optimizing with bswap when inlining with constexpr Product: gcc Version: 8.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug tree-optimization/86723] not optimizing with bswap when casting to/from int to unsigned long long

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86723 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization URL|h

[Bug tree-optimization/86723] not optimizing with bswap, that casts to int aftwards

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86723 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/86723] not optimizing with bswap, that casts to int aftwards

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86723 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|not optimizing with bswap |not optimizing with bswap,

[Bug tree-optimization/86724] New: Compilation error with new isl 0.20 (missing includes)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86724 Bug ID: 86724 Summary: Compilation error with new isl 0.20 (missing includes) Product: gcc Version: 8.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compo

[Bug tree-optimization/86724] Compilation error with new isl 0.20 (missing includes)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86724 --- Comment #1 from Rainer Jung --- For the sake of completeness, I think the following isl change removed the implicit include chain that made the code work before isl 0.20: http://repo.or.cz/isl.git/commitdiff/406f2e9e067adb901c45284c65bfdc32e

[Bug c/86617] [6/7/8 Regression] Volatile qualifier is ignored sometimes for unsigned char

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86617 --- Comment #9 from Bernd Edlinger --- Author: edlinger Date: Sun Jul 29 16:44:24 2018 New Revision: 263055 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263055&root=gcc&view=rev Log: gcc: 2018-07-29 Bernd Edlinger Backport from mainline

[Bug debug/86687] Wrong debug information for string types passed as parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86687 --- Comment #6 from Tom de Vries --- Not sure yet whether this is the desired fix, but using this patch: ... diff --git a/gcc/dwarf2out.c b/gcc/dwarf2out.c index bd45e0b0685..fbbbe9f2d2a 100644

[Bug tree-optimization/86725] New: ICE: Segmentation fault (in vect_get_vec_def_for_operand_1)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86725 Bug ID: 86725 Summary: ICE: Segmentation fault (in vect_get_vec_def_for_operand_1) Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-invalid-co

[Bug rtl-optimization/66420] valgrind error in improve_allocation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66420 --- Comment #5 from David Binderman --- Still wrong more than two years later ==15752== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) ==15752==at 0x9CF7DC: improve_allocation() (in /home/dcb/gcc/working/gcc/cc1) ==15752==by

[Bug other/86726] New: Undocumented option -f{,no}-tree-scev-cprop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86726 Bug ID: 86726 Summary: Undocumented option -f{,no}-tree-scev-cprop Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: documentation Severity: normal Pr

[Bug fortran/84674] [7/8/9 Regression] Derived type name change makes a program segfault, removing non_overridable helps

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84674 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Benda --- Bisection points to revision 254427 from 5 November 2017, which adds this chunk of code to "fortran/resolv.c" (function "resolve_fl_derived", lines 14081-14093): /* Generate module vtables subject to their a

[Bug rtl-optimization/66420] valgrind error in improve_allocation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66420 --- Comment #6 from David Binderman --- More detail: ==11707== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) ==11707==at 0x8C3209: improve_allocation() (ira-color.c:2878) ==11707==by 0x8C734C: color_allocnos (ira-color.c:32

[Bug c/86727] New: Struct argument in xmm0 register instead of rcx on Win64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86727 Bug ID: 86727 Summary: Struct argument in xmm0 register instead of rcx on Win64 Product: gcc Version: 8.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prior

[Bug target/86727] Struct argument in xmm0 register instead of rcx on Win64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86727 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- I think this is a dup of bug 64243.

[Bug middle-end/86711] [9 Regression] wrong folding of memchr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86711 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/86714] tree-ssa-forwprop.c confused by too long initializer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86714 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/34705] Reuse I/O structures to save memory and help the ME

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34705 --- Comment #2 from Jürgen Reuter --- Is this still an open issue? 10 years gone by now.

[Bug c++/86728] New: [Regression] unexpected error: conversion from ', ...)>' to non-scalar type 'std::function' requested

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86728 Bug ID: 86728 Summary: [Regression] unexpected error: conversion from ', ...)>' to non-scalar type 'std::function' requested Product: gcc Version: 9.0

[Bug c++/52869] [DR 1207] "this" not being allowed in noexcept clauses

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52869 denin at mail dot ru changed: What|Removed |Added CC||denin at mail dot ru --- Comment #

[Bug c/79010] -Wlarger-than ineffective for VLAs, alloca, malloc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79010 --- Comment #2 from Eric Gallager --- Haven't you been touching stuff in this area lately, Martin?

[Bug c/78989] Missing -Waddress warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78989 --- Comment #7 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6) > I suspect PR 77513 can be considered the dup. As in, that's the dup of this, or this is the dup of that?

[Bug c/52952] Wformat location info is bad (wrong column number)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52952 --- Comment #50 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #49) > Author: edlinger > Date: Mon Aug 22 07:34:34 2016 > New Revision: 239649 > > URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239649&root=gcc&view=rev > Log: > 2016-08-22

[Bug middle-end/84823] [6 Regression] x86 LRA hang on valid code (no ICE) with -fno-omit-frame-pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84823 --- Comment #3 from A. Wilcox (awilfox) --- Tried disabling every single optimisation that was enabled by default in sequence, yielding the following results: % for i in $(cat gcc-options); do timeout 10 gcc -I.. -I.. -O2 -ggdb -march=pentium-m

[Bug middle-end/86714] tree-ssa-forwprop.c confused by too long initializer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86714 --- Comment #2 from Bernd Edlinger --- You must have overlooked this response from Jakub: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-07/msg01238.html "If we just warn about the initializer and treat it some way, an optimization should not change h

[Bug target/86651] [8/9 Regression] lto-wrapper.exe: fatal error: simple_object_copy_lto_debug_sections not implemented: Invalid argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86651 --- Comment #13 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Sun, 29 Jul 2018, andris at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86651 > > Andris Pavenis changed: > >What|Removed |Adde